Create Account
Log In
Dark
chart
exchange
Premium
Terminal
Screener
Stocks
Crypto
Forex
Trends
Depth
Close
Check out our Level2View

GM
General Motors Company
stock NYSE

At Close
Sep 21, 2026 3:59:57 PM EDT
83.97USD+2.153%(+1.77)7,813,583
79.58Bid   88.58Ask   9.00Spread
Pre-market
Sep 21, 2026 9:29:30 AM EDT
82.13USD-0.085%(-0.07)9,506
After-hours
Sep 21, 2026 4:58:30 PM EDT
84.05USD+0.095%(+0.08)465
OverviewOption ChainMax PainOptionsPrice & VolumeDividendsHistoricalExchange VolumeDark Pool LevelsDark Pool PrintsExchangesShort VolumeShort Interest - DailyShort InterestBorrow Fee (CTB)Failure to Deliver (FTD)ShortsTrendsNewsTrends
GM Reddit Mentions
Subreddits
Limit Labels     

We have sentiment values and mention counts going back to 2017. The complete data set is available via the API.
Take me to the API
GM Specific Mentions
As of Sep 22, 2026 12:18:33 AM EDT (1 min. ago)
Includes all comments and posts. Mentions per user per ticker capped at one per hour.
1 hr ago • u/DuckTalesOohOoh • r/wallstreetbets • what_are_your_moves_tomorrow_september_22_2026 • C
The GM merger?
sentiment 0.00
2 hr ago • u/itsalwayscalls • r/wallstreetbets • short_ford_and_gm • C
GM is trading at a forward PE of 6. I bought calls the day it dropped 5%. They have V8s and SUVs that are affordable.
Short F.
sentiment 0.13
9 hr ago • u/GMGsSilverplate • r/Silverbugs • help_on_markings_and_id • C
I'm not sure where you got your info mate but its not right, GM Co is Gorham here.
sentiment -0.12
10 hr ago • u/UnskilledScout • r/AMD_Stock • daily_discussion_monday_20260921 • C
Sure, but Lisu has been at the company since Jan 2012 as GM and an SVP. She became President and CEO in Oct 2014. She wasn't coming into the position cold.
sentiment 0.17
16 hr ago • u/NoguTrades • r/Daytrading • trade_the_pool_denied_payout_ban • Giving Advice • B
I am so glad that this has been brought up in this community. I have read the initial $50k individual post and now came across the $77k person.
I would like to share my $45k payout denial and ban story.
After 1 year with TTP, they chose to deny my 1 month long hard earned money by simply stating that i have violated “system & execution manipulation” along with “trade coordination & copy trading” terms. I have received payouts in smaller amounts with my smaller accounts but when I built the experience and got my 200k account funded in the last month, they made the payout process extremely difficult and finally concluded that i violated those terms and banned me.
If you are a user of TTP, you would understand the bogus 5% rule and how detailed they are when that is violated. When they are denying such a large amount and banning someone from their platform, they chose to stay silent on the details and only cite their terms and conditions. This is not a coincidence. They do not have the money to pay such amounts and they do not want profitable traders on their platform. They would like traders to continue buying their accounts and failing them and if they become profitable do scummy business like this and try to silence them.
This is outrageous and terrible for a small trader like myself. This issue was blasted on their discord channel, and they muted all the vocal and curious traders. After it got major attention, Benjamin, the new GM, who climbed up the ranks from Live Support Chat Agent in the last 2 months, replied to the public out cry by stating that a hand full of traders were identified and risk management conducted a full review and took the necessary actions. Risk management is fixated on the fact around coordination trading and how individuals need to trade on their own. TTP has a discord community who shares alerts and they have youtube live events where they go over stocks together to execute trades. How can they claim that these handful of traders coordinated trades together? They base it off of their bot identifying trade executions in similar criteria to flag to risk management team. If you join the live alert and trade the same way as the mentor/moderator on the events, your payout and accounts will be banned.
DO NOT get your hopes up and use their platform. I also thought this was the best firm out their and took advantage of their perks because i did not want to risk my own money but after all this, I have already signed up for a personal brokerage.
I truly hope this post sheds some light on the current and future traders of this platform and learn from these public posts. Don’t waste your time and effort with such a scummy prop firm.
sentiment -0.89
23 hr ago • u/YugModnarEmosTsuj • r/wallstreetbets • tesla_vehicles_maintain_nearly_19_junk_title_rate • C
You're joking, right? I had a '97 Camry that ran with the motor mounts broken for over a year, before we were finally able to pull the engine and extract a stuck bolt. (That bolt went to one motor mount, without it, they were eventually break one at a time.) I was able to replace the motor mounts, the entire exhaust, timing chain and water pump, all in a driveway. I drove it to work one day and it threw a rod through the crankcase on the way there. I left it, came back an hour later, started back up, drove it the last bit to work, and we pulled it apart to find where it was broken. After some fussing with it, I drove it home, including 3 miles on the highway at 65mph, again, missing an entire piston and having a hole in the side of the engine.
Meanwhile, Ford built a dual clutch system that acted like a wet clutch, but was actually a dry clutch, just to cut costs, and then kept dropping these transmissions back into cars over and over despite knowing they were an issue and doing nothing to fix it. Now they (And GM) are trying to argue that since they designed their engines to use proprietary software, that means end users and third parties shouldn't be allowed to work on them at all.
sentiment -0.70
1 hr ago • u/DuckTalesOohOoh • r/wallstreetbets • what_are_your_moves_tomorrow_september_22_2026 • C
The GM merger?
sentiment 0.00
2 hr ago • u/itsalwayscalls • r/wallstreetbets • short_ford_and_gm • C
GM is trading at a forward PE of 6. I bought calls the day it dropped 5%. They have V8s and SUVs that are affordable.
Short F.
sentiment 0.13
9 hr ago • u/GMGsSilverplate • r/Silverbugs • help_on_markings_and_id • C
I'm not sure where you got your info mate but its not right, GM Co is Gorham here.
sentiment -0.12
10 hr ago • u/UnskilledScout • r/AMD_Stock • daily_discussion_monday_20260921 • C
Sure, but Lisu has been at the company since Jan 2012 as GM and an SVP. She became President and CEO in Oct 2014. She wasn't coming into the position cold.
sentiment 0.17
16 hr ago • u/NoguTrades • r/Daytrading • trade_the_pool_denied_payout_ban • Giving Advice • B
I am so glad that this has been brought up in this community. I have read the initial $50k individual post and now came across the $77k person.
I would like to share my $45k payout denial and ban story.
After 1 year with TTP, they chose to deny my 1 month long hard earned money by simply stating that i have violated “system & execution manipulation” along with “trade coordination & copy trading” terms. I have received payouts in smaller amounts with my smaller accounts but when I built the experience and got my 200k account funded in the last month, they made the payout process extremely difficult and finally concluded that i violated those terms and banned me.
If you are a user of TTP, you would understand the bogus 5% rule and how detailed they are when that is violated. When they are denying such a large amount and banning someone from their platform, they chose to stay silent on the details and only cite their terms and conditions. This is not a coincidence. They do not have the money to pay such amounts and they do not want profitable traders on their platform. They would like traders to continue buying their accounts and failing them and if they become profitable do scummy business like this and try to silence them.
This is outrageous and terrible for a small trader like myself. This issue was blasted on their discord channel, and they muted all the vocal and curious traders. After it got major attention, Benjamin, the new GM, who climbed up the ranks from Live Support Chat Agent in the last 2 months, replied to the public out cry by stating that a hand full of traders were identified and risk management conducted a full review and took the necessary actions. Risk management is fixated on the fact around coordination trading and how individuals need to trade on their own. TTP has a discord community who shares alerts and they have youtube live events where they go over stocks together to execute trades. How can they claim that these handful of traders coordinated trades together? They base it off of their bot identifying trade executions in similar criteria to flag to risk management team. If you join the live alert and trade the same way as the mentor/moderator on the events, your payout and accounts will be banned.
DO NOT get your hopes up and use their platform. I also thought this was the best firm out their and took advantage of their perks because i did not want to risk my own money but after all this, I have already signed up for a personal brokerage.
I truly hope this post sheds some light on the current and future traders of this platform and learn from these public posts. Don’t waste your time and effort with such a scummy prop firm.
sentiment -0.89
23 hr ago • u/YugModnarEmosTsuj • r/wallstreetbets • tesla_vehicles_maintain_nearly_19_junk_title_rate • C
You're joking, right? I had a '97 Camry that ran with the motor mounts broken for over a year, before we were finally able to pull the engine and extract a stuck bolt. (That bolt went to one motor mount, without it, they were eventually break one at a time.) I was able to replace the motor mounts, the entire exhaust, timing chain and water pump, all in a driveway. I drove it to work one day and it threw a rod through the crankcase on the way there. I left it, came back an hour later, started back up, drove it the last bit to work, and we pulled it apart to find where it was broken. After some fussing with it, I drove it home, including 3 miles on the highway at 65mph, again, missing an entire piston and having a hole in the side of the engine.
Meanwhile, Ford built a dual clutch system that acted like a wet clutch, but was actually a dry clutch, just to cut costs, and then kept dropping these transmissions back into cars over and over despite knowing they were an issue and doing nothing to fix it. Now they (And GM) are trying to argue that since they designed their engines to use proprietary software, that means end users and third parties shouldn't be allowed to work on them at all.
sentiment -0.70
1 day ago • u/MainlineX • r/wallstreetbets • tesla_vehicles_maintain_nearly_19_junk_title_rate • C
Yea, back in the day the same platform served several models so a lot of parts are interchangeable across a lot of different cars. GM A body and G body, Crystler A body and B body had millions and millions of cars made with parts that fit across their perspective platforms for years and years.
sentiment 0.36
1 day ago • u/joebraga2 • r/wallstreetbets • is_keeping_chinese_evs_out_of_the_us_actually • C
I think you're mixing up three different things: profitability, consolidation and government support.
China absolutely has too many EV manufacturers, and I fully expect consolidation. Some companies will fail, some will merge and some brands will disappear. But that doesn't mean the Chinese automotive industry disappears with them. The important question isn't whether every Chinese EV startup survives. It's what happens to the companies that do survive.
That's also why “Xi is taking away the subsidies, so bankruptcies are coming” is too simplistic. China has been reducing and restructuring EV support rather than simply switching it off. The industry is being pushed toward a more mature phase where weaker manufacturers are increasingly exposed to competition.
And look at the companies we're actually talking about. BYD, Geely and SAIC aren't interchangeable with tiny EV startups.
SAIC is an especially interesting example because it already has a deep industrial relationship with GM. This matters a lot in Latin America.
For decades, Chevrolet's Brazilian and Latin American identity was heavily influenced by Opel engineering. We had generations of cars with European GM roots: Opala/Rekord, Chevette/Kadett, Corsa, Astra, Vectra, Omega, Meriva, Zafira and others.
That era gradually disappeared as GM reorganized its global operations during the 2010s. But what replaced it is fascinating: Chinese engineering and GM's Chinese joint ventures became increasingly relevant to GM's global and emerging-market product development.
The current-generation Chevrolet Onix, for example, was the first model based on GM's GEM architecture, developed through GM's global engineering structure with substantial participation from its Chinese operations and SAIC-GM/PATAC.
And now GM is looking even further toward its Chinese partnerships for South America, including cooperation with SAIC-GM-Wuling on future products.
Think about what that means for the original argument.
Americans tend to imagine this as a simple competition between “Detroit” and “Chinese automakers.” But the global automotive industry doesn't work that neatly anymore.
Chinese engineering can end up inside a Chevrolet. A Western manufacturer can use a Chinese-developed platform or product outside China. A Chinese company can supply technology to the same Western manufacturers that are politically protected from direct Chinese competition in the US.
So yes, many Chinese EV brands probably won't survive the consolidation. That's almost beside the point.
If ten weak manufacturers disappear but BYD, Geely, SAIC and several other survivors emerge larger, technologically stronger and more internationally experienced, Detroit still has to compete against the resulting industry everywhere outside the protected US market.
Latin America is already showing how complicated this becomes. Chevrolet spent decades adapting European Opel engineering to this region. Now Chinese partnerships can play part of the role that European engineering once played in its product strategy.
That's the irony: Americans may eventually encounter Chinese automotive engineering without ever buying a Chinese-branded car.
Which brings me back to the question in my original post. Excluding Chinese-branded vehicles from the US doesn't stop Chinese manufacturers from developing technology, gaining scale or competing with American manufacturers elsewhere.
The investment question isn't whether every Chinese EV startup survives.
It's whether the Chinese companies that survive this brutal consolidation become stronger global competitors — and whether insulating Detroit from that same competitive pressure at home leaves it better or worse prepared to face them abroad.
sentiment 0.98
1 day ago • u/Gullible_Link_5298 • r/stockstobuytoday • ford_stock • C
Better bet than Tesla, worse than Ferrari or GM.
sentiment -0.05
1 day ago • u/Independent-Use-228 • r/wallstreetbets • weekend_discussion_thread_for_the_weekend_of • C
GM be offering a 4.9% APR for the new Sierra. How kind of you $GM to ram me without any lube.
sentiment 0.00
1 day ago • u/soggy_mattress • r/StockMarket • why_is_tesla_worth_anything • C
I was, yes, but they still aren't exact numbers.
In the US, it's something like 8.5x more than the next best-selling manufacturer (GM).
Globally, it's \~6.1x the next manufacturer (VW group).
My point stands: Tesla, despite horrible political headwind and a divisive CEO, sells multiples over the next best EV manufacturers.
sentiment 0.94
1 day ago • u/derppherppp • r/gme_meltdown • keyholders_meltdown_is_continuing_and_spiralling • C
I knew it wasnt going to end well when he kept ranting about wanting manager and GM on day 3 while also asserting he doesnt care and refused to do anything he wasnt explicitly told to do 😂 Didnt think it would happen so soon however. Shame i found it amusing.
sentiment 0.36
2 days ago • u/SkyMarshal • r/wallstreetbets • is_keeping_chinese_evs_out_of_the_us_actually • C
Detroit can't become competitive as long as China keeps the Yuan artificially low, and maybe not even then if wages in China remain substantially lower than in the US. The restriction is about preventing further loss of US jobs and bankruptcy of GM/Ford/Chrysler.
The massive outsourcing wave of the 2000s and 2010s created immense social instability, hatred and distrust of both US political parties, and the (correct) belief they've both been captured by Wall St and "globalists" who don't care about the US only their own profit margins. It's why America voted in Trump and MAGA took over the GOP, and Socialists are on the verge of taking over the Dems.
sentiment -0.89
2 days ago • u/felixfortunate • r/wallstreetbets • is_keeping_chinese_evs_out_of_the_us_actually • C
GM, Ford and Stellantis sold over 6.3 million vehicles in the US last year.
That's roughly 38% of every new vehicle sold in America.
People love shitting on American manufacturers online, but the actual consumer behavior tells a very different story. Americans are still buying millions of GM, Ford, Jeep, Ram, Dodge and Chrysler vehicles every year.
For comparison, the entire US BEV market was only about 1.3 million vehicles last year.
So I'm not sure I buy the argument that exposing Detroit to heavily subsidized Chinese manufacturers and potentially sacrificing domestic volume is somehow automatically going to make them stronger.
There's a massive domestic industry here worth protecting.
The problem isn't protection. The problem is what Detroit does with it.
If tariffs give them time to reduce costs, improve batteries/software and strengthen the domestic supply chain, great.
If they spend ten years selling $70k trucks behind a tariff wall while BYD gets better everywhere else, then yeah, we've got a problem.
sentiment 0.89


Share
About
Pricing
Policies
Markets
API
Info
tz UTC-4
Connect with us
ChartExchange Email
ChartExchange on Discord
ChartExchange on X
ChartExchange on Reddit
ChartExchange on GitHub
ChartExchange on YouTube
© 2020 - 2026 ChartExchange LLC