Create Account
Log In
Dark
chart
exchange
Premium
Terminal
Screener
Stocks
Crypto
Forex
Trends
Depth
Close
Check out our API

ETHEUR
Ethereum / Euro
crypto Composite

Real-time
May 11, 2026 8:57:23 AM EDT
1979.53EUR+0.358%(+7.06)4,265ETH8,501,549EUR
1978.37Bid   1980.31Ask   1.94Spread
OverviewHistoricalDepthTrendsNewsTrends
Composite
1979.53
Coinbase
1979.45
Bitstamp
1978.83
OKX
1979.53
Bitfinex
1980.00
Gemini
1984.83
ETH Reddit Mentions
Subreddits
Limit Labels     

We have sentiment values and mention counts going back to 2017. The complete data set is available via the API.
Take me to the API
ETH Specific Mentions
As of May 11, 2026 8:55:50 AM EDT (1 min. ago)
Includes all comments and posts. Mentions per user per ticker capped at one per hour.
4 min ago • u/Ok_Tell_4652 • r/CryptoCurrency • is_total3_signaling_the_start_of_a_broader • C
Yeah the ETH/BTC ratio is really key here - until that starts looking stronger it's hard to get too excited about alt season. I'm watching for sustained momentum above that resistance zone rather than just these quick pops that keep getting rejected

The selective nature of current moves actually makes sense for early stages but we need broader participation to really confirm anything meaningful is happening
sentiment 0.62
12 min ago • u/InvestaHepps • r/CryptoCurrency • is_total3_signaling_the_start_of_a_broader • C
Feels like the important distinction is that TOTAL3 improving and a confirmed broad alt rotation aren’t necessarily the same thing yet. The recovery underneath definitely looks healthier than a few weeks ago though. Stablecoins improved again, BTC dominance stopped accelerating higher, and TOTAL3 has clearly started repairing structurally.
But at the same time ETH/BTC still looks weak overall and TOTAL3 is still sitting below the bigger long-term confirmation area.
Usually broader rotations start with a smaller group of alts outperforming first before participation spreads wider across the market. So this kind of setup can absolutely be the early stage of a rotation attempt… it just probably isn’t full confirmation yet imo.
sentiment 0.44
38 min ago • u/True_Bodybuilder8095 • r/ethtrader • just_in_the_ethereum_foundation_unstaked_496m • News • T
Just in: The Ethereum Foundation unstaked $49.6M worth of ETH, pushing more into circulation and catching the market’s attention
sentiment 0.23
42 min ago • u/biba8163 • r/CryptoCurrency • daily_crypto_discussion_may_10_2026_gmt0 • C
ETH/BTC Ratio from Summer of 2017 to 2026
0.16 |
|*
| \
| \
0.12 | \
| \
| \
| \
0.08 | *
| \ *-----*-----*\
| \ / \\
| \\ / \*
0.04 | \ // \\
| *-- / \ --*
| \-* \*---/
|
0.00 |
+-------------------------------------------------------
'17 '18 '19 '20 '21 '22 '23 '24 '25 '26
sentiment 0.00
58 min ago • u/Sufficient-Rent9886 • r/ethtrader • using_bitmex_alongside_binance_for_derivatives • C
yeah honestly this makes sense to me, a lot of people keep everything on one exchange just because its convenient but once perps become your main thing the differences start standing out way more. i know a few traders who split their setup the same way, one place for spot and another strictly for derivs and risk management. the collateral flexibility is probably the biggest reason i’d consider it too, not constantly converting between assets saves a ton of friction over time. only thing that always makes me cautious with multi exchange setups is keeping track of exposure and liquidation risk across platforms, especially during volatile ETH moves when funding and margin can get weird fast.
sentiment -0.05
2 hr ago • u/KingPabloo • r/CryptoCurrency • bro_to_brocrypto_advice • C
Bro advice - never invest more than 10% of your portfolio in crypto, ideally even a much smaller percentage. Then stick to BTC and ETH.
sentiment 0.42
2 hr ago • u/biba8163 • r/CryptoMarkets • is_the_altcoin_season_delayed_or_already_over • C
> We will get an alt season at some point, hopefully this year. Don’t listen to anyone who says this time is different.
Imagine being this clueless and still doubling down after losing so much money...
> **Favourite ALTS for 2025?** *(Dec. 16, 2024)*
> "All AI alts. Easy money."
> "There are loads. Small cap AI alts are a bit risky but can x10. Safer AI alts are TAO and XMW. Vertai, Serv, Eave, Pinklink, Dsync are good holds but some of them up a lot recently."
> - TAO -42%
> - XMW -99.9%
> - Vertai -97.86%
> - Serv - 78.9%
> - Eave - Delisted
> - Dsync -97.44%
https://np.reddit.com/r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1hfhuws/favourite_alts_for_2025/m2c5bdv/
> **BTC whale dumped their bitcoin bags for ethereum positions..$76M sold, 68k eth bought. Why?** *(Aug. 2025)*
> "Even idiots on here know BTC>ETH>ALTS."
https://np.reddit.com/r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1mw7bwo/btc_whale_dumped_their_bitcoin_bags_for_ethereum/naa9kyy/
And I dropped so many clues for the clueless...
> That is **my prediction range $100K to $120K IF we do real well.** But BTC going 2X from here is not going to give you 5X, 10X, 50X on all these Alts that people are holding at major losses and need those type of numbers to just break even.... **Most Alts are absolutely fucked now. (September 2024)**
https://np.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/1f98l4j/daily_crypto_discussion_september_5_2024_gmt0/llnadcz/
> A lot of people are holding heavy Alt bags **rationalizing a huge Altseason is coming** this year. Your Alt echo chambers are telling you, it's 100% happening. **There is zero percentage chance of that happening** without another big BTC leg up so it would be wise to temper your expectations.
**(January 1st 2025)**
https://np.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/1hr1bgb/btc_returns_2010_2024/m4uaz4g/
> **The real Altreckoning will be in 2026.** **(October 11, 2025)**
> *ONLY 5 out of the top 200 coins from November 2021 are in profit.* *The majority are down -60% to -90% since then.* People still holding are hoping an Altseason will come but in 2026 it will start becoming more and more obvious nobody is coming to buy their bags.
> https://coinmarketcap.com/historical/20211109/
https://np.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/1o3h44p/daily_crypto_discussion_october_11_2025_gmt0/nixcgb5/
sentiment 0.71
2 hr ago • u/Itur_ad_Astra • r/ethereum • daily_general_discussion_may_11_2026 • C
How can I do that when ETH is practically at the same price every year for the past six years?
Are you talking about the 2021 $2100? The 2022 one? 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026?
sentiment 0.00
2 hr ago • u/Icy-Assignment-9344 • r/defi • natural_language_defi_execution_sounds_simple • C
the intent-confirmation layer is the right framing. one thing that makes this harder than it looks: LLM nondeterminism.
most natural language DeFi interfaces use commercial APIs (gpt-4, claude) where the same prompt can produce slightly different interpretations across calls, even at temperature 0. for a single swap that's tolerable. for chained intents like "swap some ETH, bridge to polygon, lend the rest" the model might interpret "some" as 50% in one call and 10% in the next.
that breaks the confirmation layer subtly. the user reads the summary once and trusts it. they re-execute a similar command a week later, get a different interpretation, but trust the system because last time it worked. the confirmation looked fine both times. neither was wrong on its face. but the system is not deterministic and the user can't see that.
so I'd argue the line isn't just complexity of action, it's reproducibility of intent. fixed numerical amounts (swap 0.5 ETH) → single confirm is fine. relative quantifiers (some, most, rest, idle, best) → the confirmation needs to lock in the numerical interpretation explicitly and store it, so the same phrasing replays the same way next time.
bonus problem: most teams building these agents are on commercial LLM rate limits and silently fall back to weaker models when they hit them, which compounds the nondeterminism mid-session. we run a free LLM API at apifreellm and see this category of issue come up a lot in DeFi agent builds.
sentiment 0.97
3 hr ago • u/TraderNomad1 • r/CryptoMarkets • this_cycle_isnt_antialtcoin_its_antiempty • C
Same lesson hit me last cycle. Bagheld a few "promising" L1s that went straight to zero but mostly BTC and ETH now with small bags in stuff that actually has users or revenue. Still get fomo on random tickers sometimes lol, working on it.
sentiment 0.72
3 hr ago • u/Ambitious_Rich7660 • r/ethereum • daily_general_discussion_may_11_2026 • C
Feels like people are still underestimating how much infra + data layers like $SQD can quietly grow in the background while everyone focuses only on ETH price moves, interesting cycle to watch 👀
sentiment 0.77
3 hr ago • u/mini_miner1 • r/ethereum • daily_general_discussion_may_11_2026 • C
Do you all ever use eth prices as a timeline for your life? For example... "do you remember when you last did \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_? Oh yeah, I remember that it was about 2 years ago because ETH price was $X at that point."
Or is it just me?
sentiment 0.41
4 hr ago • u/AmberSeduceX • r/CryptoMarkets • this_cycle_isnt_antialtcoin_its_antiempty • C
sticking to BTC and ETH for now, but I’m keeping an eye on alts that actually solve real problems or have real adoption.
sentiment -0.33
4 hr ago • u/IntrepidArt3053 • r/ethtrader • ethereum_price_exactly_the_same_after_5_full_years • C
who cares if they win against all other shitty cat&dog meme nonsense? nobody cares either the ETH or BTC, price only driven by the capitalist gangstas
sentiment 0.54
4 hr ago • u/thejohnnyr • r/ethtrader • eth_3000_before_august • Discussion • T
ETH $3000 before August?
sentiment 0.00
4 hr ago • u/haurog • r/ethereum • daily_general_discussion_may_11_2026 • C
> Rocketscan hasn't worked for a long time.
Rocketscan was done by a community member and unfortunately was never open sourced. The community member could not update rocketscan with all the changes necessary for it to remain usable, so they shut it down. There are some other community driven sites which look a specific topics within the rocketpool community, but nothing as all encompassing as rocketscan was:
rocketexplorer.net, is a very light version of rocketscan, but it can be useful to get a rough overview. Not sure if they kept up with the newest upgrades though.
rocket-performance.net, looks at node performances and helps people to see if certain events lead to nodes going offline.
rocketdash.net, looks at the new megapool deposits since the last upgrade and also gives some general overview over rocketpool
rocketsweep.app, you can see and claim your rewards from running validators
> Apparently they only have 6 employees
Rocketpool always was a very small team. I think they raised around $5.5M during the ICO (~8-9 years ago). With that money you cannot have a large team over such a long period. Nevertheless, they managed to build the only permissionless and decentralized LST in the Ethereum space. Could they have some more marketing and business development focused people in the team? Yes, definitely. Rocketpool also always relied on their community to implement things. This unfortunately makes it slower than other protocols to adapt to changes in the staking landscape.
> What is Rocket Pool doing
Currently the rocketpool is in between upgrades. Saturn-1 happened in February. This upgrade allowed for more capital efficient staking, meaning only 4 ETH needed per validator. Which in turn also means the protocol needs fewer node runners. Many people still want to run nodes and are waiting in the queue to get matched with people depositing to rETH.
Saturn-2 is currently being worked on and some details are being specced by the more active community members. One of the larger parts is how to handle exits. It will allow to have liquidity available which should further reduce depegs as well as allow to exit underperforming nodes which is a large reason why rETH has a lower APR than other LSTs most of the time.
Last autumn a company called rocksolid (rocksolid.network) launched a vault for rETH users to get more rewards on their rETH by deploying it in various defi protocols. You get a small additional reward on your staked ETH and until now they have not lost any ETH in any of the hacks, which honestly is pretty impressive and speaks for the due diligence the rocksolid team does. I have not used them yet though.
sentiment 1.00
4 hr ago • u/Glyzzza_ • r/CryptoMarkets • this_cycle_isnt_antialtcoin_its_antiempty • C
Yesss, BTC ETH and SOL some GOLD and AVAX for diversification ☺️
sentiment 0.46
4 hr ago • u/Syrion1984 • r/defi • weekly_defi_discussion_what_are_your_moves_for • C
I've opened some BTC longs just now, after price action came down during the night. Other than that, I'm looking at ETH and SOL too, ready to move into either a LONG or SHORT when my trading signals dictate it.
sentiment -0.12
5 hr ago • u/haurog • r/ethereum • daily_general_discussion_may_11_2026 • C
Warning, very geeky hardware topic ahead
About [two years ago](https://old.reddit.com/r/ethfinance/comments/1ewn8dw/daily_general_discussion_august_20_2024/lj2anr4/) I started playing with RISC-V boards with the goal to run an Ethereum full node on them. RISC-V is a CPU architecture which is different from the usual Intel/AMD or ARM CPUs found in moden computers and smartphones. The biggest difference is that the standard is free. Anyone with enough money can develop a CPU using this architecture and profit from the ever growing software support around it.
After playing around with the boards in summer 2024 and triaging all the clients for how easy it will be to get them to run on RISC-V, a colleague and I applied for a Devcon talk in Bangkok. [And we got it](https://app.devcon.org/schedule/J3SWYT). We were able to run a validator on a testnet, but mainnet was out of reach because of the high CPU demand from the many validators on Ethereum mainnet. We could kind of sync to the head block on mainnet in certain combinations, but running everything on one board was impossible. Not surprising as the boards back then were on the level of a Raspberry Pi 3, at least CPU wise. We guessed back then that it may take another 1-2 years until a full node can be run on a single RISC-V board.
About half a year after devcon, Robert Mordzon from Web3Pi, who attended our talk, managed to get a newer faster board and [ran a split full node on two separate boards](https://www.reddit.com/r/RISCV/comments/1j5uqrs/ethereum_node_on_riscv_yes_its_possible/), one board for the execution client and one for the consensus client. The amazing thing he did is that he also helped to improve the Lighthouse client, so it can now be compiled on RISC-V boards out of the box.
At Devcon I talked to many core devs and asked about issues I saw with their clients. Potuz, the core dev was [very interested in improving his crypto library](https://xcancel.com/haurog1/status/1858150270217454001). About a year ago he started implementing specific RISC-V optimizations for this library, which is used by Prysm and Nimbus. He even implemented certain optimizations which might take a few more years until they can be used in actual hardware.
Last autumn I got my hands on another iteration of RISC-V boards, the 'DC-ROMA RISC-V AI PC'. This one has the power of about a Raspberry Pi 4. Thanks to the work on the Lighthouse and Nimbus clients I could directly compile and run it on the board. After fiddling a bit with the settings I managed to get a synced full node running. I was always about 5-10 seconds behind the head block, and at epoch boundaries it even fell behind a few slots, but consensus client is always synced. CPU is 80-90% used, so not a lot of headroom left. The biggest limitation is the single core speed though.
I then ran an Ethereum mainnet validator through the board. I used geth and lighthouse. Surprisingly it worked and the additional workload for the validator did not really impact anything. Not surprisingly the validator missed all the head votes. In these votes your validator votes on what the newest block is that he has seen. Closely after epoch boundaries it also missed the target votes. These votes are for the first block in the current epoch. Nevertheless, I actually earned a bit of rewards with my risc-v validator.
All this long text to say, that a few months ago I managed to run the first Ethereum full node with an attached validator on a single RISC-V board. To the best of my knowledge no one managed to do that until then.
Nowadays, the RISC-V node sits on my desk, running geth/nimbus and doing it pretty reliably. Nimbus is a bit more resource efficient, but relies more on the single CPU speed, which this board lacks. So it is always about 10-20s behind the head block. As I do not like to earn less ETH than possible I normally do not run any validators through it.
I also tried running the zk attester version of lighthouse, where you only need the consensus client, as the execution side is proven with a ZK proof. Unfortunately, the single core performance was not good enough. I guess there are a lot of optimizations that are still possible for making this possible once Ethereum officially supports zk proofs.
I played with Ethrex, a newer execution client. It compiled fine, but failed consistently during sync. I guess it is because of only having 16GB of RAM available, but I have not tried to debug it properly.
Now, a new iteration of boards is coming out. They have a Spacemit-K3 CPU and official sale started yesterday. This board is on the level of a Raspberry Pi 5 and some even say it should be on the level of a RK3588 CPU. Due to the increased RAM prices, the prices for the board are eye-wateringly high. But it is great to see that the RISC-V CPU speed is increasing faster than in the overall CPU market. Many of the large CPU producers now have a RISC-V team and many smaller startups from people which left Intel and AMD are working on RISC-V CPUs. I expect the pace to continue like this until RISC-V CPU speeds come closer to current consumer CPU speeds and only then they will hit more fundamental speed increase limits which all the established players have.
Despite the fast speed increases I guess the future of devices with RISC-V CPUs mostly lies in running very low power nodes which, thanks to the usage of ZK proofs, only have to validate a proof and can then request or follow only state changes they are interested in.
sentiment 0.99
5 hr ago • u/Blockchain_Batman • r/Kraken • is_a_crypto_sip_really_a_good_longterm_strategy • C
Crypto SIPs can be a solid long-term strategy through dollar-cost averaging, letting you buy more during dips and smooth out volatility for assets like BTC/ETH, but they're high-risk due to crypto's extreme swings (50 – 80%drops aren't rare) versus stable mutual fund SIPs averaging 10-15% returns limit to 5-10% of your portfolio if you're a HODLer. Platforms like WazirX, CoinDCX, ZebPay make it easy with weekly/monthly plans, building discipline without timing the market, though India's 30% flat tax + 1% TDS eats into gains and lacks mutual funds' regulation/diversification. Start small after DYOR, pair with equity SIPs for balance it's a speculative side bet, not a core plan.
sentiment 0.90


Share
About
Pricing
Policies
Markets
API
Info
tz UTC-4
Connect with us
ChartExchange Email
ChartExchange on Discord
ChartExchange on X
ChartExchange on Reddit
ChartExchange on GitHub
ChartExchange on YouTube
© 2020 - 2026 ChartExchange LLC