Z
Zillow Group, Inc. Class C Capital Stock
stock NASDAQ

Das ist trotzdem keine Blase.
Die erste "Blase" war ja z.b. die Tulpenblase. Dort hat man dann Tulpen Knospen/Samendinger (keine Ahnung wie die heien) ohne sinn und verstand produziert obwohl es keine Abnehmer gab die damit irgendwas gemacht haben.
Die Chip Industrie ist keine Blase. Die Chips werden verwendet. Die Nachfrage ist gigantisch hoch.
Vielleicht kann man sich darüber streiten ob es im KI Sektor selbst eine Blase gibt. Meiner Meinung nach nicht weil selbst da werden Ergebnisse erzeugt, zwar auf Pump durch Investoren aber da kommen knallharte Ergebnisse raus, Z.b. Sora 2 Meme Videos.
Aber im Chip Sektor ist das eine valide über Nachfrage nach einem zu geringen Angebot.

I went back and read your 104 trades. Its a common issue as an artist to have a creation not resonate with viewers/readers, and blame them instead of question8ng your own abilities. I dont think your post was buried because the audience has bad taste, but rather because you did a poor job on delivery interesting content. So, its not that your information wasn't interesting, its that you did a bad job writing.
So, here are some specifics. The formatting post screamed ChatGPT, and people are good at identifying that. Its not bad but its written to be "scannable." Interesting posts arent lists of data or conclusions; they're stories. Like, you could have said "I was doing my monthly reviews and wasn't profitable despite having a 1.6 profit factor in backtests, so I dig in to find out why." That sets up the issues at stake and the goal. You could continue, "my strategy requires X, Y, and Z so my first thought was to adjust those and see what would have happened." People are following along and have assumptions. Every problem you propose, they're trying to resolve, so meet them at their conclusions, but then throw them a wrench. "Every adjustment I made to the entry and exit parameters would have been less profitable, as you can see in these histograms of both win rates, sortino, and RR. So, why was it unprofitable?!" Follow your thought process and explain why you decided to look at the volatility, and the struggles you encountered along the way. Thats the interesting teachable thing.
No one gives a shit about your trading but if you didn't know why you lost money and figured it out, they'll care about your journey. You didn't present that. You said, "here's my results. Most people here dont do this process." Does that make sense? The assumptions in your post were not only that you are better at trading than most people, but that you are better at trading than the people who are reading your post. And you did so in a post that showed you lost money. You in essence went to a trading convention, got up to the mic, said "I lost money last quarter, but I know why, so Im a better trader than all of you." That may not have been your intent but its what you said. If your intent isn't conveyed in your writing, or interpreted by your audience, you did a bad job writing. Look up Lens Theory. Its the idea that the audience has a lens they see the world through - a set of perspectives and assumptions - and that its your job to change your wording and approach in a way that is understood by that lens.

Schon ein bisschen traurig, wenn junge kinderlose Menschen nicht mehr voll arbeiten können wegen dem Haushalt 😂
Gen Z?

$LULU is back to levels last seen in 2018.
The reasons: Consumer behaviour and preferences change fast. It is hard to forecast these in the long run. The growth slowed down, and Lululemon pants are not the preferred choice amongst Gen Z.
At the same time, the stock was way too expensive, trading most of the time at a P/E ratio >40 in recent years.
While the stock seems cheap right now, I would not see this as a long-term investment but rather a trade, if at all.
A better way is to invest in companies that have an actual moat. Think $GOOG $AMZN $ASML. Given the recent price jumps in $GOOG and $ASML, only $AMZN is interesting right now.
What is your perspective on Lululemon? Do you believe they can come back, or were they a one-trick pony?

didnt know Jay Z was in the new season of stranger things

Ich bin mir nicht sicher ob du meinen Punkt richtig verstehst. Die Daten von dir sind schon lange bekannt! Der Roboter filmt auch nur die Bilder die dein Handy oder Laptop oder die VR Brille schon 100x gefilmt haben, und wo wir gesichert wissen, dass sie weiterverarbeitet werden. Z.B. die Wohnungseinrichtung vorher gegoogled, bei Amazon gekauft, und mit Paypal bezahlt... was also soll der Robotet schicken, was nicht bekannt ist? Selbst Adresse und somit ungefähre Wohnfläche, spzialer Status, evtl Auto vor der Tür... alles ohne Sauger.
Darauf ist das "mehr" bezogen. Er kann nicht mehr sammeln als eh schon bekannt. Du hast mit deinem Handy ein viel schlimmeres Gerät immer bei dir.
Der Punkt an dem du angeblich Kontrolle über deine Daten hast ist schon lange überschritten und nicht mehr umkehrbar.
Dass du versuchst die Datenflut einzudämmen ist zwar löblich, aber ein Kampf gegen Windmühlen, den du schon lange verloren hast, es aber wohl noch nicht akzeptierst.
Unzählige Gerichte haben schon bestätigt, dass die Daten nicht dir gehören, sondern dem der sie erhebt.
Falls du jetzt alle Datensammler aus deinem leben verbannen willst, musst du wirklich in einer Höhle wohnen

The fact you're still parroting that is insane. Is it really so hard to understand that you compare dollars invested to Z security at X time to the same amount of dollars invested in Y security at X time?
10k invested in NVDA in 2008 + 174K invested in NVDA in 2020 >>>>>>> 10k invested in QQQ in 2008 + 174K invested in QQQ in 2020. 
You can do the math yourself if you don't believe me. The dates don't even matter, as long as the dates the assets were purchased were the same between the two comparisons. Maybe you can find an exact scenario where a DCA into QQQ at multiple dates out performs NVDA DCA at the same dates but given NVDAs beta is over 2, NVDA is the best performing tech stock and the ETF now ties 10% of itself to NVDA, I'm going to say you cannot. 
Did he earn enough risk adjusted return to make it worth over a large sample size? No idea. We don't know his port size, his other trades, his port beta, or anything else really. If you wanted to have a risk adjusted rate of return conversation you could, but that's a different conversation. The point stands that what you said about underperforming the market is 100% wrong. 

Bitcoin is going through a phase where ownership is being transferred from the old guard to the new guard... And the new guard are the big fish - governments, central banks, institutions, old money. They don't care about cycles and theories, they just know to accumulate when they have funds available.
People who think Bitcoin will fall to $X just because X is Y% of Z and that's what happened in the past, may be in for a rude surprise.

Crypto-as-a-Service and Gen Z

Ich lebe in einer Stadt, in der sich eine Kunstakademie befindet. Ein Studium, Ausnahmen wie Löwentraut bestätigen die Regel, ist hauptsächlich da, um Kontakte zu knüpfen, auftreten zu üben. Talent ist nicht so wichtig, Glück und das richtige Netzwerk (vor allem Galerien, Ausstellungsmöglichkeiten) sind ausschlaggebend. Der Kunstmarkt ist ein Scam.
Ich kenne mehrere talentierte Künstler, die als Dozenten an VHS oder freien Kunstschulen, oder privaten Unterricht versuchen über die Runden zu kommen (trotz geförderter Wohnateliers). Ich kenne zwei persönlich, die sich von dem Partner durchfüttern lassen. Eine hat im Quereinstieg ein Plätzchen i. Lehrbetrieb gefunden. Ich kenne Filmhochschulabsolventen, die in der Gastronomie arbeiten. Und viele, die sich als Freelancer von Auftrag zu Auftrag hangeln. Z.B. die Dozentin meines Goldschmiedekursus, Goldschmiedemeisterin, dann Studium mit Schwerpunkt Theater/Film. Befristeter Vertrag als Bühnenbildnerin für 2 Jahre. Ansonsten hangelt sie sich mit einzelnen Aufträgen, geförderten Einzelprojekten und Dozententätigkeit durchs Leben. 
Es gibt einen Grund, dass sowohl die Krankenversicherung und die Rentenabsicherung über die Künstlersozialkasse durch Steuergelder gesichert werden müssen. 
Aber Social Media hat schon den einen oder anderdn Shootingstar hervorgebracht. Viel Glück.

* Kannst du mit dem Vorbesitzer vielleicht einen anderen Deal aushandeln als eine einmalige Ablöse? Z. B. 5% des Umsatzes für X Jahre, oder 50% des Gewinns für X Jahre? Damit würdest du dein Risiko minimieren.
* Denkst du, dass der Inhaber es schaffen würde, das Unternehmen jemand anderem für 250.000 zu verkaufen, wenn du es nicht kaufst? Bzw. denkst du, jemand anderer wäre bereit, 250.000 dafür zu zahlen?

So here is the question that makes this whole explanation (that I understood beforehand) ...not a one.
If the ip scanning from monerod connections was used to trace each stealth address in a ring CT to the particular ip address scanned, and then try to find same ip address in other ring ct-s to more or less limit possible trace deviation to the ring size, then when we make this ring CT sized same as the whole size of the block chain, what exactly can they trace? FCMP would just localize each transaction to ... ip address...OK. BUT( a major one)- not seen what is inside that transaction, not seen who to was it intended, not seen anything else besides transaction number (single used figure) , date and ip.
What does this info say?
Someone transferred something with transfer ID Y, to anyone within same network, on particular date...
Old method was saying -
Someone with the stealth address X which is one of 16 other Xs, and IP address , with transfer ID Y transferred something , to someone with stealth address Z, out of two possible Z addresses of same network but unknown place and IP, on particular date...
Or maybe we are getting FCMP wrong?

Ctrl+Z Not working on my brokerage website

Lol your random price target and evaluation, serves 0 purpose rite now at 213. Gen Z?

Have you used an AI to do complex engineering tasks?
I'm currently in the middle of using an AI to made code changes across hundreds of files in a giant codebase. Given very clear instructions and guardrails (there's a second AI pass, with a different prompt, to review the diffs and ensure that they comply with the instructions I gave in the first pass), the AI can do this effectively with a very low mistake rate.
But I can't just say "Hey AI, do this thing across all files that need it". I have to provide very clear instructions, a list of things to double check, and specific examples of "This example is good because Y" and "This example should be rejected because Z" to guide the validator.
That's all prompt engineering. Sure, yeah, if you just want the AI to explain something to you, it doesn't require any special effort, but using it for very complex high level tasks does require quite a bit of care.

Gen Z is actually cooked

Hey google! What the fuck. Z

Z SCALER DROPPING 12% AFTER EARNINGS IS A JOKE. OBVIOUS BUY

Atossa Therapeutics
$50m cash enough for 12+ months
No dilution all warrants expired 9/2025
No dilution during 2025
Upcoming Catalysts
* **FDA Meeting Minutes & Regulatory Pathway Update (December 2025):** Atossa expects to receive and announce the official meeting minutes from its November 2025 Type C meeting with the FDA to discuss an accelerated regulatory strategy for low-dose (Z)-endoxifen for breast cancer risk reduction. The outcome could materially shorten development timelines.
* **Investigational New Drug (IND) Filing (Q4 2025):** The company is targeting the submission of an IND application to the FDA for a new Phase 2 dose-ranging study of (Z)-endoxifen monotherapy in women with metastatic breast cancer (mBC).
* **Patient Enrollment in mBC Study (Following IND in Q4 2025):** Patient enrollment in the planned global Phase 2 mBC study is expected to begin shortly after the IND filing is accepted.
* **Topline Data from mBC Study (Anticipated 2026):** Topline results from the metastatic breast cancer study are anticipated in 2026. This study is designed to inform a subsequent Phase 3 trial.
* **NDA-Enabling Activities (Throughout 2026):** Atossa is concentrating its resources on activities that support the filing of a New Drug Application (NDA) for (Z)-endoxifen across various breast cancer indications.
* **Progress in Ongoing Phase 2 Trials:** The company will continue to advance and generate data from its ongoing Phase 2 trials, including the streamlined EVANGELINE study for early-stage breast cancer and the RECAST™ platform trial for DCIS
Daily RSI/MACD curling
Lets see if those .74s based last week
hold .77s for move thru .82 this week.

Swinging into Dec 9-12th presentation

Yes, Goku shouldn’t have gone past the 2x kaioken when fighting vegeta which caused him serious bodily issues during the fight, especially after the beam struggle. He looked jacked but his muscles were being torn up.
Vegeta would’ve won if he saw Goku in pain after the Kaioken. Luckily for Goku, vegeta transformed blindly and was cut by Yajirobe, and then jumped by the Z fighters.