MPCUSDT
MPC / Tether USD
crypto

Dude are u a fking bot? Everyone and their mother knows about MPC now. All the big exchanges are already using it

By Multi-Party-Computation (MPC) tech: https://docs.vultisig.com/threshold-signature-scheme/threshold-signature-schemes-used-by-vultisig

In an industry often defined by speculation, BlueLink takes a different path: *building a blockchain for real-world finance.*
BlueLink Blockchain is a purpose-built **Layer 1 protocol** designed to deliver regulatory-aligned performance for decentralized finance (DeFi), tokenized equities, and real-world financial asset infrastructure. Unlike many general-purpose chains, BlueLink is focused on **bridging regulated finance with programmable infrastructure**, creating a foundation for compliant asset issuance, capital formation, and exchange-grade trading.
In an industry often defined by speculation, BlueLink takes a different path: *building a blockchain for real-world finance.*
BlueLink Blockchain is a purpose-built **Layer 1 protocol** designed to deliver regulatory-aligned performance for decentralized finance (DeFi), tokenized equities, and real-world financial asset infrastructure. Unlike many general-purpose chains, BlueLink is focused on **bridging regulated finance with programmable infrastructure**, creating a foundation for compliant asset issuance, capital formation, and exchange-grade trading.
# Competitive Fee Model
BlueLink uses a **tiered fee structure** to align incentives across retail, institutional, and staker segments:
* **Retail Users**: 0.10% maker / 0.15% taker
* **Institutional Accounts**: 0.04% maker / 0.07% taker
* **BLT Gold Stakers**: 0.02% maker / 0.05% taker
For tokenized equities:
* **T+1 Settlement Fee**: 0.12% per trade
* **Custody Fee**: 0.03% per month
Compared to Coinbase (0.18%), Binance (0.06%), and Kraken (0.10%), BlueLink remains globally competitive with **institutional taker fees of 0.07% or lower**.
# Institutional-Grade Infrastructure
BlueLink is engineered for **regulated finance**, integrating features rarely found in Layer 1 chains:
* **Custom Pricing for High-Volume Accounts**: Tailored packages for firms trading $50M+ monthly.
* **Insured Custody**: Assets held in segregated MPC wallets via Fireblocks, with optional insurance coverage.
* **Dedicated Relationship Management**: Priority access, onboarding support, and real-time strategy execution.
* **Execution Engine**: Parallelized smart contract processing with optimistic multithreaded execution to minimize bottlenecks.
# Compliance, Security, and Governance
BlueLink embeds compliance at its core:
* **MPC Validator Key Custody**: Mitigating collusion and internal risks.
* **Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs)**: For privacy-preserving compliance.
* **AI-Based Anomaly Detection**: To detect MEV, liquidity spoofing, or price manipulation.
* **Native Token Utility**: BlueLink Coin (BLC) serves as the backbone for governance, execution, settlement, and transaction tax models (burn, reflection, liquidity).
# Why BlueLink Matters
In today’s regulatory climate, institutions need a blockchain that balances **innovation with compliance**. BlueLink delivers exactly that:
* Operates under **regulator-friendly jurisdictions** (Dubai & BVI).
* Supports **custodian-backed tokenization** (1:1 real-world equity tokenization).
* Enables **real-time T+1 settlements**, faster than traditional T+2 stock markets.
* Scales with high-throughput infrastructure for **DeFi, RWAs, and institutional trading**.
# Built for Builders. Trusted by Institutions.
BlueLink isn’t chasing hype — it’s building the **infrastructure of compliant finance**. For developers, it offers interoperability, EVM support, and open APIs. For institutions, it provides the assurance of legal, compliant, and secure trading environments.
As blockchain moves from speculation to real-world adoption, BlueLink is positioning itself as the **Layer 1 chain for regulated finance**.

👉 What do you think - is **compliance-first blockchain** the missing bridge for mainstream adoption?

So instead of managing a seed I need to properly manage my devices. what if I get 2 of 3 of my devices get stolen or fall down a well or whatever. and dont all devices need to be online for TSS/MPC to work? having mutliple devices always online does not seem like a step forward.
How is DKLS23 implemented? There is real evidence that early DKLS23 implementations had serious flaws. Trail of Bits audited one of the early DKLS23 libraries (Silent Shard) and found key destruction attack risks and mishandling of selective abort attacks.
They found ~15 issues, 2 of them high severity (nonce reuse leading to key destruction) among others.
really interested in these answers.