Benzinga | Aug 4, 2020 08:36AM EDT

Celsion Corporation To Continue Following Patients In Phase III OPTIMA Study For Overall Survival

Ongoing Analysis of Unblinded Study Data Suggests Data Maturity May be at Issue

Cohort of 26 Consecutive Patient Deaths Differs Substantially from Predicted Behavior and from the Balance of the Trial

LAWRENCEVILLE, N.J., Aug. 04, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Celsion Corporation (NASDAQ:CLSN), an oncology focused drug-development company, today provided an update on its ongoing review of unblinded data from the second pre-planned interim analysis of the global Phase III OPTIMA Study of ThermoDox(r) in combination with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), or primary liver cancer. The Company announces it will continue following patients for overall survival (OS), noting that the unexpected and marginally crossed futility boundary, suggested by the Kaplan-Meier analysis at the second interim analysis on July 9, 2020, may be associated with a data maturity issue. The Company further notes that 26 consecutive patient deaths represented exclusively in the second analysis behave far differently from the balance of the patients who have died as of this date.

Removing the 26 consecutive patient deaths, which occurred between September 2019 and March 2020, from the pre-planned interim analysis suggests that the OPTIMA Study OS pattern is similar to the prospective HEAT Study subgroup upon which the OPTIMA Study is based, at the approximate comparable point in time. In addition, subsequent to the second interim analysis there were eight patient deaths in a 3:1 ratio of control arm to treatment arm patients, which further supports a concern for data maturity.

Celsion further noted that OPTIMA Study investigators in China and Vietnam, who enrolled 37% of the subjects, joined the study approximately 12 and 18 months, respectively, after the trial was initiated. The Kaplan-Meier curves for both geographies demonstrate a potential data maturity issue when compared with the behavior of the HEAT Study subgroup and other OPTIMA Study testing site regions. The China sites, in particular, show a negative Kaplan-Meier curve, yet with a 56% improvement in the treatment arm in the median time to death. The Vietnamese sites show a marginal Kaplan-Meier benefit, yet with a 45% improvement in the median time to death. The Company believes that this dichotomy must be reconciled, most probably with longer follow up, before it can determine the study's direction.

Additionally, Celsion has sent the trial data, including Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls data, to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for independent analysis. All computed tomography (CT) scans are being prepared and will be sent for NIH's evaluation of progression-free survival (PFS). Depending on the trends noted during the OS follow-up period, Celsion may choose to discontinue the Study at any time.

On July 13, 2020 Celsion announced that the independent Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) recommended that Celsion should consider stopping the OPTIMA Study. Finding that the pre-specified boundary for stopping the trial for futility of 0.900 was marginally crossed with an actual value of 0.903, the DMC left the final decision up to the Company as the p-value of 0.524 for this analysis provided uncertainty.

"Last month's DMC recommendation to consider discontinuation of the OPTIMA Study based on the 2nd interim data was never anticipated, nor was it supported by the science, independent clinical evaluation of the HEAT Study subgroup or prospective preclinical research conducted by Celsion and our consultants to support the OPTIMA Study. We believe, therefore, that Celsion is obligated to undertake this rigorous evaluation of the data and the trial's recruitment trends," stated Michael H. Tardugno, Celsion's chairman, president and chief executive officer. "While the trial outcome as predicted by the second interim analysis may not change, and as unlikely as it may be, in the event we see substantial clinical benefit while continuing to monitor patients, we will carefully review our options with the 14 regulatory agencies that have allowed the OPTIMA Study to be conducted. We appreciate the ongoing support and confidence from our research Investigators and clinical advisors."

The OPTIMA Study is a global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial assessing the efficacy of ThermoDox(r) in combination with RFA, which was standardized to a minimum of 45 minutes for treating patients with a lesion 3-7 cm in size, versus standardized RFA alone. The OPTIMA Study enrolled 554 patients at 65 clinical sites in North America, Europe, China and Asia Pacific. In addition to the primary overall survival endpoint, progression-free survival, time to disease progression and safety are key secondary endpoints.

The statistical plan for the OPTIMA Study included two interim efficacy analyses by the DMC. The first interim analysis was announced in November 2019 following data lock in August 2019 after the prescribed minimum number of 128 patient events (deaths) was reached, and the second interim analysis was conducted in July 2020 following data lock in April 2020 after the prescribed minimum number of 158 events was reached.