ETHEUR
Ethereum / Euro
crypto Composite

Yes, every single post about price action has to reference the ICO.
At least it's a functioning blockchain unlike BTC or ETH. Maybe go buy that and stop trolling for no reason.

ETH Daily - 3rd August 2026 📰
\-BlackRock launches two tokenized funds.
\-EF monthly Protocol update.
\-Ethlabs week 6 update.
\-Uniswap launches Uniswap Earn.
\-POAP winds down.

Read more: [https://ethdaily.io/eth-daily-news-august-3-2026](https://ethdaily.io/eth-daily-news-august-3-2026)

I could try that and I’m ok with losing some money due to fees, but the thing is I tried buying ETH with the money in my Gemini account and when I try to send it to a different wallet, it glitches out and won’t work. I’m assuming it would be the same thing with USDC.

The idea is ultimately to onboard the entire traditional financial world to settle Ethereum, both on L1 like Blackrock, Fidelity, UBS, JP Morgan etc are doing, and on rollups, like Deutsche Bank, Robinhood , Sony and LG are doing.
https://ethereumadoption.com/built-on-ethereum/
Then even though each individual transaction will be cheap, there will be so many of them that the total fees, and therefore the amount of ETH being burned will be high.
It's easy to see how this works for L1 fees (as we have already had examples of deflationary periods) but it's less intuitive to picture how many transactions that would need on rollups (L2s), so there is a useful tool at https://github.com/blue-yard/ethereum-blob-simulator which models how this could play out.
For reference the ecosystem (L1 + L2s) is currently settling about 5k transactions per second (https://www.growthepie.com/ethereum-ecosystem/metricsand) the peak today was 26.8k TPS. The all time high was the 29th of January this year, with a burst throughput of 75,862 transactions in a second.

Saylor or Bukeyle did not buy Bitcoin BTC when it was a grass root project, both bought BTC when Wall Street got involved. Today 34 companies now control 25% of Ethereum validators.
That's not decentralization. That's a corporate cartel.
The Bitnet Money whitepaper predicted this in 2023.
Proof-of-Stake was never about security. It was about enabling institutions to take over.
Meanwhile, BTN uses Proof-of-Work—no validators, no staking, no 34 firms.
Want to see the proof?"
This concentration of control fundamentally undermines the narrative of Ethereum as a "decentralized" network. It proves that Proof-of-Stake (PoS) naturally evolves into an institutional cartel, where a small group of firms effectively controls the network's security, transaction ordering, and governance.
2. Why This Validates the Bitnet Whitepaper (2023)
This is not a new problem; it is the exact outcome predicted and criticized in the Bitnet Original Whitepaper (2023), Section 3: "The Ethereum Problem":
On Inequality by Design: "Proof-of-Stake... fosters further capital centralisation and favouring large holders, that can deposit their tokens into the protocol to receive block rewards, with no work... It works much like a perpetual savings account, where large holders collect block rewards and fees from less favoured users." (Section 3.b)
On Regulatory Capture: "Proof-of-Stake brings with it an array of other issues—such as susceptibility to enforcement actions by regulators... A truly global and decentralised currency cannot use a consensus mechanism that favours large investors and institutions in detriment of the retail users." (Section 3.b)
On Corporate Control: "Ethereum and ETH share more with private companies and securities than with a properly decentralised currency. Having a CEO, developers that hold the de facto power over changes... isn’t resemblant of a technology that can be truly applied fearlessly." (Section 3.c)
The "34 companies" statistic is the mathematical proof of the whitepaper's thesis.
This analysis successfully maps out the structural vulnerabilities of Proof-of-Stake validator concentration and contrasts them directly with the trustless, validator-free architecture of Bitnet Money BTN.

Why should it go up though? I mean, technically, why should ETH go up if it's adopted by more and more institutions? Just FOMO, popularity, greater fool theory, or is there something backed into the the ETH / smart contracts that natively drives the ETH price up the more it's adopted. Genially asking this. Like, one could say that the more it's adopted, the more fees are generated, but ETH has made already good progress to lower the fees, and their roadmap is to have like $0.001 per transaction. So then what is there left to push the price up (apart from FOMO and greater fool theory).

>**Holders make them whole,**
>**Low dilution over all,**
>**More supply control.**
~Daily haiku until we’re at least at 0.178 on the ETH/BTC ratio or highest market cap

Two different assets ETH and BTC

Today, U.S. Treasury FinTech Division 553.100 announced two connected, independently published technology projects:
* **USPS.cash:** A digital-wallet and transaction research platform.
* **U.S. Gamer:** An NFC-enabled competitive-play wallet and Records Vault for rules-governed pop-up events.
Together, the projects explore a mobile ecosystem for self-custody Bitcoin and Ethereum, isolated Postal Cash game value, biometric transaction approval, NFC peer discovery, and tamper-evident competition records.
The work is designed for evaluation against emerging U.S. digital-asset policy, including:
* The **GENIUS Act**, now Public Law 119-27, which establishes a federal framework for payment stablecoins.
* The House-passed **CLARITY Act**, a proposed digital-asset market-structure framework that remains under Senate consideration.
These laws and proposals provide policy context. They do not approve, license, endorse, or certify either project.
**U.S. Gamer includes:**
* Self-custody BTC and ETH wallet modes
* NFC-assisted peer discovery and transaction handoff
* Biometric approval for sensitive actions
* Postal Cash for isolated, no-real-value competitive play
* A Records Vault for rules, results, settlement references, and SHA-256 integrity records
* Published Community Rules covering fair play, anti-cheating, anti-bullying, anti-retaliation, evidence review, discipline, and appeals
* A technical White Paper documenting the architecture, security boundaries, regulatory risks, and staged deployment model
The Records Vault is record-only. It does not hold participant funds, request private keys, or automatically settle prizes.
**Explore the projects**
USPS.cash: [https://usps.cash/](https://usps.cash/)
U.S. Gamer: [https://www.usgamer.org/](https://www.usgamer.org/)
Records Vault: [https://events.usgamer.org/](https://events.usgamer.org/)
[*USPS.cash*](http://USPS.cash) *and U.S. Gamer are U.S. CRADA technology projects.*

Personally holding SBET or BMNR is a little more lucrative for me. Sure it’s a little more risk but I can sell covered calls on my shares and continue to average down during this winter. Will give me much better return in the long run instead of HODLing ETH through the downs of a winter.

My ETH position looked green until I counted every bridge and swap

yep, those are the tokens on ETH. make sure buy/own the coin version for pepe the frog. we may see the mc from tokens to shift over to the coin version.
[pepecoin.com](http://pepecoin.com)

One company now has almost 5.8M ETH. Most of it is already staked

It’s a shitcoin on ETH.

Apologies, forgot to state that the transactions are on the ETH mainnet.

You want honest verdict ? With the current implementation none. BTC is not problem solving chain it's more of store of value much like gold. It's worth is what people agree to spend. More like a rare commodity. 
For any industrial use it's already to expensive. ETH and similar are trying to bring intrinsic values by running smart contract ( pay fee for execution of the smart contract ), but again too expensive for large scale real world execution. 
Crypto is in limbo and the problem is; if your blockchain does not generate revenue it doesn't get traction or adoption and if it generates revenue it becomes too expensive for real world mass adoption.
Anyway, first the tech need to be made smooth for general purpose use and bad actors needed to be weeded out ( the casino makers, useless L1 chains, false promises etc). I think the best one not yet invented which will solve the “crypto limbo” — bring intrinsic value while being affordable. 

It may seem like 3 years because I'm deleting old posts. Although ya I don't really post much. Sometimes for fun, sometimes I lurk. It's mostly a health thing - too stressful, life priorities. Whatever. I definitely haven't meaningfully posted for like a year plus now.
I sold my entire stack like 2 years ago around $3,000 ETH. Didn't buy back, shorting MSTR lol so whatever people can call be a biased fudder.
I find MSTR situation and clarity interesting, so decided to post about it. Mostly because I just like that kind of stuff.

Hey everyone,
​I’m planning to start a long-term investment journey (planning to hold for about 10 years), and I've chosen Interactive Brokers as my primary platform.
​I know that IBKR now supports depositing stablecoins (USDC) to fund the account, as well as transferring certain crypto assets (like BTC/ETH) directly into the linked crypto account. I want to use this feature to fund my portfolio, but before I make any moves, I want to ask the experienced folks here so I can avoid any catastrophic mistakes or future account freezes.
​I have a few specific questions:
​Are there hidden risks with crypto deposits? Has anyone faced issues like account freezes or complex requests for proof of funds simply because the initial deposit originated from crypto?
​**Exchanges vs. Cold Wallets:** Does it matter where I send the funds from? I know IBKR is notoriously strict about rejecting "third-party deposits." Is it much safer to transfer from my own Ledger hardware wallet to clearly prove first-party ownership? Or is it totally fine to transfer directly from a centralized exchange like Binance?
​**Long-term impact:** Since I plan to leave my funds invested for 10 years, could funding via crypto put a "red flag" on my account later on when I eventually try to withdraw fiat down the road?
​My main goal is to protect my investments over the long haul, and I don't want any nasty surprises or account closures just because of how I initially funded it.
​If anyone has past experience or advice regarding IBKR's current crypto deposit policies, I’d be very grateful if you could share.
​Thanks in advance! 🙏

Everyone agrees AI agents are about to write most of the world's code. Almost nobody has asked the obvious next question: where does that code live?
It is not going to be GitHub. Here is why, and why the answer is currently valued at $2.4M.
**What GitLawb is**
GitLawb is the open-source git stack built for agents instead of humans:
* Identity is a keypair, not an account and password
* Every push is cryptographically signed (Ed25519) and certified
* Permissions are delegable agent-to-agent (an agent can hand another agent a scoped, signed right to review or merge)
* Payments are built in (bounties that pay on merge, x402 machine payments, USDC)
**This is not a whitepaper. It is live right now:**
* \~4,000 agents
* 3,000+ repos
* 41,000+ signed pushes
* Agents opening, reviewing, merging, auditing, and deploying each other's code with no humans in the loop
There is an agent on the network called Darwin that predicts BTC and ETH, rewrites its own signal weights when accuracy drops, and commits the change to its own repo, signed and explained. 31+ generations. Zero human involvement. GitHub structurally cannot host that.
**Why GitHub has no part in this**
GitHub is centralized (Microsoft can switch it off), human-account-first, has no native machine identity, no delegable permissions, and no way for agents to pay each other. These are architectural gaps, not missing features. You cannot patch them in. GitLawb was born with them solved.
**The numbers (this is the part nobody is pricing in)**
* GitHub: acquired for $7.5B in 2018, \~$2B ARR, estimated $20B+ as a standalone today
* $GITLAWB: fully diluted valuation \~$2.37M, \~$1.16M liquidity, trading on Uniswap V4 on Base
The agent-native GitHub is trading at roughly 1/10,000th of the human one.
The asymmetry:
* Capture 1% of GitHub's value = \~100x
* Capture 10% = \~1,000x
* Just match GitHub's 2018 acquisition price = \~3,000x
You are not betting it beats GitHub. You are betting the git layer of the agent economy is worth more than a rounding error.
**Details**
* Chain: Base
* Contract: `0x5f980dcfc4c0fa3911554cf5ab288ed0eb13dba3`
* DEX: Uniswap V4
* Explorer (live network, verify the stats yourself): [explorer.gitlawb.com](http://explorer.gitlawb.com)

NFA

What I don't know is what happens to Bitmine in that situation.
The tiny ETH yield might just be enough for them to avoid a similar fate.