Create Account
Log In
Dark
chart
exchange
Premium
Terminal
Screener
Stocks
Crypto
Forex
Trends
Depth
Close
Check out our Level2View

ETHUSDT20240623P3200
Ethereum / Tether USD Jun 23 2024 3200.00 Put
crypto

No price data
0.00USDT0.000%(0.00)00
OverviewDepthTrends
ETH Reddit Mentions
Subreddits
Limit Labels     

We have sentiment values and mention counts going back to 2017. The complete data set is available via the API.
Take me to the API
ETH Specific Mentions
As of May 8, 2026 10:57:46 AM EDT (1 min. ago)
Includes all comments and posts. Mentions per user per ticker capped at one per hour.
9 min ago • u/MulberryAcceptable39 • r/ethtrader • why_everyones_talking_about_tom_lees_22k_ethereum • C
We need some good old fashioned manipulation to bring ETH token to the moon. Been holding for six years and down -48%
/s
sentiment 0.35
28 min ago • u/fbielejec • r/quant • karpathy_autoresearch_loop_driving_a_hmm_gem • Models • B
I've tested running an LLM-driven autoresearch loop on a quant-trading stack
**Setup**
Two-file pattern borrowed from Karpathy's autoresearch experiment:
* [harness.py](http://harness.py) is read-only — data loader, scoring metric, constants.
* [sweep.py](http://sweep.py) is fair game — model and training loop.
* [program.md](http://program.md) tells the agent what to maximize and what's off-limits.
Agent picks a hypothesis, edits the modifiable file, runs the experiment, scores it, keeps or reverts, repeats.
**Model**
* 3-state HMM (Gaussian emissions) for regime detection.
* 3 GEM specialist models (bull / bear / ranging).
* Meta-allocator that soft-blends specialist portfolios when HMM confidence is below threshold.
* \~15 sweepable parameters per specialist.
**Scoring**
score = annualized\_return × drawdown\_dampener × diversification\_bonus
Plus a hard rejection on annualized return < -50% or stress-test Calmar < 0 at 1.5× the base fee.
**Run**
* 437 tokens (431 from Binance + 6 from DefiLlama), 2020-2026 (included the 2022 bear), \~508K daily candles.
* Causal walk-forward backtest with 250-day warmup. No peeking past t-1 to decide at time t
* Phase 1: Optimize HMM hyperparameters.
* Phase 2: Optimize per-specialist GemParams, one specialist at a time.
* Then a verification grid.
**Results**
Score went from -inf (every baseline rejected under a realistic 30 bps round-trip + 1.5× stress) to 1175.2. BTC+ETH buy-and-hold scored 8.3 on the same metric.
**Interesting findings**
1. Soft-blend > hard-switch. Raising hard\_switch\_threshold from 0.80 to 0.90 (so the ensemble almost never commits to one regime) scored +25%. The HMM's regime calls are informative but not confident enough to act on as a binary classifier. Or the Gaussian emissions are an oversimplification .
2. All three specialists want lower R² thresholds than my priors said. Three independent sweeps, same direction of correction. Again, exponential model is probably to simplistic. Piecewise exponential over a rolling window might be an interesting future direction.
3. top\_n=1 wins in bear regimes at scale. [Confirms an earlier 4-token finding](https://blog.nodrama.io/gem-bear-market-models/) on a universe \~100× larger.
**Known limitation**
One-at-a-time phased sweeping can't find between-parameter interactions. I'm now thinking about it.
**Links**
* Full write-up: [https://blog.nodrama.io/autoresearch-gem-strategy/](https://blog.nodrama.io/autoresearch-gem-strategy/)
* Runnable repro (Python): [https://github.com/fbielejec/trader-research](https://github.com/fbielejec/trader-research)
sentiment 0.23
32 min ago • u/account009988 • r/CryptoCurrency • whats_one_crypto_lesson_you_learned_that • C
Only BTC and ETH. Nothing else
sentiment 0.00
37 min ago • u/somedaysitsdark • r/ethereum • daily_general_discussion_may_08_2026 • C
The dude is a paid cheerleader for ETH.
Where this community and I seem to disagree is that I don't mind having some cheerleaders.
sentiment 0.13
38 min ago • u/iamfooled1 • r/AMD_Stock • daily_discussion_friday_20260508 • C
Over the years, I’ve made the mistake of investing in the “second-best” company and hoping it would eventually catch up: ETH vs. Bitcoin, AMD vs. NVDA, and so on. Just look at MRVL vs. AVGO over the last five years. That said, AMD now looks like the clear leader in CPUs, and I think that puts us in a much better position going forward.
sentiment 0.71
46 min ago • u/WoodpeckerHorror3468 • r/ethereum • daily_general_discussion_may_08_2026 • C
yes that is the path to $ETH rising. but Eth/Ethereum fans try to push valuation metrics that just don't hold water.
sentiment -0.07
47 min ago • u/ProfitAccording4178 • r/CryptoCurrency • current_alternative_to_tornadocash • ADVICE • B
I have been trying to figure this out for a while, Railgun gets mentioned constantly but someone I know sent funds that touched it to Coinbase and got his whole account locked instantly when deposit was credited.

At that point what is even the purpose of a privacy tool if the moment you deposit to a CEX, it get frozen?... I don't think anything on Ethereum really replaced Tornado yet. Most people seem to have moved to Monero or cross chain routes because ETH privacy feels basically dead now. 

Has anyone actually found something that works?
sentiment -0.62
53 min ago • u/bubblesmcnutty • r/ethereum • daily_general_discussion_may_08_2026 • C
And it was June 12 of 2017 that ETH made its last ATH against BTC at .148. Almost 9 years later we are sitting at .028
sentiment 0.00
55 min ago • u/Itchy-Box-7378 • r/CryptoMarkets • made_a_small_profit_on_btc_now_im_wondering_if • C
With tokenization i believe ETH traffic will stay high which will eventually drive price to a new revaluation in the higher 4 figures, would be a nice return from current levels.
sentiment 0.42
57 min ago • u/I_often_bump_my_head • r/CryptoMoonShots • remember_the_shuffle_monster_shuf • Eth meme:rocket: • B
Re-post because I slightly messed up a couple of metrics that I had remembered incorrectly.
The following is not financial advice and no AI was used to help me write any of this out.
Before I get into this, I want to say that I do have one reservation about sharing this.
Over the years the Telegram group for SHUF evolved into something pretty special, which is a very small group of crypto enthusiasts, ETH maxis, builders & traders sharing interesting things along with some good banter. There is very little moderation in the chat because it just isn’t really required because there aren’t any dickheads or scammers, etc. People are even free to openly discuss (as opposed to hard shill) other projects and everyone is cool and respectful. It’s pretty quiet in there these days but I don’t want to be the one to fuck it up. I won’t share the direct link to it but it’s not a secret and it’s pretty easy to find if you’re so inclined. All I ask is that if you do find your way there just don’t be a dickhead and please respect the vibe there.
With that out of the way, Shuffle Monster (SHUF) was launched back in 2019. I have noticed recently a bit of a new meta which is OG ETH contracts (which at this point is probably 2020 and earlier). That emerging trend is what got me thinking that maybe we haven’t heard the last of SHUF. I also feel like that OG ETH token meta could continue to pick up some steam over the next decade. So the resurrection of the Shuffle Monster may not happen this week or this year but I'm increasingly convinced that it's coming at some point.
SHUF was the first of its kind (combining deflationary and redistribution to holders mechanics). At the time of launch this was a very unique experiment, it pre-dated reflection tokens which would come later. The specific details of the contract are available elsewhere (check the Medium which is still available) but the high level summary is that 1% of every transaction is burned forever and 1% is distributed at random to one of the top 512 holders. Yes, here in 2026 you have now heard of this type of thing many times before and there have subsequently been many rip offs and scam copycats but the fact is that SHUF was the first to do this. Try to find an earlier contract doing this (it was the first evolution beyond just a straight up deflationary mechanic).
The original airdrop for SHUF was based on an ETH snapshot from an unannounced earlier date (so it couldn’t be planned for or gamed). From memory, for every 1 ETH you held you could claim 150 SHUF tokens for free up to a maximum of 1500 tokens. This put the token largely in the hands of some pretty big ETH holders from the very beginning and led to a really nice token distribution generally. I have spent a bit of time recently looking at the activity of the top 50 or so wallets holding SHUF and many of them haven’t been active in years. I assume a portion of these are lost or forgotten about at this point. If SHUF does come back I expect that there isn’t going to be much if any selling pressure there to slow things down.
Speaking of slowing things down, SHUF suffered from some unfortunate timing back in the day. Just as it was starting to take off a bit (the ATH was close to 1 million from memory), ETH fees went absolutely bananas. If you were around back then, I’m thinking it must have been 2020/21, you might remember there was a period where the fee for a simple Uniswap transaction could be over $100. SHUF’s unique contract means that the transaction fee is always slightly higher than a standard one. That’s no big deal when we are talking a few cents difference but it was an absolute show stopper back in the day when we were staring down the barrel of $200 or $300 fees. Thankfully that problem is now a distant memory.
Even with very little activity over the past few years, there’s an interesting thing happening with SHUF. There are bots that arbitrage the price imbalance between the SHUF/ETH pool and the SHUF/DAI pool. And every time they do this they are quietly burning the supply. There were 1,010,101 SHUF tokens when it launched. As of today there are around 907,000 left. And keep in mind a bunch of it is held in wallets that are presumably no longer active.
The SHUF dev is fully doxxed and is still active in the crypto space. He is still creating unique and experimental projects - the latest being FUCK token, which was completely built with an esoteric language called Brainfuck (some big brain stuff that I don’t completely understand but once again first of its kind). The entire supply of FUCK was actually airdropped to SHUF holders. There’s obviously no guarantee something like that would happen again but FUCK came out of nowhere fully developed and stealth launched. 
As far as SHUF goes, the [website is still up](https://shuffle.monster/), the Telegram is still active, the [X is still there](https://x.com/ShuffleToken), the [Medium still exists](https://medium.com/@ShuffleMonster).
As far as I know it’s the only truly OG deflationary token still around, quiet, on life support, but still around. With liquidity.
BTW, if you search for SHUF on X or here on [r/cryptomoonshots](https://www.reddit.com/r/cryptomoonshots/) have a look who some of the early supporters were, you may recognise some of them.
I’m hoping we can get a new generation of soldiers into the trenches for SHUF, it’s not a pump and dump token, it won’t rug, there’s likely to be very little selling pressure when it goes back up and I just think it’s deserving of another look.
I will leave you with this interesting piece of history from August 2019 when SHUF was in the top ten most traded tokens in the early days of Uniswap! Uniswap had only been around for about 9 months at that point.
[https://x.com/ShuffleToken/status/1163140143894716417](https://x.com/ShuffleToken/status/1163140143894716417)
Here's the CA, do your own research and all that business:
0x3a9fff453d50d4ac52a6890647b823379ba36b9e
sentiment 0.99
1 hr ago • u/DBRiMatt • r/ethtrader • daily_general_discussion_may_08_2026_utc1 • C
Release the ETH!
Thanks for the publication
sentiment 0.49
1 hr ago • u/Tricky_Troll • r/ethereum • daily_general_discussion_may_08_2026 • C
**Tricky's Daily Doots #1,466**
**Yesterday's Daily 07/05/2026**
[Previous Daily Doots](https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/1t60qpm/daily_general_discussion_may_07_2026/okftu1v/)
- u/alexiskef breaks [today's DeFi exploit.](https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/1t60qpm/daily_general_discussion_may_07_2026/oke6jbg/) 🔓
- u/ethdaily delivers [the daily ETH news.](https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/1t60qpm/daily_general_discussion_may_07_2026/okju2ua/) 📰
- u/Jey_s_TeArS delivers [the daily haiku.](https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/1t60qpm/daily_general_discussion_may_07_2026/okknl81/) 📝
sentiment 0.00
1 hr ago • u/AmanCMN • r/ethtrader • eth_1h_sideways_movement_inside_the_channel • Trading • T
ETH 1H. Sideways movement inside the channel. Targets and key levels are marked on the chart.
sentiment 0.00
2 hr ago • u/Misia7 • r/defi • metamask_swap_fees_are_ridiculous • :discuss: Discussion • B
MetaMask swaps are usually convenient since it's fast to execute but i noticed that I just paid close to $75 swapping $900 of ETH to USDC. that's their INSANE service fee on top of gas, which i didn't even notice for months.

Turns out their swap feature is just aggregating other routes with additional fee, There has to be a better option that's still shows the real swap cost before confirmation without KYC. what are people actually using for this?
sentiment 0.10
2 hr ago • u/DiskFearless4448 • r/ethereum • daily_general_discussion_may_08_2026 • C
$TRUMP and $MELANIA are 100% not why ETH is where it is
sentiment 0.00
2 hr ago • u/hanniabu • r/ethereum • daily_general_discussion_may_08_2026 • C
> With ETH, too many people still want a formula
BTC doesn't have a formula
sentiment 0.08
2 hr ago • u/LiquidityCompass • r/ethtrader • why_everyones_talking_about_tom_lees_22k_ethereum • C
Exactly. AI is mostly the narrative layer for now. The real driver is liquidity + capital flows combined with ETH increasingly behaving like a collateral and settlement asset instead of just a speculative token.
sentiment 0.66
2 hr ago • u/harpocryptes • r/ethereum • daily_general_discussion_may_08_2026 • C
>There is a narrative floating around that ETH tends to perform better in the first half of the year, while BTC performs better in the latter half.
Why would that be true? By what mechanism?
Also, crypto is too young to have enough data to think this is anything else that random noise that only tells you something about the past, not the future.
sentiment 0.84
2 hr ago • u/TraderNomad1 • r/CryptoMarkets • anyone_else_feels_like_this_cycle_isnt_behaving • Discussion • B
Been in crypto for quite a while and I've always kind of trusted the halving cycle playbook. BTC runs, then ETH catches up, then midcaps, then the shitcoin casino opens, you know the drill.
This time it feels off to me. BTC is doing its thing fine, but alts? Most of my bags are just bleeding slowly or doing these 2 day pumps that get sold into immediately. No real follow through.
Idk if it's just that there's way too much supply now (every week there's a new L1, a new memecoin meta, etc) or if liquidity is just spread too thin across thousands of tokens that didn't exist in 2021.
Not saying it's over, just that the rotation thing people keep parroting isn't really happening the way it used to. Or maybe I'm just coping because my portfolio ins't looking so good this days.
sentiment 0.61
2 hr ago • u/Crypto-Bets • r/litecoin • remember_when_ltc_was_positioned_as_digital_silver • C
LitVM needs to be able to contend with ETH & Solana, otherwise it’ll be just another dead smart-contract platform.
sentiment -0.62


Share
About
Pricing
Policies
Markets
API
Info
tz UTC-4
Connect with us
ChartExchange Email
ChartExchange on Discord
ChartExchange on X
ChartExchange on Reddit
ChartExchange on GitHub
ChartExchange on YouTube
© 2020 - 2026 ChartExchange LLC