Z
Zillow Group, Inc. Class C Capital Stock
stock NASDAQ

I always thought it was a older Gen Z/Millenial product? It was popular back in 2012-2018 with teens and young adults.
I guess it’s good if younger people are using it more.

As a 32 year old millenial I’ve gotta say Gen Z is really *not* that bad at all and a lot of the “cool kid” millennials have aged very poorly.
Like idk maybe the people I know in their early/mid 20s are just particularly not retarded but I think the kids are relatively ok folks
Friend I had in college who got laid more than anyone I know has Machine Gun Kelly tattoos and had dreads as white guy from upstate NY. How do you think that guy is doing today

A woman? In charge of money? Trump really wants to lose his Gen Z supporters.

Z.B. bei der BKK SKD werden die Kosten einmal im Jahr für die PZR zu 100% übernommen. Ob ich nur für die PZR eine Zusatzversicherung abschließen würde? Vermutlich eher nicht. Ist aber wie immer ein Rechenexempel.

No that’s Gen Z. Social media has affected them in a similar way lead paint affected boomers.

No Gen Z and Millennials contribute to 401k for Boomers retirement

Boomers contribute 401k for retirement
Gen Z and Millennials contribute 401k for war

Es ist einfach nicht akzeptabel das Kapital bis zu 2 Tage nicht verfügbar ist, selbst mit Einbezug von SC Credit. Je nachdem wie die Situation ist. Z. B. Silber Short oder als Roaring Kitty ein Bild gepostet hattet, waren Situationen in dem man extrem schnell sein Kapital umschichten musste um Rendite zu generieren.
Edit: bei allen anderen Brokern die ich verwende ist das Kapital innerhalb von 1 Minute für neue trades oder abhebungen verfügbar.

Nicht wirklich. Eine Übergewinnbesteuerung ist ein ordnungspolitischer Eingriff in die Marktwirtschaft, aber weder Planwirtschaft (Staat besitzt Produktionsmittel und bestimmt Produktion, Preise und Verteilung zentral) noch Kommunismus (Vergesellschaftung von Privateigentum).
Klar gibt es Leute, für die sämtliche Steuern Kommunismus oder Planwirtschaft sind, aber abgesehen davon ist es lediglich ein steuerpolitischer Eingriff innerhalb der Marktwirtschaft.
Gibt ja genügend andere Beispiele, in denen der Staat (steuer)politisch in Angebot und Nachfrage eingreift. Z.B. Sondersteuern auf Alkohol, Tabak, Alkopops, Kaffee etc. Oder umgekehrt über ermäßigte Mehrwertsteuersätze auf "Grundnahrungsmittel". Oder abseits von Steuerpolitik z.B. auch Werbeverbote für z.B. Tabak oder Glücksspiel. Oder auch Rechte von Arbeitnehmern, wie z.B. Kündigungsschutz.
Wir haben in Deutschland eben eine Soziale Marktwirtschaft und keinen Anarchokapitalismus. Staatliche Eingriffe in den freien Wettbewerb sind dort ganz grundsätzlich erlaubt und vorgesehen. Wenn überhaupt würde ich behaupten verliert das Soziale in Sozialer Marktwirtschaft zunehmend an Gewicht und nicht die Marktwirtschaft.

To add to this, you also have what I'd call the "death of the modern day sports superstar". In the 90s and early 00s, most sports had 1 or 2 people that completely transcended their sport and were global household names. i.e Tiger for golf, Agassi/Sampras/Williams sisters/Federer/Nadal for tennis, MJ/LeBron for basketball, Lance for cycling, Ronaldo/Beckham/Ronaldo/Messi for football/soccer, Schumacher for F1 andf so on. Not all of these were with Nike granted, but you get the idea. These days there is way more competition for eyeballs with the younger generations, and generally lower interest in watching sports amongst gen Z and young millenials One example is how the advent of socia media 'superstars' can crowd out the huge marketing draw that sports people may have previosuly had. I cant think of many/any modern day sports stars that have the same name recognition as those mentioned above.

All this is to say that its harder for for companies like Nike that previosuly relied on marque names to drive market penetration. The fact that Nike are still so relient on the Jordan line highlights this. Not sure where they go next but I could see the stock halving at least once more by the end of the decade.

The accounting reply
When you inherit, your assets get a step up in basis. Say worth $4000 at time. Later you sell for $6500. You have a gain of $2500. You must pay ordinary income tax on that $2500 up to 28%. But that amount is less than $700 since 28% the marginal rate. First $X is taxed at 0%, next $Y at 10%, next $Z at 12%, etc
The more of a paper trail back to you the greater the risk.
As with lots of things with taxes, best to think before you act. One you take your action you paint yourself into a corner. The amounts here are trivial, but you do that with real estate or companies you might face five or six figure consequences!

The pressure chamber in Dragon Ball Z. Can we just have fun things without having to support the Epstein class?

And even when all that infrastructure is fixed, we may now have to live with whatever is in the new "Iran-Oman Hormuz protocol". Maybe it will just be tolls on these products, or even limits. Any tolls will ultimately be used to rebuild Iran. But that will create some type of global drag, however small. Its uncertain.
I've been bearish lately due to the AI bubble, and hedged against it recently (before this war). This is the type of event that could constrain capital markets and trigger other systematic issues. We don't know what will come of this and we don't know when we are out of the woods. I don't think it will be easy to apply any general patterns here, such as "people feel X so Y will happen" or "the war did this so Z will be worth this". Its messy, and murky and as uncertain as a TruthSocial post

Und falsche unpolitische Anreize. Man konnte z.B. auch darauf wetten ob Waldbrand X bis Zeitpunkt Y Gebiete Z erreicht.

Never. They're on a terminal decline and loosing relevance to more desirable sports brands that produce better quality gear. Gen Z have little interest in Nike, even with 90s fashion making a comeback.

Es geht nicht nach Generationen. Jeder der Volljährig ist kann heiraten. Das können Boomer sein oder auch Gen Z. Es stellt keine Diskriminierung aufgrund des Alters dar, weil es eine Stichtag Regelung ist.

Dann überlege dir mal wie die früher gelebt haben. Z.b. war Elektronik damals viel teurer. Ein Farbfernseher war da was richtig besonderes. Da gab es Kinder die durften den Fernseher nicht an machen wenn die Eltern nicht da waren. Da hatte men so ein Gerät für fast 10 Jahre. Man kann das nicht so vereinfachen wie es hier viele meinen. Es ist immer leichter auf andere zu schimpfen als auf sich selbst zu schauen. 🤷

I’m a Xennial l, but they don’t recognize that generation. In my opinion the millennial generation is far too large and Xennials should be recognized. But I digress. I am 45, have a 21 year old daughter and 18 year old son that is Gen Z. As well as two mor that are Gen Alpha as the cutoff is 2013 for Gen Z. So totally possible, just not a lot of people have kids young. I chose to because I was taught family is the most important thing in life. So I figured that I would try to spend the most amount of time possible surrounded by my family.

I thought most Gen Z have Gen X parents? I know I do, but I’m 25 so a bit on the older side of the generation. So many millennials are having kids past the age of 30 that what you’re saying sounds basically impossible.
Also, Millennials are getting significant wealth transferred to them via their Baby Boomer parents. So it makes sense from that perspective.

dragon no balls gen Z?