ETHEUR
Ethereum / Euro
cryptoComposite

Sold NVDA a month ago at 239 and am thinking about going all in on ETH. Haven’t owned ETH for years but I think it’s going to be the real winner this bull market.

Wow, seems like a nice company. Are you US based? Even at annual big events at Oxbridge (one of them) and at ETH I met mostly juniors and HR people.

ETH is the hardest and most secure crypto SoV first, apps are secondary.

SPY, ES, QQQ, NQ, NVDA, TSLA, BTC and ETH Support and Resistance, Pivots and Highest Volume Levels for Day Traders, Nov 11

What's the utility of bitcoin besides melting silicon in the mad pursuit of putting 0's in front of hashes? Functionally there is no comparison, bitcoin is *Pong* compared to ETH's *Final Fantasy*. ETH literally runs 50% of the cryptosphere while all bitcoin does is make number go up or down. PoW is erratic and draws more power than small nations. PoS is consistent and runs on a laptop. I'm not sure which one is closer to a shitcoin. Maybe you take a guess.

I've been deep in the data lately and wanted to see for myself: what would actually happen if you just put £100, £150 or £250 a month into BTC, ETH, SOL or XRP? So I built this interactive page that lets you play with it yourself. It covers: \- The actual past cycles with real market prices (not modelled, the real wobbles and crashes are in there) \- Future projections using 4 different methods: the 4-year BTC cycle, power law, what history says, and a boring index fund benchmark \- You can blend the methods together or look at them one by one \- Cautious, middle and optimistic outlooks \- A shrinking returns breakdown showing how each cycle makes less than the last The whole thing is interactive so you can switch coins, change your monthly amount, flip between past and future, toggle different estimation methods on and off. Not financial advice obviously. But if you've been thinking about starting and want to see the numbers before you do, have a play. https://claude.ai/artifact/Y63tcAQY6KK3pjHcuhuueh

You are viewing it only with emotion, I'd guess you got burned holding ETH. Not all crypto is about getting rich, even Bitcoin was originally meant for something else (it failed successfully) What has made Ethereum underperform is simply related with what gives Ethereum a price to begin with. Mostly usage and tokenomics PoS is superior to PoW in almost every way. Most alt coin PoW aren't even secure because they don't have enough power protecting them from external attacks. Others have explained how, on the contrary, PoW is a lot more plutocratic. PoS is also plain more efficient (energy and operation expenses).

ETH at $4,000. So I could sell even at a slight loss

ETH breaking out of its 6 year channel and taking PEPE along with it

**Tricky's Daily Doots #1,650** **Yesterday's Daily 09/11/2026** [Previous Daily Doots](https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/1xrjzsp/daily_general_discussion_november_09_2026/19selp55p1eap/) - u/r2002 covers [the EF mandate controversy going to court.](https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/1xrjzsp/daily_general_discussion_november_09_2026/19sdtgipk6owz/) 👨‍⚖️ - u/ethdaily delivers [the daily ETH news.](https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/1xrjzsp/daily_general_discussion_november_09_2026/19se8x5gawuch/) 📰 - u/sm3gh34d shares [a great article advocating for a potentially major development pivot in the near future.](https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/1xrjzsp/daily_general_discussion_november_09_2026/19sei0nbhvc0z/) ⤴️

Getting customers in my SaaS (ETH edge updates on Discord)

ETH at $4k

Everyone loves to talk about "buying the blood," but if you actually look at the last 24 hours of 5-minute order flow and book depth, retail isn't buying fear. They're paying annualized interest to sit trapped inside an institutional chop box. Look at the 5-minute BTC perp tape and resting liquidity over the last 24 hours on the attached chart: * **19:00 to 22:00:** Price broke from the mid-74ks straight down to the $72,800 floor. That wasn't slow spot drift it was heavy forced selling and taker dumps, with $15.5M, $16.1M, $1.35M, and $18.3M red prints firing one after another until the $72,800 bid wall finally caught the bottom. * **22:00 to 03:30:** Typical elevator down, escalator up. It took five and a half hours of smaller $677k to $1.54M green prints just to claw back to $74,200 before hitting a brick wall of resting asks. * **07:00 to 08:00 (Nov 11):** Another flush straight through the late bounce buyers, tagging $783k and $1.18M in red prints at the bottom of the wick near $73,200. * **08:30 to 14:30:** Complete compression around $73,634. Within ±1% of price, the book is tilted $121.7M on the ask vs. $118.0M on the bid (49% bid), boxed right between a $73,560 bid wall and ask walls stacked at $73,760 and $74,800. Here is the insane part: after getting rinsed at 22:00 and swept again at 07:00, open interest is still sitting at $3.00B and funding is still positive at +0.0011%/h (+9.5% a year). Even every major alt on the board ETH (-2.39%), SOL (-2.71%), HYPE (-3.63%), XRP (-2.82%) is bleeding red today, and perp traders are still paying a premium to hold longs underneath heavy ask depth. Stop confusing "leverage refusing to close" with bullish conviction. When the largest single prints in a 24-hour window are $15M – $18M red nukes and the top of the book is stacked with asks, paying 9.5% APR to sit in the middle of the range is just donating margin to market makers. Cynical.

Hey everyone, I've been working on an automated crypto trading system for quite a while, covering BTC, ETH, SOL, and XRP. It's fully autonomous, handling everything from signal generation and position sizing to risk management and execution. No manual trading decisions. My main focus has always been risk management rather than trying to predict every market move. I've attached a performance report covering Feb 2025 to Sep 2026, including a comparison with an equal-weight buy-and-hold portfolio of the same four coins. The trading records come from real trading, not just a backtest. The report also looks at performance using volatility-scaled position sizing. I'm curious what people here think of the results, especially from a risk management perspective. I'm also exploring opportunities to move into institutional quant research or systematic trading. My background is in ML research, software development, and trading, though I haven't followed the traditional quant career path. Would this kind of work be relevant to a prop firm or a quant trading team? Interested to hear your thoughts.

Tom Lee keeps buying ETH! Total conviction which is nice to see. I'll continue to hold and stake. I've also fallen prey to whining on here. Mentally preparing myself for another drop. If it goes to $1,500 or even lower I'm fine with that. $800 - don't care. If it drops to $200 I'm buying a few! ***Tom Lee’s Bitmine Adds $20M in Ethereum, Seizing on Vitalik’s 'ETH Is Money' Declaration*** *The firm’s stash reached 6.07 million ETH—4.97% of supply and 99% of the way to its “Alchemy of 5%” goal—as chairman Tom Lee called Vitalik Buterin’s “ETH is money” comments a “seismic shift.”* [https://decrypt.co/382854/tom-lee-bitmine-adds-20m-ethereum-vitalik-eth-money](https://decrypt.co/382854/tom-lee-bitmine-adds-20m-ethereum-vitalik-eth-money)

Exchanges already have different limit up/down rules for overnight session. Should most retail trade overnight? No most institutions don't trade overnight unless they are MM. In fact I know many firms have long had a ban on their traders being active in the overnight because of the lack of liquidity. Even before ETH was expanded. In some cases even for futures that traded around the clock. For equities the major exchanges still mark the values at the closing print so for bookeepiing purposes at mutual funds and like won't be affected.

Why are we so quick to cast people out in the cold simply because they're disappointed with ETH's performance? Perhaps many of these people still genuinely believe in Ethereum and want to see it succeed. Perhaps they've been holding for years, watching the technology, adoption, and ecosystem grow tremendously, yet seeing very little of that success reflected in ETH's price. That's incredibly frustrating, especially when you consider inflation and the opportunity cost. Nobody is suggesting that returns are guaranteed. But surely investors are entitled to have expectations and to question why an asset has underperformed for so long. And telling people to just sell and move on misses the point. Maybe they don't want to sell because they still believe in Ethereum's future. They're simply struggling to reconcile that conviction with years of disappointing price action. I understand that relentless negativity can become tiresome, but so can the constant dismissal of legitimate concerns about ETH's performance. We should be able to celebrate Ethereum's technological achievements while also having honest conversations about its shortcomings as an investment. The two aren't mutually exclusive.

🌍 **Macro** Hotter-than-expected U.S. inflation pushed Treasury yields and the dollar higher, reversing the previous day’s equity rebound. The 2-year Treasury yield jumped 18 bps to 4.73%, while the 10-year yield approached 5%. The Dow fell 0.3%, the S&P 500 dropped 0.38%, and the Nasdaq declined 0.74%. Nvidia lost another 5.5% amid ongoing uncertainty surrounding its CEO. Crypto markets also weakened, with BTC briefly touching $72.7K and ETH falling toward $2,050. Spot BTC and ETH ETFs recorded combined net outflows of $386M on November 9, marking their third consecutive day of withdrawals. ⸻ 📈 **Market Snapshot** • BTC: $73,804.10 (-2.06%) • ETH: $2,053.36 (-3.83%) • NASDAQ: 25,065.87 (-0.74%) • S&P 500: 7,521.11 (-0.38%) • F&G: 29 (previous: 32) ⸻ 🧠 **Market Take** Prediction markets are expanding rapidly but facing increased regulatory scrutiny. Polymarket reported annualized revenue exceeding $1.8B, while its U.S. platform recorded over $14.5B in October trading volume, approximately 3.6 times June’s level. Growth was driven largely by sports and Combo event contracts. Meanwhile, the CFTC is investigating Kalshi over regulatory filing requirements, while Polymarket faces scrutiny over advertising and past compliance practices. Inflation is adding further pressure to risk assets. October headline CPI rose 0.4% month over month, while core CPI increased 0.3%, both above expectations. Fed officials have signaled that further tightening remains possible, with Christopher Waller not ruling out a 50-bps hike in December. Rising Treasury yields and continued ETF outflows could delay a recovery in crypto markets. **Key levels:** * Resistance: $74.5K–$75K * Support: $72.7K–$73K * Downside risk: $70K if support breaks * Trend: Bearish ⸻ 🔥 **Hot Tokens** * **INIT:** \+15% despite a network attack and temporary L1 shutdown, driven by speculative trading and a short squeeze. * **GRAM:** \+8% after Telegram’s founder revealed over 700K new self-custodial wallets were added within 48 hours. * **LIT:** \+9% as Lighter increased its token buyback activity, with trading volume reaching approximately $90.97M. * **ICP:** \+8.1% following DFINITY’s announcement that its decentralized cloud product, Cloud Engines, would launch this week. ⸻ 📰 **Key Updates** * **U.S.:** Texas lawmakers introduced HB 815, proposing to allow local governments to invest up to $10M in cryptocurrencies. Miami-Dade County also began accepting BTC for property tax payments. * **Polymarket:** Added withdrawal address whitelisting to strengthen account security. * **XRP Ledger:** Foundation proposed a quantum-resistant account design without additional user fees. * **Zcash:** Outlined its January 2027 NU8 upgrade, including an 8MB block size, Tachyon shielded pool, and extensible transaction format. * **Walt:** Launched a standalone crypto trading app beyond its Telegram-based business. * **Token unlocks:** ALLO unlocks 88.51% (approx. $26.42M) on Nov 11; RAIN unlocks 5.08% (approx. $197M) on Nov 12; AZTEC unlocks 31.81% (approx. $10.3M) on Nov 13. ⸻ ⚡ **Quick Take** BTC remains under pressure as sticky inflation, rising Treasury yields, and persistent ETF outflows weaken risk appetite. The $72.7K–$73K support zone is critical, while U.S. PPI and further Fed signals could determine whether selling pressure intensifies.

Solid points. Perhaps these arguments could be better served with clearer parameters and extending an understanding to what the other person might mean. As someone else pointed out today, a lot of these conversations lack nuance on both sides. For me personally, my biggest gripe is the number of people that come in here and call ETH a shit coin and add nothing else to the conversation. I understand people are frustrated and venting has its place, but just as I find myself critical of moon boys every time we've experienced a massive rise I just don't see how these types of comments contribute to the overall objectives or provide any real criticism.

In taking risks, as they say, gotta know when to hold 'em and when to fold 'em. Yes, I want ETH to succeed because I'm a holder. But, beyond that, the most important thing is for me is to make the best investing choices that I can. And that might mean being less of a holder. The reality is I've played it poorly when I didn't take action in reducing my stack when I identified strong bearish factors.

The pushback is exactly what I meant by people being antagonized. They're part of the pattern of "isn't X enough years?" And very often, they have to explain the details on how ETH is underperforming (the explanation might be what others refer to as "bombarded by negativity.") So, IMO, the negativity is often \*drawn out\* by others who dismiss the magnitude of PA from the past few years. In terms of upvotes, it's a fresh comment deep in a thread. And in any case, my original statement isn't about upvotes or downvotes. It's that there exists a pattern like this that causes people to be antagonized, and it's frequent.

You're missing the point. Yes, we're in a bear market now, but the problem is that ETH never really experienced a meaningful bull market in its third cycle to begin with. For long-term holders, this isn't simply about being disappointed by the latest downturn. ETH is now trading well below where it was five years ago, while the dollar has lost substantial purchasing power to inflation. In real terms, we've effectively endured something resembling a five-year bear market, even as other major assets reached new highs. And telling people to just sell and move on completely misses the point. Many of us have been invested in Ethereum since 2017 or earlier. We still believe in the technology and its potential. But believing in Ethereum doesn't mean we have to pretend ETH has been a good investment. There's a huge difference between complaining about short-term volatility and questioning why an asset has failed to deliver meaningful returns over an entire market cycle. At what point are long-term investors allowed to question the investment thesis without being told to sell or stop complaining? Five years? Ten? Twenty? Ethereum can be technologically successful while ETH continues to disappoint as an investment. Acknowledging that disconnect isn't being in denial. Refusing to discuss it might be.

>would you add another '5 years' to the waiting period? It kind of depends on whether there's something in the future I'm excited about, and whether that's outweighed by negatives to an extent that will kill asymmetrical bet. Right now I see: * Almost every other day there's some announcement talking about some system adopting ETH or ETH L2. So adoption does feel like it's about to scale. BULLISH. * But it is unclear how that benefits ETH the asset. BEARISH. * But if Ethereum is the first to solve PQ then why would you use any other digital asset for store of value? BULLISH. * But seeing Vitalik show up on stage in a cloak and reading this complaint about suicide pacts makes me question if the EF geniuses are mature enough to manage the technical and spiritual roadmap of Ethereum. BEARISH. * Elizabeth Warren will bring "clarity" to Crypto but not in a good way. BEARISH. So at this moment do I think Eth is a slam dunk? Absolutely not. But is it a reasonable asymmetrical bet? I still think yes. Everyone should have some crypto in their portfolio and I think Eth is the best out of the bunch.

They might have less capital to buy BTC and ETH, and right now a lot of the buying pressure is coming from DATs like MSTR, Strive, BMNR, etc.

I'd say the flows, at least for ETH. CPI hit everything, but on a 24h basis BTC is down about 2.3% while ETH is down about 4.2%, so there's an ETH-specific seller on top of the macro move, and roughly $550M of ETF outflows in about a week and a half is the obvious one. BitMine is real demand, but ~$20M a week against ~$185M out in a single day isn't close. And since most of its stack is staked, it shrinks liquid float more than it props up price day to day. The 24h low was about $2,003, so $2k has already been tested once. If outflows slow and that level holds, sellers start to look tired. If it breaks while the ETFs are still bleeding, I wouldn't lean on the round number much.