ETHEUR
Ethereum / Euro
crypto Composite

So, this would be bad for "store of value" assets like BTC, and good for "technology" assets like ETH, correct?
Isn't that what Bitcoiners claim?
Eh who am I kidding, the ratio will just drop 50% in response.

Most mentions on r/cc (2026-02-02 00:00:00):
||Mentions|
|:-|:-|
|BTC|345|
|ETH|66|
|MOON|20|
|HOME|17|
|XRP|17|
|XMR|15|
|SAFE|13|
|IP|10|
|SOL|8|
|DEGEN|7|
|FIGHT|7|
|BCH|6|
|FLOW|6|
|USDT|6|
|SNT|5|
|USDC|5|
|00|4|
|ADA|4|
|CORECHAIN|4|
|MAGIC|4|
[Data source and app](https://www.redditcoins.app/)

So ETH is done this cycle....topped at $5K.....two months ahead of BTC....right at its 2021 highs. That's what you guys think?
ETH ain't done yet, not by a fcking long shot.
On your left

DBRiMatt, this comment logs the Pay2Post fee, an anti-spam mechanism where a DONUT 'tax' is deducted from your distribution share for each post submitted. Learn more [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/ethtrader/comments/199ht5i/governance_poll_dynamic_pay2post_fee_target/).
cc: u/pay2post-ethtrader
----------
Topic: ETH Trading
Learn more about topics limits [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/ethtrader/comments/1fyb8rv/rethtrader_automated_topic_limiter_topics_allowed/).
----------
Understand how Donuts and tips work by reading the [beginners guide](https://www.reddit.com/r/ethtrader/comments/1ftnx4t/megathread_comprehensive_guide_to_rethtrader/).
----------
[Click here to tip this post on-chain](https://www.donut.finance/tip/?action=tip&contentId=t3_1quegvr)

btc.d is 60%. Reminder to myself for next cycle: Do not hold ETH. use it as gas.

ETH was 50 cents in 2015, and just about $5k a few months ago.
BTC was 6 cents in 2010, and went up to $126k.
Way more crazy than gold.
The dollar is a shitcoin.

> Like I know someone is doing yield farming
I'm running a little experiment.
Got 1 ETH lending on aave.
Got 1 ETH that I trade.
My aave balance is up to
1.0066 ETH
My trading balance is up to about 1.22 ETH
Now I'm trying to see how long it will take me to trade 1 ETH into 2. :D

There is absolutely zero market signals to suggest this is close to the floor. But beyond this, broader market conditions aren’t even in favour of ESTABLISHED tech making a run, let alone speculative assets like ETH

I was earning Uniswap LP fees and still underperforming just holding ETH

So bizarre these large players don't DCA, like why buy tens of millions in a single trade? If your whole business is just being an ETH Treasury what're you doing like...the other 23.99 hours of the day?

That’s actually a great question. That way I can separate the risk 🧐, will definitely consider. I am currently in ETH and XRP, never added anything in BTC (the price never looked inviting)

**All credit for this post goes to Kendu chad Lorniko** ([u/lorniko](/user/lorniko/))**. This is entirely his work**
Monthly top 100 wallets analysis of Kendu.
Let's directly start with the February one because this end of January was intense!
https://preview.redd.it/1qtywtlt26hg1.png?width=676&format=png&auto=webp&s=4c1a0ac2c3827b43969c064516c2eefeabb90687
* We have **9 “special” wallets**: Wormhole, LPs, Treasury, CEXs, and the burn wallet. This month was also very interesting for these wallets because the **Kendu/USDC LP sent 6B Kendu to the MEXC wallet** and is now ranked **75th** (14th in January). The MEXC wallet is significantly larger than before due to the LP transfer and another transfer that will be detailed later. Even with the 6B removed from the USDC LP, the **total number of tokens held by LPs decreased significantly** (from **71.6B in January to 60.6B now**). This means that if ETH had remained stable, **Kendu’s market cap would have increased substantially**. Overall, **Kendu had a very successful month of January**.
* We have **2 wallets that I consider “traders.”** This means they both buy and sell; whether they are aiming for a larger or smaller bag isn’t entirely clear yet. That’s **one fewer than last month**, as one sold a large portion of its bag during the recent huge pump.
* We have **3 clearly identified sellers**. Combined, these three wallets hold **16 billion tokens**. Last month we had four, but one has already emptied their bag. Among the remaining three, **only one sold large amounts in January and left the top 11 wallets**. This gives a better impression when potential investors check the top wallets.
* We have **2 soft sellers**. As with sellers, this is **one fewer than last month**, because one of them redistributed their bag but didn’t sell anything. **No soft seller sold anything in January**. Should they still be considered soft sellers? I’ll reassess next month.
* We have **48 keepers** — that’s **two fewer than January**. However, **two of them started buying again**, which is a very strong signal! One of them is the mysterious big buyer who accumulated a lot of Kendu recently. He hadn’t bought anything for more than a year.
* We have **36 buyers** — **five more than last month**, which is an excellent signal! Two keepers became buyers again. Two buyers successfully entered the top 100 by regularly DCAing. One buyer purchased a large amount of tokens and stated in the main TG that he plans to hold them. We’ll see how that plays out, as more than a year ago he behaved more like a trader than a holder or accumulator — but I’m giving him a chance. It's the first time that the buyers reach more than 100b token in my review. Good milestone reached! (It was 95b last month)
Overall, **this was a very positive month**. We have more buyers in the top 100, sellers hold fewer tokens, and fewer tokens are available to buy. I also checked several wallets ranked between **101 and 200**, and the vast majority are buyers (non-exhaustive check).
In just one month, traders, sellers, and soft sellers drastically reduced their token holdings, while buyer-held tokens exploded.
The community is also doing an **incredible job on the pure mathematical side of crypto**! Let’s keep it up — **Kendu is definitely going to reach billions! 🚀**
Bonus:
https://preview.redd.it/c8fd0ycv26hg1.png?width=424&format=png&auto=webp&s=e52717f9c5e928009e7d0ac1f530a1a89bfca2fb
I asked in the main TG how many tokens members hold approximately. It’s very interesting to see how many Kendu tokens are held among active community members on Telegram.
We can say the results are very positive! **114 people voted**, during a period when **ETH dropped from $3k to $2.3k**.
Using a **non-scientific but easy-to-understand calculation of the results**
(15×4 + 8×6 + 4.5×11 + 2×26 + 0.75×26 + 0.3×29 + 0.05×12),
I estimate that **114 active TG members hold around 238.3 billion tokens**, which represents **24% of the total supply**.
This number could be higher due to the **10B+ votes**, or slightly lower, but it still gives us a solid indication of community holdings.
**All credit goes to Kendu chad Lorniko. This is entirely his work**
We Don't Gamble, We Work
[r/KenduInu\_Ecosystem](/r/KenduInu_Ecosystem/)
ETH: 0xaa95f26e30001251fb905d264Aa7b00eE9dF6C18
SOL: 2nnrviYJRLcf2bXAxpKTRXzccoDbwaP4vzuGUG75Jo45
BASE: 0xef73611F98DA6E57e0776317957af61B59E09Ed7
CG: [https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/kendu](https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/kendu-inu)
CMC: [https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/kendu/](https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/kendu-inu/)

My crypto has been blocked on Revolut since 19 Dec 2025.
I’m based in Spain (EU) and had used Revolut crypto for over a year without issues.
On 22 Jan, support confirmed the restriction was lifted and my crypto services were *“unblocked”*. But in practice, nothing works.
Issue:
Revolut requires completing the mandatory crypto onboarding (migration to RDAEL), but:
* The links support sends are blank, or
* They lead to “This action is prohibited”
Result:
* ❌ Can’t trade, withdraw, or transfer
* ❌ ETH & DOGE stuck
* ❌ Crypto features completely unusable
What I’ve tried:
* Cache clear, reinstall
* Multiple Android devices
* Every workaround support suggested
Support keeps saying *“wait 1–4 days for a specialist”* — I’ve been stuck like this for weeks.
I’ve already:
* Filed a formal complaint
* Opened a Financial Ombudsman case (ref PNX-5860035-Q7X0)
Question:

Has anyone in the Eurepean Union had their account legally cleared but technically broken like this?
Did anyone manage to:
* Force a manual reset of crypto onboarding?
* Get this fixed through a specific escalation path?
Any real-world advice appreciated.

Pretty heavy overkill for staking.
I use a Minisforum HX90G, with a Ryzen 9 5900HX 8-core CPU. This already has a ton of headroom and is kinda overkill, but it was pretty cheap. I run with 32 GB and 2 TB; the RAM is plenty and the SSD is sufficient.
I'd skip the 1 TB boot drive, keep the 4 TB SSD, drop down to 32 GB, and use something like the Minisforum UM760 instead, saving about $900. You can use a 2 TB drive nowadays since Partial History Expiry was rolled out, but 4 TB is likely to save you some headaches at some point down the line.
That UPS is also pretty heavily oversized. It has 1500 VA (i.e. W) of capacity, whereas your peak load will only be about 160 W and average load around 15 W.
A UPS isn't necessary for staking. The penalties for being offline are roughly equal to the reward for being online, so if you're offline 1% of the time, you're only losing 2% of your potential revenue (i.e. missing out on 1%, and also being penalized for an additional 1%). With a single 32 ETH validator, 1% downtime would be equivalent to $40 per year. In practice, grid power reliability is usually around 99.9%, which means you should expect about $4 per year per validator in downtime costs that could be addressed by a UPS. This makes it hard to justify $400, even amortized over 5 years, unless you're running 20+ validators or are running in a region with an unreliable grid.
That said: the requirements for running llama.cpp can definitely be significantly different from staking. It will need more RAM and either CPU or GPU power (The Ryzen AI chips might be appropriate), but less SSD.

you could say michael saylor. holds actually more BTC than Vitalik ETH. so he can very much dictate with it‘s liquidity impact. vitalik may impact on a social level but always with good reason so far.

My portfolio will rise from ashes like a phoenix as ETH hits 8k later this year.

In the adoptions listed in the OP link, I'd have wanted ETH to have been chosen. Maybe I'm just too greedy? Another way to look at it is we prob wanted those institutions to have chosen a permissionless chain (ETH) instead of what they went for or are going for.

People need to realize that as every chain, even ETH needs a blue chip memecoin to attract some attention. Normies are needed, word of mouth is needed. Vitalik, start opening your eyes

Hello, this link was sent to me by your group. I connected Brave Wallet and sent $20 worth of ETH, and it went to the contract on the chain and was processed and confirmed. It said that it was not real dollars and that it was not processed on the network. Please provide me with a detailed explanation. Transaction TX hash#0x361658ecb822bdf19a4067a9241ffc6c6b4f54e508842ac2ba760472b8c1053f

No stupid questions at all. Great question. One way is setting up a perpetual short on something like GMX, but for me I typically do it in Aave by borrowing the moving asset. In this case ETH. That is essentially taking a short as ETH goes down in price, your debt value decreases.
Those who really like perpetuals argue that this is less capital efficient, but for me I’m more comfortable using the Lending and Borrowing protocols and because I have to over-collateralize, meaning you can only borrow a percentage of what you provide as collateral (I usually try to stay below 45% LTV), it requires less active management which is what I like.