TSLA
Tesla, Inc. Common Stock
stockNASDAQ

TSLA 410 Calls for Friday (thats basically some lotto shit) NVDIA 230 Calls for Monday

If it's a long term (no more memes) account that seeks compounding, I go to the biggest of the biggest (MAGS) because that's where most of the institutional money will be parked while everyone else fries. NVDA MSFT GOOG META I wouldn't go for AMZN or TSLA right now but I might be inclined to pick up some SPCX.

Got TSLA puts 😬

I don’t want to hear another fucking analyst talk about PLTR, TSLA, SPCX add in the fag 7 to the list minus aapl. ALL ARE CASH FLOW NEGATIVE. Memory and GPU are the only fucking things making net profit. Also if another fucktard goes on tv and says “invest in small caps, mkt has to broaden” they are fucking delusional. You either believe in AI or not. If you don’t, the SPY should be down 40%. You can’t have it both fucking ways, memory and chips are about to skyrocket.

TSLA calls for roadster/ earnings ! LFG 🚀

Puts on TSLA.. speeding in a school zone.. ugh! …probably just keeping up with traffic.. who slows down and puts their phones down while driving in a school zone.. really.. be honest.

Unfortunately the world has this collective psychosis around Elon Musk. Take TSLA for example, the world believes his bullshit forever. I don't ever see them recovering.

I use to own $TSLA. Doubled my money, didn’t understand why. I also owned $APDN, halved my money despite them getting what seemed like surefire government contracts. Figured if I wasn’t able to understand why those things happened, I should pick something that doesn’t require that kind of knowledge. So I went with TDFs and later index funds.

My point is that people are not buying TSLA today as a car company... That's gonna get crushed by BYD.. It's a robotics company now.

Here my quant (his name is Claude) explaining my setup. Some things there I don't even understand, but I think it covers your points. There are definitely problems still, though, for example the sign assumption or using absolute levels instead of biggest 3, or focusing only on key dates like earnings. Each map is frozen at its timestamp: per strike, gamma = Black-Scholes gamma (implied vol from the mid of the last quotes before the timestamp, spot at that time) × open interest × 100 × spot, calls +, puts −. The premarket variant uses only the previous close's quotes plus the open interest published before the open. The intraday variant recomputes gamma from the last quotes up to 10:30, but open interest stays at the premarket value because it is only published once a day. The sign convention is an assumption (customers long calls and puts, dealers the opposite). I don't have trade sides, so it is not observed positioning. Everything was fixed before running: a band of 0.1–1.5 trailing daily ranges around the open, "big" = top 3 by |gamma| per side of spot, and horizons of 1 hour and 15:55. To separate magnet from volatility and drift, distances are in units of the trailing range, and each big level is compared with weaker strikes of the same day, same side, same round-number class and same distance. I also used a regression with day-side fixed effects and shuffled-gamma placebos. Outcomes are touch rate, progress toward the level, closing distance, and continuation vs reversal in the 15 minutes after a touch. Result on SPY/NVDA/TSLA: no pull (touch-rate difference about −0.01 to 0.00, CI roughly ±0.03). The aggregate net-gamma → volatility relationship does replicate, so the data and sign are not broken.

Flight to quality: TSLA and SPCX enter the chat.

Easy day, nothing urgent. I bought back puts in AAPL and Tesla. Both were approach 50% profit in 6 days and 15 days. I opened new positions in both. I rolled a TSLL covered call out and time and up. Had to move it up, the same strike didn't exist in 11-20. I rolled covered calls in AMD and PLTR, and rolled a put in MU. Collected $3611 in premiums. I had a put in TSM that I tried to roll, to little premium and it has earnings in 3 days... on watch list. Same with replacing the TSLA put. I wanted more premium, so will work this one.

RIVN is the ugly cousin of TSLA. You can tolerate tessie because she has perky tits, but rivn is deep down an ugly girl with deeprooted need for validation

TSLA | Tesla - Current Price: $378.00 - Current Market Cap: ~$1.49T - Bull Target (12–18m): $480–$550 - Bear Target: $260–$300 - Upside: +27% to +46% - Downside: -21% to -31% - Reward-to-Risk: ~1.4:1 - Success Probability: 60% (estimated) - Expected ROI: +12% (estimated) - Forward P/E: ~196 - Debt-to-Equity: 0.18 🟢 - Dividend Yield: 0% - 1-Year Return: +8.29% 🟢 - 5-Year Return: +41.20% 🟢 - Profitability: Profitable 🟢 - Revenue Growth: +11.76% TTM 🟢 - Free Cash Flow: +$5.76B 🟢 - Share Dilution: +0.58% YoY 🟢 - Price Trend: Volatile 🟡 - Bull-Case Market Cap: $1.90T–$2.18T - Comparable Companies: BYD, Toyota, Rivian - Risk: High - Conviction: 6/10 - Grade: B Tesla manufactures electric vehicles, energy-storage systems, and autonomous-driving technology. I like its strong balance sheet and long-term robotics potential, but a nearly $1.5T valuation and extremely high earnings multiple leave insufficient reward-to-risk for a higher grade. --- SPCX | SpaceX - Current Price: $164.00 - Current Market Cap: ~$2.23T - Bull Target (12–18m): $210–$240 - Bear Target: $90–$110 - Upside: +28% to +46% - Downside: -33% to -45% - Reward-to-Risk: ~1:1 - Success Probability: 55% (estimated) - Expected ROI: +4% (estimated) - Forward P/E: ~103 - Debt-to-Equity: 0.31 🟢 - Dividend Yield: 0% - 1-Year Return: N/A (June 2026 IPO) - 5-Year Return: N/A - Profitability: Unprofitable 🔴 - Revenue Growth: +121.9% TTM 🟢 - Free Cash Flow: -$32.52B 🔴 - Share Dilution: +41.79% YoY 🔴 - Price Trend: Volatile since IPO 🟡 - Bull-Case Market Cap: $2.85T–$3.26T - Comparable Companies: Rocket Lab, Boeing, Amazon (satellite connectivity) - Risk: Extreme - Conviction: 4/10 - Grade: C+ (Speculative) SpaceX develops reusable rockets, operates Starlink satellite internet, and has expanded into artificial intelligence. I like its technological leadership and exceptional revenue growth, but its enormous valuation, substantial losses, negative free cash flow, dilution, and limited public trading history make this too speculative for my preferred investment strategy.

!banbet TSLA $398 4d

I agree on TSLA, while there is a lot of promising tech, the valuation of the company is removed from reality.

!Banbet TSLA +1% 1D

**BanBet Created** ▲ | **Record:** 15W - 5L | Ticker | Target | Entry | Move | Expires | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **TSLA** | $383.06 (above) | $379.26 | +1.0% | Tue 1:51 PM ET |

I lost $46k on TSLA calls in one day a few years ago, it was almost all my money. Even when you make it back you'll never forget how that felt. I literally fell to floor it was physically nauseating. I'm still here though. Life goes on bro don't get too much in your head about this and definitely do not start telling yourself "it's over" bc it isn't

I lost like 50k across a series of shitty trades in a week like 6 years ago. Still pains me today. To make matters worse, I sold stock positions in NVDA, MSFT and TSLA to fund them.

How do people here think about concentration vs diversification after a strong run? Over the past few years, my portfolio has become more concentrated in a handful of large-cap tech names (GOOGL, DELL, AAPL, MSFT, META, TSLA). These were companies I understood and wanted to hold long term, and the strategy has worked well so far. The interesting part is that some positions have grown much larger than their original allocation. At what point does a successful investment become too much concentration risk? I understand the argument for diversification, but I also understand why many investors prefer holding their best ideas instead of constantly trimming winners. For those who have held individual stocks through large gains, how do you think about rebalancing? Do you regularly reduce positions back to a target allocation, or do you let your winners run as long as the original thesis remains intact?

That's if we were at the same level of sentiment as TSLA or PLTR today. If financials keep improving that number gets even better!

I know this thread is 6 years old but if you're reading it in 2026, hi, this one's for you. This question keeps coming up and I've read every reply here. "Someone still has to buy the 100 shares." "Cboe tried mini options and nobody cared." "Dumb question." And OP's point got kind of buried, which is that it was never really about being cheap. They just wanted to write a covered call or hedge something without buying 100 shares of TSLA first. Honestly most of you weren't wrong for the time. If an option settles in shares then yeah, somebody needs the shares. And the minis were still running on the same old setup as every other listed contract. But that's a plumbing problem, not an idea problem. Cash settle it and nobody has to deliver shares. Make settlement cost the same whether it's $5 or $5M and small contracts finally make sense. So the "why not" is pretty much gone now. See you on the other side of 100 shares. I hope you are early.

TSLA and SPCX

TSLA bulls scattering like cockroaches under the sun