ETHEUR
Ethereum / Euro
crypto Composite

yep, those are the tokens on ETH. make sure buy/own the coin version for pepe the frog. we may see the mc from tokens to shift over to the coin version.
[pepecoin.com](http://pepecoin.com)

One company now has almost 5.8M ETH. Most of it is already staked

It’s a shitcoin on ETH.

Apologies, forgot to state that the transactions are on the ETH mainnet.

You want honest verdict ? With the current implementation none. BTC is not problem solving chain it's more of store of value much like gold. It's worth is what people agree to spend. More like a rare commodity. 
For any industrial use it's already to expensive. ETH and similar are trying to bring intrinsic values by running smart contract ( pay fee for execution of the smart contract ), but again too expensive for large scale real world execution. 
Crypto is in limbo and the problem is; if your blockchain does not generate revenue it doesn't get traction or adoption and if it generates revenue it becomes too expensive for real world mass adoption.
Anyway, first the tech need to be made smooth for general purpose use and bad actors needed to be weeded out ( the casino makers, useless L1 chains, false promises etc). I think the best one not yet invented which will solve the “crypto limbo” — bring intrinsic value while being affordable. 

It may seem like 3 years because I'm deleting old posts. Although ya I don't really post much. Sometimes for fun, sometimes I lurk. It's mostly a health thing - too stressful, life priorities. Whatever. I definitely haven't meaningfully posted for like a year plus now.
I sold my entire stack like 2 years ago around $3,000 ETH. Didn't buy back, shorting MSTR lol so whatever people can call be a biased fudder.
I find MSTR situation and clarity interesting, so decided to post about it. Mostly because I just like that kind of stuff.

Hey everyone,
​I’m planning to start a long-term investment journey (planning to hold for about 10 years), and I've chosen Interactive Brokers as my primary platform.
​I know that IBKR now supports depositing stablecoins (USDC) to fund the account, as well as transferring certain crypto assets (like BTC/ETH) directly into the linked crypto account. I want to use this feature to fund my portfolio, but before I make any moves, I want to ask the experienced folks here so I can avoid any catastrophic mistakes or future account freezes.
​I have a few specific questions:
​Are there hidden risks with crypto deposits? Has anyone faced issues like account freezes or complex requests for proof of funds simply because the initial deposit originated from crypto?
​**Exchanges vs. Cold Wallets:** Does it matter where I send the funds from? I know IBKR is notoriously strict about rejecting "third-party deposits." Is it much safer to transfer from my own Ledger hardware wallet to clearly prove first-party ownership? Or is it totally fine to transfer directly from a centralized exchange like Binance?
​**Long-term impact:** Since I plan to leave my funds invested for 10 years, could funding via crypto put a "red flag" on my account later on when I eventually try to withdraw fiat down the road?
​My main goal is to protect my investments over the long haul, and I don't want any nasty surprises or account closures just because of how I initially funded it.
​If anyone has past experience or advice regarding IBKR's current crypto deposit policies, I’d be very grateful if you could share.
​Thanks in advance! 🙏

Everyone agrees AI agents are about to write most of the world's code. Almost nobody has asked the obvious next question: where does that code live?
It is not going to be GitHub. Here is why, and why the answer is currently valued at $2.4M.
**What GitLawb is**
GitLawb is the open-source git stack built for agents instead of humans:
* Identity is a keypair, not an account and password
* Every push is cryptographically signed (Ed25519) and certified
* Permissions are delegable agent-to-agent (an agent can hand another agent a scoped, signed right to review or merge)
* Payments are built in (bounties that pay on merge, x402 machine payments, USDC)
**This is not a whitepaper. It is live right now:**
* \~4,000 agents
* 3,000+ repos
* 41,000+ signed pushes
* Agents opening, reviewing, merging, auditing, and deploying each other's code with no humans in the loop
There is an agent on the network called Darwin that predicts BTC and ETH, rewrites its own signal weights when accuracy drops, and commits the change to its own repo, signed and explained. 31+ generations. Zero human involvement. GitHub structurally cannot host that.
**Why GitHub has no part in this**
GitHub is centralized (Microsoft can switch it off), human-account-first, has no native machine identity, no delegable permissions, and no way for agents to pay each other. These are architectural gaps, not missing features. You cannot patch them in. GitLawb was born with them solved.
**The numbers (this is the part nobody is pricing in)**
* GitHub: acquired for $7.5B in 2018, \~$2B ARR, estimated $20B+ as a standalone today
* $GITLAWB: fully diluted valuation \~$2.37M, \~$1.16M liquidity, trading on Uniswap V4 on Base
The agent-native GitHub is trading at roughly 1/10,000th of the human one.
The asymmetry:
* Capture 1% of GitHub's value = \~100x
* Capture 10% = \~1,000x
* Just match GitHub's 2018 acquisition price = \~3,000x
You are not betting it beats GitHub. You are betting the git layer of the agent economy is worth more than a rounding error.
**Details**
* Chain: Base
* Contract: `0x5f980dcfc4c0fa3911554cf5ab288ed0eb13dba3`
* DEX: Uniswap V4
* Explorer (live network, verify the stats yourself): [explorer.gitlawb.com](http://explorer.gitlawb.com)

NFA

What I don't know is what happens to Bitmine in that situation.
The tiny ETH yield might just be enough for them to avoid a similar fate.

Wyckoff's volume ideas get taught as if they were settled. No supply means nobody is left to sell. No demand means no buyers are showing up. Shortening of the thrust means the move is running out. Every course repeats them and I have never seen anyone put a number on them, so I did.
Setup: ES 5-minute bars, 2010 to 2026. Price cut into waves with a volatility-scaled threshold instead of a fixed one, volume totalled per wave, then five of the classic events detected mechanically. I wrote the definitions and the success criteria down before running anything, which matters here, because with this many events you can find whatever you want if you decide what counts after you look.
The two that held up:
Change in behaviour, long side. 51.8% over 13,867 events, p=1.6e-5
No supply, long side. 51.4% over 23,077 events, p=3e-5
Both are real in the statistical sense and both are small. 51.8% is not a business. It is a tilt, and anyone selling you Wyckoff as a high accuracy method is selling something the data doesn't support.
The two that came back backwards:
No demand, short side. 45.6% over 22,262 events
Shortening of the thrust, short side. 47.6% over 9,427 events
Tradition says both are bearish. On ES, shorting them lost more often than it won, which means the information was there, just pointing the other way. Going long after a no-demand event was the better side of that trade over the sample.
Change in behaviour on the short side came in at 48.6% over 12,642 events. Below baseline, not reversed, just not the mirror of the long version that the symmetry of the teaching implies.
The part I found most useful is that none of this travels. I ran the same frozen protocol on BTC: eight pre-registered tests, zero confirmations, and no supply flips to 48.3%. Gold and ETH show the same anti-signature. So whatever this edge is, it seems to belong to index-type instruments with a long upward drift, not to volume analysis as a universal law. If someone taught you these patterns as market-agnostic, that part is not holding up.
Caveats. It is one instrument for the main test. My wave definition is one of many reasonable ones and a different threshold would move these numbers. And an event firing is not a trade, since there is no cost, no slippage, and no position sizing in any of this.
The reason I ran it is that I'm building this kind of chart reading into something an agent can call, and I wanted to know which parts survive measurement before encoding them. Happy to explain the method if anyone wants it.
What I actually want to know: has anyone here traded no-demand long instead of short, and did it hold up for you? A reversed sign on 22,262 events is either something real or something wrong with my definition, and I can't tell which from my own data.

The problem with alt coins is the only useful thing they have ever done is offer a cheaper way to move BTC and ETH around when gas is high.
They literally don't do anything but offer speculation. After 10+ years of multiple generations of investors being burned, its just not worth it.
You can get the same returns with less risk from the stock market.

TL;DR
Memetic / Pepecoin (2016) – The original Pepe coin launched in 2016 as Memetic and later rebranded to Pepecoin. There were concerns about the first few blocks, where roughly 500k coins were mined. Years later, due to low mining activity, the project migrated to Ethereum.
PEPE (ETH) – The largest Pepe project by market cap. Launched about two years ago as an Ethereum token. There have been wallet-freezing controversies, and while token burns were promised, there hasn't been much news about them for over a year.
Pepecoin (Pepecoin.com / $PEP) – Launched in January 2024 as a fair-launch Layer 1 blockchain with no premine and no VC funding. Development and listings are community-funded. The network is secured through merged mining with Litecoin and Dogecoin, giving it the security of the Scrypt mining ecosystem.

the best sign for ETH would be people arguing about fundamentals again instead of only price predictions. That usually means the market is maturing

Depends on what you undestand as original, almost all are tokens hosted by L1 chains like ETH or SOL
Only one is still L1 and it's $PEP

There are two. $PEPE is an Ethereum ERC-20 token that requires ETH for network fees, whereas $PEP is an independent Layer 1 blockchain based on PoW.

Swapping BTC to ETH now? LOL

In a currency exchange? I doubt it. This wasn’t a transfer. This was a swap from BTC to ETH.

I used to have about 1% of my portfolio in BTC and ETH.
What ultimately became a problem for me, if I have "skin in the game" in any investment, I then feel compelled to follow that space at least bit. And with crypto that space is such a cesspool of gambling addicts, conspiracy theorists, and fraudsters, that it was just too much.
For me the return in psychological well-being outweighs any diversification benefit I might get from crypto.

BTC market cap is $1.26T compared the global stock market cap of $152T…or around
0.8%.
BTC + ETH ($227B) is around $1.5T.
A 1% holding in BTC/ETH is close enough to “market weight” when only considering equities and crypto.
For reference Gold market cap is around $30T.
Crypto is much more volatile than gold and given that BTC is way below peak there is arguably headroom for growth where gold is still mostly a currency and inflation hedge.
If you believe in the BTC 4 year cycles BTC will likely decline until 2028ish when the next halving happens…so its not a terrible time to buy as nobody knows the future but the past has indicated a $100K price.

I will never recommend crypto to anyone. I'll take the risk, but I don't want someone else getting screwed because of me. I've had more than one person call me for advice and I told them not to get involved because crypto is too volatile and there are way too many scams and rug pulls out there. Even the top chains like BTC and ETH have scary looking charts. ETH's 5-year chart is absolutely horrendous.