ETHEUR
Ethereum / Euro
crypto Composite

Most mentions on r/cc (2026-01-17 00:00:00):
||Mentions|
|:-|:-|
|BTC|157|
|SOL|51|
|ETH|47|
|ALGO|28|
|XMR|19|
|ADA|17|
|IP|15|
|HBAR|13|
|MOON|11|
|SAFE|9|
|XRP|9|
|HOME|8|
|CORECHAIN|7|
|ME|7|
|SNT|6|
|DOGE|5|
|USDT|5|
|ATOM|4|
|TRU|4|
|TRUMP|4|
[Data source and app](https://www.redditcoins.app/)

Accidently wrote this in the old daily:
Awesome, Rocketpool Saturn II comes in February!
https://rp-saturn.webflow.io/
Do I understand correctly:
Current 8 ETH validators can swap to 4 ETH validators (using the express ticket for reentering the rocketpool queue?). Additionally, orchestration of multiple rocketpool validators can be done through a single smart contract ("megapool")?

You forgot about ETH

No this is exactly the point, you need to have a system which can withstand this. On Ethereum, in addition to being exceedingly difficult to successfully pull off an attack because it will cost a minimum of $66 billion, you would also need all of Lido, Binance, Etherfi, Coinbase, Figmetn, Kraken, Blockdaemon, Everstake, Kiln, Rocket Pool, OKX, Bitcoin Suisse, Upbit, StakeWise, P2P.org, Stakefish and Liquid Collective to agree to attack Ethereum, coordinate and carry it out.
AND, even if that was to happen, as unlikely as it seems, if they attacked the networked, they could do it once, it would immediately be detected, they'd have all their ETH deleted and the community would fork them off the network and carry on without them.
You don't got any of this in Bitcoin. In Bitcoin just 2 pools need to collude, for whatever reason, and then they can spawn camp the network. You can throw them off the network, you are at the mercy of your attackers.

Guys, I count on all of you to tell people in the ETH dev community that projects like Etheroll are now much more feasible than a few years ago. Mainnet fees, the single biggest reason why projects like this failed, is now super cheap. Contracts are all on chain. Relaunch wen?

I cashed out far to early, I had 2 BTC at one point, spent lots on cannabis, I also had at least 70 ETH, then swapped it for LTC, stupid mistake. Not that LTC was bad, ETH was just worth far far more now.
This was back when coinbase first listed ETH, if only I held and kept on buying it.
Timing the markets is hard, when do you cash out ?
I bet lots of people might of bought BTC at $800 then sold at $15000, would you hold or sell ?

LIDO is probably the single largest risk factor for ETH. I don’t understand why anyone would chose them over rocket pool….

>and maybe in etherium
Altcoins are offtopic here but I would avoid ethereum
Not every altcoin is a scam but if I were you I would just focus on education and Bitcoin until you learn more because that one is indeed a scam. no point to ethereum , its on a slow decline because its primary use case was launching pump and dump scam tokens and now solana can do that cheaper than ethereum because of higher gas prices. If solana ever becomes more popular than their fees will rise like eth and another altcoins will overtake solana
1) Vitalik and many others in the Ethereum space are known scammers. Vitalik is not an idiot thus he should have known better than pitch something as ridiculous as quantum mining to potential investors. This is a snake oil salesman pitching technical nonsense to the credulous.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DkUpZkeqhF4
https://medium.com/bitcoinerrorlog/vitaliks-quantum-quest-9e6af6570f23
2) ETH is an illegal security according to the Howey test with a premine of 72 million eths. They purposely misled investors by suggesting merely 12 million gifted premine ignoring the 60 million they sold. Misleading total supply graphs in their prospectus.
3) Vitalik and many other have been falsely representing Ethereum and misleading others over and over again. example - pitching turing completeness as the valuable aspect of ETh , now pivoting away from that and saying it was never about turing completeness but "rich statefulness"
4) Ethereum is a pointless project that will lead to no efficiency because there is no censorship risk in code execution. If a project has no hope of ever creating an efficiency(like bitcoin has found with regulatory arbitrage) than every company and project will ultimately fail in its ecosystem. Are you trying to suggest that someday in the future there will be censorship risk in code execution? If not than what purpose does Ethereum solve if it comes with a horrible tradeoff of an extremely large attack surface and huge scaling problems?
5) Advertising immutability and unstoppable contracts that were than immediately reversed with multiple hard forks.
6) For goodness sake the inflation distribution rate or final algo is not even defined and people are investing in this. This is insane and basically amounts to faith in vitalik and his team, while at the same time newbs are misled into believing eth is decentralized.
7) Ethereum has already failed to scale as expected and so they created a whole new blockchain instead of upgrading and following the difficulty bomb/ice age as they promised and lied about many times.
8) the fact that ethereum is switching over to staking rewards has serious tax implication in many countries where merely holding your eth unlike bitcoin being staked will expose you to taxes. Coinbase for example files 1099MISC for any staking over 600 usd a year to the IRS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wUUVlatCvp0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCiHTJRbIf4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BgFXqVpGDNg
https://medium.com/startup-grind/i-was-wrong-about-ethereum-804c9a906d36
https://np.reddit.com/r/EthereumScam/
Proof of stake as a whole is pointless, insecure, and will always trend to centralization
Proof of stake game theory insures that those with the most coins will continue to collect the most fees , thus creating a vicious cycle of centralization where they continue to accrue more coins with 0 effort unlike with Proof of work where a meritocracy exists of those trying to be more efficient and miners are forced to sell most of their coins
Ask yourself why metamask which is open source wallet was forced to ban certain people in certain countries recently while no open source bitcoin wallet needs to do that
Its because ethereum is so centralized only a few companies can afford to run a full archival node(infura) which is necessary for metamask functionality and governments can target these single companies unlike bitcoin full nodes.

Buying more ETH, BNB, RENDER, AIOZ. Looking to add another from strong recommendations.

ETH bears are going to be destroyed, ETH will melt faces

Exactly. I'd like to see LIDO's dominance drop to even below 20% at some stage, I give Everstake a good recommendation for those looking to stake with even smaller amounts of ETH.
!tip 1

Awesome, Rocketpool Saturn II comes in February!
https://rp-saturn.webflow.io/
Do I understand correctly:
Current 8 ETH validators can swap to 4 ETH validators (using the express ticket for reentering the rocketpool queue?). Additionally, orchestration of multiple rocketpool validators can be done through a single smart contract ("megapool")?

I mean, stocks etc is often gambling too. Crypto is more volatile, a lot of the projects do not have intrinsic value but a lot of them also do. If you develop or work in defi etc for example you'll need to use ETH either way.
But then you have Fartcoin and other meme coins. They are speculation, and here I'd like to point to art or alternative investments like stamps, wine, pokemon cards etc.
At the end of the day, it comes down to risk management.
Higher risk, higher reward or loss.
If you want to be safe, don't be greedy.

Golden Cross Alert System: ETH Example on 30m Timeframe

Well. If you want to use your current bank/broker and you do not care about self custody, ETF is a very good option.
ETF keeps your life simple and gives you exposure to ETH

In your first comment you claimed that fees were low because demand for blockspace had 'evaporated'...
... I pointed out that the number of transactions was literally at an all-time high.
Did you admit to being proven completely wrong in your claim?
No, of course not, next you tried a new one, claiming that the transactions were just rollups and spam...
... I pointed out that rollup data doesn't add to transaction counts as it uses blobs not gas, and that rather than spam the most common uses were sending ETH and stablecoins.
Did you admit to being wrong a second time?
No, of course not, you then tried to pivot again.
You are not capable of engaging in honest discussion, instead you are just pasting LLM slop that is trivially easy to disprove, as I have done twice now. It is pathetic, come back when you have learned how to argue in good faith rather than just spam bot generated false narratives.

don’t really see this as a negative for Lido.
This chart doesn’t show people leaving staking it shows staking becoming more diversified. Total ETH staked keeps increasing and the number of validators continues to grow; Lido’s share is just getting diluted as more alternatives gain traction.
Considering how close Lido once was to the 33% threshold, this kind of decline is actually healthy for Ethereum. It suggests that centralization concerns were taken seriously and that users are consciously spreading risk across different providers.
Lido played a key role in the early days of ETH staking, when there were very few options available. Now the ecosystem is more mature, and it’s normal for market share to redistribute.
From an Ethereum perspective, this is a positive evolution.

Patos Token Soft-Bridged to Ethereum, Opening Door to ETH & ERC-20 Tokens

We might see a good spike on ETH next week

ETH really is life.
It’s the backbone of DeFi, NFTs, L2s, stablecoins — basically the financial OS of crypto. When ETH wins, the whole ecosystem wins.