ETHEUR
Ethereum / Euro
crypto Composite

Hey man, listen, lots of people havent saved a dime by the time theyre your age and theyll NEVER have $200,000. Clearly you have learned how to save (unless it was an inheritance or something). I would take the L and learn from it. Double down on your earning, double down on your saving, and dont make the same mistakes again. I would suggest passive investing, something simple, and just dollar cost average. SO maybe go 60% S and P 500 INdex fund (VOO of VTI), 10% QQQM, 10% VXUS, 10% SGOV, 5% GLDM, 5% BTC/ETH.... it doesnt have to be complicated. I have been doing that for 10 years and Im up over 7 figures in gains, I make a killer income but still...i did not start saving until 10 years ago and have been able to earn almost $2M in gains with that simple portfolio and honestly the first 7-8 years it was really just VTI and VXUS, had I had BTC and GLDM Id be up over $2M. I recommend reading the white coat investor, I also like NOlan Govea and Tom Nash on youtube. they have good content in my opinion
but in general, just dont overcomplicate it, dont put all your eggs in one basket, keep DCAing every month, never sell in a downturn, GOD BLESS you man I know its depressing to lose money, hit me up if you wanna talk more

1 - Please use your real vocabulary when talking about strats vs letting opus do the work for you, real human tone conveys more. For the moment i doubt you have any idea what opus has given you and you just copy and paste, but i could be wrong.
2 - I mean you could have just bought XRP/ETH/Sol when Trump spoke about $HYPE and you'd be up 30+% since wednesday. Sometimes there is opportunity but you miss it because you are tunnel vision in your own stuff.

>**Holder club member,**
>**Institutions remember,**
>**Buy in September.**
~Daily haiku until we’re at least at 0.178 on the ETH/BTC ratio or highest market cap

The difference is that I’m not looking for validation. Check my post history how rare I post about this stuff. I shared my idea after many years of waiting for ETH price getting into the regression band (5 years to be exact).
DCAd around 9 ETH during the past months.

Not salty just all y’all need some validation it seems for sharing your charts. You’re not saying anything different to all the other predictors on this sub. I’m assuming you’re up already bag then? How much ETH did you buy at your level?

The whole crypto market is connected by automatic trading systems and basically all altcoins are connected through Altcoin/BTC and Altcoin/ETH pair.
That's why everything rises or crashes at the same time.

Given the context it wasn't obvious at all. And I'm going to go ahead and voice my opinion that allowing a single entity to reach 24 million staked ETH before there's any mechanism to disincentivize them, is the same as having no mechanism for disincentivizing centralization.

ETH/USDT 15M Chart Analysis: Key Resistance & Breakdown Setup

Literally none of them, with the possible exception of ETH by virtue of being the biggest and for staking which BTC can't do.

Scam? Do you realize he’s been a force behind Bitmine who has been buying ETH every week for many months now?
Tom Lee is the chairman of Bitmine. You’d be hard pressed to find an article mentioning Bitmine without Tom Lee’s name in it.
Would be kind of a strange strategy to try to pump ETH price to $10k when you’re trying to accumulate 5% of all units…
https://www.coingecko.com/en/treasuries/companies/bitmine

I don't think the DAO example gets us any closer to establishing 50% staked as a point of no return. If anything, it demonstrates that social intervention is not determined by what percentage of ETH is economically affected. The DAO involved only a fraction of supply and nevertheless produced a social fork. It also wasn't a case of PoS validators being held accountable for a correlated consensus failure, so I don't think it maps cleanly onto the social-slashing scenario.
My objection isn't “everything below 50% is safe.” I'm asking what specifically makes a highly decentralized validator set structurally unrecoverable as the staking ratio rises. If 60%, 75% or 90% staking creates a credible failure mode where social recovery or validator accountability actually ceases to work, that's exactly the evidence that would make me reconsider issuance. But saying more stakers would have an incentive to resist losses still doesn't mean they form one coordinated majority, nor that the rest of Ethereum must recognize their preferred fork.
And I don't mean that you personally want issuance permanently open to optimization. My point is about the standard we set for reopening mature protocol properties. Saying “there are issues with the current curve and this change improves them” is a much lower bar than demonstrating that the current curve contains a serious long-term protocol defect. That's precisely where ossification matters: eventually “better under some economic model” should stop being sufficient reason to change settled parameters. Bitcoin's declining security subsidy is an example of the kind of structural, specification-level problem that can justify reopening something fundamental. I still don't see Ethereum's equivalent here.

Okay wait a minute.
Are you saying that in your reply above to cryptOwOcurrency, you were in fact talking about if 1 single entity had staked 24 million ETH and wouldn't have incentive to stake more than 24 million ETH? Was that the point you were making about how this EIP protects against centralization? Because wow yeah that was so obvious and extremely explicit I can't believe anyone could misunderstand that.

Anything over a 95% correlation would likely be a synthetic ETH asset, so most LSTs, WETH. In terms of other l1's, likely not. Bitcoin is about \~80% correlated with ETH over the past 2 years.

Originally I purchased my 2 ETH on Coinbase and moved them into my Exodus wallet, but over the last few years Exodus started allowing buying and selling directly, so there is no need to use Coinbase at all if and when I decide to buy more or sell. Idk about selling fees because I have never sold, but that should reduce or remove transfer fees I think.

DOT used to follow ETH like a shadow but that was a couple cycles back, not sure if it still holds that tight now

ETH Correlation

It's kind of frustrating that I'm asking really basic straight forward questions and you're just refusing to answer.
Yes or no, in the scenario I'm asking about above, with you being an expert on the curve, does the entity who doubles their stake from 4 million ETH to 8 million ETH stake, bringing the total amount of stake up from 24 million ETH to 28 million ETH, does the entity earn more or less in this scenario?

You have the specific cutoff numbers in this plot.
https://imgur.com/a/UxG8ced
With the curve as proposed, for a single staker your issuance revenues grows until 20M staked. For 2 at 38M ETH. Etc...
With this observation we could have designed an issuance curve from the get-go that would be resilient to capture and would push towards decentralization by design much more aggressively. Essentially by pushing the peak of the issuance curve towards 0. Unfortunately we arrive quite a few years late and we are limited by trying to not disrupt the status quo too much. But EIP-8363 has this anticoncentration of stake mechanism embedded.

Highly doubt. I think he just like others think that ETH is undervalued by a lot. He believes tokenized assets will sit on ETH and the market cap will be in trillions. This will obviously take long time to get there. It’s a long term purchase.

Actually we do know his intentions. He’s formed his own business and making bank telling the markets how high they will go and the markets follow because that’s what the money does. (Although he said S&P woul hit 8k by the 31st) He is wrong a few times but now his business is in ETH and that’s why he is promoting it.