Create Account
Log In
Dark
chart
exchange
Premium
Terminal
Screener
Stocks
Crypto
Forex
Trends
Depth
Close
Check out our Level2View

ZKUSDT
ZK / Tether USD
crypto Composite

Real-time
Dec 5, 2025 2:45:01 AM EST
0.03650USDT-20.479%(-0.00940)193,147,454ZK8,110,356USDT
0.03648Bid   0.03649Ask   0.00001Spread
OverviewHistoricalDepthTrendsNewsTrends
Composite
0.03650
Binance
0.03654
OKX
0.03650
Huobi
0.04630
ZK Reddit Mentions
Subreddits
Limit Labels     

We have sentiment values and mention counts going back to 2017. The complete data set is available via the API.
Take me to the API
ZK Specific Mentions
As of Dec 5, 2025 2:43:56 AM EST (1 min. ago)
Includes all comments and posts. Mentions per user per ticker capped at one per hour.
14 hr ago • u/whalepapi • r/Ripple • should_xrpl_add_privacy_via_zk • T
Should XRPL add privacy via ZK?
sentiment 0.00
14 hr ago • u/Trick-Sprinkles-3083 • r/CryptoCurrency • thoughts_on_anomapays_stablecoin_router_idea • DISCUSSION • B
So I’ve been reading about Anoma⁤Pay, which is pitched as a *stablecoin router* rather than a normal cross‑chain bridge or wallet. Basic idea: you send in whatever supported token on an EV⁤M chain (USDC/USDT/... etc.), the other side gets their preferred token, and the routing happens under the hood.​
They’re also leaning pretty hard into privacy and “enterprise‑grade data protection” using ZK, so not every payment has to be a clean, public trail on a block explorer. It’s positioned as infrastructure that wallets/payment providers can plug into, and it’s still on devnet, initially focused on more boring stuff like payroll, B2B payments, etc.​
Curious what r/CryptoCurrency thinks:
* Do we actually need a dedicated *router* layer for stablecoin payments, or should wallets/bridges just keep evolving?
* Is opt‑in privacy for stablecoin payments something you’d actually use, or is transparent‑by‑default fine for most people?
* For anyone already doing stablecoin payroll/settlements: would this kind of routing + fee abstraction change much for you, or is it just another piece of middleware in an already stacked system? Source: [https://anoma.net/blog/introducing-anomapay](https://anoma.net/blog/introducing-anomapay)
sentiment 0.92
19 hr ago • u/MinimalGravitas • r/CryptoCurrency • gold_is_not_the_problem_your_moe_is • C
> layer 2 networks continue to expand
The only 'real' Bitcoin L2 (as in a layer that is actually secured by the L1) is Lightning, and that has been reducing in capacity over time... the amount of Bitcoin that was using Lightning dropped by about 30% between August 2024 and August 2025:
https://news.bitcoin.com/data-shows-sustained-slide-in-lightning-network-capacity-channels-through-2025/
It seems intentionally midleading to use a phrase like "continue to expand" when it is doing the opposite...
There are of course other chains that claim to be 'L2s' and often use phrases that sound plausible like 'ZK rollup'... but as far as I can tell all of these are just variations of sidechains/commit chains... not actually using Bitcoin L1's security but instead they are just completely seperate networks that post commits to Bitcoin, presumably to trick non-technical Bitcoin maxis into supporting them! They are equivalent to the relationship between Gnosis or Polygon with Ethereum L1... tangentally linked but not in the ways which actually count.
> I am not the delusional one here.
I never used that term, and I wasn't replying to you.
sentiment 0.91
1 day ago • u/Worldly-Law9012 • r/ethereum • how_is_ethereum_solving_the_blockchain_trilemma • B
Ethereum is actively working to address the blockchain trilemma, a core challenge in the design of decentralized systems that suggests a blockchain can only achieve two of three key properties—Decentralization, Security, and Scalability—at the same time.
Ethereum's strategy involves a multi-phased roadmap and the heavy utilization of Layer 2 (L2) scaling solutions to tackle scalability while maintaining its core commitments to decentralization and security.
🛡️ Security and Decentralization
Ethereum's foundational layer, or Layer 1 (L1), prioritizes security and decentralization, which are fundamental to its value proposition as a "world computer."
* Security: The network transitioned from a Proof-of-Work (PoW) consensus mechanism to Proof-of-Stake (PoS), known as The Merge (September 2022). PoS maintains a high level of security by making it prohibitively expensive for a malicious actor to gain enough staked ETH to compromise the network. The economic cost of an attack on Ethereum's PoS network is arguably higher than on its former PoW network.
* Decentralization: PoS is intended to boost decentralization in the long run by making it easier for more people to become validators, as it requires less specialized, expensive hardware compared to PoW mining. The development roadmap also includes phases like The Scourge and The Purge, which aim to further improve censorship resistance and reduce the hardware requirements for running a node, promoting wider network participation.
🚀 Scaling (Solving the Trilemma's Third Side)
Ethereum's main challenge was scalability—the network became congested, leading to slow transactions and high gas fees. The strategy to address this is primarily through Layer 2 solutions and fundamental L1 upgrades.
1. Layer 2 (L2) Scaling Solutions
Ethereum leans heavily on L2 networks, which process transactions off the main chain but settle on L1, inheriting Ethereum's robust security.
* Rollups: These are the most prominent L2 solution. They execute thousands of transactions off-chain and then bundle ("roll up") the resulting data into a single, compressed transaction that gets submitted back to the Ethereum Mainnet.
* Optimistic Rollups (e.g., Arbitrum, Optimism): Assume transactions are valid but allow a "challenge period" where anyone can submit a fraud proof if they detect an invalid transaction.
* Zero-Knowledge (ZK) Rollups (e.g., zkSync, Starknet): Use cryptographic proofs (validity proofs) to instantly verify the correctness of off-chain transactions, providing stronger security guarantees.
By offloading the execution layer to L2s, Ethereum L1 can focus on its role as the secure and decentralized data availability layer.
2. Layer 1 Upgrades
Ethereum's roadmap includes major L1 upgrades to support the L2 scaling strategy:
* Proto-Danksharding (EIP-4844): Implemented in the Dencun upgrade (March 2024), this introduced a new, cheaper way for rollups to post transaction data to the L1 using "blobs". This significantly lowered L2 transaction costs, boosting scalability without compromising security or decentralization.
* The Surge (Full Sharding): The long-term vision involves a form of data sharding where the network is split to handle data more efficiently. This will dramatically increase the data capacity of the L1, further scaling the L2 ecosystem to potentially handle hundreds of thousands of transactions per second (TPS).
In essence, Ethereum is solving the trilemma by adopting a layered approach: L1 provides decentralized security, and L2s provide scalability.
sentiment 1.00
14 hr ago • u/whalepapi • r/Ripple • should_xrpl_add_privacy_via_zk • T
Should XRPL add privacy via ZK?
sentiment 0.00
14 hr ago • u/Trick-Sprinkles-3083 • r/CryptoCurrency • thoughts_on_anomapays_stablecoin_router_idea • DISCUSSION • B
So I’ve been reading about Anoma⁤Pay, which is pitched as a *stablecoin router* rather than a normal cross‑chain bridge or wallet. Basic idea: you send in whatever supported token on an EV⁤M chain (USDC/USDT/... etc.), the other side gets their preferred token, and the routing happens under the hood.​
They’re also leaning pretty hard into privacy and “enterprise‑grade data protection” using ZK, so not every payment has to be a clean, public trail on a block explorer. It’s positioned as infrastructure that wallets/payment providers can plug into, and it’s still on devnet, initially focused on more boring stuff like payroll, B2B payments, etc.​
Curious what r/CryptoCurrency thinks:
* Do we actually need a dedicated *router* layer for stablecoin payments, or should wallets/bridges just keep evolving?
* Is opt‑in privacy for stablecoin payments something you’d actually use, or is transparent‑by‑default fine for most people?
* For anyone already doing stablecoin payroll/settlements: would this kind of routing + fee abstraction change much for you, or is it just another piece of middleware in an already stacked system? Source: [https://anoma.net/blog/introducing-anomapay](https://anoma.net/blog/introducing-anomapay)
sentiment 0.92
19 hr ago • u/MinimalGravitas • r/CryptoCurrency • gold_is_not_the_problem_your_moe_is • C
> layer 2 networks continue to expand
The only 'real' Bitcoin L2 (as in a layer that is actually secured by the L1) is Lightning, and that has been reducing in capacity over time... the amount of Bitcoin that was using Lightning dropped by about 30% between August 2024 and August 2025:
https://news.bitcoin.com/data-shows-sustained-slide-in-lightning-network-capacity-channels-through-2025/
It seems intentionally midleading to use a phrase like "continue to expand" when it is doing the opposite...
There are of course other chains that claim to be 'L2s' and often use phrases that sound plausible like 'ZK rollup'... but as far as I can tell all of these are just variations of sidechains/commit chains... not actually using Bitcoin L1's security but instead they are just completely seperate networks that post commits to Bitcoin, presumably to trick non-technical Bitcoin maxis into supporting them! They are equivalent to the relationship between Gnosis or Polygon with Ethereum L1... tangentally linked but not in the ways which actually count.
> I am not the delusional one here.
I never used that term, and I wasn't replying to you.
sentiment 0.91
1 day ago • u/Worldly-Law9012 • r/ethereum • how_is_ethereum_solving_the_blockchain_trilemma • B
Ethereum is actively working to address the blockchain trilemma, a core challenge in the design of decentralized systems that suggests a blockchain can only achieve two of three key properties—Decentralization, Security, and Scalability—at the same time.
Ethereum's strategy involves a multi-phased roadmap and the heavy utilization of Layer 2 (L2) scaling solutions to tackle scalability while maintaining its core commitments to decentralization and security.
🛡️ Security and Decentralization
Ethereum's foundational layer, or Layer 1 (L1), prioritizes security and decentralization, which are fundamental to its value proposition as a "world computer."
* Security: The network transitioned from a Proof-of-Work (PoW) consensus mechanism to Proof-of-Stake (PoS), known as The Merge (September 2022). PoS maintains a high level of security by making it prohibitively expensive for a malicious actor to gain enough staked ETH to compromise the network. The economic cost of an attack on Ethereum's PoS network is arguably higher than on its former PoW network.
* Decentralization: PoS is intended to boost decentralization in the long run by making it easier for more people to become validators, as it requires less specialized, expensive hardware compared to PoW mining. The development roadmap also includes phases like The Scourge and The Purge, which aim to further improve censorship resistance and reduce the hardware requirements for running a node, promoting wider network participation.
🚀 Scaling (Solving the Trilemma's Third Side)
Ethereum's main challenge was scalability—the network became congested, leading to slow transactions and high gas fees. The strategy to address this is primarily through Layer 2 solutions and fundamental L1 upgrades.
1. Layer 2 (L2) Scaling Solutions
Ethereum leans heavily on L2 networks, which process transactions off the main chain but settle on L1, inheriting Ethereum's robust security.
* Rollups: These are the most prominent L2 solution. They execute thousands of transactions off-chain and then bundle ("roll up") the resulting data into a single, compressed transaction that gets submitted back to the Ethereum Mainnet.
* Optimistic Rollups (e.g., Arbitrum, Optimism): Assume transactions are valid but allow a "challenge period" where anyone can submit a fraud proof if they detect an invalid transaction.
* Zero-Knowledge (ZK) Rollups (e.g., zkSync, Starknet): Use cryptographic proofs (validity proofs) to instantly verify the correctness of off-chain transactions, providing stronger security guarantees.
By offloading the execution layer to L2s, Ethereum L1 can focus on its role as the secure and decentralized data availability layer.
2. Layer 1 Upgrades
Ethereum's roadmap includes major L1 upgrades to support the L2 scaling strategy:
* Proto-Danksharding (EIP-4844): Implemented in the Dencun upgrade (March 2024), this introduced a new, cheaper way for rollups to post transaction data to the L1 using "blobs". This significantly lowered L2 transaction costs, boosting scalability without compromising security or decentralization.
* The Surge (Full Sharding): The long-term vision involves a form of data sharding where the network is split to handle data more efficiently. This will dramatically increase the data capacity of the L1, further scaling the L2 ecosystem to potentially handle hundreds of thousands of transactions per second (TPS).
In essence, Ethereum is solving the trilemma by adopting a layered approach: L1 provides decentralized security, and L2s provide scalability.
sentiment 1.00
2 days ago • u/MinimalGravitas • r/CryptoCurrency • is_ethereum_failing_scaling_is_still_a_dream • C
> Reliance on Layer-2s for scaling is still unhealthy.
Why? Rollups settle to Ethereum L1 and use blobs on Ethereum L1 for their data availability.
Are you maybe just thinking that 'L2' means sidechain? If so then you have very much misunderstood the term.
As an example of the difference, a user with assets on a rollup can always exit directly back to the L1 just by making a transaction on the L1, a feature sometimes referred to as an escape hatch. This works even if the rollup operators turn evil and censor all transactions on the L2 or even shut it down completely... and this isn't just theoretical, an early ZK rollup called dYdX shut down and everyone who hadn't bridged back to Ethereum then had to use the escape hatch to withdraw.
It's also silly to pretend that L2s have not been the plan and that they are just a stop-gap when sharding is what was intended... the Rollup Centric Roadmap was published over 5 years ago now and has been recognized as a better way to scale than the old ideas about L1 shards.
Also, tonight's upgrade does include a type of sharding, Peer Data Availability Sharding (PeerDAS), which will allow up to 8x more throughput to be processed by rollups (so over 200,000 TPS)... the limit will be demand for transactions rather than network capacity.
And finally:
> The real TPS of Etheruem still remains 15 per second.
Ethereum L1 is processing about 25 TPS at the moment and the peak today was 57 TPS... all time high was 136 TPS... so let's not pretend the limit is 15 huh?
https://www.growthepie.com/chains/ethereum
sentiment -0.82
2 days ago • u/HSuke • r/CryptoCurrency • ethereum_records_another_alltime_high_for_tps • C
It's due to Lighter L2. I've never heard of it before. It's a ZK perpetuals DEX.
That single L2 is producing as many transactions as the rest of the L2s combined. I have no idea how a DEX even uses 10k TPS, or even 1k TPS.
sentiment -0.30
2 days ago • u/bitjson • r/btc • design_sketch_postquantum_shielded_pools_for_bch • C
Original post: https://x.com/bitjson/status/1995873869077332056
---
December 2025: no one has built a ZK prover that is:
🥷 Actually zero-knowledge,
⚛️ Quantum ready, and
⚡️ Reasonably succinct for one-off proofs (<100KB).
This is a feature request from a future enthusiastic user/supporter 🚀
Post-quantum ZK Leaderboard:
1. @NeptuneCash's Triton VM:
✅ zero-knowledge
✅ quantum ready
⚠️ min. proof: ~533KB
2. @0xMiden VM:
⛔️ privacy leaks
✅ quantum ready
✅ min. proof: ~33KB
3. @Starknet's Stwo:
⛔️ privacy leaks
✅ quantum ready
✅ min. proof: ~64KB
(All at ~96 bits soundness) [[Correction](https://x.com/bitjson/status/1995921132831089027): a minimum of ~96 bits – Triton VM targets 160 bits.]
Am I missing any post-quantum ZK projects? Any smaller proof demos?
More background: https://x.com/bitjson/status/1975206165899555239
sentiment 0.84


Share
About
Pricing
Policies
Markets
API
Info
tz UTC-5
Connect with us
ChartExchange Email
ChartExchange on Discord
ChartExchange on X
ChartExchange on Reddit
ChartExchange on GitHub
ChartExchange on YouTube
© 2020 - 2025 ChartExchange LLC