ETHEUR
Ethereum / Euro
crypto Composite

Firstly, establish the daily trend, most recent resistance & supports. Using the 1 hr sticks.
Then I switch to 30 mins to establish localised trend( within the last 2hrs-ish). And I see how far the price is from a recent support( for bears) or resistance( for bulls)
If the price is approaching a recent significant level( S or R), I wait to see if it will break it or bounce.
Whatever it does, I enter soon afterwards & set a long position in the new/ continuing direction.
With 2:1 TP/SL. Usually 0.05-0.1 lot size.
ETH moves pretty consistently compared to BTC so it’s my favourite trade pair. I have never got a “feel” for any other pairs.
I moved from 15$ to 250$ in 6 weeks on ETH/USD. My mistake was trading BTC.
Am back at square 1

EF has been selling ETH since the very beginning to fund its operation no matter the actual price. People should stop fixating about this, it has nothing to do with price action. Saylor selling 32 BTC had an effect as he ecplicitely said they woould never sell any, definetely not the case for EF.

If reserves have been falling almost continuously since 2021, why has ETH spent most of the last 4 years trading below its peak? A supply metric by itself tells us very little about price. The real question isn’t whether liquid supply is shrinking. It’s whether demand is growing faster than supply is becoming inaccessible.

I concur. People keep downvoting BNB / TRX-related posts. Yes, those projects are centralized, but at least they kept up with BTC.
Honestly, it makes me feel slightly less regarded that I also hold BNB / TRX when I look at my ETH holdings.

0xa7362c99afd12406b89451df2d89108b06d2867f
ETH network 👍

UMich Data science to Boston university transfer — does it hurt ETH Zurich QF admission or European quant careers?

ETH had the same problem at the beginning

new bounty on poidh from u/bbroad25 that gives you two ways to support the encrypted mempool movement!
1. spread the word using the share widget on https://encryptedmempool.org and post a message of support on either Farcaster or X, then submit a claim on poidh for a shot at the ETH prize pot
2) add Base ETH to the prize pot to incentivize more people sharing the site
we boosted this bounty with $25 from a Farcaster CEF activation grant we received because what's good for Ethereum is good for Farcaster 🤝

I bought ETH when it was $9 then sold at $300 in 2017.

BTC dominance is starting to fall slightly, but ETH is falling too.
I think BTC.D is dropping partly because stablecoin supply is increasing while BTC’s price is declining. That does not necessarily mean capital is rotating into ETH.
30-day PA:
BTC: -18.42%
ETH: -24.78%
3-month PA:
BTC: -9.67%
ETH: -20.48%
ETH continues to underperform BTC. Even if we zoom out one year and ETH is about 5% ahead of BTC, that is nothing to celebrate. ETH still cannot stop being more volatile than BTC.
I cannot believe ETH shit the bed again and dropped all the way back to the $1.5k - $1.6k range. Now it is just going sideways in this pathetic price range. Honestly, I cannot recommend ETH to anyone. Look at how TRX / BNB / BTC has performed by comparison.
I am not sure how confidence comes back to ETH. After 9 years, I am finally bearish on this asset. I was always bullish on Ethereum and ETH’s value potential, but the problem is there are clearly more people bearish on it than bullish. ETH would not be performing like this if more people actually believed in it.
The crowd is not always right, but it is not always wrong either.

I just checked the numbers. Assuming ETH supply is about 121.779M and grows around 0.833% per year, a 5% stake would be about 6.089M ETH today and about 6.616M ETH in 10 years.
If BMNR earns 2.5% to 3% staking yield on that stake, the yield would more than offset the supply growth.
So BMNR would not need to buy more ETH to maintain 5%. In fact, to stay exactly at 5%, BMNR would likely need to sell excess staking rewards, roughly 1.05M to 1.37M ETH over 10 years, assuming those rates remain unchanged.

ETH is a blockchain designed to execute transactions at lower costs. It is however, overhyped and manipulated. The true value is much less than 1k

🚨 Breaking 🚨 The U.S. SEC recently approved the T. Rowe Price Active Crypto ETF for trading on NYSE Arca. This actively managed multi-asset fund includes exposure to both #Ethereum (ETH) and #Litecoin (LTC) as part of an eligible basket of 5 to 15 digital assets.

I trade SMC concepts (order blocks, FVGs, break of structure, liquidity sweeps etc ). and wanted a way to test strategy variations .So I built a configurable backtester where the SMC rules — entry TF, confluence TF, OB lookback, invalidation, FVG Validation — are all set through a UI.
**What it does:**
* Configure SMC strategies through a UI — entry timeframe, confluence timeframe, order block lookback, invalidation rules, FVG Validation toggle, and so on
* Runs on years of Binance USDT-M perpetual data across 20 pairs (1H, 4H, 1D timeframes; 3m–15m confluence available for BTC and ETH)
* Walk-Forward Analysis available — splits data into in-sample optimization and out-of-sample test windows
* Reports give a 4-tier descriptive verdict on whether the equity curve survives walk-forward: Robust / Marginal / Curve-Fit / Unprofitable
**What it doesn't do:**
* No signals, no real-time alerts to act on
* No claims about future performance
* Doesn't tell you whether to trade or what to trade
It's a **research tool.** Most of the time you'll find a strategy you thought was an edge turns out to be curve-fit once you run walk-forward. That's the point — better to find that out on historical data than live.
Free tier lets you run a limited number of backtests on one pair — enough to see how the engine works and judge whether the methodology is honest. Walk-Forward Analysis, the Strategy Monitor, and unrestricted access are on paid plans.
This is built for SMC and price action traders who don't want to write code.
Not a broker, not a signal service, not investment advice. Educational and research only.
[app.smcchartsense.com](http://app.smcchartsense.com)
Happy to answer questions..

**20M from Pakistan, doing CA — weighing whether to pivot to quant. Genuinely confused, need real advice.**
I'm currently doing Chartered Accountancy in Pakistan. Decent qualification, stable future — but I find it genuinely boring and can't see myself in that corporate CA life long term. I've been seriously interested in financial markets and quant trading for a while now (not the YouTube "quants make millions" version — I understand it's extremely math-heavy and competitive).
The path I'm considering: drop or pause CA → do A-Levels (2 years) → undergraduate in maths/stats abroad (Warsaw, TU Munich) → masters at somewhere like Waterloo or ETH Zurich. That's roughly 7-8 years, significant cost, and I'd likely have no income for most of it living fully dependent on family.
My concern is honest: my high school grades weren't strong, I don't have olympiad medals, I haven't been coding since childhood. I know big firms mostly hire from top-tier targets. I'm not expecting a Goldman Sachs quant role — I just want to know if there's a realistic path here for someone starting from where I am.
**My actual question:** For people who are in quant or went through the maths route — is this risk worth taking given the cost, time, and uncertainty? Or is staying with CA and perhaps pivoting toward risk/finance roles through CFA the more rational call?
*(Also posting in other quant subreddits — happy to consolidate discussion here.)*

I generally agree that nobody knows anything about price but I do think people closer to big enterprise are more aware of the mood and trends than we are. Like if pretty much every large financial institution is in stealth working on tokenization on ethereum the participants of this sub wouldn't know. But then it's also difficult to trust the big ETH holders cause they could be bluffing in hopes of swaying everybody.

The issue is that the "death of ETH" ratio was like double what it is now.

Even during the stupidest FOMO mania period ETH barely got to the midway point lmfao. That was, what, *five years ago!?*

I got tired of "this setup has a 70% win rate" posts with no actual numbers behind them, so I did the boring version: took 12 of the most-talked-about retail setups, wrote each one as exact mechanical rules with zero discretion, and ran them on a full year of real 1-minute data across BTC, ETH, gold and EUR.
Fees on the whole time. 0.05% commission per side, $10k start, 1% risk per trade, same deterministic engine for all of them so nothing gets a special exception.
That's 48 backtests total. The aggregate:
* 34,962 simulated trades
* \~$292,000 in simulated commissions paid across all runs
* average win rate: 35.2%
* profitable after costs: 4 out of 48
The four that actually cleared the fee hurdle:
* engulfing on ETH: +19%, profit factor 1.11
* break of structure on ETH: +24.5%, pf 1.34
* break of structure on gold: +25.8%, pf 1.23
* inside-bar breakout on gold: +36.7%, pf 1.66
Everything else lost money, mostly through commissions and the 35% hit rate. And I want to be clear because it's the part people skip: the 44 that failed aren't hidden. They're the actual point.
https://preview.redd.it/as4juzwpt87h1.png?width=2400&format=png&auto=webp&s=a25fda74f52146754208442b49c7ca9b3fa0a627
*What I take from it: the mechanical floor of almost every famous setup is negative after costs. That doesn't mean "nothing works." It means the raw rule alone doesn't have an edge, so whatever edge you have has to live in the filtering and discretion on top of it — which session you take it in, the higher-timeframe context, when you stand aside. The naked pattern by itself just doesn't pay for its own commissions on 1m.*
*It also explains why backtested-looking strategies fall apart live. A lot of the "edge" people show is survivorship across one market or one window. Run the same rules across four markets and a full year with fees on and most of it evaporates.*
Curious if anyone else has actually mechanized their setup and run it honestly with costs in. What held up for you, and what quietly died once you turned commissions on?

I know but it s useful to paste it and it grabs the ratio instantly. You know I can open the link and instantly copy the important part you should have looked. (0.025970) $1,670.10
It also serves as a quick reminder that the trolls were not entirely wrong. ETH is dead right now. The ratio cratered to hell and everyone that told me the flippening just sold a dream because Bitcoin proved to be king. I am 100% ETH Though. Picking dead horses is my passion