Create Account
Log In
Dark
chart
exchange
Premium
Terminal
Screener
Stocks
Crypto
Forex
Trends
Depth
Close
Check out our Level2View

HUGE
FSD Pharma Inc. Class B Subordinate Voting Shares
stock NASDAQ

Inactive
Aug 14, 2024
5.84USD-10.100%(-0.66)343,472
Pre-market
0.00USD-100.000%(-6.50)0
After-hours
0.00USD0.000%(0.00)0
OverviewPrice & VolumeSplitsHistoricalExchange VolumeDark Pool LevelsDark Pool PrintsExchangesShort VolumeShort Interest - DailyShort InterestBorrow Fee (CTB)Failure to Deliver (FTD)ShortsTrendsNewsTrends
HUGE Reddit Mentions
Subreddits
Limit Labels     

We have sentiment values and mention counts going back to 2017. The complete data set is available via the API.
Take me to the API
HUGE Specific Mentions
As of Dec 16, 2025 5:55:57 PM EST (1 min. ago)
Includes all comments and posts. Mentions per user per ticker capped at one per hour.
47 min ago • u/wentwj • r/stocks • tesla_stock_hits_record_as_wall_street_rallies • C
But it's also not realistic to assume Tesla would capture 100% of Uber's business in in the taxi replacement space. Much less capture any of those other areas, and half of the ones you listed if you think about it for 30 seconds aren't likely to be cost effective to replace with self driving vehicles for any significant reason. People are sold on a weird cyberpunk sci-fi world where trash is picked up by robots without looking outside their front door and thinking about what massively would need to change to even start approaching that business.
You can give Tesla the benefit of the doubt and assume they capture a HUGE and unrealistic amount of these spaces (public transportation, taxi's, etc), and their PRESENT day valuation still doesn't make sense.
I won't bet against it because it's not rational, but some day it will crash, that day may not be until Elon dies though because his following is just that delusional.
sentiment 0.44
5 hr ago • u/Beetlejuice_hero • r/stocks • is_now_a_bad_time_to_jump_into_index_funds • C
Maybe, but maybe not. Maybe there *is* a HUGE downturn in AI/tech, but it's not accompanied by a downturn in boring ol' value. Maybe SCHD finally picks up and sees a 20% in 2026 while AI implodes. But maybe not.
We all like to fk around with individual stocks, that's why we're on this sub. I have zero problem with gambling on the betting apps, but I full on like to gamble in the stock market. I bet last week ELF would not drop to $72/share by EOD Friday and I in turn got paid $221.35. Bets all around on "maybe/maybe not".
But when it comes to index fund, just turn off your brain and stop overthinking it. Set a monthly auto-buy and never never never turn it off. There is no winning jumping in & out or trying to time your buys. Just automate it. If it helps, put you auto transfer + buys in a separate brokerage account and lose the PW.
sentiment -0.78
5 hr ago • u/sweejaa • r/Baystreetbets • three_penny_stock_picks_5_months_later • C
Check out YES.V
CHAR Technologies (CVE:YES)
Char Technologies is a Canadian Clean Energy company which uses different types of waste to create Clean Energy products.
They will be producing Pelletized Biocarbon and Renewable Natural Gas (RNG).
They are about to complete the phase 1 expansion of their current facility in Thorold Ontario.
The phase 1 will be completed by end of this year (dec 2025). At the end of phase 1, they will be producing 5,000 tonnes of biocarbon for which they already have a buyer - ArcelorMittal. (They have an offtake agreement signed, all the trial and testing is already done)
ArcelorMittal, one of the largest steel companies in the world through their canadian subsidiary - ArcelorMittal Dofasco (based out of Hamilton).
Phase 2 expansion will be completed by end of next year, which at that point will double their biocarbon production + start producing RNG.
That RNG will be sold to a major gas company in Canada. (Like Enbridge or FortisBC, we dont know who yet)
Next year before the RNG production starts, they will be working on securing a 15 to 20 year gas contract with a gas company. (HUGE catalyst)
Thorold is their first commercial facility.
They will also start constructing their 2nd facility next year sometime in Lake Nipigon, they've partnered up with Lake Nipigon Forest Management Inc (an indigenous led forest company who owns a massive forest up north).
The forest company will be providing massive amounts of wood waste to CHAR to use in their 2nd facility to convert to biocarbon.
For their facility in Thorold , they partnered up with the BMI group (CHAR leases the industrial land from them) and the BMI group put in $8 million towards the thorold facility for 50/50 partnership of the Thorold facility and also put in $2 million into the CHAR Tech at the company level.
Arcelor Mittal also invested $6.5 million ($5 mil USD) into CHAR. (Through their X Carb Innovation Fund)
CHAR technologies has also received over $20 million or so in grants and contracta from government fundings (NRCan, provincial funding and others) etc towards their company and projects.
Now with the BMI group on board with them for the thorold facility, theyre held accountable and the construction of the facility is going according to plan as per their recent news updates in October 2025.
Theyre also working on securing financing for the phase 2 of the thorold facility for which theyre only raising $2 million in equity and the remaining $28 million in debt financing ($30 million total). This will be much easier to do with the BMI group on board.
The BMI group is a billion + dollar industrial real estate company and theyre already talking about replicating the thorold facility onto their other industrial sites with CHAR.
So they'll eventually gear up to more facilities.
In a nutshell, CHAR, through high temperature pyrolysis will be burning industrial waste , bio waste and wood waste etc and turning it into biocarbon and renewable natural gas. Which can then be sold to steel manufacturing companies and gas companies .
The reason steel manufacturing companies are interested in buying this biocarbon is because carbon tax is high and its going up by $15 per year until it reaches $170 per tonne of C02 by 2030.
Also, Canada has energy goals by 2030 and 2050. Net zero by 2050 totally i think and so these steel companies are also looking for energy efficient or green solutions to their charcoal that they currently burn.
Recently, CHAR tech was invited to join CISERA
(Canadian Iron & Steel Energy Research Association).
ArcelorMittal Dofasco, Algoma Steel and a few other steel companies + Canmet Energy who is associated with NRCan are all members of CISERA.
Disclaimer: Not Financial advice, please do your own research also!
sentiment 0.98
7 hr ago • u/icantgetthenameiwant • r/ethereum • ethereums_vitalik_calls_out_elon_free_speech_is • C
Handful?
In the UK alone there's been almost 10k arrests for social media posts this year- about 12k in 2023
In the US there's been maybe 5
Even Russia is estimated at ~400, with a way larger population than the UK
China is also estimated at "low hundreds"
Again with a HUGE population compared to the UK
Germany also had a program on our 60 Minutes where they bragged about arresting people for social media
sentiment -0.69
7 hr ago • u/Puzzleheaded_Soil275 • r/whitecoatinvestor • help_me_convince_my_spouse_i_need_disability • C
$126/mo for a female is probably like a $3000/mo benefit no?
You don't need to carry a HUGE external policy for the reason you alluded - your employer covers 70%. However, depending on other aspects of your financial situation, you generally should carry some additional insurance outside of your work policy. And if you ever find yourself between jobs for a few months, this also helps smooth out some of the risk involved with that.
You need more if you have lots of dependents, are a single household income, don't have many assets, etc.
You need less if you don't have many dependents, are a dual household income, have lots of assets, etc.
In our case, we are dual income with 2 kids and we carry an extra 5k/mo on my wife outside of her work policy. We will drop that when we are close to FI (probably next 5-8 years)
sentiment 0.62
8 hr ago • u/HOMO_FOMO_69 • r/stocks • is_now_a_bad_time_to_jump_into_index_funds • C
Most will tell you since you have such a long time horizon that you should just buy at any price... While it's true that over 40 years the odds of you not making money are seemingly zero, if you buy $SPY for $500 vs $700, that will make a HUGE difference over 40 years. For simplicity, imagine your money will 10x over 40 years (typically you can expect your money to double every 5 years; so in 40 years you'll probably get more than 10x). If you assume you had $5,000 and you bought 10 shares of $SPY at $500. In 40 years spy will be worth $5,000 per share so your 10 shares would be worth $50,000. If you paid $700 for those same shares you'd only be able to buy 7.14 shares. Keeping our assumption of $SPY being $5,000 per share in 40 years, your 7.14 shares is only worth $35,700...
Now imagine you started with $50,000 instead of $5,000... now you're talking about a difference of $143,000 just because some guy told you to "every price is a good price to buy"
The longer your time horizon, the bigger impact your decisions today will have
sentiment 0.98
8 hr ago • u/sweejaa • r/stockstobuytoday • which_stock_would_u_hold_for_the_next_5_years • C
CHAR Technologies (CVE:YES)
Char Technologies is a Canadian Clean Energy company which uses different types of waste to create Clean Energy products.
They will be producing Pelletized Biocarbon and Renewable Natural Gas (RNG).
They are about to complete the phase 1 expansion of their current facility in Thorold Ontario.
The phase 1 will be completed by end of this year (dec 2025). At the end of phase 1, they will be producing 5,000 tonnes of biocarbon for which they already have a buyer - ArcelorMittal. (They have an offtake agreement signed, all the trial and testing is already done)
ArcelorMittal, one of the largest steel companies in the world through their canadian subsidiary - ArcelorMittal Dofasco (based out of Hamilton).
Phase 2 expansion will be completed by end of next year, which at that point will double their biocarbon production + start producing RNG.
That RNG will be sold to a major gas company in Canada. (Like Enbridge or FortisBC, we dont know who yet)
Next year before the RNG production starts, they will be working on securing a 15 to 20 year gas contract with a gas company. (HUGE catalyst)
Thorold is their first commercial facility.
They will also start constructing their 2nd facility next year sometime in Lake Nipigon, they've partnered up with Lake Nipigon Forest Management Inc (an indigenous led forest company who owns a massive forest up north).
The forest company will be providing massive amounts of wood waste to CHAR to use in their 2nd facility to convert to biocarbon.
For their facility in Thorold , they partnered up with the BMI group (CHAR leases the industrial land from them) and the BMI group put in $8 million towards the thorold facility for 50/50 partnership of the Thorold facility and also put in $2 million into the CHAR Tech at the company level.
Arcelor Mittal also invested $6.5 million ($5 mil USD) into CHAR. (Through their X Carb Innovation Fund)
CHAR technologies has also received over $20 million or so in grants and contracta from government fundings (NRCan, provincial funding and others) etc towards their company and projects.
Now with the BMI group on board with them for the thorold facility, theyre held accountable and the construction of the facility is going according to plan as per their recent news updates in October 2025.
Theyre also working on securing financing for the phase 2 of the thorold facility for which theyre only raising $2 million in equity and the remaining $28 million in debt financing ($30 million total). This will be much easier to do with the BMI group on board.
The BMI group is a billion + dollar industrial real estate company and theyre already talking about replicating the thorold facility onto their other industrial sites with CHAR.
So they'll eventually gear up to more facilities.
In a nutshell, CHAR, through high temperature pyrolysis will be burning industrial waste , bio waste and wood waste etc and turning it into biocarbon and renewable natural gas. Which can then be sold to steel manufacturing companies and gas companies .
The reason steel manufacturing companies are interested in buying this biocarbon is because carbon tax is high and its going up by $15 per year until it reaches $170 per tonne of C02 by 2030.
Also, Canada has energy goals by 2030 and 2050. Net zero by 2050 totally i think and so these steel companies are also looking for energy efficient or green solutions to their charcoal that they currently burn.
Recently, CHAR tech was invited to join CISERA
(Canadian Iron & Steel Energy Research Association).
ArcelorMittal Dofasco, Algoma Steel and a few other steel companies + Canmet Energy who is associated with NRCan are all members of CISERA.
Disclaimer: Not Financial advice, please do your own research also!
sentiment 0.99
9 hr ago • u/princeoinkins • r/wallstreetbets • ford_takes_195b_charge_in_hybrid_pivot_cancels • C
There's not alot of crossover between "people who want to buy a truck" and "people who want to buy an EV". There never was, and, unless there is a HUGE shift in consumer sentiment, there never will be.
sentiment 0.38
9 hr ago • u/keyser_squoze • r/Superstonk • yen_gone_wild_in_morning_ah • 📈 Technical Analysis • B
Etf tracking the Japanese Yen spiked on very low volume in the AH this morning at precisely 8am EST / 5am PST. (Shout out to PowerTracks guy.)
Not sure what it signifies but Japanese Yen upside moves have often portended big moves with GME (another of those completely unrelated yet related security correlations.) Inverse correlation to SLV is also interesting (also had a weird 8am spike as did GME - just like every day.)
Hey do you remember the HUGE silver push by hedgies and institutions on ball sweet sweats? post-sneeze 2021? Pepperidge Farms remembers.
The RSI spiked to 94. On no volume.
Stay frosty yall.
[One candle is not like the others...](https://preview.redd.it/7gdsz0qxhk7g1.png?width=1219&format=png&auto=webp&s=a7e52b968b94b68aaf64f39e05d5c85d1f85a9fb)
sentiment 0.77
12 hr ago • u/bartturner • r/ValueInvesting • amzn_vs_googl • C
I do like and own both. But to me it is no contest. Google is the only company on the planet that not only has every layer of the AI stack but is also selling at every layer of the AI stack.
The one that had been missing is silicon. But Google is now selling the TPUs.
The TPUs have been rumored to be twice as efficient as the best from Nvidia, Blackwell.
That means the same data center, power, cooling, etc will get twice the output if you use Google Ironwood TPUs instead of Nvidia Blackwell.
That is HUGE! Google is just going to make a fortune.
sentiment 0.79
18 hr ago • u/Final7C • r/wallstreetbets • ford_takes_195b_charge_in_hybrid_pivot_cancels • C
All of the big 3 do a shitty job with EVs.
Let me explain.
Either they don't actually want to make a good car. Or they don't know how to make a good car.
The EVs have been underpowered, with middling ranges, with prices that are too high to make sense for almost anyone.
The hybrid is what they should have been doing 20 years ago. but instead they laughed in oil. They kept full ICE vehicles and put an outrageous markup on EVs and anything close to a Hybrid.
Teslas would probably still sell really well if Elon hadn't gone and got into politics. The problem is, conservatives tend to dislike EVs.
And there is a lot to dislike EVs from a visceral level.
1.) They take at a minimum 30-45 minutes to fully charge. At best. Is that a long time, well, when you're used to 2-5 minute fill up times, yes. It's a long ass time. If you run out of energy on the side of the road, a tow truck or an electric generator is the only thing that can help you now.
2.) They cost more than comparable ICE Cars. They use less parts, but the parts are more expensive. They also know that people who want an EV will pay through the nose for it. At least that was the thought. They saw Teslas and thought - Boy, I bet we could crank out a piece of shit EV and it would sell like hot cakes... Except, The reason why Teslas were so coveted, is Elon made an expensive car, that was fun. It seemed futuristic, and it didn't feel like he was shitting them out as the lowest bidder. And the ones that he was shitting out, those were priced similar to a midsize sedan and STILL went faster and further than the Big 3's EVs. paying an extra 20k for a car, just doesn't work.
3.) They don't have as many options as ICE cars. They are so worried about making a car that goes as far as an ICE car, that they cut out all the bells and whistles because it reduces range.
4.) They are heavier, and thus cannot pull as much as an ICE vehicle. And lose charge when under load (not much different than a big engine using more gas, but the difference is, the ICE F150 has a towing capacity of 8,200lbs - 13,500lbs. vs the Lightning of 7,000 -10,000lbs.) 3,500 lbs is significant. especially if you're buying the truck to tow.
5.) They have a maximum range that is less than a current ICE vehicle, and the re-fill structure isn't nearly as well developed as ICE vehicles. And they haven't cracked the code on fast refill.
6.) EVs are a direct competitor to most of the secondary market for the auto industry. - The companies that make the parts (replacement and otherwise) for the cars are suddenly not going to have as many parts, meaning hundreds of thousands of manufacturing jobs are gone. Your car doesn't need an exhaust, anything in the engine block, it needs 4 identical motors, (well maybe 2 sets of 2), you need chassis and suspension, you need, electrical, a heater, an AC, a wiper system. But the big ticket items of a transmission and engine are gone. replaced with a battery pack and wiring harness.
7.) Range anxiety is a stupid but real thing. Oh no, my car only gets 200 miles to the charge. The average rural driver drives around 40 miles per day. Do some drive more than that? yes. But we're talking averages. That is from home, to work, and all side trips, 40 miles. In the harsh winter that means you're probably needing to charge due to the 39% drop in efficiency (ICE vehicles tend to use 15-24% more gas on cold days). But it's still WELL within the range that most people drive per day. but because it's not 500+ miles, we all freak the out.
8.) The Oil and gas industry is literally a MAJOR part of the american economy. It is one of the largest employers in the US, and you won't find most of its workers switching to EVs anytime soon. That's like watching someone from GM drive a Toyota.
Here's what Tesla did to make themselves successful.
1.) They pulled an APPLE. They made something fun, that just seemed to work.
2.) They were a vertical monopoly. They build all the components themselves. ALL of the software/hardware was developed by Tesla, all of the batteries were built by Tesla. That's HUGE difference in how the software worked. It's why most other makers touchscreens and media centers feel like total dogshit. Because every component was made by a different manufacturer. And all told to "Just work together".
Instead of building a single unified software/hardware package. They had tons of individual lines doing a segment, then slapped them into a different hardware package. And it feels clunky and unintuitive. Because they KNEW we'd buy it no matter what. afterall, almost no one chooses a car based on the media center. So why spend the money on it, just make it mostly functional.
The problem is, most of the parts to these cars are the same way. They work, and they mostly work together, but they don't feel made for the vehicle they are going in. instead they feel like they are just sourced from a big bin of "generic parts" and made to fit. It's really just a slap in the face of anyone who wants to be in one.
They are actively made them underpowered. You know what sold 50% of the people on a tesla. Insanity mode. The ability to go from 0-60 in about 3 seconds. That sold more Teslas than ANY OTHER THING. The next biggest thing was "He released an update over the air, increasing range , no need to take it in, it just updates wirelessly."
It was cool, dangerous as fuck and not a great idea to allow a car to be "always tied to the manufacturer" but cool. It is hard to sell "We purposefully made your life harder, to help you".
Hybrids are a good route for them to take. it allows them to figure out the fucking battery problems, it gets everyone used to the angel halo sounds, and excitement at getting more than 20mpg while still driving a big ass SUV. and they can charge "a bit" more. Not waaay more, but a bit more.
Politics of the current admin wanting to gobble Oil Exec's giblets while handing their asses to OPEC. All while basically cutting out ANY price incentives AND adding tariffs to all foreign cars and any EVs and EV parts. It makes sense that for the next 3 years or so Ford, and GM are going to say "We can't survive a lack of demand" And instead of learning the "lesson we keep trying to teach you old man" they are going to just stop, and switch only to hybrids. Which is still a step, but a 1/2 step at best. But you know what... maybe this will give them the chance to figure out how to make a decent car.
sentiment -0.13
20 hr ago • u/Ok_Security8232 • r/wallstreetbets • what_are_your_moves_tomorrow_december_16_2025 • C
Prediction market is HUGE as long as gov doesn't get too involved regulating it. Crypto dumping will affect in short term, but when the market heats up, and it will heat up again, RH will pump even harder. Calls
sentiment 0.36
1 day ago • u/Many_Easy • r/weedstocks • daily_discussion_thread_december_15_2025 • C
**It’s been 18 weeks or 126 days since the “few weeks” comment.”
Remember when his cult followers were saying it’s a **priority? **
Or when his cult followers were saying he had other more pressing priorities, but soon thereafter?
Or when his followers were talking about how great DOGE is and that savings are HUGE when they weren’t?
Or in February when they said things would get much better in a few months?
Or when they believed in a “few weeks?”
Or that they argued with me that a “few weeks” is more than 5 weeks and that it would be soon?
Or that a “few weeks” is different for politicians than other people that use exact same words?
Or that S3 was imminent?
Or that that things are AFFORDABLE yet to buy less toy dolls?
**Watch his actions and ignore his and his followers words.**
**So when I hear “as soon as Monday” or “looking at very strongly” - I RATIONALLY have reasons to express my skepticism.”**
ACTION not WORDS.
sentiment 0.77
1 day ago • u/OutlandishnessUsed24 • r/stockstobuytoday • flws_update_106_si_forced_buying_starts_tomorrow • C
Buy shares and sell covered calls at a HUGE IV to apes like us. You are almost guarnteed nice profit here, your still helping the cause, and your only downside is you would miss out on a rare STD deviation event but you would still get a nice xmas bonus!
sentiment 0.94
1 day ago • u/ladyeclectic79 • r/investingforbeginners • why_do_you_think_that_the_market_has_recently_had • C
Lots of worry and political uncertainty. It certainly hasn’t crashed (yet) but it’s stagnated after a HUGE surge this year so far. Think of it more like a correction or hiccup than anything else; it’ll resume eventually, always does.
sentiment 0.41
1 day ago • u/iMakeGOODinvestmemts • r/wallstreetbets • daily_discussion_thread_for_december_15_2025 • C
Google holding well
Will probably rip HUGE up soon
sentiment 0.33
1 day ago • u/Alert-Mirror-9334 • r/pennystocks • bnai_extremely_low_float_ai_play_after_reverse • :Bagger: 𝗕𝘂𝗹𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗵 :Bullish: • B
If you’re looking for a **post-reverse-split setup with real AI tech + a tiny float**, you might want to keep **Brand Engagement Network ($BNAI)** on your radar **right now**.👇
🔥 **They just completed a 1-for-10 reverse stock split** that officially took effect on **Dec 12, 2025**
**Post-Split Share Stats:**
• **\~4.49M shares outstanding** \- tiny for a Nasdaq stock
• **\~1M public float** \- super low float = huge move potential on volume.
**Their goal:**
• AI for **healthcare, insurance, finance, retail, and government**
• **Voice + chat + digital assistants**
• **Compliance-first, brand-safe AI** (this is HUGE for enterprises)
They’re developing proprietary tech (ELM™) designed to **replace outdated call centers, chatbots, and IVR systems** with smarter AI that companies can actually deploy without legal nightmares.
🚀 **POTENTIAL CATALYSTS TO WATCH**
👀 New enterprise or government contracts
👀 Licensing or regional expansion deals
👀 Revenue growth updates / earnings
👀 AI sector momentum rotation
👀 Short-term squeeze on volume
With a float this small, any one of these can change the chart fast.
**Why This Is The PERFECT Time to Stake Your Claim:**
• **Ultra-Tight Float = Explosive Moves**
With just 1 million shares available to trade, even modest buying pressure can drive sharp upward swings.
• **Cheap Valuation With AI Tech Potential**
BNAI isn’t a random meme - they build **enterprise conversational AI for regulated industries** like healthcare, insurance, finance, retail, and more. Their proprietary Engagement Language Model (ELM™) powers **multimodal, compliance-first AI across chat, voice, and digital channels** \- a niche that big companies are desperate *for right now*.
• **Sharply Lower Share Count = Clean Slate**
After the reverse split, the stock is *‘reset’* with far fewer shares floating around. That means if interest picks up, short squeezes and retail momentum waves can hit harder.
**SPECULATIVE PRICE TARGET (OPINION, NOT FACT):**
Not saying this will happen - but purely based on float + AI peers:
• Short-term momentum target: $3–$5
• Bullish breakout scenario: $7–$10+
Do your own DD. Size appropriately.
sentiment 0.96
1 day ago • u/Open_Sir_8830 • r/wallstreetbets • daily_discussion_thread_for_december_15_2025 • C
HUGE GREEN COCK KEEP PUMPING
sentiment -0.15
1 day ago • u/bartturner • r/stocks • spacex_a_financial_and_strategic_windfall_for • C
Most definitely. But it is just one more bullish thing with Google.
There are so many. A HUGE one is them now selling the TPUs directly.
Ironwood, V7 TPU, is rumored to be twice as efficient as Blackwell. The best from Nvidia.
That means the same sized data center. With the same power and electric now has twice the output,
Google is going to make a fortune selling the TPUs.
sentiment 0.94
1 day ago • u/wegster • r/ETFs • selling_etf_for_ipo • C
Don't be so sure. AFAIK, there's no valuation out there with respect to what the initial offering will even look like. Do you have access to financial numbers others don't, and can do a projection of P&L for the company for the next 5 years, or 'just a feeling'?
I have no doubt SpaceX and OpenAI if/when they IPO will be at HUGE valuations, including the hype train being calculated in (they will call them projected earnings, but still not necessarily real). Meanwhile, private equity and VCs have been or will already be making their own deals before the public gets close to being able to purchase shares at all.
I absolutely wouldn't be changing stable, sane positions of significance to literally 'roll the dice' on this.
Somewhat recently, I worked at a company in one of the 'hype' areas. Let us just say while I was impressed the CEO managed to keep this company in existence for quite some time, I was shocked at the fact they lacked a single real customer. I tried to fix the latter, but the whole concept of 'land some smaller deals to get credibility then expand' fell on deaf ears as they would only really chase the equivalent of F500 or even F100 deals, which they were not equipped to close on. Leading up to the IPO and the paperwork filed at IPO, several of us were quite \*shocked\* by the claimed pipeline. Sure, it was \*possible\* - just in my and several others opinions, highly unlikely.
Somehow the IPO went through at some number with what seemed like a quite high valuation - but bear in mind, this is what every IPO tries to do really. Numbers dropped rapidly, I finally moved on to a company looking for actual real customers. 1-2 years on they're still in a 'hype' market, trading at around 20% of the open. Still churning out impressive-sounding PR articles yet still no significant revenue.
You do you, but I won't be touching my core investments to dump $$ into SpaceX or similar - if the valuation is crazy, it'll settle out over time then stand or fall on it's own merits. Note I do expect SpaceX to likely fare better than TSLA over time, but if their starting valuation is already insane, it doesn't mean there's lots of $ to be made by us normal people, etc.
sentiment 0.86


Share
About
Pricing
Policies
Markets
API
Info
tz UTC-5
Connect with us
ChartExchange Email
ChartExchange on Discord
ChartExchange on X
ChartExchange on Reddit
ChartExchange on GitHub
ChartExchange on YouTube
© 2020 - 2025 ChartExchange LLC