ETHEUR
Ethereum / Euro
cryptoComposite

When millions of AI agents enter the market soon, bet on tech (eth atd) seems too risky to me. When a coin cannot clearly get above the old ATH in whole cycle, it’s a huge red flag. If you honestly look at the last cycle ETH’s performance, you find out that nobody actually accumulated, it went up in just a momentum trade and that’s it. Of course you still have delusional maxis like Tom Lee but I would definitely prefer to put my money on Saylor’s opinion. But of course time will tell and maybe ETH surprises everyone..

I’d put a 35%into $UBER, 30% in $AMZN and then remaining 35% into crypto (BTC or ETH) Good luck!

Fr. Feels like ETH the asset’s value is the last thing on every core Ethereum dev’s mind. Identify problems and create solutions, of course. But can our most important contributors PLEASE stop acting like asset price is below them?

The thing I'd watch is whether Ethereum's activity and liquidity are supporting the bigger narratives people keep repeating. Price predictions are easy, but sustained usage is harder to fake. Moon's ETH price movement betting is another way people express market views, although that shouldn't be confused with participating in Ethereum's ecosystem.

The Doots Weekly ^ The [Trinity](https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/s/g47iwma7Hk) The [Haiku](https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/s/c0KLjiyMZT) The [Eternal Shit](https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/s/zcM8AAprNS) u/poidhxyz updates us on the ever-growing local offline [Al bounty](https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/s/RhtixS7VBz) u/Tricky_Troll decoments Reddits [latest round of enshittification](https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/s/WqmFPRVeIe) u/ElEterElote shares the EF's latest [privacy tool for Al using cool ZK tech!](https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/s/VF6rQQsJg0) u/nonetherless325 shares [Vitalik's latest creation](https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/s/AG2TYOVwLL) u/tokyo_guy375 thinks we really need a [narrative and ratio appreciation](https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/s/9yLJXq2jU5) u/Sargos stumbles across a story of [someone reclaiming their own privacy](https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/s/PoK03iDDZ7) u/robmacca shares Justin Drake's calm warning of [precautions which may be best taken](https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/s/yzpG6EMUuA) -u/FoucaultCareofSelf thinks about the two open questions [which will decide how well ETH performs](https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/s/1WMhO9foaR)

>but I ended up getting the standard one just in case I decide to venture into other cryptos like XRP or ETH. Ripple es una estafa ajena a la temática del foro r/RippleScam https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQKxSVLLfAk Parte de la estafa consiste en publicar comunicados de prensa afirmando que grandes bancos están adoptando la tecnología, cuando en realidad lo único que hicieron fue sobornar a un empleado bancario para inventar la mentira de que dicho banco participa en el proyecto; se trata de algo sumamente engañoso. Usa el sentido común: los bancos y los gobiernos no necesitan comprar las tenencias de los inversores de Ripple. Si el código de Ripple ofreciera alguna ventaja (que no la ofrece), simplemente podrían copiarlo gratis, ya que es de código abierto. Incluso antes de Bitcoin, existía la idea de un sistema de pagos digitales llamado Ripple. La premisa era que se podían realizar pagos mediante pagarés (IOU) a través de redes de amigos. Por ejemplo: si confías en que Bob te deba hasta 100 dólares, Bob confía en que Alice le deba hasta 500 dólares y Alice confía en que Chad le deba hasta 200 dólares, entonces tus ordenadores —al conocer esta red de confianza— podrían permitir que Chad te pagara 100 dólares, aunque tú no confíes en él y ni siquiera conozcas a Alice... todo ello propagando la deuda de una parte a otra. Una característica de esta idea era que resultaba totalmente agnóstica respecto a la moneda: no requería un token propio y podía utilizarse con muchas monedas simultáneamente. Pero, sobre todo, no necesitaba un consenso centralizado, sino simplemente relaciones entre pares basadas en la confianza mutua, sin autoridades intermedias, etc. Sin embargo, fue difícil ponerla en marcha porque el dinero existente no era nativamente digital, salvo a través de los bancos, que suelen complicar las cosas. Por tanto, no había forma de liquidar automáticamente estas deudas, lo que hacía que el uso del sistema resultara muy engorroso para los usuarios. Tras la aparición de Bitcoin, mucha gente se entusiasmó con la posibilidad de aplicar esta idea de Ripple a Bitcoin para reducir los costes y la latencia de las transacciones, así como para mejorar la escalabilidad en general. Hubo mucho debate al respecto, ya que parecía que Bitcoin resolvía los principales problemas que limitaban la utilidad de Ripple, mientras que Ripple abordaba algunas limitaciones interesantes de Bitcoin. En cualquier caso, mientras esto sucedía, surgió la primera gran oleada de *altcoins*. Algunos posibles desarrolladores de *altcoins* compraron el nombre "Ripple" a su creador original. El sistema que crearon carecía de todas las propiedades que hacían que el sistema original resultara interesante para los entusiastas de Bitcoin. Introdujo una nueva moneda con una preemisión —sin precedentes— de cien mil millones de unidades y sin posibilidad de minería posterior. En lugar del diseño fuertemente descentralizado y sin consenso centralizado, presentaba un sistema de consenso, concretamente uno centralizado basado en "firmantes autorizados" (aunque en sus comunicaciones engañaban y ocultaban información sobre el nivel de centralización, lo que provocó reacciones de incredulidad y desconcierto). Ni siquiera resultaba particularmente interesante como moneda digital debido a su alto grado de centralización; sin embargo, en los años siguientes, todo lo relacionado con las criptomonedas despertó el interés de quienes buscaban ganancias rápidas. Ripple se dedicó activamente a pagar a empresas para que se "asociaran" con ellos, anunciando luego dichas alianzas como una prueba genuina de adopción destinada a impulsar el valor de sus tokens. Oleada tras oleada, miembros del público crédulos cayeron en estas campañas de marketing engañosas diseñadas para inflar el precio, solo para acabar perdiendo dinero cuando Ripple y sus "socios" se deshacían de sus activos vendiéndoselos a ellos. Debido a que este nuevo "Ripple" —que, cabe recordar, no tenía ninguna relación funcional con el proyecto original cuya reputación explotaban— había sido preminado masivamente, comenzaron a pagar a personas para que lo promocionaran; pronto, las conferencias y reuniones sobre Bitcoin se vieron invadidas por promotores de Ripple hasta el punto de resultar molestos. Sobornaban a las plataformas de intercambio con enormes cantidades de dinero y monedas para lograr su inclusión en los listados, estableciendo un estándar que impedía listar otras *altcoins* que no hubieran sido preminadas masivamente y contribuyendo a que las plataformas descuidaran el soporte para Bitcoin, que les resultaba menos rentable de forma directa. Más tarde, empezaron a presionar a gobiernos y ONG para que bloquearan o clausuraran Bitcoin. Como cabe imaginar, no cuentan con muchos amigos por aquí. Personalmente, no veo nada malo en que la gente cree sistemas de transacciones altamente centralizados; sin embargo, promocionarlos como algo que no son resulta poco ético. Además, ejercer presión para eliminar alternativas que realmente ofrecen descentralización —especialmente Bitcoin, que fue el origen del mercado de compradores entusiastas que acabaron adquiriendo su moneda— es una acción francamente maliciosa. En cualquier caso, las ideas que en un principio se asociaban con Ripple perduran hoy en día bajo la forma de Lightning; esta tecnología combinó los canales de pago de Satoshi y reforzó la seguridad, de modo que ya no es necesario depositar una confianza ciega en las contrapartes del canal. La desventaja de este cambio es que los canales respaldados por garantías reales escalan peor que los basados ​​en simples promesas de pago (IOU), pero es probable que la mayor seguridad compense con creces este inconveniente.

Ciao io non spostarei le Cripto da un exchange (Binance ) a un altro exchange, se hai una quantitá considerevole di ETH potresti spostarli a una tua wallet personaje sia hot o cold, il meglio sarebbe una cold wallet, che non ha per forza bisogno di essere conessa a internet per sicurezza, alcune cold wallet permettono di fare swap cioè cambiare una minera per un altra. Non capisco perché ti prende il 33% é troppissimo!!!! Informati meglio supla auto custodia

After yesterday's bloodbath, I'm just praying ETH can crawl back up to $2,700 at this point. Brutal week.

Prendere una decisione ETH BTC

It was his Vitaliks own comment on the possibility of AI deciphering ETH

I still have confidence in ETH. We are headed towards 24/7 markets with RWA (real world assets) and tokenized everything. Now this has been in the works for literally years, but it is happening. ETH is still positioned to do the heavy lifting in the RWA space.

ETH/BTC ratio is near multi-year lows. Historically, that is a mean-reversion setup, not a sell signal.

For actually spending, a card wins easily since almost nowhere takes wallet payments directly. The real choice is the type of card. Custodial ones make you preload onto an exchange, while newer ones like MetaMask’s card pull from your own wallet at checkout, so you’re not parking funds with someone else. Either way, spend stables rather than ETH or BTC if you can. In a lot of countries every swipe with a volatile coin counts as a taxable sale, and a year of coffee purchases turns into hundreds of tiny gains to report. Though trackers like Chain Glance and Bitcoin.Tax can untangle that, you probably won't need it if you’re only spending stables.

Honestly they’re just different bets. BTC is the digital gold play, and ETH is more of a bet that stuff like stablecoins and tokenized assets keeps running through Ethereum. So I’d ask yourself if your reason for buying ETH has actually changed, or if it just stings seeing it next to BTC’s 2x. Dumping whatever lagged to chase last year’s winner is how a lot of people end up buying high and selling low.

After years of holding both BTC and ETH, I've sold ETH for BTC only.

Thank you for your honest feedback. Actually, I make everything public, including drawdowns, trade durations, detailed explanations of which trades were taken and why, track records, and so on. I’ve also considered that three months might not be enough to convince people. My current plan is to push the research further, moving toward ultra-low timeframes and expanding into more markets. Right now, I only allow the system to trade major markets with a market cap or equivalent market value above $500M, such as BTC, ETH, XAU, XAG, WTI, Brent crude, EUR, GBP, and index funds. The main issue is that training models requires a lot of money in GPU rental costs. If I could raise funding to either purchase my own GPUs or rent more compute resources, I could experiment with more models and improve the system much faster, rather than just sitting around waiting for my small trading account to grow. There are also marketing and advertising costs involved in reaching the right audience. For example, the platform also includes alerts for assets that may be at high risk. It combines fundamental and technical analysis to identify stocks that may be subject to market manipulation or trading below their intrinsic value, among other things.

Update: I sent USDT to my ETH Etoro address (correct network), but still no way to recover and get them credited, converted or sent back to owner. I will assume these are lost...

The VC has an optional list of builder URLs configured in Glamsterdam. This can be relays as well, they look like a builder. Commit boost pbs and MEV boost continue to be options. Commit boost pbs suggests that the use case for their software is bid streaming via websockets. Maybe there will be additional use cases as we go. I haven’t seen anything from flashbots as to what the use case for MEV boost will be. The easy path is to configure known builder / relay URLs on the VC pre Glamsterdam, remove the PBS side car (MEV boost, commit boost pbs) post Glamsterdam, and then reassess. If no builder/relay URLs are configured, it’ll use P2P bids. Min bid and proposer boost factor work as before, just that min bid is now set on the VC. New is max execution payment, to get a trusted bid instead of only untrusted bids. The keymanager API builder path exists to configure additional parameters such as auth, if your particular special use case needs them. Per key configuration of builder URLs and parameters also goes here. Alternatively clients have json or yaml files to configure per key parameters, if you prefer that over using the API. In ETH docker, the migration to ePBS builder URLs is automatic if MEV boost is in use now. ethd keys set-builder handles per-key config and configuration not expressed via the defaults. VC\_EXTRAS can be used to set a max execution payment globally, rather than per key: ETH docker defaults to only trusted payments, deliberately. Users need to manually seek untrusted payments.

Attending Crypto conferences and industry meetups, such as Consensus, ETH Denver and ETH DevCon, is a great way to meet people, learn from builders, and discover job opportunities. Don’t be afraid to introduce yourself and start conversations!

ETH is not a good store of value so it will never outpace BTC. I have held both for several years and BTC is now x3 while ETH stayed more or less the same value with massive swings up and down. I’ve moved everything into BTC now and am happy with the decision.

Everyone sell bitcoin and ETH and buy Pokémon /s

Attending crypto conferences and industry meetups, such as Consensus, ETH Denver, ETH DevCon, is a great way to meet people, learn from builders, and discover job opportunities. Don’t be afraid to introduce yourself and start conversations!

Are you sure you have legit ETH and not a scam coin with the same name?

I'd keep both rather than rotate into BTC. ETH is the settlement layer for most of the tokenization and stablecoin work happening right now, so it has its own driver separate from digital gold. With price near 2493, about $122M of short liquidations sits at 2488 and another $140M near 2495, so a push through 2490 probably gets a hand from forced buying. I'd be wrong if it loses 2458, where about $142M of longs are stacked. Not advice.

It's so obvious that you're short ETH right now lol