ETHEUR
Ethereum / Euro
cryptoComposite

It is possible we are wrong. But it helps knowing Ethereum has been the dominant "alt" for the last 10 years. Many projects have tried to be ETH killers but none have succeeded. Of all the crypto to bet on, ETH is still, IMHO, the best one.

Most perp venues show only what their order book looks like now. I wanted to see where liquidity had been resting before price reached it, how long it stayed, and whether it traded or disappeared. So I built Solana Perp Liquidity. It compares Pacifica, Phoenix, Bullet and Bulk, with Hyperliquid included as a liquidity benchmark. It currently covers SOL, BTC, ETH, HYPE and ZEC and combines historical liquidity heatmaps with live books, large trades, VWAP, depth, open interest, taker flow, and volume/turnover. One important caveat: an order-book wall is visible intent, not a completed trade or a prediction. It can move or be cancelled at any moment. I am the author and would appreciate feedback from active perp traders about which comparisons are useful or misleading. [https://solana-perp-liquidity.softfork.se/](https://solana-perp-liquidity.softfork.se/)

**📸 PROOF & PHOTOS:** [Mint's Missing Inventory](https://imgur.com/a/2Rcl36j) Apparently, collecting U.S. Mint sets for decades and then realizing you have enough to open a small museum is a thing. 😂 Time to thin the herd! I've got a nice assortment of **90% silver Proof Sets, 40% silver Mint Sets, Special Mint Sets, Blue & Brown Ikes, and Bicentennial silver**. Most are in original U.S. Mint packaging. **Looking for other years?** I also have regular clad Proof Sets and Uncirculated Mint Sets for most years. Feel free to ask about a specific year, and I'll check what I have! All prices are per set or coin unless otherwise noted. # 🪙 90% SILVER PROOF SETS The 1962–1997 sets listed contain **$0.85 FV in 90% silver**. The 1999–2008 sets listed contain **$1.85 FV in 90% silver**. * **1962 Philadelphia** — Qty 1 — **$50** * **1963 Philadelphia** — Qty 1 — **$50** * **1996-S Silver Proof Set** — Qty 1 — **$35** * **1997-S Silver Proof Set** — Qty 1 — **$35** * **1999-S Silver Proof Set** — Qty 1 — **$80** * **2003-S Silver Proof Set** — Qty 3 — **$75 each** * **2008-S Silver Proof Set** — Qty 1 — **$75** # 🪙 40% SILVER SPECIAL MINT & PROOF SETS Each contains a **40% silver Kennedy half dollar** (approximately 0.1479 oz ASW). * **1965-P Mint Set** — Qty 1 — **$15** * **1967 Special Mint Set** — Qty 2 — **$15 each** * **1968-S Proof Set** — Qty 1 — **$12** * **1969-S Proof Set** — Qty 5 — **$12 each** * **1970-S Proof Set** — Qty 5 — **$12 each** # 🪙 40% SILVER UNCIRCULATED MINT SETS Each contains a **40% silver Kennedy half dollar**. The 1970 set includes the better-date **1970-D Kennedy half**, issued only in Mint Sets. * **1968 P&D Mint Set** — Qty 3 — **$12 each** * **1969 P&D Mint Set** — Qty 4 — **$12 each** * **1970 P&D Mint Set** — Qty 3 — **$22 each** # 🦅 40% SILVER EISENHOWER DOLLARS Each contains approximately **0.3161 oz ASW**. **Blue Ikes — Uncirculated** * **1971-S Blue Ike** — Qty 2 — **$19 each** * **1973-S Blue Ike** — Qty 1 — **$20** * **1974-S Blue Ike** — Qty 2 — **$19 each** **Brown Ikes — Proof** * **1971-S Brown Ike** — Qty 2 — **$20 each** * **1973-S Brown Ike** — Qty 1 — **$22** # 🇺🇸 1976-S BICENTENNIAL 40% SILVER **1976-S Three-Coin Silver Proof Set — Qty 1 — $35** Includes the 40% silver Eisenhower dollar, Kennedy half dollar, and Washington quarter in original U.S. Mint packaging. # 📦 SHIPPING * USPS Ground Advantage starts at **$6** * Larger orders quoted based on weight and destination * Insurance available at buyer's expense, subject to coverage eligibility * Secure packaging and tracking provided # 💰 PAYMENT * **Zelle preferred** * Venmo * PayPal F&F — no notes 🍕 * **Crypto:** BTC, ETH, SOL, KAS, USDC — others considered # 📌 ADDITIONAL INVENTORY & CONDITION I have **regular Proof Sets and Uncirculated Mint Sets for most years** beyond what's listed above. If you're filling holes in a collection, just ask! Most items are in original Mint packaging, which may show normal age-related wear. Additional photos available upon request. **Please comment before sending a chat or PM.** 🏰🔐 **2FA locked down tighter than Fort Knox.** Thanks for looking, and happy stacking! 🪙

Similar situation to me a couple months back, but my ETH gains outweighed my ADA losses. I sold both positions, realised a net gain (which I'll pay less CGT on due to tax loss harvesting from ADA), while freeing up a load of capital to start buying again. I've been rebuilding an ETH position, with a cost basis less than where I sold, but higher than the cost basis on the initial position. I doubt I'll buy ADA ever again. If you think we're going lower, you could sell with the plan to buy lower. If you think we're going higher, you may as well hold on. Also, not sure what exchange you use, but you can trade your ADA for ETH to tax loss harvest while keeping your ETH position (which is in the green). Good luck ;D

Just checked and ZEC is at $1,375! Wow, up 7% today. Everything else is red, with ETH and XRP leading the pack again.

XMR will be (as that's the only true crypto left by now) 5k sooner than ETH ever again. So yeah, dumpit.

Hey r/crypto_com, With a lot of questions coming in about how to move assets from your current exchanges to [Crypto.com](http://Crypto.com) Exchange, we put together a quick guide to help. Here's the short version: 1. Set up and verify your account at [exchange.crypto.com](http://exchange.crypto.com) 2. Enable 2FA on both your current exchange and [Crypto.com](http://Crypto.com) Exchange 3. For each asset: get the deposit address on [Crypto.com](http://Crypto.com) Exchange → withdraw from your current exchange using the same network → always send a small test amount first 4. Supported networks include ETH, BTC, SOL, Polygon, Arbitrum, BNB Chain, Tron, and more — always check both platforms before sending A few important reminders: • Network mismatch = lost funds. Double-check every time. • Deposits on [Crypto.com](http://Crypto.com) Exchange are free. Your sending exchange may charge a withdrawal fee. • If you prefer not to do multiple on-chain transfers, you can sell to fiat, withdraw to your bank, and re-deposit on [Crypto.com](http://Crypto.com) Exchange. For high-volume traders: the VIP Matching Program lets you match your current fee tier instantly for 60 days + $1,000 in trading fee credits. Apply at [https://crypto.com/exchange/vip-portal](https://crypto.com/exchange/vip-portal) or email [vip@crypto.com](mailto:vip@crypto.com). Campaign page: [https://crypto.com/sg/product-news/exchange-vip-matching-program](https://crypto.com/sg/product-news/exchange-vip-matching-program) Feel free to ask questions below — happy to help.

I'll be there! If ETH is at 10k...

**Tricky's Daily Doots #1,646** **Yesterday's Daily 05/11/2026** [Previous Daily Doots](https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/1xob6gn/daily_general_discussion_november_05_2026/19s6ckx1lhkp0/) - u/haurog checks in after [day 3 of Devcon 8.](https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/1xob6gn/daily_general_discussion_november_05_2026/19s6s1i2e8dfk/) 🇮🇳 - u/ethdaily delivers [the daily ETH news.](https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/1xob6gn/daily_general_discussion_november_05_2026/19s7eaa3a5qmb/) 📰 - u/FoucaultCareofSelf makes the case that [the AI bubble popping is long-term good for ETH.](https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/1xob6gn/daily_general_discussion_november_05_2026/19s6upxmt9ipu/) 🤖

I have the same problem. I've been circling the investment scene for years and years. I sat in the front row of a Vitalik Butrin's talk over 10 years ago before ETH was even public traded. But I could never get into it. Both of my parents are completely ignorant of this and none of my siblings or friends cared for the stock market. I think ChatGPT really helps now. You just need to treat this as if you are learning biology. If you are looking at the diagram of a cell, anyone would be lost. But use the same tactic you learn about that to learn about things like performance indicators. Yes, they show like 20 of them at the same time, but so does a diagram of a cell in your body. The only difference is that you are writing the textbook. This is not a very fast way of learning but ultimately learning is about you reading things, putting them in your mind, and applying them.

Staking risk really depends on the method. Solo staking avoids third-party smart contract exposure but still carries operational and slashing risks. Liquid staking adds smart contract and protocol risks. For long-term holders prioritizing security, keeping most ETH in cold storage and staking only a smaller portion can be a reasonable balance. A few percent yield isn't worth risking your entire stack.

Juicer is Hydration’s newest product: A simple strategy that allows you to earn juicy yield on your ETH and BTC spot while keeping your deposited principal separate from the strategy’s liquidation path. Under the hood, Juicer uses the borrowing capacity of your collateral to borrow HOLLAR at a discounted rate and deploy it into a yield-generating PRIME looping strategy. Synthetic backing protects the Main collateral position, while the looping exposure sits in the separate PRIME strategy. The complexity stays under the hood. Juicer handles borrowing, swaps, looping, harvesting and rebalancing, then converts strategy surplus back into the original collateral and compounds it into your position. Juicer puts the borrowing power of your ETH or BTC to work while you keep exposure to the asset you wanted to hold in the first place. **Principal outside the liquidation path** The key design choice behind Juicer is that the asset you deposit does not sit directly in the liquidation path of the PRIME looping strategy. Your ETH or BTC remains in the Main position, while Juicer adds synthetic backing alongside it to cover the liquidation-threshold value of the HOLLAR debt. That backing does not create additional borrowing power; its job is to protect Main while the borrowed HOLLAR is deployed elsewhere. This separates your principal collateral from the PRIME loop. If the strategy runs into trouble, earned strategy value absorbs losses before original principal backing. Any remaining shortfall becomes a governance recovery obligation, with unpaid claims preserved. **Keep your spot exposure, skip the impermanent loss** Juicer does not require you to pair your ETH or BTC with another asset in a liquidity pool. There is no impermanent loss from a pool rebalancing your holdings as prices move. You keep your exposure to the asset, including its upside, while Juicer manages the borrowing underneath. Your position’s dollar value still follows the market, but ordinary strategy rebalancing does not sell your deposited ETH or BTC to adjust the debt. **How Juicer generates yield** Once your collateral is deposited, Juicer starts putting its borrowing capacity to work. Main borrows HOLLAR against your collateral and deploys it into the shared PRIME strategy. Inside that strategy, HOLLAR is swapped into PRIME and supplied to the money market. The PRIME position can then borrow additional HOLLAR and repeat the process until it reaches its target health factor. When the strategy generates a surplus, Juicer harvests it, allocates it back to the participating vaults and converts each share into the asset originally deposited. After the protocol’s harvest share and Main borrowing interest, the remaining ETH or BTC is added back into the position. The harvest share goes hand in hand with discounted HOLLAR borrowing. Much of the loop’s yield would normally go toward HOLLAR interest. Juicer reduces that borrowing cost and collects a share of harvested collateral instead, supporting protocol revenue and reserves for its principal-recovery responsibility. These settings are configurable by governance. **One strategy, everything handled** Building a comparable position manually would require borrowing HOLLAR, swapping into PRIME, supplying it, borrowing again, monitoring health factors, harvesting returns and rebalancing as conditions change. Juicer handles that operational work through permissionless keepers. When the PRIME loop reaches its safety threshold, automatic deleveraging reduces exposure and repays debt. When collateral prices call for less Main borrowing, Juicer unwinds part of the strategy and uses the proceeds to repay HOLLAR. The user enters a single strategy, while the machinery underneath manages deployment, compounding and debt adjustments within configured limits. **Beyond ETH and BTC** Multiple collateral vaults can plug into the same PRIME engine, allowing different assets to share the underlying yield infrastructure. That opens up possibilities beyond crypto. Tokenized gold and tokenized S&P 500 exposure, such as SPY-linked assets, are potential future candidates: Assets people want to hold that could also put their borrowing capacity to work. Each addition would depend on suitable lending-market support, reliable pricing, sufficient liquidity and governance approval. **Exiting Juicer** Juicer is designed around a managed withdrawal process. To exit, users submit a withdrawal request and wait through the cooldown before the strategy settles the corresponding debt and releases collateral. The withdrawal delay is currently seven days and is configurable by governance. That is the earliest point at which an unwind can begin; completion depends on queue progress and available liquidity. Explore juicer here: https://app.hydration.net/strategies/juicer For more info, check out the juicer docs: https://docs.hydration.net/quick\_start/juicer/ Stay hydrated. Squeeze the yield. 🧃💧

ETH at $2,230. Which button are you pressing?

Long-term holders: Do you still risk staking your ETH or just keep it cold?

Sol ETH HBAR

Proof: [https://imgur.com/a/gLwU8bu](https://imgur.com/a/gLwU8bu) **$318** Payment methods: * USD: venmo, PayPal, Cash APP. No note. * Cryptos: USDC on ETH network, BTC on BTC network (3% surcharge), ETH on ETH network (3% surcharge). Ship to all 50 states, US Territories, and Military Bases. Shipping fee will be estimated based on zip code, weight, and size. Almost all my shipping labels each carry $100 complimentary insurance. Additional insurance coverage is available at the buyer's expense. Packaging will be done in a way that protects not only the metals, but also their containers. I have an industry-leading standard of padding, filling, packaging, and taping for every shipment. Once the carrier takes possession of the package directly from my hands, my liability ends. But I will do my best to help with investigation, and insurance claim filing on behalf of the buyer, in the rare case of package loss, package damage, or content leakage.

🌍 **Macro** The post-election rally lasted just one day before U.S. equities suffered a sharp sell-off, led by AI and technology stocks. The Nasdaq plunged 5.52%, the S&P 500 fell 4.35%, and the Dow dropped 3.44%. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index crashed 12.3%, its largest daily decline since March 2020, wiping approximately $2.9T off the S&P 500’s market value. Concerns over tighter AI regulation, data center restrictions, stretched valuations, and the returns on massive AI investments fueled the sell-off. Crypto followed: BTC retreated from above $80K toward $76K, while ETH fell below $2,250. Despite BTC ETFs recording $74.57M in net inflows on November 4, broader risk aversion and leveraged liquidations continued to weigh on prices. ⸻ 📈 **Market Snapshot** • BTC: $76,087.90 (-5.49%) • ETH: $2,238.01 (-7.70%) • NASDAQ: 24,315.00 (-5.52%) • S&P 500: 7,353.79 (-4.35%) • F&G: 28 (previous: 50) ⸻ 🧠 **Market Take** Hedge fund deleveraging may be amplifying the equity sell-off. Walleye Capital, which manages approximately $17B, plans to scale back its internal equity long/short business and return some capital after losing 5.9% in October. Other multi-strategy funds are reportedly facing redemptions, shutting down investment teams, or unwinding positions. If multiple funds reduce exposure simultaneously, forced selling across asset classes could intensify volatility. Meanwhile, Hyperliquid’s daily priority fees hit a record $521K, accounting for 12.7% of platform revenue as liquidation bots, arbitrageurs, and high-frequency traders competed for faster execution. The AI trade is also facing a major reality check. SanDisk fell approximately 22%, Micron, Western Digital, and AMD dropped more than 17%, while Nvidia lost around 9%. Investors are increasingly questioning whether massive AI infrastructure spending can generate sufficient commercial returns. Concerns over potential data center restrictions, weaker-than-expected AI business outlooks, and skepticism around major AI companies’ fundraising and IPO valuations have added to the pressure. The market is shifting its focus from infrastructure expansion toward actual revenue growth and investment returns. **Key levels:** * Resistance: $78K * Support: $75K–$76K * Trend: Bearish, closely correlated with U.S. tech stocks ⸻ 🔥 **Hot Tokens** * **INJ:** Held up against the broader market sell-off, gaining approximately 2%–3% after Canary’s staking-enabled INJ ETF began trading on Nasdaq, following an intraday rally above 10%. * **CCD:** Gained over 20% as Concordium launched a 75M CCD developer grant program, brought its EURQ euro stablecoin to testnet, and advanced its AI agent identity infrastructure. ⸻ 📰 **Key Updates** * **U.S. Elections:** 226 pro-crypto candidates won House seats and 19 won Senate seats, totaling 245 across both chambers. * **South Korea:** Plans to delay its digital asset income tax by two years, pushing implementation to 2029. * **Greece:** Passed its first crypto tax framework, setting a 10% capital gains tax and a 15% tax on lending, liquidity provision, and staking income, effective January 1, 2027. * **Singapore:** Visa opened six global centers focused on AI, agentic commerce, stablecoins, wallets, and quantum computing. HSBC, JPMorgan, Standard Chartered, and two other banks also established Global Layer One to advance tokenized financial infrastructure. * **Samsung:** Enabled USDC on Solana in Samsung Wallet for U.S. Galaxy users, reaching approximately 82M devices. * **Base:** Activated its Denim mainnet upgrade, reducing block times to 200 milliseconds. * **Uniswap:** Introduced a permissioned pool hook, bringing the first permissioned asset to its AMM. * **Other developments:** Arkansas sued Kalshi over alleged illegal gambling operations; the White House is reviewing proposed SEC crypto broker rule changes; France’s rejected budget bill puts proposed stablecoin taxation and self-custody reporting provisions on hold. * **Token unlocks:** STABLE unlocks 4.93% (approx. $23M) and AVAX 0.3% (approx. $14.7M) on Nov 8. ⸻ ⚡ **Quick Take** BTC has fallen back toward $76K as the AI stock sell-off, hedge fund deleveraging, and leveraged liquidations trigger broader risk aversion. The $75K–$76K zone is the key support to watch, while tonight’s U.S. nonfarm payrolls could further influence rate expectations and market direction.

Short answer: no. Leaving fees in and keeping a 1% range does not lock you to 1 ETH forever. While price sits inside the range the pool is continuously rebalancing you — selling the asset that is rising into the one that is falling. Your ETH balance only looks stable when price is still near your entry and you have not been pushed to the edge yet. Once price walks fully through that 1% band and you are 100% cbBTC, that cbBTC amount is whatever the swaps left you with (including IL). Pulling only fees does not rewind the inventory shift; on a tight range fees are usually tiny next to that move. A single-sided 1% deposit is basically a range / limit order. The strong fee APR is the market paying you for that liquidity. The flip into less of the other asset when it fills is the other half of the same trade. If the real goal is accumulating more ETH or cbBTC rather than max fee APR, people usually either re-center when price leaves the band (paying the rebalance cost) or widen the range so composition drifts slower. Tight range + single-sided + "never touch principal" do not all fit together 👀

ETH Daily - 5th November 2026 📰 \-Base activated Denim upgrade. \-Reth v2.10.0 patch release. \-Lido x Firelight protection. \-Amundi tokenized fund on Ethereum. \-ETHBEAT CROPs guide. \-Zilliqa transitions into an L2. \-AZTEC delegation program. \-EtherFi launches Liquid Bold USD vault. \-DIFC Courts Dispute Resolution Oracle. Read more: [https://ethdaily.io/base-activates-denim-upgrade](https://ethdaily.io/base-activates-denim-upgrade)

A poke above 2.4k after a wick to 2.22k is not the same thing as owning the level. Reclaims that stick usually leave footprints: a few daily closes back on top, a retest that holds instead of slicing straight through, and ETH/BTC not making a fresh low while spot wiggles around the number. Until that shows up I treat the bounce as short covering, not a regime change. Same pattern showed up on the last couple of false recoveries this year. Level first, narrative second 👀

I traded a single trade after market close going short on NQ and it is based on my scanner on futures in NQ, ES, CL, GC, BTC and ETH. Makes $415.

Going to sleep. Probably sub 2k when I will wake up because, well because this is ETH

ETH price is the way to measure it

It's completely unrelated to crapto, entire markets rose yesterday and shit today. ETH will follow the overall tech trend. Look at crypto and relate it to the political calender. Mid-terms is always a crab market, presidential election is a bull market, post presidential election is the start of the bear market. You can't fully know when each part begins but this is usually how it's gone every 4 years (especially since the halving cycle also dances around the US political cycle)

On a 1% range, a single-sided deposit is basically a limit order, it fills around the middle of the range, so 0.0296 to 0.028 is more than it should cost, and I’d check the tx. To stack ETH, I’d put the next cbBTC range at or below where it sold. If price runs away you sit out of range earning nothing