ETHEUR
Ethereum / Euro
crypto Composite

If they're ERC-1155's they're ETH NFT's and can technically be recovered, but would require Loopring's assistance. This is a problem for self-custody. This went bad.

I explain in the post, the NFT's are ETH NFT's, they're just stuck on L2, through the lack of an interface.

>**More tokenized stocks,**
>**Activity in the blocks,**
>**Liquidity shocks.**
~Daily haiku until we’re at least at 0.178 on the ETH/BTC ratio or highest market cap

Robinhood's layer 2 for tokenized stocks is built and settles on Ethereum, it uses ETH as a token for settlement, it doesn't have it's own token.
https://robinhood.com/us/en/chain/

Only legitimate tokens you should invest in is BTC and ETH

Hello guys, I developed my own indicator and it works on ETH and BTC . Ive been trading with that bot for a while and it works well. I want to advertise of this bot but idk how, if you have any idea, let me know

Honestly, don't sweat it - this is actually a massive long-term win for ETH.
I get the worry. Because it’s a private network (Hyperledger Besu), these Wall Street trades won't burn public gas or force banks to buy mainnet ETH today.
But look at the bigger picture: the world's biggest clearinghouse ($100T+ in assets) just chose Ethereum's tech stack (EVM) over everything else.
* EVM wins: It cements Ethereum as the undisputed standard for institutional finance.
* Dev lock-in: Future financial apps will keep being built in Solidity, starving other chains of dev talent.
* The bridge: Moving assets from a private EVM chain to public ETH Layer 2s later on is just a simple bridge, not a total rewrite.
No direct buy pressure yet, but Wall Street just adopted Ethereum's blueprint for the next decade. Super bullish.

Great! Got some comments from Fable. One pushback: 'fees drive the price' isn't quite what your paper shows. Your own appendix (OA.2) tests whether the actual AMOUNT of fees predicts anything — and it doesn't. Zero. What predicts returns is whether fees are running hotter or colder than the last 3 months. Those are very different claims. You've built a model that tells you which way ETH probably moves over the next month or two based on whether activity is heating up or cooling down. Cool! But it doesn't tell you whether ETH should be worth $220B or $22B — it takes today's price as the starting point and predicts the wiggle, not the worth. It's like a thermometer: great for telling if the patient's fever is rising or falling, says nothing about what the patient weighs.

But nobody seems to "buy the rumor".
If people sell the news when ETH is at $1800, I don't know how down we could go lol

Probably because outside of this small little echo chamber, the world doesn’t care about ETH. It’s just for you and your fellow crypto bros. 

I have capital to repay my loans (borrowed against BTC) + I kept my LTVs low. Wake me up in the $40s.
I sold a lot early in the bear and have been farming stables for going on a year now. When all the exploits and phishing attacks started happening, I moved some stuff to a HYSA and kept my *liquid on-chain to deploy* stables in something pretty simple like Spark/Maker and Morpho markets that are like USDC lending against like 2-4 assets and the assets are standards like WBTC, ETH, wstETH, cbBTC, cbETH. I pulled out of all the "money LEGOS" and lending against 15+ assets protocols/pools.

Hey mate, the demand-side fee flows are really what drives the current ETH price. I’ve just published a working paper and submitted to Management Science for peer-review.
Essentially it called Ethereum‘s market price directionally correctly 76.4% of the time out-of-sample. I consider it the first science-backed valuation model for Ethereum ever. It’s not taking into account USD-denominated fees, but rather ETH-denominated, since otherwise you would introduce fiat-circularity into any valuation model
You can take a look at the entire paper here: https://majorkeycapital.com/ethereum/paper

I've held ETH for over 6 years. Yes, sure, I was buying it at $150. But I've accumulated a lot and I haven't sold any. I still think it's just getting started. Probably won't sell any until it's at least $25,000.
In short, in my opinion, it's the best investment out there.

The reason it had any effect on ETH price at all was because of inflation expectations. It's always about inflation expectations and the resulting monetary policy.

Missing out on the Lego boba fett still hurts to this day. I was one click away to spend my 10K on these gems instead I bought broken legs ETH.

You and me both.. buying more BTC and not strategy right? Their CEO, Phong, saying it’d be panic at $8-10k range.
I’m a big BTC and ETH guy. Dabbled in a few other blue chips, but 99% those 2. I buy direct assets, I struggle to understand the investment thesis today in strategy over BTC. A few years ago it made more sense, now there is added risk.
https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2026/07/15/strategy-feels-very-secure-until-bitcoin-reaches-usd8-000-usd10-000-says-ceo

Once again retail is left scratching their heads trying to make sense of it all. Government shuts down ETH goes up, government shuts down again and ETH goes down. Iran was just an excuse to get retail to capitulate. Now that that’s out of the way the trend is reversed and there’s no headline that’s going to stop it.

Two questions matter more than the BTC-vs-alts split:
1. Is this $5,000 money you can leave alone for years and afford to lose? If it's an emergency fund or you'll need it soon, "where should it go" is "not crypto." Assuming it's genuinely spare —
2. How you put it in matters as much as what you buy. Dropping the full $5k in one click means if the price dips 30% next week (completely normal), you're staring at a $1,500 paper loss and far more likely to panic-sell. Spreading it in over, say, 8–12 weeks smooths out both the timing and the emotion. Nobody, including the pros, reliably buys the bottom.
On the actual split, for a beginner:
- BTC (and maybe some ETH) is the "sleep at night" core — most established, least likely to go to zero. Most people keep the majority here.
- A small slice of other large, established coins is fine for diversification — but keep it small and stick to ones you actually understand.
- Avoid the tiny "next 100x" tokens. That's where beginners with $5k turn it into $500. The upside stories are loud; the wipeouts are silent.
- And remember diversification beyond crypto exists — for a lot of people crypto is a small % of a portfolio that's otherwise boring index funds. $5k all-in on one volatile asset is a big swing.
If I were new: majority BTC, small ETH, dollar-cost average it in over a couple of months, skip the tiny coins. Boring — but boring is what survives your first big dip.

Fair point, I was stacking signals rather than isolating them. If I had to pick one that actually changed the decision it was the ETH to equity correlation tightening in 2026. Fear and greed at 25 on its own I would probably ignore, it has been in fear territory for most of this year. TVL declining is a slow structural trend, not an actionable signal on a single day. The nikkei move mattered specifically because the lag between traditional equity selloffs and crypto has been shortening. That made the timing feel less like coincidence and more like a countdown. The genius act is noise for positioning decisions today, longer term signal only.
So to directly answer your question, yes I would have made the repayment anyway if TVL was stable. The equity correlation was the deciding factor.

Have you noticed that the resumption of hostilities in the Strait of Hormuz doesn't seem to be affecting the ETH price? The very same event that recently caused the price to crash no longer has that kind of impact today. Perhaps the whales and major investors have realized that the temporary closure of a strait does not diminish the value of the Ethereum network.