DAOETH
DAO Maker / Ethereum
crypto

🍴So, Gnosis Chain validators [executed a hard fork](https://x.com/i/status/2003410653185474630) to recover the funds lost in the November Balancer hack.
As a [reminder ](https://forum.gnosis.io/t/balancer-hack-hard-fork/11884), "At the start of November the majority of Gnosis validators adopted a soft fork in response to the Balancer exploit affecting Balancer‑managed contracts on Gnosis Chain"
Is this the DAO moment for Gnosis? The funds affected were [waaaay less! ](http://The hard fork aims to restore access to $9.4 million worth of frozen assets, a move impacting thousands of users.): "The hard fork aims to restore access to $9.4 million worth of frozen assets"

Why is he selling low.
Might as well just let it ride out. Who knows what can happen.
Worst case scenario, it goes lower. But at this point, he's probably down like 90% anyway.
The Marshall DAO is currently in development. Once they finished crossing their T's, it's gonna open a lot of doors for Moons. Things Reddit wasn't able to do with them before.

Yep, lots of Aave drama right now. Aave Labs seeks dedicated to holding onto the IP, and the DAO doesn't have a way to stop them really. Just cause bad pr and maybe some headache lawsuits.

tldr; A dispute within the Aave ecosystem has escalated into a governance clash between Aave DAO and Aave Labs over control of CoW Swap fees, intellectual property, and brand assets. Concerns arose when swap fees were found flowing to Aave Labs instead of the DAO treasury. Governance proposals have called for transferring Aave's IP and brand assets to DAO control, sparking debates about decentralization and economic alignment. The conflict highlights tensions in DeFi governance and may set a precedent for balancing community authority with centralized execution.
*This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

tldr; Aave's token, AAVE, dropped significantly amid a governance dispute over control of the protocol's brand assets, including its name, website, and social media channels. The debate was initiated by BGD Labs, advocating for these assets to be owned by the Aave DAO rather than a single entity, to ensure fair governance. Aave founder Stani Kulechov moved the proposal to a Snapshot vote, sparking further controversy. The issue highlights broader challenges in DeFi governance, particularly over off-chain assets.
*This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

I've seen this happen a lot. In my experience with DAO treasuries, the teams that handle it best keep monitoring and reporting separate. Real-time dashboards and Telegram/Discord are useful for alerts, but they’re too noisy to rely on as a source of truth.
Most DAOs end up organizing on-chain activity into an accounting-style ledger that tracks wallets, strategies, P&L, and exposures, then taking weekly or monthly snapshots for reporting and governance. Off-chain “alpha” stays separate and is mainly used to trigger alerts, not go directly into reports.
There’s no perfect tool yet. Most teams use a mix of DeFi monitors, an accounting system, and some manual checks. It’s not exciting, but it works and helps avoid missed issues.

Discord, X, Youtube.
Plenty of ways the DAO could increase their reach and exposure for advertisers, and also increase the general community size.
Eventually offer a bundle advertising option where an advertising campaign can run across multiple platforms.

The founder is throwing the DAO under the bus

Happy Monday Everyone -
I hope everyone is having a great start to the holiday week. This is a special time of year as the world slows down and people live with more intention.
As our first year at TassHub comes to an end, I want to take a brief moment to thank each of you for everything you do in support of our vision of a socialFi platform truly built for web3 and the creator economy.
A companies’ culture defines its existence and future. Thank you for making TassHub's existence and future so bright. We are well on the path to disrupting the way creators monetize.
Here are key updates on our progress:
Our user growth trajectory clearly represents a need in the market that TassHub is filling. 1000 users incoming, fast.
TassHub User Growth.png
Bubbles, our CTO, has brought on 3 new devs to the team. The engineering blueprint of the platform is done.
MoonPay Commerce with payment via USDC and Sol with a fiat on/off ramp is currently being implemented.
Continued work on our proprietary AI search is continuing. This is huge for the creator economy.
The TassHub token is performing exceptionally well in the current market climate. We are outperforming the major coins significantly and this is due to Peter's genius and the strength of the TassHub community. Kudos amigo.
Our entities are getting closer to formation. DAO formation comes next. Many of you know have heard me speak about securities law and how we will navigate those waters in the coming months. Bullish.
Our finalized flow to comply with adult content has been finalized. Upon initial sign-up to TassHub.com, you will be required to agree to the Terms of Service and to certify that you are over the age of 18. No ID required, solely agreeing to being 18+.
If you want to post adult content as a creator, you will be redirected to a 3rd party KYC verification service. That is the only cohort that will have to KYC/age verify. Period. This flow has been vetted and approved by our stellar US attorneys.
We appreciate everyone's trust as we continue to build the platform which will disrupt how creators monetize and how decentralized individuals socialize.
Sending you positive vibes and much love from myself and everyone at TassHub. As always, myself and the team are always here to answer any questions and to listen to feedback on this collaborative journey. Much love from CDMX - the best is yet to come!
Happy Holidays!
Burning ceo at TassHub

This is a pretty cool community run DAO!

I agree with you, though I think of him as a bald faced scam king, not a wolf.
A short history:
In the early Ethereum days he lied to his colleagues about his academic background, acting has if he dropped out of PhD studies, when he actually had not even completed an undergrad degree. His Ethereum colleagues more or less say he was a habitual liar and want nothing to do with him. This is all well documented in Laura Shin's book, The Ethereans.
He broke away from Ethereum and helped to launch "Ethereum Classic" after The DAO Hack. IMHO "Eth Classic" was never anything more than an opportunist money grab grift. It was hugely pumped and dumped early on, it then for many years before it was attacked and suffered multiple block re-orgs.
In 2017/18 Charles jumped on the hot ICO bandwagon with ADA. The project raised over $60M. The market cap soared well into the double digit billions. Founders got 57% of the coins released. Another 11% went to "further development" through IOHK. So buyers actually owned less than 40% of the tokens and a bulk of the wealth accrued to you know who.
With some of that money, Hoskinson donated several millions to Cornell with the condition that they name the math building the money was raised for after him. This way he can casually drop to future would-be investors that Cornell named a math building after him of course leaving out that it was simply a financial exchange and nothing to do with any kind of academic achievements.
I lost track of his dealings after this point, but he has been snaking his way into Trumps crypto push in congress as they like to lay with their own kind.

Hey everyone!
I'm on the contrib team for a mid-sized DAO (mostly DeFi yields + some treasury diversification), and treasury reporting has become such a headache lately.
We pull from a mix of onchain stuff (wallets, protocols) and offchain (Telegram/Discord alpha, market signals), but everything's so scattered and noisy.
During volatile weeks, it's impossible to get clean aggregated context fast enough for governance calls we've nearly missed a couple red flags because signals were buried.
Generic dashboards give basic holdings, but no personalized filtering or real-time insights across feeds. And when reporting deadlines hit, compiling it all manually eats days.
Anyone else struggling with this for DAO treasuries? What tools or setups are you using to pull together high-fidelity onchain + offchain data without drowning in noise?
Natural language summaries or agentic alerts would be ideal if something reliable exists...
Open to any tips would save my sanity.
Cheers!