Create Account
Log In
Dark
chart
exchange
Premium
Terminal
Screener
Stocks
Crypto
Forex
Trends
Depth
Close
Check out our Level2View

CGCP
Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF
stock NYSE ETF

At Close
Jul 3, 2025 12:55:15 PM EDT
22.44USD-0.244%(-0.06)669,478
0.00Bid   0.00Ask   0.00Spread
Pre-market
Jul 2, 2025 9:21:30 AM EDT
22.46USD-0.178%(-0.04)0
After-hours
0.00USD0.000%(0.00)0
OverviewPrice & VolumeDividendsHistoricalExchange VolumeDark Pool LevelsDark Pool PrintsExchangesShort VolumeShort Interest - DailyShort InterestBorrow Fee (CTB)Failure to Deliver (FTD)ShortsTrends
CGCP Reddit Mentions
Subreddits
Limit Labels     

We have sentiment values and mention counts going back to 2017. The complete data set is available via the API.
Take me to the API
CGCP Specific Mentions
As of Jul 4, 2025 8:47:33 AM EDT (<1 min. ago)
Includes all comments and posts. Mentions per user per ticker capped at one per hour.
116 days ago • u/TrainingThis347 • r/Bogleheads • was_hoping_for_a_critique_of_my_roth_ira_and_my • C
I haven’t looked too deeply at the percentages, they seem good enough. What I think they’re doing with all those funds is breaking your holdings into lots of different categories: 
- US growth
- US value
- International growth
- International value
- Emerging market growth
and so forth. In an IRA it feels like complexity for complexity’s sake. Just three funds — CGUS, CGIE, and CGCP — could basically do the same thing. In a taxable account the advantage of this fragmented approach would be that if certain segments of the market gain and others lose, it’s easier to sell the losers and claim a tax benefit. 
The expense ratios aren’t terrible in my opinion, but they’re higher than they need to be. At your current balance you’re paying $20-30 per year in fund fees, plus of course the 1% you’re paying the advisor. Those expense ratios get to be a big deal as your balance climbs; a 0.1% difference on a million dollar portfolio is $1,000 per year. 
I think CGCP is your only bond fund. That’s 10%. Assuming this is long-term money (10+ years) that’s reasonable. Fund managers tend to play it safer than we would individually.
sentiment 0.94
116 days ago • u/TrainingThis347 • r/Bogleheads • was_hoping_for_a_critique_of_my_roth_ira_and_my • C
I haven’t looked too deeply at the percentages, they seem good enough. What I think they’re doing with all those funds is breaking your holdings into lots of different categories: 
- US growth
- US value
- International growth
- International value
- Emerging market growth
and so forth. In an IRA it feels like complexity for complexity’s sake. Just three funds — CGUS, CGIE, and CGCP — could basically do the same thing. In a taxable account the advantage of this fragmented approach would be that if certain segments of the market gain and others lose, it’s easier to sell the losers and claim a tax benefit. 
The expense ratios aren’t terrible in my opinion, but they’re higher than they need to be. At your current balance you’re paying $20-30 per year in fund fees, plus of course the 1% you’re paying the advisor. Those expense ratios get to be a big deal as your balance climbs; a 0.1% difference on a million dollar portfolio is $1,000 per year. 
I think CGCP is your only bond fund. That’s 10%. Assuming this is long-term money (10+ years) that’s reasonable. Fund managers tend to play it safer than we would individually.
sentiment 0.94


Share
About
Pricing
Policies
Markets
API
Info
tz UTC-4
Connect with us
ChartExchange Email
ChartExchange on Discord
ChartExchange on X
ChartExchange on Reddit
ChartExchange on GitHub
ChartExchange on YouTube
© 2020 - 2025 ChartExchange LLC