ETHEUR
Ethereum / Euro
cryptoComposite

ETH Daily - 5th November 2026 📰 \-Base activated Denim upgrade. \-Reth v2.10.0 patch release. \-Lido x Firelight protection. \-Amundi tokenized fund on Ethereum. \-ETHBEAT CROPs guide. \-Zilliqa transitions into an L2. \-AZTEC delegation program. \-EtherFi launches Liquid Bold USD vault. \-DIFC Courts Dispute Resolution Oracle. Read more: [https://ethdaily.io/base-activates-denim-upgrade](https://ethdaily.io/base-activates-denim-upgrade)

A poke above 2.4k after a wick to 2.22k is not the same thing as owning the level. Reclaims that stick usually leave footprints: a few daily closes back on top, a retest that holds instead of slicing straight through, and ETH/BTC not making a fresh low while spot wiggles around the number. Until that shows up I treat the bounce as short covering, not a regime change. Same pattern showed up on the last couple of false recoveries this year. Level first, narrative second 👀

I traded a single trade after market close going short on NQ and it is based on my scanner on futures in NQ, ES, CL, GC, BTC and ETH. Makes $415.

Going to sleep. Probably sub 2k when I will wake up because, well because this is ETH

ETH price is the way to measure it

It's completely unrelated to crapto, entire markets rose yesterday and shit today. ETH will follow the overall tech trend. Look at crypto and relate it to the political calender. Mid-terms is always a crab market, presidential election is a bull market, post presidential election is the start of the bear market. You can't fully know when each part begins but this is usually how it's gone every 4 years (especially since the halving cycle also dances around the US political cycle)

On a 1% range, a single-sided deposit is basically a limit order, it fills around the middle of the range, so 0.0296 to 0.028 is more than it should cost, and I’d check the tx. To stack ETH, I’d put the next cbBTC range at or below where it sold. If price runs away you sit out of range earning nothing

DCA daily ETH and BTC.

One thing I keep wondering about Ethereum is how we should measure its progress beyond the ETH price. Lower fees and better scaling are great, but the real test is whether they bring in more people who actually use the network, build on it, and stay. Sometimes it feels like the most important Ethereum milestones are happening quietly in the background, while everyone is watching the chart. What metric do you think best reflects Ethereum's long-term health: active users, L2 adoption, developer activity, staking participation, or something else?

It's so fun how ETH gets none of the benefits of the AI capex cycle but all of the drawbacks.

I think the key distinction here is between keeping your initial deposit untouched and keeping its value in ETH. Those are two very different things in a concentrated liquidity position. With a 1% range, your position is constantly rebalancing between ETH and cbBTC as the price moves. Once it goes out of range, you're effectively holding one side of the pair, so the amount of ETH you can recover later depends on where the price is when you convert back. Also, fees don't automatically cancel out impermanent loss. You could withdraw only the fees and still end up with less ETH-equivalent value than simply holding your original ETH. I'd track three things separately: the original capital, the fees earned, and the current value of the LP position compared with holding 1 ETH. That last comparison is the one that really tells you whether the strategy is working. Are you measuring performance in ETH, cbBTC, or USD? The answer can look very different depending on the benchmark

aaaaaaaand ETH dumped. You should have listened to the wisdom and made 7%.

No, unfortunately. While the price sits inside your range, the pool keeps selling whichever token is rising for the one that is falling, so your 1 ETH only stays 1 ETH while price is on the side of the range where the position is all ETH. Once price crosses the whole 1% band you are fully converted at roughly the average price of that band, and you only get the ETH back if price crosses back. Pulling out just the fees does not change that, because the fees are separate from the principal that is being swapped. The narrow range earns more because it converts more often, and that conversion is where the cbBTC shortfall you saw comes from. If your goal is to grow either token, track the position in one unit, say ETH, including fees, and compare it to simply holding. If it beats holding over a full month, the narrow range is working for you. If not, a wider range or rebalancing less often usually does better.

BTC is yesterday's news XMR is the future, it's poised to explode like BTC did when Silk Road hit the mainstream SOL/ETH are the distant future, incredble tech but too soon, and contracts are not secure yet. BCH is likely Satoshi's original plan and it has great devs and community YMMV

So I am currently experimenting with single asset deposits on cbBTC/Weth pool on pancake swap. The returns have been phenomenal but compounding only works if you end up with the same tokens when it goes out of range. I am only trying to accumulate more tokens. Lets say 1 ETH is 0.0296 cbBTC. If you deposit 1 ETH on 1% range and price of ETH rises then it gives you 1 ETH + fees. But when it turns to cbBTC completely you notice that you have less cbBTC such as 0.028 cbBTC. The only solution I find was to keep a large range but this means earning very less in fees. If I am not withdrawing from my capital of 1ETH and only withdrawing the fees, and keep the range 1% will I always end up with 1ETH regardless of price changes?

The great flippening isnt ETH BTC but SNDK MU

Which will happen sooner? S&P 500 below 7000 or ETH below 2000? But tbh, i'm happy that the AI craze settles down a bit.

I think holding time is a big factor, but the type of market matters too. Funding costs can add up on perps, especially for longer holds, while spreads and liquidity can make a big difference for active traders. Are you mainly looking at crypto perpetuals like BTC/ETH perps, or the newer Kalshi contracts? The cost structure can be quite different.

Any crypto representing a pure fiat replacement with no value case is complete speculation with no heading. Platform cryptos (ETH, SOL) have a leg to stand on because they fundamentally resolve true RWA blockchain adoption use cases, like stock tokenization, real estate tokenization, etc. Then you have to account for rug-pull ability. If you can freely buy as much of the crypto as you want and sell liberally, it’s probably not gonna work out either. Greed corrupts. My bias is for GENNY since its basis is effectively data tokenization

I think BTC and ETH are the strongest long-term bets, with LINK being interesting because of its role in connecting blockchain infrastructure with real-world data and tokenized assets. XLM could benefit from cross-border payments, while XMR has a different use case centered on financial privacy. The real question is whether adoption translates into lasting value for the tokens themselves. I also think most altcoins will eventually fade away, especially those that rely entirely on hype rather than solving a genuine problem.

ETH and BTC are the only two worth picking up. Just look at what asssets are being tokenized on ETH.

You didn’t respond to my answer. It is the most fluid , easiest collateral on the chain that will most certainly be used for much of finance. Why would someone take all the risks to use some derivative of BTC on the native chain of ETH .

>**Numerous wallets,** >**Execution was flawless,** >**Blockchain chocolates.** ~Daily haiku until we’re at least at 0.178 on the ETH/BTC ratio or highest market cap

Not sure what AI you are using but PayPal only uses its own stable coin (pyusd) on SOL and ETH network. Id trust what the PayPal representative told you before anything AI is saying.

BTC and ETH would be my starting point, with everything else needing a much stronger case for why it'll still matter in ten years. I'd pay more attention to whether people use a network when the token incentives dry up than how well its price performed during the last bull run.