ETHEUR
Ethereum / Euro
crypto Composite

might convert my USD stables into more .BTC and .ETH

**Tricky's Daily Doots #1,583**
**Yesterday's Daily 01/09/2026**
[Previous Daily Doots](https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/1w424z1/daily_general_discussion_september_01_2026/p7a3ik1/)
- u/nonetherless325 brings up [the ETH FUD around RobinHood chain](https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/1w424z1/daily_general_discussion_september_01_2026/p759asn/) with some takes from Twitter users in the replies. 🏹
- u/ethdaily delivers [the daily ETH news.](https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/1w424z1/daily_general_discussion_september_01_2026/p7a2xal/) 📰
- u/Jey_s_TeArS delivers [the daily haiku.](https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/1w424z1/daily_general_discussion_september_01_2026/p79j5m8/) 📝

haha all good, thanks for the reminder of my reminder. .18 ETH myself so all very similar lmao

I think it would be a broad rally, all majors going up, and things like ETH, SOL, HYPE, LIT overperforming. And maybe some old coins like LINK and XRP. 

AI/quantum may create volatility and technical challenges, but neither automatically kills crypto. Over 5–10 years, the strongest growth case is probably stablecoins, tokenized assets, payments and settlement infrastructure. BTC/ETH can still grow too, but for different reasons.

AI bubble popping would probably drag crypto down with it. The two have traded as correlated risk assets this whole cycle, same liquidity chasing both, so a real AI selloff triggers risk-off sentiment that hits crypto too. Not because of any actual technical overlap but just correlated positioning.
Quantum is a real long-term risk, but not an immediate one. A sufficiently powerful quantum computer could theoretically break the elliptic curve cryptography wallets currently rely on, but credible timelines put that years out, and quantum-resistant cryptography already exists. Chains can migrate to it the same way they've handled other protocol upgrades before.
The Japan/US debt situation is happening right now, it’s not hypothetical. The Treasury's been buying yen with dollars to prop up the currency, while Japan's been selling US Treasuries to defend the yen from their side, part of what pushed 30-year yields to a 19-year high recently. It cuts both ways for crypto. Tighter liquidity and higher yields usually pressure risk assets, crypto included. But sovereign debt stress like this is also exactly the scenario the currency-debasement case for Bitcoin was built around. Which effect dominates probably comes down to how disorderly this gets.
On 5-10 year adoption, stablecoins look like the safer bet, real regulatory momentum and institutional infrastructure building around them right now. BTC and ETH holder growth is genuinely harder to call with any confidence over that horizon. Be skeptical of anyone claiming certainty either way.

AI popping doesn’t automatically kill crypto. They’re both high-beta liquidity toys, so if risk-off hits tech, crypto usually eats shit with it. That’s a flow thing, not “AI replaces Bitcoin.” Longer term, AI agents paying each other is a real use case. Stablecoins win that more than random L1s.

Quantum isn’t a 2026 problem. If large quantum ever threatens current signatures, chains can migrate. The “quantum kills crypto next year” posts are mostly bag advertising. Don’t rotate into some “quantum resistant” coin because a YouTuber got scared.

US debt and Japan drama are the same story: messy fiscal systems and liquidity shocks. Short term that can dump everything. Medium term it usually helps the “I want something outside the banking spreadsheet” pitch. BTC and dollars-onchain benefit more than 200 new ecosystems.

5–10 years: crypto as casino tokens can easily stay mid. Crypto as rails probably gets bigger. Stablecoin usage should keep growing. BTC/ETH holders can rise even while most alts go to zero. “More popular” ≠ every coin you buy moons.

If you’re starting projects, pick something people already do (trade, pay, save) and don’t build a new chain because the old ones “need an ecosystem.” Most of those are just waiting rooms.

cow.fi is my go to for ETH Trading.
Otherwise app.uniswap.org and sushi.com are my go two for trading alts/meme/shitcoins

It probably will because its ETH

72% of ETH ETF inflows in august came from one company. is that bullish or a single point of failure?

KuCoin now supports ETH deposits and withdrawals via Robinhood Chain. 🎉

It's reliable at doing exactly what you configured — which is usually the problem.
Four things worth checking before you trust those numbers:
Position sizing. If order size is set to a % of equity, you're compounding, and results go exponential. A 32,240% on ETH is far more likely to be compounding than edge. Switch to a fixed amount per trade and see what survives.
Commissions and slippage. Both default to zero. Set realistic values and re-run. If the edge disappears, it was never there — that test alone kills a lot of strategies.
Intrabar fills. The tester doesn't know whether the high or the low came first within a bar. If your stop and target can both be hit in the same candle, it's guessing, and the guess tends to flatter you. That's what bar magnifier is for, and it's exactly the feature behind the paywall you hit.
Lookahead. If you're pulling data from another timeframe, make sure it's set to no lookahead — otherwise the strategy is reading candles that hadn't closed yet.
Also: your results are negative on XRP and TRX. That's actually the honest signal in your post — the same logic works on some assets and fails on others, which usually means the wins are asset-specific rather than a general edge. Worth checking how many trades each of those numbers is built on; anything under ~30 tells you very little either way.

Hi everyone, starting my GRE prep now and looking for some candid feedback on my target score, school list viability, and general prep strategy.
**My Profile:**
* **Education:** [B.Tech](http://B.Tech) (2024 graduate) from a Tier 1 engineering college in India (IIT/BITS).
* **GPA:** 3.7 / 4.0 (converted equivalent).
* **Experience:** 1 Summer Internship at a Tier-1 Investment Bank (GS/JPMS/MS) + 2 years of full-time experience at a major quantitative hedge fund.
* **Target Programs:** Top 10 US MFE/MSQF programs (e.g., Baruch, Princeton, CMU MSCF, NYU Courant, Berkeley, Columbia, Cornell) + ETH Zurich.
**My Plan:**
I am not working so I can dedicate myself completely to the prep. I am looking to work on GRE first (using gregmat), aiming 320+ with 169+ in quant. I an aiming to give my first attempt in second half of this month. Meanwhile I will keep drafting my LoR. I can get it from a college prof in MQaths dept and my professional manager who has been in industry for 10+ years.
**Courses taken:**
Maths and probability (advanced)
Numerical techniques
Finance and economics for engineers
Computer programming
Engineering mathematics 1 (basic)
**Questions for the sub:**
1. **Target GRE Score:** What is the absolute baseline I need to avoid getting filtered? Assuming a 169+ in quant is mandatory, what should I realistically aim for in Verbal/AWA to be safe at places like Princeton or MIT?
2. **Are these schools realistic?** Given the buy-side experience, do I have a competitive shot at the MFE M7 equivalent, or are these programs a crapshoot even with this profile?
3. **Prep Strategy:** Since I am starting right now, what resources or timelines do you recommend to fast-track a top-tier score?
Would like to get some feedbacks or suggestion.
Thanks.

The tester is useful, but those numbers are a smoke alarm, especially +32,240% on ETH. Check for repainting or future leakage, same-bar execution, bar magnifier settings, fees, slippage and whether orders really execute at the next tradable price. Also compare CAGR, max drawdown and time in market, not only terminal return. I’d export the trades and rerun one asset in a small independent simulator. If it survives that plus a frozen walk-forward period, then it gets interesting.

NCIQ vs BTC/ETH/SOL ETFs individually

Share the screenshot so I can make sure you have the time frame correct and you don't have it set to ETH giving far worse results

The price of Solana along with BTC and ETH is being held up by institutionals and funds to frustrate everyone (both longs and shorts) into not seeing it pump further or dump down to a breakdown level or anywhere close to it. These are short-term consolidations, but all indicators are pointing strong bullish momentum in SOL as well as BTC.

This is why separating spot from the trade matters, like if the goal is accumulating ETH, touching the core stack creates a really messy benchmark. Now because OP mentioned it e.g. Moon lets you take the directional ETH trade separately with the wager defined upfront, so the hold position can just sit there doing its job.

The mistake probably isn’t trading itself, it’s using the same ETH for both jobs. If you actually want to keep accumulating ETH, every swing trade should be judged against just leaving that stack alone.

Adding on fees probably explain some of it but I think the bigger problem is measuring the result in dollars instead of ETH. If you start with 14.2 ETH and finish with 12.8, the trade has to outperform that missing 1.4 ETH before it actually added anything.