BTCUSDT20240531C78000
Bitcoin / Tether USD May 31 2024 78000.00 Call
crypto

Well, if you take this year return on BTC, it would be negative, from thanksgiving '24 to thanksgiving '25. So, yeah, not a risk but more like a bad investment, if all you want is to "be rich as fuck" this is not the way. On the other way, if you're either convinced that it is a good project or that it can be used to gamble, then, well, try it.

If the US GOV rebases off of a $1 million BTC and $20,000 gold, this is very achievable.

I mean, floppy disks were obsolete way before the BTC paper was dropped.
But a lot of computer viruses will fit on a floppy disk just as easily as a seed.

BTC,ETH,SOL,XRP QuantSignals Katy 1M Prediction

401jK is literally all about the attitude you are discussing. If you want actual gains, I would check them out. BTC isn’t going to get you “rich” at this point. 10+ years ago, sure

You ain't getting rich with BTC bro. You should have done that 10 years ago hahahahahaha.

„Hält lange genug“ reicht ja, siehe der dude von gestern mit BTC -> Alphabet -> Gral.

is there any plan to add TAO/BTC pair?

I \_think\_ he means funds like BTCI being driven by call options. As an example, BTC is down 2.29% for the year, but BTCI is down 25.2%. How do you see the long-term viability of this as a fund? Obviously you got income which I did not factor into that 25.2%, so the gap isn't as large as it may seem by raw stock price, but I think that's the concern.

HMRC considers your cost basis to be the market value of the cryptocurrency at the time that you received it. Any subsequent change in it's value is treated as a capital gain/loss, and thus subject to Capital Gains Tax in the usual way.
The circumstances under which you received the cryptocurrency will determine the tax treatment of the cost basis. For example, if you were paid 1 bitcoin in exchange for doing work for someone, and the exchange rate at the time of invoicing/payment was 1 BTC = 80,000 GBP, then HMRC would consider you to have made £80,000 in income, thus subject to Income Tax; likewise if it was inherited, it would be subject to Inheritance Tax (IHT); or if it was a gift, it may be subject to IHT according to the death taper for gifts.

Nope. BTC is the king. The one and only.

Swap it to BTC and hold another 10 years.

I mined a few when it first came out, they were worth pennies. There is no way I wouldn't have sold before BTC hit $1k

No, that's kinda the opposite of what he said.
He said take 100 BTC, leverage-bet on *rising* prices (you now have 0 BTC because you got liquidated), then announce that the remaining coins will be verifiably destroyed, *increasing* the value of all remaining coins.
The leveraged short is a lot more sensible.

Check the market cap for gold, check the market cap for BTC, then check the news about countries building a BTC reserve, now open your calculator and apply gold mcap to BTC.

Highly doubtful, but you will still be in a great position. You’ll end up with several millions sats.
You don’t need 1 BTC. The vast majority of people will never own even close to this amount due to bitcoin’s supply cap compared to the population.

Bitcoin is BTC which can be identified by market cap, total users and adoption. Something that BSV doesn't have much of

If I plan to invest $168,000 usd over the next 5 years will the average be low enough for 1 BTC

Just crown him the patron saint of BTC already.

BTC Signal Breakdown: Market Analysis Points to Key Level Approaching