ETHEUR
Ethereum / Euro
cryptoComposite

Invest weekly into ETH 70% and Silver 30%? What do you think?

Agreed. People here tend to get upset whenever TRX or BNB is mentioned. From a decentralization standpoint, I understand the criticism. But from an investment perspective, surely it's worth examining what they've done right to keep pace with Bitcoin. Zoom out five years: **BTC: +27.69%** **ETH: -38.04%** **BNB: +49.28%** **TRX: +229.37%** Let that sink in. Both BNB and TRX actually outperformed Bitcoin, while Ethereum lost nearly 51.5% of its value against BTC! We should be asking what they're doing right and what Ethereum is doing wrong, rather than dismissing them simply because they're more centralized. Neither BNB nor TRX comes close to Bitcoin in terms of mainstream marketing, recognition, or mindshare, yet both have outperformed it over the past five years. Clearly, there's something worth learning here. Decentralization is important, but it doesn't automatically translate into investment performance.

VALL, VWRA, IGLA long term You can do crypto sa IBKR din pero i prefer yun stocks na leveraged proxy for crypto like MSTR (for BTC) and BMNR (for ETH)

>**Curl for the biceps,** >**New regulatory steps,** >**May God save the perps.** ~Daily haiku until we’re at least at 0.178 on the ETH/BTC ratio or highest market cap

They took the ETH name so crypto bros are really gonna get fucked🤣

Do you guys use Safe for ETH multisig? Has there ever been any malicious activity or security concerns or is it generally considered safe to use?

The problem is in the premines. Like there's this tech investor who is a kind of Cathy Woods who keeps buying ETH, but he's just driving up exit liquidity for the ethereum foundation.

If nothing is done soon regarding L2's diluting/chipping away ETH value, ETH wont be appealing to any new investors and will become a permanent near-stablecoin ranging from 1500-5000$ every cycle. I mean, How can Vitalik not see this by now?

a bounty for the buildooors Austin Griffith from the EF launched a new open source 3D printable hardware wallet last week: https://x.com/austingriffith/status/2111105390368948680 🩲 https://wedgie.dev/ and now there's a $45 bounty on mainnet (with funding from Austin and myself) for whoever builds one first + posts proof of the build process: https://poidh.xyz/mainnet/bounty/40 open bounty so anyone who wants to promote open source hardware wallets can help the mission by adding ETH to the pot 🫡

>**Spam calls are bleak,** >**Privacy turns hide-and-seek,** >**Blame the data leak.** ~Daily haiku until we’re at least at 0.178 on the ETH/BTC ratio or highest market cap

>Has anyone here used MPC wallets? How was your experience? Yeah I've been using Viltisig from the beginning. The upsides are: \- There never exists a single full key anywhere, so there are no seed words to be compromised. \- There's no single point of failure. \- You use your own hardware that you already own (smartphone, desktop, browser extension, etc.) so you don't need to buy any specialized hardware. \- You can always add or remove a device or re-distribute the key-shares without losing the underlying wallet, which makes it flexible. \- It's pretty much chain-agnostic, open-source and has undergone public audits. And in case the application gets abandoned for some reason you can use an [emergency tool](https://docs.vultisig.com/security-and-technology/emergency-recovery) to retrieve individual keys per chain (i.e. a BTC wallet key, an ETH wallet key, etc. depending on what you need). There's a user-friendly tool and a CLI tool for more technically inclined people. The downsides are: \- Slightly higher overhead for signing transactions, because you have to coordinate with multiple devices (though there is a single-device option that involves a third-party signing server that works together with a password, completely optional) \- You have to make sure to keep (optionally encrypted) backups of the key-shares for each threshold device, which is the equivalent of keeping a backup for a seed phrase. If you don't and use more devices/keys than the minimum threshold, you're fucked. (You also need to make sure not to keep the backups in the same location, but they can be encrypted with a password at least, just in case). That's from the top of my head, I'm sure I forgot some details. But yeah, it's not necessarily more secure or less, it really depends on your needs and wants.

A two-year window is short enough that downside matters more than picking the most exciting coin. I’d first decide how much loss you could tolerate, whether the money must be available on schedule, and what would invalidate each thesis before comparing ETH, Monero or QNT. Is the two-year date flexible?

Large node operator exiting, so about 2000 validators worth of ETH are without yield until they’re done exiting and new validators are up to replace them.

Modeling fee drag in 15m mean-reversion backtests on SOL, XRP, and ETH: Spot (0.10%/side) vs Perp Maker (0.02%)?

30M, single, Seaman. Earning around 420k-450k/month. I don’t want to be a seaman forever and plans to retire early. I currently have liquid 3m cash. As preparation for my early retirement 10-15 years from now, hopefully? What will be the best option you think I can do? I am targetting to invest 200k php/month, my options are: 1. Start investing on VUAA via IBKR, an Irish domicile ETF to lessen tax. What other ETF should i buy when I go with this option? I am currently worried with peso weakening against USD which is why i am still doubtful with this as Peso to USD might strengthen comes 2028 election? I am worried when this time comes, my gains will be eaten by conversion rate? 2. DCA on BTC & ETH via Binance? 3. Temporarily invest on dividend yielding stock on PSE to combat inflation and will tranfer to IBKR when peso strengthens against USD? I am watching for MER & MBT for dividend as well as ICT for stock growth.

ETH been testing patience like it's getting paid for it. 2.8k is not crazy target but market don't care what we need rn. i just keep stacking small amounts when it dips, not worth losing sleep over

I’ve been investing for 10+ years professionally and personally - perfect time to come into a bit of money to invest. Been investing in crypto for almost 4 cycles now and it’s clear the crypto bull cycle is restarting. Great time to double at least that and add quickly your stack. If you’re going for safe, easy gains: $BTC, $ETH, microstrategy $MSTR, $COIN, $IBIT (Bitcoin etf type deal). If you’re going high risk / high reward, my personal favorites are: $NEAR, $PYTH, $LTC, $MET, $ZEC, $LIT, $HYPE. do your own research!

Do we have hope on ETH

Good question, so I checked it. The split rule and my guess were written down before I ran it. The question itself came after the post, though, so treat this as a follow-up rather than a pre-registered test. Each day I split coins into thirds by their past 30-day trading volume and re-ran the same regression inside each third, in both periods. **Next 7 days vs the average coin, per 10% coin-specific move:** ||small|mid|large| |:-|:-|:-|:-| |after a pump, 2022–26|−2.2%|−2.0%|−3.1%| |after a pump, 2019–21|−4.4%|−2.1%|−0.4% (not significant)| |after a drop (further fall), 2022–26|−0.6%|−1.1%|−3.3%| |after a drop (further fall), 2019–21|−1.4%|−1.9%|−2.2%| Your mechanism fits the pump side better than the drop side: * **Pumps:** in 2019–21 the largest third's pumps didn't fade at all, while small coins gave back a lot. That's where size matters. * **Drops:** the continuation shows up in every size group in both periods. In 2022–26 it's actually strongest in the largest third (large vs small difference, t = 4.6). So it isn't mainly a "small altcoin with nothing underneath" effect. My own guess was also that drops would continue less in large coins, and that was wrong too. **BTC and ETH on their own:** * **BTC pumps:** BTC-specific pumps fade over the next week in both periods. A BTC-specific pump means BTC beating what the market and its own characteristics predicted that day. In 2022–26 that's −2.7% per 10% (95% CI −4.5% to −0.9%); in 2019–21 it's −5.7% (CI −10.9% to −0.5%). * **BTC/ETH drops:** the intervals are too wide to say anything. Their coin-specific moves are small (daily residual sd \~2.2–2.6%, vs \~4–5% for the median coin), so there isn't much signal to work with. One caveat on "large": it means the top third of Binance spot pairs by volume (\~110 coins a day in 2022–26, median \~$13M a day), not just BTC and ETH. Why would large coins' own drops keep going longer? I don't know. One guess is that a large coin rarely falls on its own without real news (an exploit, an unlock, a regulatory story), and news takes time to sink in. I can't separate news days yet, so that's untested.

I finally sold my last crypto, but made 10x, 15x and finally 20x. I think the stable coins have a real future, and likely BTC and ETH will stick around, but yes it’s hard to see much else surviving.

You can't really refer to cryptocurrencies like this collectively anymore. They have very different properties in 2026. Bitcoin (BTC) , Ether (ETH) , HYPE, PEPE as examples are all very different from one another. Bitcoin is best as store of value and can be used sub optimally to be a money and capital asset. Ether is naturally a composite asset, commodity, money, store of value, and capital value. Hype token is similar a stock and there are many very good businesses like this (UNI, LIT etc) that just use a token to represent an equity. They use their revenue to buy back their own tokens just like companies do with their stocks. Meme coins like PEPE would be the ones you refer to as no instrinsic value and a purely spectulatory unless you also take the opinion store of value properties are not 'intrinsic value.

> to the point that all ETH holders will effectively subsidize validators through delution to keep a Network running that is underused. At a rate which is lower than almost any other network, including Bitcoin btw. Anyway, if gas fees are already insignificant, then what does it matter if it becomes yet more insignificant? The burn is already not that relevant. ETH burned in the last week is literally 0.1% of what was issued. Who cares if it goes to 0.01%? >Glamsterdam is an expansion move by Ethereum looking to grab a bigger share, looking to go from 5% to 15% of all blockspace to the detriment of Base and others. Agreed. We're doubling down on reclaiming market share and making the L1 a major hub. L2s will still have a place, no doubt.

At what price would you sell you ETH?

WETH/cbBTC is already a solid pair for going wide since ETH and BTC mostly move together. You might not need a new pool, just a wider range on yours. Tight ranges mean constant rebalancing, and every rebalance eats gas and locks in IL. For true set and forget, go correlated: stables (low IL, low fees) or LST pairs like wstETH/WETH. Also check Aerodrome since you're on Base, usually more volume than Pancake there. And compare your LP value to just holding both tokens. Lots of positions earn fees and still lose to holding. Revert Finance shows this per position, and if you end up running LPs across a few protocols, trackers like DeBank, Zerion or Chain Glance help see it all in one place. Overkill for one pool though.

That actually makes sense to me. When a stock drops, there's still a real business behind it that might attract buyers. But with many altcoins, once people lose confidence, there's not much stopping the price from falling further. I wonder if this pattern holds for BTC and ETH too, or mostly smaller coins?