Create Account
Log In
Dark
chart
exchange
Premium
Terminal
Screener
Stocks
Crypto
Forex
Trends
Depth
Close
Check out our Level2View

CAG
Conagra Brands, Inc.
stock NYSE

At Close
Jul 11, 2025 3:59:59 PM EDT
19.37USD-0.616%(-0.12)20,159,777
0.00Bid   0.00Ask   0.00Spread
Pre-market
Jul 11, 2025 9:24:30 AM EDT
19.44USD-0.257%(-0.05)12,620
After-hours
Jul 11, 2025 4:55:30 PM EDT
19.48USD+0.568%(+0.11)43,800
OverviewOption ChainMax PainOptionsPrice & VolumeDividendsHistoricalExchange VolumeDark Pool LevelsDark Pool PrintsExchangesShort VolumeShort Interest - DailyShort InterestBorrow Fee (CTB)Failure to Deliver (FTD)ShortsTrendsNewsTrends
CAG Reddit Mentions
Subreddits
Limit Labels     

We have sentiment values and mention counts going back to 2017. The complete data set is available via the API.
Take me to the API
CAG Specific Mentions
As of Jul 13, 2025 4:14:07 PM EDT (<1 min. ago)
Includes all comments and posts. Mentions per user per ticker capped at one per hour.
2 days ago • u/Shot-Beautiful-6160 • r/investing_discussion • zacks_research_wizard_discussion • C
I started in Q1 but the market was too crazy to draw any conclusions. But I began by looking at nearly every screen (40+) going way back. I also look at performance during Q2 which I weigh heavier than previous years. From that I took New Highs, TA FA Winners and Value Method1 and modified them for better results.
TA FA Winners I changed to the top 4 and only took USA stocks. Normal theoretical CAG for Q2 is 215, but modified I get 563. I have made money on this one and continue to run it, with actual CAG above 100. Running this since 4/11/
New Highs I took USA stocks and changed the last line to include I20, which is one week. It has performed very well but I am cautious of it since tests in 2023 and 2024 were not so hot. If it underperforms for a few weeks I may dump it. The last couple of weeks the standard New Highs has outperformed it. Actual CAG has been 200+ which is incredible. Running this since 5/23. I was running the standard New Highs before this.
I took Value Method 1 which seems to be the one they recommend. For Q2 the theoretical CAG is 244. I modified it to have a 1019 CAG with less drawdown. Modification include changing to US stocks (I'm biased), changing the Zacks Rank to 1, and narrowing it down to 4 stocks by taking the bottom 4 in Price/Sales. I just started testing it a week and half ago but as mentioned earlier I am down about 4%. I only put $1K in to test it.
I just started a new test this week on a variation of Small Anomaly. Theoretical for Q2 was a CAG of 673 (drawdown of -3) for the stock version (which is the highest standard screen for Q2) My modified version shows an incredible 1503, although the drawdown is -8.7. I just started testing this one on paper this week.
So bottom line I have made money on TA FA and New Highs, and awaiting results from Value Method and Small Anomaly.
As you probably have guessed, I spend a lot of time on this (too much?) but I am really encourage with the results I have seen in Q2.
Keep me posted on your results! Good luck!
sentiment 0.99
2 days ago • u/Shot-Beautiful-6160 • r/investing_discussion • zacks_research_wizard_discussion • C
I started in Q1 but the market was too crazy to draw any conclusions. But I began by looking at nearly every screen (40+) going way back. I also look at performance during Q2 which I weigh heavier than previous years. From that I took New Highs, TA FA Winners and Value Method1 and modified them for better results.
TA FA Winners I changed to the top 4 and only took USA stocks. Normal theoretical CAG for Q2 is 215, but modified I get 563. I have made money on this one and continue to run it, with actual CAG above 100. Running this since 4/11/
New Highs I took USA stocks and changed the last line to include I20, which is one week. It has performed very well but I am cautious of it since tests in 2023 and 2024 were not so hot. If it underperforms for a few weeks I may dump it. The last couple of weeks the standard New Highs has outperformed it. Actual CAG has been 200+ which is incredible. Running this since 5/23. I was running the standard New Highs before this.
I took Value Method 1 which seems to be the one they recommend. For Q2 the theoretical CAG is 244. I modified it to have a 1019 CAG with less drawdown. Modification include changing to US stocks (I'm biased), changing the Zacks Rank to 1, and narrowing it down to 4 stocks by taking the bottom 4 in Price/Sales. I just started testing it a week and half ago but as mentioned earlier I am down about 4%. I only put $1K in to test it.
I just started a new test this week on a variation of Small Anomaly. Theoretical for Q2 was a CAG of 673 (drawdown of -3) for the stock version (which is the highest standard screen for Q2) My modified version shows an incredible 1503, although the drawdown is -8.7. I just started testing this one on paper this week.
So bottom line I have made money on TA FA and New Highs, and awaiting results from Value Method and Small Anomaly.
As you probably have guessed, I spend a lot of time on this (too much?) but I am really encourage with the results I have seen in Q2.
Keep me posted on your results! Good luck!
sentiment 0.99


Share
About
Pricing
Policies
Markets
API
Info
tz UTC-4
Connect with us
ChartExchange Email
ChartExchange on Discord
ChartExchange on X
ChartExchange on Reddit
ChartExchange on GitHub
ChartExchange on YouTube
© 2020 - 2025 ChartExchange LLC