Create Account
Log In
Dark
chart
exchange
Premium
Terminal
Screener
Stocks
Crypto
Forex
Trends
Depth
Close
Check out our Level2View

Z
Zillow Group, Inc. Class C Capital Stock
stock NASDAQ

Market Open
Apr 7, 2026 12:06:10 PM EDT
41.03USD-1.501%(-0.62)809,502
40.95Bid   41.07Ask   0.12Spread
Pre-market
Apr 7, 2026 8:20:30 AM EDT
41.76USD+0.264%(+0.11)300
After-hours
Apr 6, 2026 4:00:30 PM EDT
41.65USD+0.036%(+0.02)0
OverviewOption ChainMax PainOptionsHistoricalExchange VolumeDark Pool LevelsDark Pool PrintsExchangesShort VolumeShort Interest - DailyShort InterestBorrow Fee (CTB)Failure to Deliver (FTD)ShortsTrendsNewsTrends
Z Reddit Mentions
Subreddits
Limit Labels     

We have sentiment values and mention counts going back to 2017. The complete data set is available via the API.
Take me to the API
Z Specific Mentions
As of Apr 7, 2026 11:58:43 AM EDT (8 minutes ago)
Includes all comments and posts. Mentions per user per ticker capped at one per hour.
1 hr ago • u/hairytreefarmer • r/ValueInvesting • duol_hims_nke_and_pypl_are_all_down_7585_from • C
Nike are really struggling from increased competition compared to 10-15 years ago, and the "death of the modern day sports superstar". In the 90s and early 00s, most sports had 1 or 2 people that completely transcended their sport and were global household names. i.e Tiger for golf, Agassi/Sampras/Williams sisters/Federer/Nadal for tennis, MJ/LeBron for basketball, Lance for cycling, Ronaldo/Beckham/Ronaldo/Messi for football/soccer, Schumacher for F1 and so on. Not all of these were with Nike granted, but you get the idea. These days there is way more competition for eyeballs with the younger generations, and generally lower interest in watching sports amongst gen Z and young millenials. One example is how the advent of socia media 'superstars' can crowd out the huge marketing draw that sports people may have previosuly had. I cant think of many/any modern day sports stars that have the same name recognition as those mentioned above.

All this is to say that its harder for for companies like Nike that previosuly relied on marque names to drive market penetration. The fact that Nike are still so relient on the Jordan line highlights this. Not sure where they go next but I could see the stock halving at least once more by the end of the decade.
sentiment 0.56
1 hr ago • u/DudeWithTudeNotRude • r/investingforbeginners • how_do_you_actually_handle_the_emotional_side_of • C
Start a plan, then stick to the plan.
The plan for buying is usually "Buy X" or "Buy X, Y, Z", and then "Chill" (i.e. "don't panic sell")
You don't "buy the dip", you buy every two weeks when you get paid, or whatever the plan is. Probably you'll get lots of dips and spikes. Much of that is noise. Much of that isn't noise. You probably won't know the difference. That's why the plan is "Buy.....then chill", bc you don't have the signal for where prices are going to go (i.e. you lack future-sight, even if you have graphs of past performance).
Selling is hard. Hire a flat-fee fiduciary maybe 10-15 years before selling/retiring, to help create a plan that is robust to selling in a downturn.
then stick to the plan.
for now, just buy.
sentiment 0.85
1 hr ago • u/CryOk7998 • r/CryptoMarkets • selling_db4_usdt_z • T
Selling DB4 USDT Z
sentiment 0.00
1 hr ago • u/jarkon-anderslammer • r/wallstreetbets • daily_discussion_thread_for_april_07_2026 • C
You have a naive view of the world and it is beautiful. Person 3 (or even Harris after a legit primary) would not lose to Gen Z men by 16%.
sentiment 0.62
3 hr ago • u/jarkon-anderslammer • r/StockMarket • dump_it • C
But, I mean, it was a minimal effort thing to just talk to Joe Rogan.
Would also be nice if they could have a primary for once in 12 years instead of anointing and funding the candidate HRC wants.
Then again, you couldn't stop the wave of Gen Z boys who wanted to say the R word freely.
sentiment 0.87
3 hr ago • u/Imzadi76 • r/Finanzen • trotz_hervorragender_schufa_alles_abgelehnt_ob • C
Das Problem könnte sein, dass dein Namen auf einer Terrorliste steht. Z.b. nehmen Arbeitgeber automatische Prüfungen gegen diese Liste mit den Mitarbeiterdaten vor. Dies auch auch bei Banken der Fall.
sentiment -0.40
5 hr ago • u/PreparedForZombies • r/stocks • now_i_know_why_everyone_is_furious_that_markets • C
But we are talking a younger age group... they very much have experienced crypto.
​Key Statistics for Investors Under 30
​The "Crossover" Majority: Approximately 65% to 67% of Gen Z investors (ages 18–29) who own traditional stocks also own or plan to purchase cryptocurrency within the next 12 months.
​Adoption Rates: Recent 2025 data from YouGov shows that 65% of Gen Z investors plan to invest in crypto specifically, despite many of them (84%) acknowledging it as a high-risk asset.
​Portfolio Weight: Younger investors are more likely to be "crypto-heavy." Reports from early 2026 suggest that 35% of Gen Z crypto investors allocate more than half of their total investment portfolio to digital assets.
The FINRA Foundation’s most recent analysis of the National Financial Capability Study highlights a massive lean toward digital assets among young "active" investors... More than 50% of investors under 35 (including both Gen Z and younger Millennials) are currently invested in cryptocurrencies.
​
​Schwab’s latest survey takes a broad look at how different generations view their portfolios - nearly half (approx. 48-50%) of all American investors—regardless of age—have owned or currently own crypto. However, for the Gen Z cohort, this interest is significantly higher.
​
​Very recent data from early 2026 - according to OANDA, nearly 50% of 18–24-year-olds have traded some form of investable asset (stocks, options, or crypto) in the last 12 months.
sentiment 0.96
6 hr ago • u/Left-Technology-8705 • r/quant • april_2026_jane_street_puzzle • C
Ok Rahid Z.
sentiment 0.30
9 hr ago • u/pg3crypto • r/BitcoinMarkets • daily_discussion_monday_april_06_2026 • C
This range feels an awful lot like that time we kept revisiting Vegeta.
We are Vegeta-ing in a Dragonball Z filler zone.
sentiment -0.13
12 hr ago • u/Retaining-Wall • r/wallstreetbets • what_are_your_moves_tomorrow_april_07_2026 • C
Yes. We may not be there yet, but we are headed in a chaotic direction where once the snowball is rolling, it's rolling. And Ctrl+Z/deadline extensions won't be relevant anymore.
sentiment -0.53
13 hr ago • u/LowTimePilot • r/stocks • the_market_wants_to_go_higher • C
"Not X, Not Y, just Z."
Your comment reminded me just how many generative AI bots are on this site. Man I miss the old reddit...
sentiment -0.15
16 hr ago • u/WayAgreeable3999 • r/WallStreetbetsELITE • gonna_think_its_a_request_for_an_extension • C
Trump killed anyone over the age of Gen Z.
sentiment -0.67
19 hr ago • u/DovhPasty • r/wallstreetbets • been_talking_about_this_for_weeks • C
I guess that explains the boomer mentality. I couldn’t tell if you were Gen Z and espousing the shit your grandpa has said your whole life or if you were the grandpa.
sentiment 0.61
24 hr ago • u/Feltzinclasp5 • r/stocks • what_is_happening_in_here • C
I think the simplest answer is
a) Stock investing has become mainstream now. Lots of Gen Z watching TikToks on "10x baggers". Those same people use Reddit and have little-to-no experience of volatility
b) Trump is a moron of unforeseen proportions
c) Not many people can still yet wrap their head around the AI boom, so they feel like the market is still unjustifiably overvalued
sentiment -0.11
1 day ago • u/moderndaymesh1 • r/investingforbeginners • ethical_investing_always_sacrifices_returns • C
People invest in/divest from stuff all the time for way sillier reasons than ESG screening. Grandparents buy their kids a share of Disney as a gift for fun. People exclude emerging markets or Chinese stocks specifically for moral reasons and not empirical. People bought GameStop because lol. If it makes you feel morally good to know your money isn't going toward X, Y or Z company and it keeps you invested, go for it. 
That said, I think you necessarily have to accept that you're increasing the chances that you won't make market returns by doing it. There isn't evidence to suggest that investing in an ESG complaint way leads to better expected performance and any excess returns it *might* gain in the short term can be explained by other factors: the recent tech boom, exposure to small cap and value stocks, etc. Plus you'll likely pay more in expense ratio (though Vanguard has some pretty inexpensive and liquid total market ESG funds that at least screen out the "worst of the worst" by the index's scoring)
Personally, I don't invest in ESG screened funds, but I do throw a few bucks in a "fun fund" every two weeks that invests in index funds for water conservation/purification companies (PHO) and solar companies (TAN).
sentiment 0.92
1 day ago • u/hamsta1234 • r/Finanzen • wieso_maklergebühr_so_hoch • C
Es geht darum, dass es ein konkretes Angebot mit ein Gesamtpreis gibt. Z. B
Haiuptstrase 43 für 550.000 inkl Maklerkosten und sonstigen nebenkosten. 
Wenn es dafür eine Nachfrage gibt und das jmd kauft, dann ist es das perfekte Beispiel für sich treffendes Angebot und Nachfrage 
sentiment 0.00
1 day ago • u/FractalFunny66 • r/stocks • i_dont_get_it_why_did_the_price_of_oil_basically • C
the stock market seems detached from traditional economic analysis and has been for some time. I do not know why, just that all the old ways of understanding the world seem to be disappearing. it’s confusing and disorienting. I am older, though. I don’t know how Gen Z analyzes the stock market - I would love to learn! As for Trump, we are seeing FINALLY the what happens when you are “the little boy who cried wolf”-unfortunately for millions of people suffering and dying for no reason, this insanity is being played out on the world stage with death and destruction. I hope when Trump is finally gone that all people, especially Americans, commit to improving our hearts, minds and lives and reject killing for profit.
sentiment -0.78
1 day ago • u/thetreece • r/investingforbeginners • feeling_stuck_financially_can_investing_actually • C
Investing is not a way to generate income for your current expenses.
You earn X income through whatever means. You spend Y amount of it. X-Y= Z (whatever is left). That's what you invest. It grows and compounds over years, until it is sizeable enough to sustain your spending needs indefinitely and you can stop working if you want.
If you're barely staying above water, you will not be able to invest enough to have meaningful current income from it.
You need to focus on increasing X, or decreasing Y, or both, in order to make Z become a larger number.
sentiment 0.18
1 day ago • u/WrexyWrex • r/wallstreetbets • what_are_your_moves_tomorrow_april_06_2026 • C
8=H=O=R =M=✊🏼=M=U=Z=D💦😩
sentiment 0.45
1 day ago • u/miniaznray • r/ValueInvesting • i_finally_bought_nke_but_not_because_it_looks • C
How many people here have even resell sneakers before? Cause anyone that does, will know Nike ain't gonna bounce if the sneaker reselling culture continues to be dead. Almost all of the demand before was driven by hype and resellers buying up all the stock in the stores which created a fake demand since there's no inventory that nike had in stock. Nowadays, completely the opposite, you can literally walk in Nike and buy a shoe off the rack. Investors who buy this stock, expect at least 5-7 years+, to recover. Not looking good for them especially NYC Soho NIKE just closed. I would avoid this stock tho cause from what I'm seeing Gen Z and Y don't care about the hype and collab of sneaker culture. Shows why On, Salomon and Hoka are booming without even a hype collab, jordan or kayne west pumping it.
sentiment -0.93


Share
About
Pricing
Policies
Markets
API
Info
tz UTC-4
Connect with us
ChartExchange Email
ChartExchange on Discord
ChartExchange on X
ChartExchange on Reddit
ChartExchange on GitHub
ChartExchange on YouTube
© 2020 - 2026 ChartExchange LLC