H
Hyatt Hotels Corporation
stockNYSE

Q5. Ritu Baral, TD Cowen: site training; buy-and-bill vs pharmacy benefit** **OPERATOR:** Thank you, Gavin. Our next question comes from Ritu Baral with Cowen. Please go ahead, Ritu. **RITU BARAL:** Good morning, guys. Um, another question on competitive positioning, especially as it relates to site support. Um, Laura, you mentioned that the team that you have will help with drug sourcing and monitoring. What about um, training that has come up with a lot of the interventional sites that we have spoken to? Um, what sort of programs are you guys? Um, developing or sponsoring for drug training, and how might that um, translate to other therapies that could be competitively available? And then you mentioned buy and bill versus the pharmacy benefit um, uh, that could be used for reimbursement. Do you have, do you guys um, have any idea right now what the preference for buy and bill versus pharmacy benefit is in the interventional sites that you guys are working with? **KABIR NATH:** Thanks, Ritu. That was definitely two questions, not one. But leaving that aside, Sorry. I think Bill, and the first part to Steve, and then to Laurie. **STEVE:** Yeah, I'll take training. Good morning, Ritu. Uh, in terms, let's start with what the requirements will be. Based on our interactions with the FDA as we work towards finalizing our REMS, we expect there to be uh, training content within the REMS that will take about one to two hours to review. And again, that will represent the requirements for healthcare providers. Beyond that, there's an opportunity here. Because we anticipate our, the approval of our product to, to be the beginning, really, of a shift and an evolution in how mental health care is delivered, we will also support, and we have begun to support, the enablement of other forms of training and education. We will develop our own resources, but we've also enabled this through the grants that we've provided to training organizations. And to other forms of education and training that we will enable to really solidify our leadership in the space of preparing the workforce for this paradigm shift in how people living with severe mental health care conditions receive their care. **LORI ENGLEBERT:** And hi, Ritu. I'll ask, I'll answer the second question. Um, so remember, for psychiatry, buy and bill is relatively new. Uh, as new as Spravato um, has come to market. So right now, uh, we think and believe, you know, Spravato buy and bill volume is somewhere in the in the 30 to 40% range um, of volume. And in terms of preference, you know, just using that as a proxy, we don't believe that buy and bill will be uh, a huge for COMP360 out of the gate, but we expect it to ramp to something very similar for Spravato, potentially even even surpassing it. **LORI ENGLEBERT:** What we know is that some sites do prefer buy and bill, and, and we definitely want to make sure that that option remains open for them because it is obviously an additional source of revenue. And also, part of the reason why uh, interventional psychiatry treatment centers are starting to grow so rapidly, um, there is obviously appeal in the fact that there are additional sources of revenue for these sites uh, beyond just the, the billing for, for monitoring time. **Q6. Madison El-Saadi, B. Riley: efficacy by number of prior failures** **OPERATOR / MADISON EL-SAADI:** Thank you, Ritu. Our next question comes from Madison El-Saadi from B, B. Riley. Uh, over, I believe, 95% of the patients had failed two to four treatments. Uh, how does COMP360 efficacy compare in less severe versus uh, the more refractory patients? And is this, I know you've spoken about this before, is this different something that's fundamental to psilocybin itself? And maybe I'll just state the same question in a different way. Within 005, 006, did response and durability differ between patients with zero to one prior failure, uh, versus those that had three or four prior failures? **STEVE:** Uh, good morning, Madison. Uh, first, I'll be a bit obnoxious and say I'm militant at saying that patients are failed by treatments. They haven't failed. Uh, but that's a side point uh, and not a criticism of you. Uh, we haven't yet done an analysis of the response or remission rates or other outcome measures based upon the number of lines of treatment that have failed these patients within our studies. That said, it's well established. That the longer someone goes untreated, the more lines of treatment that have failed these patients, the more refractory they are, the less likely it is that they'll benefit from further treatment. And so, looking at the baseline characteristics in our phase III study and phase IIb, where the average length of the current episode is three to four years, to see the benefit that we've seen for these patients is really quite remarkable. And it's very reasonable to assume that those who have A shorter time course of treatment, or who have had fewer treatments within this episode, would actually be more likely to benefit or might have a deeper response. And you know, I think we can say that pretty clearly because the stream does move in one direction. We know that for the 55 plus NDD labeled antidepressants that exist today, many of them have tried to demonstrate efficacy in TRD and failed to do so. However, if you are starting with the most difficult to treat patients and showing the efficacy we've shown with the rapid onset and the durability that's on the scale, unlike anything we've ever seen, it is very reasonable to assume that those who have had a, a less refractory course would be more, even more likely to benefit. **LORI ENGLEBERT:** And Madison, it might also just be worth noting that because we were studying treatment-resistant depression, we are we were required to study the failures after two two failures, so we would not have any data on the zero to, to two failures. **MADISON EL-SAADI:** Understood. Thank you both. **OPERATOR:** Thank you, Thanks, **Q7. Josh Brewer, RBC: the white-glove approach** **OPERATOR:** Matt. Thank you, Madison. Our next question comes from Josh Brewer with RBC. Please go ahead, Josh. **JOSH BREWER:** Uh, hey, everybody. Um, yeah, so I was wondering if you could give us a, a little more detail on sort of the outlines of the white, white glove approach you'll be taking um, in the uh, initial phases of the launch and uh, whether or not you expect you know, white glove service to have the biggest impact. On adoption enthusiasm among private academic community or government sites. Thanks. **KABIR NATH:** Oh, sure. **LORI ENGLEBERT:** Yeah, thanks, Josh. This is probably my favorite topic to talk about. Um, Steve has his favorites, I have my favorites. Um, so the white glove approach that that, that I, I like to talk about is is all encompassing about the way that we will show up. Um, not only the way that our field force shows up in offices, um, but also how Compass shows up as, as, as a company. I think it's very important to understand that physicians, when adopting something as paradigm changing as COMP360 has the potential to, to do, and psychedelics in general coming to market, there will be some hesitancy or uncertainty. Um, there will be some, you know, this is not the typical antide oral antidepressant that's rolling out from a pharma company. There will be some newness to this, um, and the newness will be, you know, what the REMS requirements will look like. Um, and what, uh, you know, how they get reimbursed for the time spent monitoring for, for the six hours. Um, all of this will need some hand holding, which is the white glove that I'm, I'm referring to. We also recognize, as I mentioned earlier in, in, in comments, that, you know, we want to make sure that we're showing up and making sure that patients are not prohibited from receiving treatment due to financial constraints. Um, and so we are going to put, put forth a very robust patient support services. Program. We're going to make sure that sites know how to bill correctly. We're going to make sure that they are attaching the CPT III codes so that we can advance them to category one as quickly as possible. So all of this requires a, a, a somewhat different approach and level of, of attention to the sites and to patients. Uh, that is not usual in, in pharma companies. **KABIR NATH:** And Josh, it's maybe worth adding that what we've been building and what we're planning for is not only based on past experience, and certainly it's not pulled out of thin air. Much of this has been, the foundations have been laid with the work we've been doing over the past few years with a wide variety of settings of care, many of which you named within your question, to really understand any of the potential barriers to implementation and delivery. Not just in the most obvious settings like the interventional psychiatry clinics, of which there's more than 8,500 at this point, for whom this will be very easy, but also all the other settings of care where people living with TRD receive that care today. **JOSH BREWER:** All right, thanks, guys. **Q8. Pat Trucchio, H.C. Wainwright: retreatment label language** **OPERATOR:** Thank you, Josh. Our next question comes from Pat Trucchio with H.C. Wainwright. Please go ahead, Pat. **PAT TRUCCHIO:** Hi, good morning. Uh, my question is on uh, repeat dosing. I'm wondering what regulatory feedback you've received on physician-directed retreatment versus minimum interval or defined symptom threshold. And what would be the ideal language in a, you know, upcoming potential label? **KABIR NATH:** Thank you, Patrick. So we're not going to go into great detail on the label now, given where we are in the review process. But as we've said always, what we would envisage and target is, you know, after one or two initial administrations, that then there is the provision for episodic dosing per physician decision.

H...h...h...hi...

Morning everyone! Economic report(s) scheduled for the day is(are) | at^[i](https://fidelityfiplus.econoday.com/byweek): Factory Orders | 10am, JOLTS | 10. Media platforms are discussing: AI Rout continues, Apple’s free cash flow and earnings performance, Political Prediction market midterms test, Palantir’s forecast increased, K-shaped Economy analysis, Marvell to acquire Lumentum, Oil rises amid Iran statements, Financial market concerns, Central Banks buying Gold, USD performance amid current risks. The analysis of the economy suggests that in the past two years the spending of each income group has been around 4 to 5% per year, attempting to refute the K-shaped economy claim, only for others to point out that 75% of new wealth accumulated in the top 20% of earners. Premarket futures were down this morning, apart from the Nasdaq which was up a bit, Dow was firmly down, Russell 2k and S&P were very slightly down; VIX futures were up modestly. MVIS ended the last trading session at 1.26, on much lower volume traded compared to the average over the past month. Stock price action saw the Short related volumes by percentage of the total _reported_ volumes come in well below the average of the last 30 days. Like Big Tech, everything the company does now will be continually compared to what it will cost, and that puts greater emphasis on the finances. The math is fairly straight forward for determining what the company will likely need to continue operations, where one can take the gross margins times the revenue expected: 0.35 x 30M = 10.5M (best case) and subtract that from the amount expected to be spent for operations: 40M - 10.5M = 29.5M. That is how much cash they will need on the books for the coming year, while still expecting $4M in workforce reduction related costs for this year, and having just under 29M in cash at present (with the whole of Q4 left to go). So, if the company manages to spend only $14M for Q4, that is $10M for the quarter to match next year’s estimate plus the $4M for workforce reductions, that leave the company with $15M on the books and needing to raise another $25M or so for the next year to cover expenses while staying above the HTC covenant of ~$11M on the balance sheet. How they might do that could include some mix of grants, debt financing, divestment of assets, new business contracts beyond what has been anticipated to date, or of coruse dilutiion. The messaging from management to date has included dilution as one of its expected ways to continue to fund operations, but with the share price so low, that might be untenable. Just be aware of what the numbers are telling us, what the company has stated they plan to do, and recognize that the current revenue forecast is insufficient to keep the company afloat on its own. ## Daily Data *** |H: 1.45 — L: 1.25 — C: 1.26 ^[i](https://chartexchange.com/symbol/nasdaq-mvis/historical/) |[Calendar](https://fidelityfiplus.econoday.com/byweek.asp)| |:- |:-| |**Pivots ↗︎ : 1.39, 1.52, 1.59** ^([i](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/pivotpoint.asp)) |**Pivots ↘︎ : 1.19, 1.12, 0.99**| |Open Exchanges: 335k ~ 34% ^[i](https://chartexchange.com/symbol/nasdaq-mvis/exchange-volume/) |Off Exchanges: 650k ~ 66% ^[i](https://chartexchange.com/symbol/nasdaq-mvis/exchange-volume/)| |IBKR: 10k Rate: 41.89%^[i](https://chartexchange.com/symbol/nasdaq-mvis/borrow-fee/) | |**R Vol: 49% of Avg Vol: 2,009k** ^([i](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/averagedailytradingvolume.asp)) |**Short Vol: 379k of 713k ~ 53%** ^[i](https://chartexchange.com/symbol/nasdaq-mvis/short-volume/?tblshortvolix=0)| ^(Follow links for sources. Bold text represents key points or larger data, Italics are slightly unusual or lower than normal.)

Guter Einwand. Weiterer Vorteil: Der Einsatz vor dem letzten Spiel beträgt "nur" 25.920€. Das hat zwei Vorteile. 1. Wird es leichter sein Ein Casino zu finden dass eine Wette i.H.v. 25.920 auf eine Zahl akzeptiert, da die Chance schon sehr positiv für das Haus ist. 2. Tut es weniger weh bei 25.920€ zu scheitern, als beim 16 Spiel und 650.000€ so kurz davor heimzugehen

https://preview.redd.it/majhyd9px5zh1.png?width=1263&format=png&auto=webp&s=82592e57ab26e57122978f8fc0f921fc44adc761 WTI has rallied from the high 80s to above 104, and the 4H is now printing something that looks like a Head & Shoulders at the top. What stands out on the chart: \- Left shoulder and head both got rejected around the $102 - $104 zone \- Price is sitting on the $99 support zone (the possible neckline) right now \- A bounce toward $102 - $103 would form a right shoulder But I'm not sure it's that clean. The bulls could argue this is just a healthy pullback inside a strong uptrend, and 99 has held before. What's your read? \- Is this a valid H&S or am I forcing the pattern? \- Do you need a 4H close below $99 to confirm, or would you act earlier? \- Where would you place the invalidation? Curious to hear both sides, especially from anyone trading crude or watching oil headlines closely.

https://youtu.be/H\_g8xjYufHo?is=2svZac6Zr7O1nPFx

I thought this thread was about the amended S-1 released today that included the 3rd Q & was very confused. "Anthropic reported an operating loss of $536 million in the September quarter, compared with operating income of $974 million in the June quarter." - Yahoo Finance That is a wild swing quarter to quarter. Is AI just Intuit and H&R Block claiming they make the same amount year round? For me it looks like a scam but everyones going to buy so is it worth it to buy the IPO? I jumped through hoops to get in the SPCX IPO and barely got out. I had indigestion for a month until I could get off of Cathie Woods wild ride. If you have a private company fund don't hold a public company in it you old bag. You should have ditched SPCX BECAUSE IT WENT FUCKING PUBLIC. Fucking hell, I hate that woman. Why the hell would anyone "invest" in a business like this at this valuation. Just wait, I guarantee it isn't going anywhere but up and down real fast. Hell, at this rate we are going to see Reddit back at its IPO price in no time. Thats sucks for me but thats why I don't bother with IPOs unless it's a day trade. I would say momentum but momentum is currently to the downside and has been for a month now in tech. I don't get it. Is all the money coming out of semis actually going to fund this insane valuation. Fuck that Im sticking with my high yield "Bad Bunny" munis for now. Nothing like owning high risk Puerto Rican infrastructure. At least I know I bought them at 10% real annualized gains (meaning no taxes). No way, the bottom def isn't in if this is the shit they are trying to pull and pretend they are FCF positive.

Trade successfully completed between /u/Meg--Griffin and /u/Joseph_H_Mallard. **Transaction Complete - Please Leave Feedback** Leave feedback for BUYER: [u/Joseph_H_Mallard](https://www.reddit.com/user/Joseph_H_Mallard) [Positive](https://www.reddit.com/r/pmsfeedback/submit?title=[POSITIVE]+for+/u/Joseph_H_Mallard+[buyer]) | [Neutral](https://www.reddit.com/r/pmsfeedback/submit?title=[NEUTRAL]+for+/u/Joseph_H_Mallard+[buyer]) | [Negative](https://www.reddit.com/r/pmsfeedback/submit?title=[NEGATIVE]+for+/u/Joseph_H_Mallard+[buyer]) Leave feedback for SELLER: [u/Meg--Griffin](https://www.reddit.com/user/Meg--Griffin) [Positive](https://www.reddit.com/r/pmsfeedback/submit?title=[POSITIVE]+for+/u/Meg--Griffin+[seller]) | [Neutral](https://www.reddit.com/r/pmsfeedback/submit?title=[NEUTRAL]+for+/u/Meg--Griffin+[seller]) | [Negative](https://www.reddit.com/r/pmsfeedback/submit?title=[NEGATIVE]+for+/u/Meg--Griffin+[seller]) --- *Click a link above, add your feedback, and submit. Already left feedback? Ignore this message.* [Message mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2FPmsforsale)

**Proof:** [https://imgur.com/a/proof-72RrSDt](https://imgur.com/a/proof-72RrSDt) **Payments:** **zelle** *(preferred)*, **Venmo FF, crypto, PFFF** in order of preference **Shipping:** Risky $1-2 depending on weight, USPS raised their rates (again) so **ground is now $7** and **sfrb $11**. Other options and international shipping is available. Shipping from Houston Texas **Trades:** Will trade for bullion, usually gold is preferred. Looking for low-premium items kitco gold spot at time of posting: **$3946.30** kitco silver spot at time of posting: **$50.50** **ask for close ups! Open to offers on everything!** # Bullion 1 fv Junk silver (including a barber quarter and earlier date mercs) - **$36.50 (melt)** 2016 Canada 5 dollars 1oz .999 peregrine falcon reverse proof in OGP - **$75** 2002 Ukraine 10 hryven 1oz (33.63g .925) proof Athens Olympics very rare toning - **$85** # Graded/Slabbed US Coins: 1836 Capped Bust 50c ANACS VF30 Lamination Error - **~~$150~~** **$145** \- Really nice and attractive type coin with very nice surfaces, sold at wholesale 1919-s Walking Liberty 50c PCGS VF20 - **~~$400~~** **$390** \- Nice attractive key-date walker in slightly better grade, well below pcgs price guide ($475) 1892s Morgan Dollar ANACS F12 - **~~$120~~** **$115** \- Semi-Key date morgan in a straight graded F12 at wholesale 1922-D Peace Dollar PCGS MS62 VAM-2A - **~~$500~~** **$475** \- Very rare elite 30 variety with blast white and flashy surfaces. Prominent obverse die cracks World Coins: 1860 Cambodia 1 franc NGC XF45 - **~~$250~~** **$240** \- Another 1899 restrike though the slab doesn't note it. Nice straight grade 1860 Cambodia 2 francs NGC XF45 - **~~$350~~** **$340** \- Very rare, possibly an original strike superb toning and excellent details 1895-1905 China 50c Hupeh Province PCGS VF Details Chopmarked - **$400** \- Much rarer type than the $1, the chopmarks don't really detract from the coin. Way below any current comps I could find 1913A French Indo-China 1 piastre NGC XF details environmental damage - **$80** \- Really nice crown, not seeing why they gave the environmental damage designation. Looks like a wholesome, honestly-worn coin. 1907EB Sweden 2 Kroner PCGS MS64 - **~~$85~~** **$80** \- Super nice BU example with flashy surfaces 1908B Switzerland 5 francs NGC UNC details OBV cleaned - **$200** \- Rarer type with excellent details, some light toning # Raw Coins Crowns 1816B Joao VI regent Brazil 960 reis AU cleaned struck over Charles IIII 8 reales better date/mint - **$175** 1821R Joao VI Brazil 960 reis AU struck over 8 reales x2 - **$175 ea** 1824R Pedro I Brazil 960 reis VF better date struck over 8 reales - **$175** 1965 France 10 francs UNC from FDC sets, some have pvc x10 - **$36.50 ea (melt)** 1887 Great Britain Double Florin UNC rainbow tone mounted - **$54** 1921 Mexico 2 pesos independence centennial AU cleaned - **$135** 1923B Switzerland 5 francs (large type, 25g) XF cleaned - **$60** 1877 USA trade dollar tooled better date toned XF - **$175** Ancients Abbasid Caliphate dirham, slightly bent but good condition - **~~$35~~** **$30** Roman Empire Gordian III (238-244) AR antoninianus PAX AUGUSTI XF - **$50** Roman Empire Philip I The Arab (244-249) AR antoninianus Sear 2553 VF - **$35** Roman Empire Valerian I (253-260) BI/AR antoninianus VF chipped - **~~$20~~** **$17** Roman Empire Probus (276-282) AR silver gilt antoninianus AU encrustations - **$35** Zand Dynasty Karim Khan 1753-1779 AR abbasi Shiraz Mint AH118X AU nice - **$75** Other AH128X Afghanistan 1 rupee Kabul mint XF/AU nice toning - **$35** 1944 Australia florin XF green - **$17 (melt)** 1879 PTS FE Bolivia 20 centavos AU - **$20** 1909 H Bolivia 20 centavos lustrous AU - **$17** 1953 Cuba 25 centavos XF - **$14** 1953 Cuba 25 centavos AU/UNC flashy - **$15** 1874 Denmark 10 ore VF/XF cleaned x3 - **$3 ea** 1875 Denmark 10 ore low grade x2 - **$3 ea** 1903 Denmark 10 ore VF/XF problem coins x4 - **$3 ea** 1917 Denmark 10 ore XF/AU corrosion x2 - **$3 ea** 1874 Demark 25 ore lower grade/problems x7 - **$7.50 ea** 1891 Demark 25 ore VF - **$7.50** 1894 Demark 25 ore VF - **$7.50** 1963 Dominican Republic 10 centavos XF/AU - **$5** 1889 Finland 50 pennia F - **$9** 1917 Finland 25 pennia bent AU/UNC - **$3** 1916 France 1 franc G - **$6.75 (melt)** 1913 Germany 2 marks Napoleon's defeat AU discolored spot - **$25** 1943 Great Britain sixpence UNC cleaned - **$2.30 (melt)** 1879 Great Britain shilling VF decent - **$18** 1938 Iraq 50 fils VF/XF - **$14** 1940 Ireland 1/2 crown F cleaned - **$25** Mixed date 1950s-60s Japan silver 100 yen x5 - **$5 ea** 1925 Latvia 2 lati AU - **$25** 1926 Latvia 2 lati AU x2 - **$25 ea** 1952 Lebanon 50 piastres UNC - **$8** 1960 Mozambique 5 escudos VF/XF x3 - **$5 ea** 1960 Mozambique 5 escudods AU/UNC x3 - **$6 ea** 1905 Netherlands 25 cents XF/AU toned - **$15** 1891 Ottoman Empire 1 kurus VF/XF x3 - **$5 ea** 1904 Panama 5 centesmios AU cleaned - **$9** 1931 Panama 1/10 balboa VF semi-key date - **$10** 1953 Panama 1/2 balboa XF - **$18.25 (melt)** 1833B Cuzco Peru 1/2 real holed F - **$12** 1947s Philippines 50 centavos McArthur BU - **$25** 1939 Seychelles rupee VF x7 rare type - **$20 ea** 1928 Soviet Union 15 kopecks toned AU - **$7** 1924 Soviet Union 20 kopecks VF - **$6** 1910 Straits Settlements 5 cents AU old cleaning - **$4** 1910 Straits Settlements 10 cents VF - **$5** 1916A Tunisia 50 centimes VF nice circ cameo - **$13** 1836 USA capped bust half dime (5c) cull condition worn & bent G - **$14** 1965 USA silver kennedy 40% BU - **$6.25 (less than 85% of melt)** 1931 Yugoslavia 10 dinara XF - **$14** **end of post**

Hey everyone! I have here some Roman Republican and Imperial denarii as well as an Antoninus Pius Zodiac series drachm from Egypt. The Republicans is are an issue of Mark Antony and Julius Caesar. The Imperial denarius was issued by Augustus as emperor. They are budget pieces which allow you to own an incredible piece of history at an affordable price! PROOF: https://imgur.com/a/o35YOcv \--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ROMAN REPUBLIC: $125 $115 The Triumvirs. Mark Antony. 32-31 BC. AR Denarius (18mm, 3.2 g). Military mint moving with Mark Antony (Patrae?). ANT AVG - III VIR•R•P•C Galley right, with scepter tied with fillet on prow / LEG III Aquila between two signa. Crawford 544/15. CRI 350. RBW 1839. Sydenham 1217. Note: This coin is heavily worn, hence the price, however, LEG III is still readable enough to attribute and much of the galley on the obverse is still visible. Very nice value piece to add this historic and desirable type to your collection! \--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- $350 JULIUS CAESAR. Denarius (48-47 BC). Military mint traveling with Caesar in North Africa. Obv: Diademed head of Venus right. Rev: CAESAR. Aeneas advancing left, holding palladium and carrying Anchises on his shoulder. Crawford 458/1. Condition: Fair. Weight: 3.50 g. Diameter: 17 mm. Ex-Numismatik Naumann Auction 148, Lot 596 (hi-res photos and description credited to Numismatik Naumann). Note: This coin is also heavily worn, Caesar's name is still mostly visible, but faded. The photos are an accurate portrayal of how it will look in person. \--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ROMAN IMPERIAL: $275 $250 AUGUSTUS (27 BC-14 AD). AR Denarius. Lugdunum. Obv: AVGVSTVS DIVI F. Laureate head right. Rev: C CAES / AVGVS F. Gaius Caesar riding horse right, holding sword and reins; in background, aquila between two signa. RIC² 199. Condition: Fair. Weight: 3.57 g. Diameter: 18 mm. Ex-Numismatik Naumann Auction 148, Lot 614 (hi-res photos and description credited to Numismatik Naumann). Note: This coin is also somewhat worn, however, the most important parts of the coin (Augustus' portrait, Gaius Caesar on horseback, the Aquila standard, most of Augustus' name and Gaius' complete name) are completely recognizable. \--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ROMAN PROVINCIAL: $425 $400 EGYPT, Alexandria. Antoninus Pius. AD 138-161. Æ Drachm (31mm, 19.93 g). Zodiac series. Dated RY 8 (AD 144/145). AYT K T AIΛ A∆P ANT\[ω\]NINOC CЄB ЄVC, laureate head right / Sun in Leo – Lion leaping left; above, radiate and draped bust of Helios (Sun) left and eight-rayed star; L H (date) below. Köln 1498 var. (obv. bust type); Dattari (Savio) 2966; K&G 35.276; Emmett 1531.8 (R5); Staffieri, Alexandria In Nummis 146 (this coin). Good VF, dark green and reddish brown patina, natural hole in flan, flan flaw near edge on obverse. Very rare with the reverse type left, as indicated by Emmett’s R5 rating. This variant is missing from most major collections. Compare to: https://www.cngcoins.com/Coin.aspx?CoinID=349286 \--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Payment methods: PPFF, Venmo, and Cashapp. USPS Ground Advantage shipping for $10. All in price (all four coins + shipping) - $1000 (from $1115)! Thank you for taking the time to read my post!

Will you be voting for candidate A, who's backed by billionaire A,B,C,D, defense firms and big oil or Candidate B who's backed by billionaire E,F,G,H, big tech, Wall Street and insurance firms? Both of whom go to the same country club

How is it not is the better question. It’s like how all things lead back to H somehow

Proof/photos: [proof](https://imgur.com/a/XU7QCgy) Selling the 20 copper rounds pictured as one lot: • 16 Morgan-style rounds • 4 Civil War 150th Anniversary rounds: The General, Battle of Shiloh, Battle of Gettysburg, and H. L. Hunley Please review photos for condition. These are copper rounds, not silver dollars. Price: $60 for all 20 tube included . Shipping: $6 ground Payment: Zelle & Venmo Please comment before sending a chat or PM.

Anno 2011 habe ich eine Bollerwagentour organisiert und hierzu auch für alle Teilnehmer ausreichend Bier besorgt. Die Übernahme der Kosten je Person wurde im Vorfeld konkret besprochen und von allen akzeptiert. Dem Grunde nach habe ich die ganze Orga, das Besorgen etc. umsonst gemacht, was ich schon recht nett fand. Viele hatten mir am Tag der Tour sofort das Geld in die Hand gedrückt. Eine Person - wir nennen ihn mal anonym Björn H. - gab an, gar kein Geld dabei zu haben. Ich kriege das die Tage. Später waren wir noch Döner essen. Ich habe diesem Herren dann sogar noch Geld geliehen. Gegen Abend waren wir sehr gesellig unterwegs. Es war lustig. Björn H. unterhielt sich mit einem weiteren Freund. Ich zitiere Björn H. mit den Worten "Ganzen Tag gesoffen und gefressen und nicht ein Cent gezahlt, Leben ist geil." Einige Tage später habe ich Björn H. eine Nachricht geschickt mit der Frage, wann und wie er das mit dem Geld klären möchte. Björn H. hat mir nie wieder geantwortet. Das war das letzte mal, dass ich so etwas übernommen habe. Das ich so etwas für die Breite organisiert habe. Björn H. ist heute Mitarbeiter des Allgemeinen Deutschen Rundfunks und ich sehe seinen Namen ab und zu. Björn H. ist ein Arschloch.

Morning everyone! Economic report(s) scheduled for the day is(are) | at^[i](https://fidelityfiplus.econoday.com/byweek): PMI Manufacturing Final | 9:45am, ISM Manufacturing Index | 10, Construction Spending | 10; Fed speaker Goolsbee is at 11:15am. Media platforms are discussing: The $5T AI Rout, NVidia’s stock valuation, President’s economic approval ahead of midterms, Big Tech earnings analysis, iPhone sales expectations, Treasury sales overhaul, Oil falls on hopes for Iran war talks, Intel’s steep decline. Amid the sea of Tech related discussions were a couple on International farm trade, a bit on Communications companies, and one analysis of consumer finances amid continued inflation. Premarket futures were up solidly this morning, led by the Nasdaq and Russell 2k; VIX futures were firmly down. MVIS ended the last trading session at 1.35, on lower volume traded compared to the average over the past month. Stock price action saw the Short related volumes by percentage of the total _reported_ volumes come in well below the average of the last 30 days. MicroVision announced expanded collaboration with FieldAI, stating it reflects growing demand for advanced perception solutions. However, this came with no change in the company’s forecasted revenue expectations, and as such should likely already be factored into the stock valuation. That is why there is very little in the way of movement for the stock, as the path to profitability is clearly built upon increasing sales, but the current sales figures do not keep the company from having to continue to dilute. Until other options are communicated to investors by management, we have to assume they plan to continue with the methods they have been using so far. ## Daily Data *** |H: 1.40 — L: 1.30 — C: 1.35 ^[i](https://chartexchange.com/symbol/nasdaq-mvis/historical/) |[Calendar](https://fidelityfiplus.econoday.com/byweek.asp)| |:- |:-| |**Pivots ↗︎ : 1.40, 1.45, 1.50** ^([i](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/pivotpoint.asp)) |**Pivots ↘︎ : 1.30, 1.25, 1.20**| |Open Exchanges: 715k ~ 50% ^[i](https://chartexchange.com/symbol/nasdaq-mvis/exchange-volume/) |Off Exchanges: 712k ~ 50% ^[i](https://chartexchange.com/symbol/nasdaq-mvis/exchange-volume/)| |IBKR: 200k Rate: 50.80%^[i](https://chartexchange.com/symbol/nasdaq-mvis/borrow-fee/) | |**R Vol: 74% of Avg Vol: 1,933k** ^([i](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/averagedailytradingvolume.asp)) |**Short Vol: 447k of 917k ~ 49%** ^[i](https://chartexchange.com/symbol/nasdaq-mvis/short-volume/?tblshortvolix=0)| ^(Follow links for sources. Bold text represents key points or larger data, Italics are slightly unusual or lower than normal.)

Moin, aufgrund der Planung einer Reise mit unbestimmter Dauer bin ich auf der Suche nach einem höchst möglichen Nebeneinkommen. Ich plane 10.000 Anteile (50k-55k $ CC-Dividende p.a.) am o.g. ETF zu erwerben um mindestens 2500€ netto monatlich zu generieren. Aktuell würden im Durchschnitt 3500€ monatlich rumkommen, wenn man durch die Teilfreistellung nur ca. 19% Steuer ansetzt. (15% an die Amis, wird in GER angerechnet und 30% steuerfrei von den üblichen 26,4% Abgeltung) Mir ist relativ egal ob die Einlage i.H.v. 300k nach 5-10 Jahren 250k oder 400k Wert ist, primär sind die monatlichen Ausschüttungen. Es ist ein amerikanischer ETF der mit CC seine Gewinne im Energiesektor macht. Meine Überlegung ist, egal ob Krieg, Demokraten oder Republikaner, Gas- Öl- oder sonstige Krise. Die Amis benötigen immer enorme Mengen an Energie, daran wird sich auch in Zukunft nichts ändern. So lange die monatliche Auszahlung über 2500€ netto bleibt, kann ich damit super leben. Das Geld würde auch nur teilweise benötigt werden, kann sicher zu 50% reinvestiert werden. Das Kapital kann auch ohne Probleme bei +/-0 bleiben, ich rechne aber mit einem Anstieg über dir Inflation. Die Rechnung sollte über einen Zeitraum von ca. 10 Jahren funktionieren, dann werde ich wieder mehr in der Familie eingebunden sein. Frage: Kennt jemand diesen ETF? Nutzt ihr ihn? Ich kann ihn z.B. über eToro erwerben. Bei IBKR kann ich als deutscher retail nicht direkt darauf zugreifen, müsste eventuell noch ein paar Formulare ausfüllen um die KID Problematik zu umgehen. Habt ihr ähnliche CC ETFs mit einer so hohen Ausschüttung im Hinterkopf? Ich hoffe die Anlagesumme zu halten und würde mich neben den CC-Dividenden auch über einen Zuwachs von 5-10% p.a. nicht beschweren. Habe ich bei der Konstellation einen Denkfehler oder ist es wirklich ein relativ sicheres Konstrukt? Keiner schenkt einem 17% Dividende, die CC können sicher auch mal deutlich schlechter laufen, aber die Amis werden mit ihren Rechenzentren und Spritschleudern immer auf alle möglichen Arten von Energie angewiesen sein? Zumindest sehe ich die US Ölindustrie auch in 10 Jahren noch gut dastehen. Gern eure Meinungen und Gedanken zur o.g. Problematik.

Spot on read — you nailed the exact trap that played out over the next 4 bars. Here is the actual bar-by-bar reveal from the session after Bar 18: * **Bar 19 (15:40)**: Inside bull bar (O: 728.52 | H: 729.18 | L: 728.51 | C: 728.88) — reclaimed the 20EMA (728.64) immediately without triggering 728.36. * **Bar 20 (15:45)**: Wicked below the 728.36 trigger down to **728.03**, sweeping the aggressive sell stops, **but failed to hold below 728.36** — buyers stepped right back in at the 20EMA and closed the bar at **728.72** (back above both 728.36 and the 20EMA at 728.65). * **Bars 21–22 (15:50–15:55)**: Pushed back up to 729.41 and chopped above the 20EMA into the close (728.84). Your condition — waiting for a full bar to close and hold below 728.36 and then shorting the retest — would have completely saved you from the Bar 20 bear trap. In fact, in our 10-year empirical matrix, raw first-entry V-Reversals against Always-In dominance have a marginal/negative real-time EV (-0.03R on this bar), whereas waiting for the **Breakout Test (retest after a confirmed break)** jumps into our Top 5 setups by Profit Factor (1.55 PF across 10,112 occurrences). We just posted the full post-Bar-18 chart screenshot and interactive bar-by-bar replay pinned on our profile / r/MarketSightAI if you want to inspect the rest of the session. Out of curiosity, when you trade the retest after a confirmed break below the 20EMA, do you enter on a limit order at the 20EMA/breakout level or wait for a bear reversal bar on the retest?

My thesis of Perpetual MOASS states that after GME sneezes, the price doesn't come crashing down to pre-sneeze level but stays elevated at a higher floor. Example would be GME sneezes up to $220/share, then the price comes down to around $130/share floor. This process doesn't happen once but keeps repeating. If I am correct, then the process will keep repeating for more than 20 or 30 years ahead. Perpetual MOASS takes into consideration for diamond hand GME investors + wrinkled brain GME investors. GME investors will be all wealthy with time. As always, my thesis doesn't rely on technical analysis. It mainly relies on my feelings from everything I observed since January 28, 2021. I work in nail care industry. Every day, my business serves females from few years old to almost 100 years old. Most females have this kind of superpower they called intuition. It's like human wisdom without logical connections. Their intuition is scarily accurate most times. They call this intuition "feeling". This very "feeling" is the foundation for my Perpetual MOASS thesis. [Dumb Money\(2023\) and Keith Gill.](https://preview.redd.it/6d1e3txo33zh1.png?width=794&format=png&auto=webp&s=922f5af44e387d74009675c319b64ec372164220) 1. MOASS is the reason why most of us here. Superstonk believes MOASS happens due to forced closing of remaining short positions. Example would be Volkswagen short squeeze. 2. SlowASS is another idea that Superstonk also believes. Superstonk believes SlowASS happens when shorts cover over an extended time. Example would be Tesla slow short squeeze. \*\*\* In 1860s, Cornelius Vanderbilt bought up heavily distressed railroad companies to consolidated them into a massive, efficient transit monopoly running directly into New York City. To do this, Vanderbilt needed the New York State legislature to pass a bill authorizing the consolidation. A group of New York politicians, led by a Wall Street bear named Daniel Drew, colluded and led Vanderbilt to believe they would pass the consolidated bill, causing the Hudson River Railroad stock to rise. The politicians secretly planned to vote the bill down at the last minute. Expect the stock to crash violently when the bill failed, they shorted the stock with everything they got. Vanderbilt had anticipated their betrayal. While the politicians were busy shorting the stock, Vanderbilt and his associates were quietly buying every single share that hit the market. Vanderbilt bought more shares than the total float of the company. When the short contracts expired, the politicians and short sellers were legally obligated to deliver Hudson River Railroad shares back to Vanderbilt. Because Vanderbilt owned them all, the short sellers had to buy them directly from him at whatever price he demanded. Vanderbilt stated he would settle for $285 a share, up from a fraction of that price. The squeeze completely bankrupted many of the New York legislators and elite Wall Street traders who had bet against him. In 1901, E. H. Harriman and James J. Hill(backed by J.P. Morgan) were fighting for control of the American railroad system, specifically the Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad, which connected Chicago to the Pacific Northwest. When Harriman lost the bidding war to buy Burlington railroad directly, he secretly bought controlling stake in the Northern Pacific Railway, which owned the Burlington. By the time J.P. Morgan realized what was happening, Harriman was only a fraction of a percent away from owning the entire company. J.P. Morgan immediately order to buy 150,000 shares of Northern Pacific at any price when the market opened. As both Harriman and J.P. Morgan bought up every available shares, the total float completely vanished. Seeing the stock price climb rapidly into the $100s ad $120s, Wall Street traders began massively shorting Northern Pacific, expecting it to crash. However, they didn't realize that Harriman and Morgan had no intention of selling. On May 9, 1901, short sellers were forced to cover their positions, but zero shares were available to buy. Northern Pacific stock exploded from $170 to $1,000 per share in matter of hours. Because short sellers were facing millions of dollars in losses on Northern Pacific, they were forced to dump their holdings in every other company to raise cash. Blue-chip stocks like U.S. Steel and Amalgamated Copper plummeted by 20% to 50% in a single morning, trigger a brutal nationwide market panic. Realizing that the corner was going to collapse the entire United States financial system, Harriman and J.P. Morgan called a temporary truce. They agreed to let the short sellers settle their contracts for $150 per share instead of forcing them to buy at $1,000, averting a total collapse of Wall Street. The Volkswagen case and the Tesla case are recently and well known, so I will let readers have the privilege to do their own research. \*\*\* In mentioned squeezes above, settlements were the end decision. Settlement prevented U.S. financial system from collapsing. For GameStop saga, I feel settlement is also the solution for everyone including SHFs, GME investors, our government, our people, and people all over the world. Perpetual MOASS thesis based on expectation that SHFs, GameStop, and the current administration are responsible business people who do not want the U.S. financial system to collapse. For this to happen, settlements of some kind must be the solution. If a company attempts to squeeze its stock price to infinity, it will be stopped. Example would be the recent FINRA U3 halt in 2022. ATM offerings GameStop had in the past could be used as examples for these settlements. The convertible bonds can be viewed as settlements also. All these unspoken settlements helped SHFs limit the loss while helped GameStop raised money. With the money raised, GameStop short thesis is dying, while cash per share floor price is rising. The government can quietly gives a green light for these events to unwind without damaging normal people at 2008 scale or larger. People talked about how the DTCC, FINRA, SEC, etc. control the market, but I feel that the current administration is much more powerful than these entities. Regardless if people like the current government or not, the government has the power to allow GME squeeze or stop it. So, even if a GME investor doesn't like the president, that investor should stay quiet until MOASS cash settled in his bank account. I feel Ryan is too smart to carelessly posted those controversial political tweets. Let's talk about how I feel about Project Genesis. Money is infrastructure. It is the earthly logistics required to make an idea dominate the world. There is no mass expansion of consciousness without a strong material foundation to sustain and shield the movement. And that is exactly why GME did multiple ATM offers to raise money and got out of potential threat of bankruptcy. Without resources, GameStop's voice cannot echo, and MOASS message dies unheard. True prosperity is not about accumulating things to inflate the ego, it is about purpose leverage. It is about having the exact fuel to architect reality and manifest phone number share price. Money is the very first tool we must master to break out of the cellar boxing. If we are ready for GameStop to break out of this financial suppression, GME investor must grow some wrinkles. Project Rocket is to build a rocket to reach the moon, and the trip will only start when the rocket is complete. I think Project Rocket is to compress the shorts spring, so when the rocket launches, all those fuels will lift GME to the moon. I feel warrants' purpose is to hold things back until everything else is ready and in place. I haven't have much thought about the left over convertible notes except for the war chest cash. What I learned from Keith Gill is that an investor can make money by trading options and buying shares. Keith made a lot of money trading options. He then using money and those options to buy GME shares. It doesn't seem like he has any plan to sell his GME shares. I feels Keith believes that GME will go to similar price range like Berkshire Hathaway. Even though I acknowledge Keith's skill as a option trader, I am still not sure how he knew exactly when GME would sneeze in 2024 and resurfaced the night before. I have my theory, but that is more like conspiracy. I feel Keith's actions in 2024 and his meme "When I move, you move" are connected somehow. Next time RK appears with his new options, I will make sure to buy any call options I can. Of course, I will only buy near-the-money LEAPS. What I learned originally from Ryan Cohen is buy and hold GME shares. Ryan believes he will be able to build GameStop into a holding company like Berkshire Hathaway with similar stock price but in much shorter time frame. For that, I'm not sure if Ryan's intention to buy eBay was real or it is his Kansas Shuffle. Without Ryan's intention to buy eBay or his interviews after, I'm not sure GameStop's investment in eBay would be that much of a success. I, however, feel that Ryan would keep his eBay options open, similar to the suggestion from "Art of The Deal" book. The lesson I learned from warrants is similar to the lesson I learned from buying OTM LEAP options. Holding OTM LEAPS is a wonderful thing with mixed emotions. When the contract price goes up, I think "MOASS, MOASS", so I buy more. Then when the contract price goes down, I buy more to average down. What I should do instead is to remember that OTM LEAPS is a mean for me to make extra money to buy GME shares on ComputerShare, not diamond handing it. It means that I need to sell my OTM LEAPS when price goes up. When the price goes back down, I can reposition with another OTM LEAPS. It might not be GameStop's intention to teach options to investors through distribution of warrants, but that is the lesson I learned from it. I also will change from OTM LEAPS to NTM LEAPS to help with the Gamma ramp. You don't have to learn the same thing I learned. Next, I feel that RK's Seymour dog meme is Keith waiting for Ryan's signal of a massive good news. The mass and institutions need a reason to buy GME. I feel when RC gives the signal, RK will appear. [RK Memes](https://preview.redd.it/y6xzyckx33zh1.png?width=1344&format=png&auto=webp&s=a41b96d8453978b45e9a9e16d4dd51c0ffd45f90) Let's create a fictional scenario, with estimate numbers, how Perpetual MOASS would happen. When T+35 Ryan's 2026 purchases start to kick in early November, GME price starts to climb slowly. Without warrants, GME can break past $28-$30 resistant barrier. The Power Pack TIME PSA pulls create a speculated baby Gamma ramp helping things moving upward. GameStop's December 2026 earning with eBay's numbers justify traders buys and institution buys. With that signal, RK returned on X with his massive 150,000 NTM option blocks. Within milliseconds of the post going live, institutional trading system would aggressively buy to front-run the retail wave, pushing GME past its $35 resistance zones before retail investors even open their apps on Monday morning. With Roaring Kitty's post, millions of global retail traders would aggressively sweep NTM and OTM call options of $40, $60, and $100 strikes create a massive Gamma loop. Options market makers who sold those contracts are legally required to balance their risk by purchasing physical GME stock. As the price flies upward, market makers must exponentially buy more shares to maintain their delta hedges. This creates a relentless buying loop similar to January 21, 2021. If the retail community and DRS holders then refuse to sell as GME climbs through $50, $80, and $100, they effectively draining the available tradeable float. When automated buying orders from hedging options brokers or panicked short sellers hit an empty order book, the price begins to jump violently in massive increments skipping straight from $120 to $180, then $220 simply because there are no matching "Ask" orders in between. Ryan announces an ATM offering for 1 billion shares and complete with an average price of $200. GME then drops to the new floor at $130 per share. [GameStop chart January 2021](https://preview.redd.it/7r6jhjh143zh1.png?width=878&format=png&auto=webp&s=334e0e16afee723b7a1dec44646b750843dd91d2) The repeat cycle starts, because the price increase forces short sellers to either inject more capital to maintain their position or buy back a small portion of shares to cut losses. This constant, incremental buying from retreating shorts acted as a continuous upward engine for the stock price. With the new $200B war chest, Ryan & board will continue the Kansas Shuffle with the next undervalued companies similar to eBay. Diamond hand GME investors will make much money with the new stock price, and the winkled brain GME investors will make even more with their skills in options market. I feel this is how Ryan can win the thumb war with Warren Buffett in a really short time. Of course, Ryan can do ATM at any share price to increase the GME floor. [Personal position for hodling GME shares & NTM LEAP call option](https://preview.redd.it/0aumw0h543zh1.png?width=734&format=png&auto=webp&s=d0869b4a273f540839ec164b9df3011d162383b2) Above are my position on shares and LEAP option. Shares are on ComputerShare, and NTM LEAP option is on Robinh00d(yikes). The sentiment is bearish, so it's a good time to buy since IV is low. $25 strike price is near-the-money and can easily be reached. It's similar to RK's call option in 20024. The expiration is over a year out, so it gives me time even if GME goes sideways for awhile. With bullish news coming up for December 2026 earning and potential spikes since warrants are gone, I feel this LEAP can easily goes ITM. This NTM call forces market makers to buy GME shares to hedge which helps build Gamma ramp. Once the option reaches 300% or GME goes over $28-$30, I'll sell. On a red day afterward, I'll reposition with another NTM LEAP. Perpetual MOASS thesis is based on my feelings of everything I observed in past many years, not technical data. If you really want to learn how to trade correctly, do your own research. My feeling in this thesis is right for me but might not be right for you. Peace out. Have a good read on Sunday night. Posted 2026/11/1

Einfach Baumwolle kaufen das hält doch ewig und nen 2 mm Loch kann man auch ignorieren oder dann nur noch zur Arbeit tragen Alles mögliche an „normaler“ Kleidung, C&A, H&M und sonstige

contact my company. Miles Franklin Precious Metals. Tell them I sent you. See what we can do for you. Tell them I sent you. James H. Hatland Affiliate/Consultant Miles Franklin Precious Metals [silverdoctor63@yahoo.com](mailto:silverdoctor63@yahoo.com) [milesfranklin.com/james-hatland](http://milesfranklin.com/james-hatland)