ETHEUR
Ethereum / Euro
cryptoComposite

I think so, fees and control. But we will see, I hope ETH will thrive and wish the best luck to all investors, of course 😉

ETH does what BTC does but more violently (goes up harder and goes down harder). However, ETH is also stuck between 1k and 5k while BTC overall goes up. To me ETH is just a buy low sell high kind of investment.

Start by asking whether ETH is weakening on its own or whether BTC and the broader market are shifting regime too. That distinction is exactly why I built my own rule-based tracker around market regimes rather than looking at ETH in isolation.

Huh? The entire tech market receded. ETH always dumps hardest.Another case of narrative following price.

No, declaration means anything at all. You'd need to prove you are able to withhold 51% attacks. Crypto like BTC and ETH are powerhouses in terms of hashpower.

> Do you mean the smart contracts that get hacked about once per week? I'm not aware of ANY of the major ETH staking pools that have been hacked. Lido Finance, Rocket Pool, StakeWise, etc all have never been hacked and have multiple auditors > You're trusting the contract to allow you to get your coins back at a future date. Having confidence in open source, heavily audited code (and you can audit it yourself too) is not "trust". Trust means having some sort of blind risk or belief without evidence. Open available code has zero trust required. Or even if you do define trust that way yourself to include open source code, then guess what bucko? BTC requires "Trust" then too, by the exact same token that it's open source code that you need to believe works securely. > You absolutely do NOT have full custody when you put your ETH into one of these contracts. Entering into a contract is non-custodial. You do not give up keys, nobody else has control over your tokens except in the ways explicitly outlined in the contract, which you're fine with, since you looked at it and agreed. And these contracts do not allow anyone to go do a 51% attack or blah blah. > Got it, you're worried about a hypothetical future. A guaranteed future by basic laws of supply and demand shown to work for hundreds of years. If a coin doesn't do halvings, then it's a bit more unsure, but with halvings like bitcoin, it's blatantly obvious and guaranteed. > Energy could be purchase in Kazakhstan for pennies of what they're paying in USA, so clearly this is not about energy cost The profit margin just isn't slim enough yet. With more halvings, it is guaranteed to get slimmer, at which point you MUST go to kazakhstan at some point to literally even be able to mine without taking a loss. E.g. if the energy price difference is 4 cents per kwh between the two places, and the margin on mining is only 3 cents per kwh spent mining, then mining in the place that's 4 cents more expensive becomes impossible. Not "non preferable", *impossible*, as you would lose at least 1 cent per kwh not make any profit at all. > Yes mining gives you influence over consensus, but buying a PoW coin does NOT. So what? Again, the equivalent to staked coins is ASICs. Talking about owning PoW coins is simply off topic and has nothing to do with anything I'm saying. Who cares?

In my last post, I covered my bout with pricing the 15min BTC prediction market as an option \[ [https://www.reddit.com/r/algotrading/s/ML4vQP2Ly1](https://www.reddit.com/r/algotrading/s/ML4vQP2Ly1) \]. A few people asked how the system is actually put together, so here’s the architecture and why I landed on it. **Why not one script?** From the get-go, I knew I did not want a single script running everything. One bad data point or one connectivity drop shouldn’t take the whole system down with it. Likewise, one null exception shouldn’t crash the whole process. Once you split it up, you’re looking at a pipeline with at least 9 distinct steps: market discovery, market price ingestion, market data ingestion, data aggregation, pricer, gates, execution, position management, and logging to a database in parallel. That raises the first problem: how do you keep the state of each step in sync? **Problem 1: Message-based pipeline on Redis** I looked at a few options and settled on a message-based design using Redis as the transport layer. Every step is an input/output mailbox. It waits for messages on one or more input streams, processes them, and publishes its result. Each step gets its own independent behavior. For example, market discovery listens to the exchange for market openings and closings. Since Kalshi’s 15min markets are constantly rolling over, it publishes a state update on every event. The pricer waits until all the inputs it needs are present and fresh, checks timestamps for staleness, and only then runs and publishes a price for execution to evaluate. **The logger sits beside the pipeline, not inside it** The logger and database writer is one more subscriber, running in parallel to the whole pipeline. It listens to the same streams, writes everything to the database, and never sits in the path between a price and an order. If it falls behind or dies, trading carries on untouched. https://preview.redd.it/lcnzwtk5ohuh1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=717b2a58665c68915b083028180f9ab5a543df6e A nice side effect is that once the data is in the database, presenting it as a live chart and a dashboard is straightforward. It’s just reads on top of a table. [hyhy.app dashboard with live streaming prices](https://preview.redd.it/v668qtk5ohuh1.png?width=1567&format=png&auto=webp&s=7592cea4d470fb2ef95361c0cc7d4ed85583e44d) **Problem 2: Scaling beyond one of everything** Having a clean pipeline for one market and one asset is only half the job. The next question was how to extend it to different assets, markets, pricing models, and execution strategies without rewriting each step every time. I ended up with a factory-worker setup. Each step stays the same, and I spin up multiple instances with different parameters. The best example is spot price ingestion. Instead of one script subscribed to 5 exchanges, I run 5 instances, each pointed at a different exchange. Same idea for the pricer: one instance per asset (BTC, ETH), each subscribed to its own inputs. **What I got out of it** * **Horizontal scaling.** Adding an exchange or an asset means starting another instance, not touching the code. * **Fast recovery from failure.** Because each process is small and independent, one crash only takes out one step. A simple cron job that health-checks each process and restarts it is trivial to set up, and recovery is quick. Compare that to untangling a single monolith that died halfway through something. * **Isolation.** A bad feed from one exchange only affects the instance listening to it. **The downsides** None of this is free: * **Memory.** Running the same process many times over adds up.  * **Latency.** Every hop through Redis adds time. Having everything local helps. * **Stale quotes.** If a consumer falls behind, old messages can reach the pricer. That’s exactly why every consumer checks timestamps before acting. * **Reasoning about state.** With many independent processes, answering “what state is the system in right now?” is harder than with a single script. I think the tradeoff is worth it, but I wouldn’t claim it’s the right call for everyone. **Open to questions** Each stage has its own set of engineering decisions. Which one would you want me to go deeper on?

How do you tell when an ETH drop is actually about Ethereum?

Bitcoin is now trading at the high 82's. My cousin told me that because Bitcoin had a flash crash on 10-10-2025 (going down from 122k to 105k), he predicted that because tomorrow is the 1 year anniversary of the flash crash (which he cited as the end of the bull market last year even though there is more to it because Trump announced 100% tariffs on China last year, so hence the crypto market crashed), Bitcoin may do the opposite and instead, be parabolic, rising like 15-20% or something to 100k, but who knows how reliable his predictions were. My cousin (31M) stated that Bitcoin would go up between 1-5 June 2026 and I should long. Turned out, BTC went down and because I shorted, I earned a lot of money. He also predicted that on 14 May 2026, Bitcoin would crash from 79 to 76k only for it to bounce up to 82k. Most absurdly, he told me late on 19 August 2026 to short Ethereum at 2250 and set the limit to 2100 (ETH only went down as far as 2225 and after 22 August, ETH never touched below 2375 and went above 2700 on some days). He shorted Bitcoin on late 19 August 2026 when Bitcoin is at 69k and is still holding it unhedged, hoping for a drawdown despite the fact since 22 August 2026, Bitcoin never went below 75k on any day and has touched 87k. My cousin told me he is a genius investor and financial advisor but I have seen his account dip from 250,000 USD in 2017 (he put tens of thousands of personal loans into Robinhood and he only uses Robinhood and will not switch to another platform) to 50k in 2026, with him owing over half a million in student and personal loans after having dropped out of pharmacy school 2 weeks before finishing his final course in Summer of 2019 (6 years in, having finished x out of x+1 courses, aka 1 course remaining).

Prima di vendere controlla se puoi ancora scaricare lo storico ordini da Binance. Anche senza le ricevute originali, l'export delle transazioni con data e prezzo di acquisto spesso basta per dimostrare il costo medio, e cosi paghi la tassa solo sulla plusvalenza invece che sul totale. Se ETH e ancora su Binance, conviene fare lo scambio ETH/BTC li e spostare direttamente BTC. Vale la pena chiedere a un commercialista prima di muovere tutto. Non e un consiglio finanziario.

Bitcoin is now trading at the high 82's. My cousin told me that because Bitcoin had a flash crash on 10-10-2025 (going down from 122k to 105k), he predicted that because tomorrow is the 1 year anniversary of the flash crash (which he cited as the end of the bull market last year even though there is more to it because Trump announced 100% tariffs on China last year, so hence the crypto market crashed), Bitcoin may do the opposite and instead, be parabolic, rising like 15-20% or something to 100k, but who knows how reliable his predictions were. My cousin (31M) stated that Bitcoin would go up between 1-5 June 2026 and I should long. Turned out, BTC went down and because I shorted, I earned a lot of money. He also predicted that on 14 May 2026, Bitcoin would crash from 79 to 76k only for it to bounce up to 82k. Most absurdly, he told me late on 19 August 2026 to short Ethereum at 2250 and set the limit to 2100 (ETH only went down as far as 2225 and after 22 August, ETH never touched below 2375 and went above 2700 on some days). He shorted Bitcoin on late 19 August 2026 when Bitcoin is at 69k and is still holding it unhedged, hoping for a drawdown despite the fact since 22 August 2026, Bitcoin never went below 75k on any day and has touched 87k.

>**Neither vault nor crate,** >**While Ledger investigate,** >**Good time to update.** ~Daily haiku until we’re at least at 0.178 on the ETH/BTC ratio or highest market cap

When millions of AI agents enter the market soon, bet on tech (eth atd) seems too risky to me. When a coin cannot clearly get above the old ATH in whole cycle, it’s a huge red flag. If you honestly look at the last cycle ETH’s performance, you find out that nobody actually accumulated, it went up in just a momentum trade and that’s it. Of course you still have delusional maxis like Tom Lee but I would definitely prefer to put my money on Saylor’s opinion. But of course time will tell and maybe ETH surprises everyone..

I’d put a 35%into $UBER, 30% in $AMZN and then remaining 35% into crypto (BTC or ETH) Good luck!

Fr. Feels like ETH the asset’s value is the last thing on every core Ethereum dev’s mind. Identify problems and create solutions, of course. But can our most important contributors PLEASE stop acting like asset price is below them?

The thing I'd watch is whether Ethereum's activity and liquidity are supporting the bigger narratives people keep repeating. Price predictions are easy, but sustained usage is harder to fake. Moon's ETH price movement betting is another way people express market views, although that shouldn't be confused with participating in Ethereum's ecosystem.

The Doots Weekly ^ The [Trinity](https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/s/g47iwma7Hk) The [Haiku](https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/s/c0KLjiyMZT) The [Eternal Shit](https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/s/zcM8AAprNS) u/poidhxyz updates us on the ever-growing local offline [Al bounty](https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/s/RhtixS7VBz) u/Tricky_Troll decoments Reddits [latest round of enshittification](https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/s/WqmFPRVeIe) u/ElEterElote shares the EF's latest [privacy tool for Al using cool ZK tech!](https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/s/VF6rQQsJg0) u/nonetherless325 shares [Vitalik's latest creation](https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/s/AG2TYOVwLL) u/tokyo_guy375 thinks we really need a [narrative and ratio appreciation](https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/s/9yLJXq2jU5) u/Sargos stumbles across a story of [someone reclaiming their own privacy](https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/s/PoK03iDDZ7) u/robmacca shares Justin Drake's calm warning of [precautions which may be best taken](https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/s/yzpG6EMUuA) -u/FoucaultCareofSelf thinks about the two open questions [which will decide how well ETH performs](https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/s/1WMhO9foaR)

>but I ended up getting the standard one just in case I decide to venture into other cryptos like XRP or ETH. Ripple es una estafa ajena a la temática del foro r/RippleScam https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQKxSVLLfAk Parte de la estafa consiste en publicar comunicados de prensa afirmando que grandes bancos están adoptando la tecnología, cuando en realidad lo único que hicieron fue sobornar a un empleado bancario para inventar la mentira de que dicho banco participa en el proyecto; se trata de algo sumamente engañoso. Usa el sentido común: los bancos y los gobiernos no necesitan comprar las tenencias de los inversores de Ripple. Si el código de Ripple ofreciera alguna ventaja (que no la ofrece), simplemente podrían copiarlo gratis, ya que es de código abierto. Incluso antes de Bitcoin, existía la idea de un sistema de pagos digitales llamado Ripple. La premisa era que se podían realizar pagos mediante pagarés (IOU) a través de redes de amigos. Por ejemplo: si confías en que Bob te deba hasta 100 dólares, Bob confía en que Alice le deba hasta 500 dólares y Alice confía en que Chad le deba hasta 200 dólares, entonces tus ordenadores —al conocer esta red de confianza— podrían permitir que Chad te pagara 100 dólares, aunque tú no confíes en él y ni siquiera conozcas a Alice... todo ello propagando la deuda de una parte a otra. Una característica de esta idea era que resultaba totalmente agnóstica respecto a la moneda: no requería un token propio y podía utilizarse con muchas monedas simultáneamente. Pero, sobre todo, no necesitaba un consenso centralizado, sino simplemente relaciones entre pares basadas en la confianza mutua, sin autoridades intermedias, etc. Sin embargo, fue difícil ponerla en marcha porque el dinero existente no era nativamente digital, salvo a través de los bancos, que suelen complicar las cosas. Por tanto, no había forma de liquidar automáticamente estas deudas, lo que hacía que el uso del sistema resultara muy engorroso para los usuarios. Tras la aparición de Bitcoin, mucha gente se entusiasmó con la posibilidad de aplicar esta idea de Ripple a Bitcoin para reducir los costes y la latencia de las transacciones, así como para mejorar la escalabilidad en general. Hubo mucho debate al respecto, ya que parecía que Bitcoin resolvía los principales problemas que limitaban la utilidad de Ripple, mientras que Ripple abordaba algunas limitaciones interesantes de Bitcoin. En cualquier caso, mientras esto sucedía, surgió la primera gran oleada de *altcoins*. Algunos posibles desarrolladores de *altcoins* compraron el nombre "Ripple" a su creador original. El sistema que crearon carecía de todas las propiedades que hacían que el sistema original resultara interesante para los entusiastas de Bitcoin. Introdujo una nueva moneda con una preemisión —sin precedentes— de cien mil millones de unidades y sin posibilidad de minería posterior. En lugar del diseño fuertemente descentralizado y sin consenso centralizado, presentaba un sistema de consenso, concretamente uno centralizado basado en "firmantes autorizados" (aunque en sus comunicaciones engañaban y ocultaban información sobre el nivel de centralización, lo que provocó reacciones de incredulidad y desconcierto). Ni siquiera resultaba particularmente interesante como moneda digital debido a su alto grado de centralización; sin embargo, en los años siguientes, todo lo relacionado con las criptomonedas despertó el interés de quienes buscaban ganancias rápidas. Ripple se dedicó activamente a pagar a empresas para que se "asociaran" con ellos, anunciando luego dichas alianzas como una prueba genuina de adopción destinada a impulsar el valor de sus tokens. Oleada tras oleada, miembros del público crédulos cayeron en estas campañas de marketing engañosas diseñadas para inflar el precio, solo para acabar perdiendo dinero cuando Ripple y sus "socios" se deshacían de sus activos vendiéndoselos a ellos. Debido a que este nuevo "Ripple" —que, cabe recordar, no tenía ninguna relación funcional con el proyecto original cuya reputación explotaban— había sido preminado masivamente, comenzaron a pagar a personas para que lo promocionaran; pronto, las conferencias y reuniones sobre Bitcoin se vieron invadidas por promotores de Ripple hasta el punto de resultar molestos. Sobornaban a las plataformas de intercambio con enormes cantidades de dinero y monedas para lograr su inclusión en los listados, estableciendo un estándar que impedía listar otras *altcoins* que no hubieran sido preminadas masivamente y contribuyendo a que las plataformas descuidaran el soporte para Bitcoin, que les resultaba menos rentable de forma directa. Más tarde, empezaron a presionar a gobiernos y ONG para que bloquearan o clausuraran Bitcoin. Como cabe imaginar, no cuentan con muchos amigos por aquí. Personalmente, no veo nada malo en que la gente cree sistemas de transacciones altamente centralizados; sin embargo, promocionarlos como algo que no son resulta poco ético. Además, ejercer presión para eliminar alternativas que realmente ofrecen descentralización —especialmente Bitcoin, que fue el origen del mercado de compradores entusiastas que acabaron adquiriendo su moneda— es una acción francamente maliciosa. En cualquier caso, las ideas que en un principio se asociaban con Ripple perduran hoy en día bajo la forma de Lightning; esta tecnología combinó los canales de pago de Satoshi y reforzó la seguridad, de modo que ya no es necesario depositar una confianza ciega en las contrapartes del canal. La desventaja de este cambio es que los canales respaldados por garantías reales escalan peor que los basados ​​en simples promesas de pago (IOU), pero es probable que la mayor seguridad compense con creces este inconveniente.

Ciao io non spostarei le Cripto da un exchange (Binance ) a un altro exchange, se hai una quantitá considerevole di ETH potresti spostarli a una tua wallet personaje sia hot o cold, il meglio sarebbe una cold wallet, che non ha per forza bisogno di essere conessa a internet per sicurezza, alcune cold wallet permettono di fare swap cioè cambiare una minera per un altra. Non capisco perché ti prende il 33% é troppissimo!!!! Informati meglio supla auto custodia

After yesterday's bloodbath, I'm just praying ETH can crawl back up to $2,700 at this point. Brutal week.

Prendere una decisione ETH BTC

It was his Vitaliks own comment on the possibility of AI deciphering ETH

I still have confidence in ETH. We are headed towards 24/7 markets with RWA (real world assets) and tokenized everything. Now this has been in the works for literally years, but it is happening. ETH is still positioned to do the heavy lifting in the RWA space.

ETH/BTC ratio is near multi-year lows. Historically, that is a mean-reversion setup, not a sell signal.

For actually spending, a card wins easily since almost nowhere takes wallet payments directly. The real choice is the type of card. Custodial ones make you preload onto an exchange, while newer ones like MetaMask’s card pull from your own wallet at checkout, so you’re not parking funds with someone else. Either way, spend stables rather than ETH or BTC if you can. In a lot of countries every swipe with a volatile coin counts as a taxable sale, and a year of coffee purchases turns into hundreds of tiny gains to report. Though trackers like Chain Glance and Bitcoin.Tax can untangle that, you probably won't need it if you’re only spending stables.