ETHEUR
Ethereum / Euro
crypto Composite

That gap is wild but honestly not surprising if you been watching the space even a little bit. Points farmers don't care about the token, they just want the airdrop and then they bounce. Seen this pattern in so many protocols last couple years

The dev dropoff is more concerning to me, 53% is massive. Builders who stick around when there's no free money are the real signal and seems like not many did

What you think about the ETH roadmap part? I been worried about that since the blob upgrade made things so cheap. Feels like the whole value prop gets squeezed from both sides

Most efficient way to swap ETH to SOL?

Dein Beitrag wurde aufgrund folgender Regel entfernt:
>8. Kryptodiskussionen sind begrenzt.
Es dürfen nur die folgenden Kryptowährungen diskutiert werden: BTC, ETH, LTC, BCH Allgemeine Diskussionen z.B. zur Besteuerung sind erlaubt. Als Alternative steht r/Kryptostrassenwetten zur Verfügung.
Bitte halte dich in Zukunft an diese Regel.

I actually bought ETH since its market is down. What are your thoughts about holding it?

For crypto -BTC maybe ETH, XRP, XLM
Try the BPI Feeders as well, about 15% p.a.
cost average, be patient and continue on your investment journey..... wish I had the knowledge, guts and funds to do that when I was your age eons ago

Stopped reading at "Excluding BTC and ETH..."

Been messing with the Aave liquidation data from Oct 10 again. Quick recap for anyone who wasn't around for it, DeFi had its biggest liquidation cascade ever that day, most of the damage on Aave hit inside about a 13 minute window, and the worst chunk of it landed in under a minute when ETH and BTC just dropped hard and fast.
Something I kept wondering about: for people who actually tried to defend their position while it was happening, repaying debt, adding collateral, did that even do anything?
So I pulled every wallet that made a Supply or Repay to Aave V3 on Ethereum in the 3 hours around the worst of it, then checked how many of them still got liquidated that day anyway.
410 survived. 59 got liquidated anyway. So like 87% made it, 13% didn't.
Quick caveat before someone (rightfully) calls this out, this isn't proof the action is what saved them. Some of the 410 could've just been doing normal supply/repay stuff unrelated to dodging liquidation, never really at risk to begin with. I don't have each wallet's health factor at the exact second they acted, so I can't fully separate "acted and it worked" from "was fine either way." But it does tell you that among people who actually touched their position mid-crash, getting wrecked anyway was the exception, not the rule.
One from the 59 that stuck with me: someone repaid $200K USDT at 19:43 trying to hold on, then still got liquidated for $12.2M in WBTC about 90 minutes later. The repay wasn't close to enough, and by the time the real crash hit it was probably already too late to matter.
My guess on the split is if your health factor is bleeding down slowly over hours, there's a real window to react and it usually works. If price just gaps down in minutes, the oracle and the app and you are all behind the actual market, so reacting fast doesn't help much if the number you're looking at is already stale. Feels like the 59 are mostly this second case
Might pull the full list of the 59 next if people want it, probably the more interesting half honestly
This is kind of the exact thing I keep thinking about for DeFi Guardian too (defiguardian.fi), not just pinging you when HF drops, but telling you whether reacting is even going to help in that moment.

ETH

I did some Research in that - imho the big chains will be able to migrate - think ETH will be faster than BTC, in the quantum pure area I think QRL is the most serious approach but super small/niche

I would go with 80% BTC, 10-15% ETH and 4-10% LINK
Maybe link and eth will not be used to tokenize stocks markets but im convinced that their chains will be used. That said I'm no expert, just a dude watching some stuff on the internet

I haven't commented since the day we switched to r/ethereum, but EIP-8363 demands more than lurking. Put simply, this proposal is an abomination; if it didn't come from such sincere and well-respected researchers, I'd think it was an attack on Ethereum.
The proposal, as offered, would almost certainly do grave harm to the credible neutrality and decentralization of Ethereum. It would dramatically undermine serious DeFi businesses and treasuries that have been built on Ethereum in good faith, at a time when the institutional and government worlds are finally becoming comfortable with what we've been offering them. Worse, it would validate the popular Bitcoiner argument that Ethereum has capricious monetary policy, subject to the whims of ivory tower researchers with no real skin in the game.
I understand the motivation behind the proposal, and find many of the arguments elegant, but there are better and less invasive ways to avoid runaway stake growth. Maybe the solution is a form of delegation, maybe we (gasp) make it a little harder to get in the staking pool when it's getting too big. The community should develop and discuss approaches for such interventions, giving the topic the time, attention, and consideration it clearly deserves. Through much broader efforts, we will no doubt arrive at a better solution than the one proposed in 8363.
Turning to my personal perspective, I have strong feelings on this matter. I am the exact thing Ethereum claims it wants: A true blue solo staker since genesis, with all my validators under index 32,768. I maintain my own server, and have never run MEV software, because it feels like taking money out of someone else's pocket (also, my setup contributes to the network's censorship resistance). I rely on my validator income to provide everyday cashflow, and tolerate making a little over 2% because of ideological conviction, bolstered by long-term faith in Ethereum and its ethos.
Here's why EIP-8363 would be such a disaster: If it makes it into a hard fork, I will take that as a signal that Ethereum has abandoned its core values. I will unstake 75% of my ETH, sell almost all of that, set aside 20% for taxes, and split the rest between Bitcoin and USDC. I'll make more ongoing income holding that USDC than under the tapering proposal with my full present stake. I'll also hold a substantial amount of a real store of value, and will have limited my exposure to Ether, which I would no longer trust. Please don't make me do that. Kill EIP-8363 with fire
ps I've never passed off an AI's words as my own; frankly, I understand this audience better than Fable and Sol put together. I expect this drama will blow over, and all will be well

top 5 biggest market cap: BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, TRX.
Sell small alts first when it pump, BTC and ETH can wait.

BTC and ETH mainly, some SOL & gold when the setup lines up. Been on crypto specifically for years now.
Switched a couple times early on, started on forex, moved to indices for a stretch, ended up settling on crypto because the volatility actually suits how I read structure. wasnt really about one instrument being better, more about which one matched how I actually trade.

Dein Beitrag wurde aufgrund folgender Regel entfernt:
>8. Kryptodiskussionen sind begrenzt.
Es dürfen nur die folgenden Kryptowährungen diskutiert werden: BTC, ETH, LTC, BCH Allgemeine Diskussionen z.B. zur Besteuerung sind erlaubt. Als Alternative steht r/Kryptostrassenwetten zur Verfügung.
Bitte halte dich in Zukunft an diese Regel.

BTC, ETH and SOL

BTC, ETH, SOL, HYPE for majors
XMR, ZEC, MORPHO, SKY, RUJI for alts
I also recommend 30% of portfolio in market making products like jlp or hlp. 

Kaspa would be my pick outside of BTC/ETH.
The tech angle is what got me in: it’s a proof-of-work chain using a BlockDAG structure instead of a single blockchain, so it can process blocks in parallel rather than sequentially. That gives it way higher throughput than traditional PoW coins without giving up decentralization the way a lot of “fast chain” alt L1s do…
I’ve been DCA-ing into it for a while now with a set exit plan rather than just holding blindly, since it’s still a small-cap and can be brutal in drawdowns. But for a 3-year hold, low market cap + real technical differentiation + still PoW (so it fits the “relatively low risk by crypto standards” framing) is the combo I’m betting on.
*Not financial advice, obviously, just why it’s in my bag.*\*

The holy trinity of BTC, ETH, XMR. Please don’t listen to BTC maxis attempting to convince you it is BTC or nothing.

I started buying BTC and a few other cryptos such as ETH and Antshares (which later became NEO) in May 2017, intending that they would be a very small part of my portfolio, but then Antshares went up over 100% in 2017, and BTC and ETH also soared, so BTC and cryptos ended up being a very big part of my portfolio (about 25% to 35%), and they still are now. Bitcoin has risen 3398% (i.e. about 35x) since I first bought it, even though it is in a slump right now.

Why would you buy an ETH etf and also ETH? Surely just choose one or the other... And even then, why an ETF when you can gain direct exposure?