Create Account
Log In
Dark
chart
exchange
Premium
Terminal
Screener
Stocks
Crypto
Forex
Trends
Depth
Close
Check out our API

CTO
CTO Realty Growth, Inc.
stock NYSE

At Close
Feb 24, 2026 3:59:55 PM EST
19.41USD-1.771%(-0.35)305,204
0.00Bid   0.00Ask   0.00Spread
Pre-market
Feb 20, 2026 9:10:30 AM EST
19.25USD-2.581%(-0.51)0
After-hours
Feb 23, 2026 4:00:30 PM EST
19.76USD-0.051%(-0.01)0
OverviewOption ChainMax PainOptionsPrice & VolumeSplitsDividendsHistoricalExchange VolumeDark Pool LevelsDark Pool PrintsExchangesShort VolumeShort Interest - DailyShort InterestBorrow Fee (CTB)Failure to Deliver (FTD)ShortsTrendsNewsTrends
CTO Reddit Mentions
Subreddits
Limit Labels     

We have sentiment values and mention counts going back to 2017. The complete data set is available via the API.
Take me to the API
CTO Specific Mentions
As of Feb 25, 2026 5:16:33 AM EST (<1 min. ago)
Includes all comments and posts. Mentions per user per ticker capped at one per hour.
11 hr ago • u/breadbedman • r/investing • atlassian_stock_oversold • C
Lots of reasons. But primarily when you’re a large company and you’re the CIO or CTO you want to buy a proven, stable, and secure platform to cover your ass. There are more reasons to buy the “safe choice” than to save a few bucks and go with a smaller competitor or open source or roll-your-own-with-AI alternative.
Nobody ever got fired for buying Salesforce or Atlassian or Microsoft. Because it was the default play.
sentiment 0.72
19 hr ago • u/Alternative-Hat-8628 • r/MVIS • microvision_enhances_financial_position_to • C
Agreed. He's been impressive since the get-go. Anytime he contributed to the earnings calls while still CTO was great; he has the ability to break down the technical into easily understandable terms, and clearly has a strong understanding of the auto industry. Elevating De Vos to CEO feels like a huge step in legitimizing MVIS.
sentiment 0.98
20 hr ago • u/PressureDry1111 • r/stocks • ibm_sinks_as_anthropic_positions_claude_code_as • C
for real. it strikes me that most people are focusing on tech while completely forgetting this crucial human dynamics. " no bank CTO is going to look at a blog post from anthropic and go "yeah let's have the AI rewrite our entire transaction processing system, what could go wrong." --> so true, let's jeopardize a big salary and stock options plan to chase the latest tech trend.
sentiment -0.10
23 hr ago • u/sciencewarrior • r/wallstreetbets • ibm_shares_plummet_13_worst_day_since_2000_after • C
Claude isn't making new software. It is translating software from Cobol to Java. LLMs are actually very good at translation.
Large companies have decades of legacy code in Cobol. It costs a fortune to run it on IBM hardware, and it's almost impossible to find good developers. Projects to convert or rewrite that code used to take years, longer than the average CTO tenure. Now we're talking months. It doesn't matter who you are, "successfully migrated all legacy systems from mainframe, reducing operating costs in 90%" will look great on your resume.
sentiment 0.92
23 hr ago • u/stockist420 • r/stocks • been_digging_into_quantumscapes_board_connections • C
Yeah good call, I was just checking last year and saw your comment so perfect timing. Almost the exact same thing happened Feb 19-21 2025. Same people, same window. CEO sold \~$1.95M, CTO \~$375K, CFO \~$670K, CDO \~$660K, CLO \~$624K. Even Fritz Prinz the co-founder sold $67K. Then another round in early March. So this is almost certainly must be tied to an annual RSU vesting schedule, mid February every year, with 10b5-1 plans set up to auto sell on vest to cover taxes. The bulk selling isn't discretionary. That said two things still stand out to me. One, nobody has cancelled their 10b5-1 plan which is what you'd expect if something was brewing. And two, Straubel's Dec and Jan sells are on a completely different cadence from the vesting schedule. Those are his own separate planned sales and he's been doing them monthly at lower and lower prices.
sentiment 0.74
23 hr ago • u/Material-Macaroon298 • r/wallstreetbets • ibm_shares_plummet_13_worst_day_since_2000_after • C
No one ever gets fired for hiring IBM to maintain and support their legacy systems though.
The procurement officer and CTO might get fired for hiring Claude to do it.
sentiment -0.77
1 day ago • u/Some-Jellyfish-7412 • r/wallstreetbets • are_the_claude_fears_legit_or_extremely_overblown • C
the fact that a single CTO was the barrier between workers and AI job loss sounds more scary to me then nice to see but you're the expert on this one
sentiment -0.31
1 day ago • u/slightlyslappy • r/wallstreetbets • are_the_claude_fears_legit_or_extremely_overblown • C
Yeah none of cobol or your machines are special sorry. Your CTO is probably trying to save his own job for a bit
sentiment 0.78
11 hr ago • u/breadbedman • r/investing • atlassian_stock_oversold • C
Lots of reasons. But primarily when you’re a large company and you’re the CIO or CTO you want to buy a proven, stable, and secure platform to cover your ass. There are more reasons to buy the “safe choice” than to save a few bucks and go with a smaller competitor or open source or roll-your-own-with-AI alternative.
Nobody ever got fired for buying Salesforce or Atlassian or Microsoft. Because it was the default play.
sentiment 0.72
19 hr ago • u/Alternative-Hat-8628 • r/MVIS • microvision_enhances_financial_position_to • C
Agreed. He's been impressive since the get-go. Anytime he contributed to the earnings calls while still CTO was great; he has the ability to break down the technical into easily understandable terms, and clearly has a strong understanding of the auto industry. Elevating De Vos to CEO feels like a huge step in legitimizing MVIS.
sentiment 0.98
20 hr ago • u/PressureDry1111 • r/stocks • ibm_sinks_as_anthropic_positions_claude_code_as • C
for real. it strikes me that most people are focusing on tech while completely forgetting this crucial human dynamics. " no bank CTO is going to look at a blog post from anthropic and go "yeah let's have the AI rewrite our entire transaction processing system, what could go wrong." --> so true, let's jeopardize a big salary and stock options plan to chase the latest tech trend.
sentiment -0.10
23 hr ago • u/sciencewarrior • r/wallstreetbets • ibm_shares_plummet_13_worst_day_since_2000_after • C
Claude isn't making new software. It is translating software from Cobol to Java. LLMs are actually very good at translation.
Large companies have decades of legacy code in Cobol. It costs a fortune to run it on IBM hardware, and it's almost impossible to find good developers. Projects to convert or rewrite that code used to take years, longer than the average CTO tenure. Now we're talking months. It doesn't matter who you are, "successfully migrated all legacy systems from mainframe, reducing operating costs in 90%" will look great on your resume.
sentiment 0.92
23 hr ago • u/stockist420 • r/stocks • been_digging_into_quantumscapes_board_connections • C
Yeah good call, I was just checking last year and saw your comment so perfect timing. Almost the exact same thing happened Feb 19-21 2025. Same people, same window. CEO sold \~$1.95M, CTO \~$375K, CFO \~$670K, CDO \~$660K, CLO \~$624K. Even Fritz Prinz the co-founder sold $67K. Then another round in early March. So this is almost certainly must be tied to an annual RSU vesting schedule, mid February every year, with 10b5-1 plans set up to auto sell on vest to cover taxes. The bulk selling isn't discretionary. That said two things still stand out to me. One, nobody has cancelled their 10b5-1 plan which is what you'd expect if something was brewing. And two, Straubel's Dec and Jan sells are on a completely different cadence from the vesting schedule. Those are his own separate planned sales and he's been doing them monthly at lower and lower prices.
sentiment 0.74
23 hr ago • u/Material-Macaroon298 • r/wallstreetbets • ibm_shares_plummet_13_worst_day_since_2000_after • C
No one ever gets fired for hiring IBM to maintain and support their legacy systems though.
The procurement officer and CTO might get fired for hiring Claude to do it.
sentiment -0.77
1 day ago • u/Some-Jellyfish-7412 • r/wallstreetbets • are_the_claude_fears_legit_or_extremely_overblown • C
the fact that a single CTO was the barrier between workers and AI job loss sounds more scary to me then nice to see but you're the expert on this one
sentiment -0.31
1 day ago • u/slightlyslappy • r/wallstreetbets • are_the_claude_fears_legit_or_extremely_overblown • C
Yeah none of cobol or your machines are special sorry. Your CTO is probably trying to save his own job for a bit
sentiment 0.78
1 day ago • u/ifdisdendat • r/StockMarket • ibm_3rd_biggest_crash_this_century_2nd_was_covid • C
Mainframe is more than COBOL. It’s a crazy ass system that lets you change a CPU while running with no downtime. Vmware was supposed to kill it, The Cloud was supposed to kill it, distributed computing was supposed to kill it. The reality is that no CTO will risk their careers trying to replace a system that runs millions of transactions (like chase ATMs backend) with some servers running python code generated by a LLM - as good as it is. People forget about the constraints of production. You still need human to vouch for your code and take responsibility. Anyways talk is cheap but real world production is a a b****.
sentiment -0.88
1 day ago • u/Advanced_Design_3141 • r/MVIS • after_hours_trading_action_monday_february_23_2026 • C
Saw this on the Foretellix site and it’s almost a year old but don’t remember seeing it before so just sharing it here:
https://www.foretellix.com/foretellix-glen-devos-interview/
Team Foretellix
03/11/2025
Interview with Glen De Vos – Foretellix’s Newest Board Member
You’re joining our board as Temasek’s representative, what about our technology, team, and vision excites you?
What excites me about working with the Foretellix team is that they are offering a comprehensive solution to a critical issue that OEM’s and Tier 1’s are facing during the development of Level 2++, 3 and 4 advanced mobility systems. Namely, the move from a patchwork of tools and an “island of automation” approach to a fully integrated tool chain that is able to much more effectively leverage virtual development as well as seamlessly integrate each step in the system development process.
You’ve led innovation in the automotive world for decades. What’s one lesson from your time as CTO that you think will be especially valuable on the journey toward safe, scalable autonomy?
It may sound basic, but it’s the importance of discipline in the execution of the system development process – what we often refer to as the “System V”. From requirements gathering, analysis and allocation to development, to component and system validation; the ability to complete and verify each step is critical to a successful outcome. The challenge, however, is always time and resources … the clock is running, deliverable deadlines are on top of you. That’s why Foretellix’s solution is so compelling for me – as an integrated tool chain with its powerful simulation capabilities, it not only makes the development process much more efficient it also makes it much more effective at each step and is well positioned for AV companies transitioning to Physical AI. This is absolutely required to deliver these highly complex autonomous solutions.
From your vantage point, what must the industry get right to unlock mass deployment of autonomous vehicles?
I believe there are several key points that will need to be addressed.
The first relates to system training and validation testing coverage – driving is incredibly complex and traditional methods simply haven’t been able to account for all corner cases. The approach of simply driving millions of miles won’t get us there – especially when you begin to factor in weather and other variables. This will significantly limit the achievable ODD’s and scale of deployment.
The second is cost – both development cost and system cost (on the vehicle). The current approach has seen many billions spent on development with relatively limited deployment. Additionally, the cost of these systems has meant that for personal owned vehicles, Level 3 systems have only achieved a very small volume – they are still a premium option on a premium vehicle from a premium OEM. The situation with commercial autonomy isn’t much (if at all) better with significant on-costs to enable the autonomous operation … meaning that the commercial viability of autonomous mobility is years away.
There’s been a lot of promise around AVs, but also a fair amount of setbacks. Where do you see the biggest gap between expectation and reality, and how can a company like Foretellix help close that gap?
If you think about the current barriers (reference the prior question), Foretellix directly addresses all of these issues. Foretellix’s tool chain increases coverage of training data, simulation scenarios, and virtual validation which both accelerates the development of the system while also significantly reducing the development time and cost. This enables the developer to deploy the feature or vehicle with much greater confidence in its performance capability and quality.
Looking five years ahead, what will separate the winners from the rest in autonomous driving, and what role do you envision Foretellix playing in that future?
One of the key differentiators for the winners is they will be able to deliver safe Physical AI and have the right balance and integration between virtual development and real-world physical testing. That is where Foretellix is a key enabler – they bring the real-world and the virtual world together in a seamlessly integrated tool chain and that is the future of automated mobility system development.
About Glen De Vos
Mr. De Vos has over 30 years of senior leadership experience in automotive and industrial technology sectors, particularly around autonomy and mobility. In his career he has held a number of leadership roles at Aptiv and its predecessor Delphi Automotive. Positions included Chief Technology Officer and President of the Advanced Safety and User Experience business unit. He currently serves as the CEO of MicroVision, Inc.
Mr. De Vos holds degrees in Mechanical Engineering and Business Administration from Calvin University, University of Michigan, and Ball State University.
Mr. De Vos is joining the Foretellix Board of Directors as a representative of Temasek.
sentiment 1.00
1 day ago • u/JohnPaulDavyJones • r/wallstreetbets • are_the_claude_fears_legit_or_extremely_overblown • C
Not to mention buying the newest Z-series machines.
We spent $22mm on those cabs in 2024 just so they can run our overnight transaction batch processing. We have PMs who wanted to see what we could have AI do with that, and our CTO gave them the “Get the fuck away from our core processes”. So nice to see.
sentiment 0.03
1 day ago • u/azjunglist05 • r/wallstreetbets • are_the_claude_fears_legit_or_extremely_overblown • C
This. Who gives a fuck what CTOs think. Tell me what the CEOs and CFOs think. Once these things can actually replace and do the work of an FTE software engineer they will start forcing the CTO to layoff their workers
sentiment -0.54


Share
About
Pricing
Policies
Markets
API
Info
tz UTC-5
Connect with us
ChartExchange Email
ChartExchange on Discord
ChartExchange on X
ChartExchange on Reddit
ChartExchange on GitHub
ChartExchange on YouTube
© 2020 - 2026 ChartExchange LLC