ETHEUR
Ethereum / Euro
cryptoComposite

Every single day since mid 2024 when I converted everything I had as shitcoins (including ETH, BTC, and a lot of smaller ones) to XMR has been the best decision of my life. The only true crypto, not on CEX, witchunt against it nonstop and still 4x while Bitcoin halved.... Wake up people, most of you who think they buy a fungible, untraceable CRYPTO when buying BTC realize eventually that it is exactly the opposite... Just ask yourself the question, why every government is afraid of it? Because it is what BTC originally wanted to be Satoshi just could not solve the fungibility with untraceable ways yet.

Every time "10k" is written in this sub, ETH will Crab for another day. Meaning, unfortunately, that there are millions of years of Crab in our future.

it defies all logic, but yes I think BTC has an excellent chance of hitting 250k between now and 2030. if it is shown to have quantum or other security problems then of course it will crash and hopefully never return, but otherwise that ship of fools sails on and ETH continues to build a widely used global finance network.

>**Post Quantum belayed,** >**ECDSA decayed,** >**Hegota delayed.** ~Daily haiku until we’re at least at 0.178 on the ETH/BTC ratio or highest market cap

lmao if you actually understand Ethereum you know ETH is going **way** beyond $10k. Ethereum has practically no competition. ETH will inherit the majority of the mcap of BTC and then go way beyond it. ETH at BTC's mcap is already beyond 10k and BTC is useless, insecure and destined for failure. ETH was \~5k last year. 10k could come in a few weeks and it wouldn't even be weird for crypto.

The price reflects the interest is talking daily about ETH. It’s dead because the price sucks and if/when it runs this thread floods with comments

The issue is, ETH has *barely* beaten inflation since the 2017 top. Not 2021. 2017. That's nearly a decade. Similar thing applies to your logic. ~5K in 2021 is not ~5K in 2026.

Posting here because crypto subs will just tell me to buy the dip. I co manage a small investment partnership, and we've decided to build a sizeable ETH position this quarter. The decision to own it is done and I'm not looking to debate it. The fight now is about how to buy it and the partners have split into two camps. The first camp wants an OTC block one call, one price, done by the afternoon. No slicing orders into public books, no leaking intent, and nobody babysitting an algorithm for six weeks. The tradeoff is that the desk prices its risk into the spread. There's also the fear that the market drops the following week and we look foolish for buying everything at once. The second camp wants a TWAP over several weeks. Smaller pieces mean less market impact, and timing risk gets spread out. The tradeoff is time and effort. If price rises steadily, we pay more on average than the block would have cost, and someone has to own monitoring it. I pulled historical volatility and ran some rough scenarios. The conclusion was that it depends which regret you'd rather live with, which is true but not helpful. A few things keep bugging me. Our position is big for us but probably small against daily volume, so market impact may matter less than the TWAP camp thinks. The one block quote we got was wider than I expected, and I have no reference for whether that's normal or whether we called the wrong desk. Someone suggested a hybrid, blocking part and running an algo for the rest. It sounds like a committee compromise, but maybe it's just correct. Settlement matters too. Whatever we choose, I don't want assets parked on an exchange longer than necessary. For people who've bought real size in crypto, how did you make the call? Is TWAP pointless below a certain size? And how do you judge whether a block quote is fair when you don't have a list of desks to compare?

I've been seeing a lot of different opinions lately about what Ethereum needs to improve, and I'm curious what people here think should actually come first. If you could pick just one thing for Ethereum developers to focus on next year, what would it be? Lower gas fees? Faster transactions? Making L2s easier to use? Finding ways for ETH to benefit more from network growth? Or something else? Obviously, Ethereum can't fix everything at once, so I'm interested in what people think would make the biggest difference. And what would you actually need to see happen to feel like Ethereum is moving in the right direction? Curious to hear everyone's thoughts, especially from people who have been using or holding ETH for a while.

Was it ever? The Canton tries to be modern, so officially supported it a little bit. But was there much more, besides the millionaire of "Bitcoin Suisse" living there and the ETH (some organisation) letterbox.

I wouldn’t bet on $10k, but I also think it would be a little dangerous to bet against it. ETH hasn’t existed in a low rate environment since 2021. We had ~5k in 2021 at 0% in great macro with full focus on crypto, then it hit $5k again in 2025 at 4% in terrible macro competing with AI for risk capital. We didn’t appreciate in price, but we did appreciate in relative importance to command the same price in much worse macro. I’m not vouching for $10k, but I think $6k-8k (3x) in the next few years is much more likely than people think. Between here and ATH, it’s all just a numbers game. No breakthroughs or paradigm shifts needed. When macro improves, ETH can take $6k like it’s nothing. $8k might be a battle. $10k is not impossible.

It's always had low periods in the bear but after all the shit-talking (and shit-pricing) in the last bull nobody has stuck around to bemoan the crabbing of the price. Won't they be surprised when ETH to 10k.

For actual spending I think stablecoins have already won, and honestly that's fine for ETH 🙂 A few reasons I don't see ETH becoming the everyday payment coin: - Volatility cuts both ways. Nobody wants to pay for groceries with something that might be up 8% next week, and merchants don't want to receive something that might be down 8% before they convert it. - Tax friction. In the US (and plenty of other places) spending ETH is a disposal, so every coffee is technically a taxable event with its own cost basis. Spending a dollar stablecoin barely creates a gain, so the bookkeeping mostly disappears. - Pricing. Shops, salaries and bills are all denominated in fiat, so a dollar-pegged token just slots in. But look at where those stablecoin payments actually run. A huge share of USDC and USDT lives on Ethereum and its L2s, and since blob data arrived with the Dencun upgrade, L2 transfers usually cost cents. The stablecoin is the thing you spend; ETH is what secures the network, pays the gas (directly or through a paymaster behind the scenes with smart wallets) and gets burned through EIP-1559. So I'd frame it less as "stablecoins vs ETH" and more as "stablecoins as the cash, Ethereum as the rails". The more people pay with stables onchain, the more blockspace demand there is, which is the part that actually matters for ETH holders 👀

ETH

Same way the original CSM started. Going by Lido's staking router history on our node, CSM launched at a 1% cap in October 2024 and went up in steps, to 2%, 3%, 5%, 7.5%, 8.5% and then 9% this July. The 0x02 module went in on 23 Oct at 0.01%, which is about 970 ETH or 30 validators, and all 30 were deposited by the 25th. So it's been full since, and the 2 keys waiting are on hold until that limit goes up.

QQQ, NQ, NVDA, BTC, ETH, GLD, SLV and CL Support and Resistance, Pivots and Highest Volume Levels for Day Traders, Nov 2

I used to spend ETH before but now I mostly stick to USDT for everyday stuff. Just makes more sense to me with the price being stable. I use Oobit for payments so I can still spend either one when I want

I had small balances in several exchanges that went busted like Celsius and Blockfi... Like BTC and ETH in amounts smaller than gas fees, I imagined a MTGOX scenario getting several grands in a few decades but no, I got my pennies back in time... Lol

Are stablecoins becoming more useful than ETH for everyday payments?

Hey r/NFT, While the NFT landscape has largely rotated between 10k generative PFP mints and speculative memecoins, we set out to explore the opposite extreme through an ongoing open experiment: \*\*Can a radical, hyper-minimalist digital artifact be created, deployed on Ethereum, listed for $1,000,000 (413.00 ETH), and positioned for fine art institutions and digital collectors using a coordinated team of AI agents as technical auditors, legal counselors, and curatorial researchers?\*\* Here is our honest breakdown of the journey so far: the conceptual premise, the unexpected technical breakdowns we hit with on-chain EIP-1155 and IPFS resolution, the regulatory minefields of the Howey Test, and where the challenge stands right now. \--- \### 1. The Premise: Inverting the Million Dollar Grid In 2005, Alex Tew launched the \*Million Dollar Homepage\*, carving a 1000×1000 screen into 1,000,000 ad units for $1 each. In 2021, digital creator Murat Pak auctioned \*The Pixel\* (a single 1×1 grey square #9A9A9A) at Sotheby's for $1.36 million. We wanted to push digital minimalism to its ultimate origin point: \*\*Black Pixel\*\*—a single, indivisible #000000 black pixel deployed as Token #1 on Ethereum Mainnet. \* No utility roadmap, no staking schemes, no speculative secondary tokens. \* Pure ontological reduction, immutable provenance, and the conceptual weight of screen coordinate zero. \--- \### 2. Technical Pitfalls & What Broke During Deployment We deployed an \`ERC1155Supply\` contract on Ethereum Mainnet (\`0xdafe69b04bb2ee097b6d483b2d272b3fbb519159\`, Token ID: 1, \`totalSupply = 1\`) and listed Token #1 on OpenSea via Seaport v1.6 for exactly \*\*413.00 ETH\*\* (\~$1M). During subsequent technical verification by our specialized agent team, several critical edge cases emerged: 1. \*\*The EIP-1155 vs. IPFS 404 Resolution Failure:\*\* \* The ERC-1155 specification dictates that client applications substitute the \`{id}\` parameter in metadata URIs with a 64-hex lowercase string padded with leading zeros (\`.../0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001.json\`). \* However, our initial IPFS directory structure was pinned with decimal naming (\`/1\`). \* When standard clients queried the URI using hex padding, public gateways returned an immediate \*\*HTTP 404 Not Found\*\*. The artwork metadata appeared broken. We resolved this by auditing gateway behaviors, configuring dedicated Pinata gateway resolution for the decimal route, and publicly documenting the resolution mechanics in our technical dossier. 2. \*\*Vector vs. 69-Byte Raster Bitmap:\*\* \* Early draft descriptions inadvertently referred to the piece as a "vector artwork." In reality, the on-chain URI resolves to a physical, 8-bit RGB raster PNG measuring 1×1 pixel and weighing exactly \*\*69 bytes\*\*. In high-stakes digital art, precision is non-negotiable. We revised every marketplace field and curatorial entry to guarantee byte-level accuracy. 3. \*\*Public Gateway Throttling:\*\* \* Automated scrapers and bots frequently hammered public gateways (\`ipfs.io\`, \`cloudflare-ipfs\`), producing transient HTTP 429 and 403 errors. We deployed a static curatorial mirror on Vercel with cryptographic SHA-256 and IPFS CID verification to ensure uninterrupted access. \--- \### 3. Legal & Regulatory Guardrails: Avoiding the SEC's Crosshairs Publicly challenging the market with a $1,000,000 listing triggers immediate regulatory obligations under US securities and digital property law: 1. \*\*Howey Test Neutralization:\*\* \* Any marketing promising "investment returns," "secondary liquidity," or "value accrual through developer efforts" risks classification as an unregistered investment contract. \* We structured the entire offering strictly as conceptual Fine Art sold on an \*\*AS-IS\*\* basis, with zero guarantees of resale liquidity or future financial yield. 2. \*\*The "Audit" Terminology Trap:\*\* \* Early internal documents were titled "Security Audit." Our legal analysis promptly struck this: an internal multi-agent code analysis does NOT constitute a formal third-party audit from an accredited firm (like OpenZeppelin or Trail of Bits). Labeling it an "audit" would mislead collectors. We re-classified all documentation as a \*Curatorial & Technical Dossier\*. 3. \*\*Smart Contract Transparency:\*\* \* The Seaport listing is signed directly by the creator address. There are no secondary royalty traps, no hidden treasury splits, and no custodial third parties. It is an atomic, immutable settlement: ETH transfers to the seller, and Token #1 transfers to the buyer. \--- \### 4. Current Status of the Challenge \* \*\*On-Chain Artifact:\*\* Ethereum Mainnet Contract \`0xdafe69b04bb2ee097b6d483b2d272b3fbb519159\` is live and verified. \* \*\*OpenSea Seaport Order:\*\* Active at 413.00 ETH. \* \*\*Curatorial Dossier:\*\* Publicly accessible at \`https://black-pixel-1x1.vercel.app/dossier.html?ref=reddit\_ca\`. \* \*\*Institutional Outreach:\*\* We have initiated targeted dispatches to digital art institutions (such as MoCDA) and research publications (Digicult, Clot Magazine). \* \*\*Live Telemetry:\*\* Public logs and archival interactions are maintained live via \`@blackpixel1x1\` on X. \--- \### 5. The Question for the Community Can extreme conceptual reduction command serious value in an era saturated with algorithmic complexity, or has the market permanently pivoted toward token utility, staking yields, and social hype? We'd love to hear your perspectives, critiques, and feedback. The challenge remains live.

Hey r/NFT, While the NFT landscape has largely rotated between 10k generative PFP mints and speculative memecoins, we set out to explore the opposite extreme through an ongoing open experiment: \*\*Can a radical, hyper-minimalist digital artifact be created, deployed on Ethereum, listed for $1,000,000 (413.00 ETH), and positioned for fine art institutions and digital collectors using a coordinated team of AI agents as technical auditors, legal counselors, and curatorial researchers?\*\* Here is our honest breakdown of the journey so far: the conceptual premise, the unexpected technical breakdowns we hit with on-chain EIP-1155 and IPFS resolution, the regulatory minefields of the Howey Test, and where the challenge stands right now. \--- \### 1. The Premise: Inverting the Million Dollar Grid In 2005, Alex Tew launched the \*Million Dollar Homepage\*, carving a 1000×1000 screen into 1,000,000 ad units for $1 each. In 2021, digital creator Murat Pak auctioned \*The Pixel\* (a single 1×1 grey square #9A9A9A) at Sotheby's for $1.36 million. We wanted to push digital minimalism to its ultimate origin point: \*\*Black Pixel\*\*—a single, indivisible #000000 black pixel deployed as Token #1 on Ethereum Mainnet. \* No utility roadmap, no staking schemes, no future DAO token airdrops. \* Pure ontological reduction, immutable provenance, and the conceptual weight of screen coordinate zero. \--- \### 2. Technical Pitfalls & What Broke During Deployment We deployed an \`ERC1155Supply\` contract on Ethereum Mainnet (\`0xdafe69b04bb2ee097b6d483b2d272b3fbb519159\`, Token ID: 1, \`totalSupply = 1\`) and listed Token #1 on OpenSea via Seaport v1.6 for exactly \*\*413.00 ETH\*\* (\~$1M). During subsequent technical verification by our specialized agent team, several critical edge cases emerged: 1. \*\*The EIP-1155 vs. IPFS 404 Resolution Failure:\*\* \* The ERC-1155 specification dictates that client applications substitute the \`{id}\` parameter in metadata URIs with a 64-hex lowercase string padded with leading zeros (\`.../0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001.json\`). \* However, our initial IPFS directory structure was pinned with decimal naming (\`/1\`). \* When standard clients queried the URI using hex padding, public gateways returned an immediate \*\*HTTP 404 Not Found\*\*. The artwork metadata appeared broken. We resolved this by auditing gateway behaviors, configuring dedicated Pinata gateway resolution for the decimal route, and publicly documenting the resolution mechanics in our technical dossier. 2. \*\*Vector vs. 69-Byte Raster Bitmap:\*\* \* Early draft descriptions inadvertently referred to the piece as a "vector artwork." In reality, the on-chain URI resolves to a physical, 8-bit RGB raster PNG measuring 1×1 pixel and weighing exactly \*\*69 bytes\*\*. In high-stakes digital art, precision is non-negotiable. We revised every marketplace field and curatorial entry to guarantee byte-level accuracy. 3. \*\*Public Gateway Throttling:\*\* \* Automated scrapers and bots frequently hammered public gateways (\`ipfs.io\`, \`cloudflare-ipfs\`), producing transient HTTP 429 and 403 errors. We deployed a static curatorial mirror on Vercel with cryptographic SHA-256 and IPFS CID verification to ensure uninterrupted access. \--- \### 3. Legal & Regulatory Guardrails: Avoiding the SEC's Crosshairs Publicly challenging the market with a $1,000,000 listing triggers immediate regulatory obligations under US securities and digital property law: 1. \*\*Howey Test Neutralization:\*\* \* Any marketing promising "investment returns," "secondary liquidity," or "value accrual through developer efforts" risks classification as an unregistered investment contract. \* We structured the entire offering strictly as conceptual Fine Art sold on an \*\*AS-IS\*\* basis, with zero guarantees of resale liquidity or future financial yield. 2. \*\*The "Audit" Terminology Trap:\*\* \* Early internal documents were titled "Security Audit." Our legal analysis promptly struck this: an internal multi-agent code analysis does NOT constitute a formal third-party audit from an accredited firm (like OpenZeppelin or Trail of Bits). Labeling it an "audit" would mislead collectors. We re-classified all documentation as a \*Curatorial & Technical Dossier\*. 3. \*\*Smart Contract Transparency:\*\* \* The Seaport listing is signed directly by the creator address. There are no secondary royalty traps, no hidden treasury splits, and no custodial third parties. It is an atomic, immutable settlement: ETH transfers to the seller, and Token #1 transfers to the buyer. \--- \### 4. Current Status of the Challenge \* \*\*On-Chain Artifact:\*\* Ethereum Mainnet Contract \`0xdafe69b04bb2ee097b6d483b2d272b3fbb519159\` is live and verified. \* \*\*OpenSea Seaport Order:\*\* Active at 413.00 ETH. \* \*\*Curatorial Dossier:\*\* Publicly accessible at \`https://black-pixel-1x1.vercel.app/dossier.html?ref=reddit\_ca\`. \* \*\*Institutional Outreach:\*\* We have initiated targeted dispatches to digital art institutions (such as MoCDA) and research publications (Digicult, Clot Magazine). \* \*\*Live Telemetry:\*\* Public logs and archival interactions are maintained live via \`@blackpixel1x1\` on X. \--- \### 5. The Question for the Community Can extreme conceptual reduction command serious value in an era saturated with algorithmic complexity, or has the market permanently pivoted toward token utility, staking yields, and social hype? We'd love to hear your perspectives, critiques, and feedback. The challenge remains live.

Not much in CSM itself, at least the original module. Right now our node shows it with 0 keys waiting to be deposited, and its last deposit was yesterday at 13:01 UTC. It's at a bit over 8% of Lido's stake against a 9% cap, so the flat line is a lack of new keys, not a backlog. The slow part comes after: the beacon chain entry queue is about 1.1M ETH, roughly 19 days. The new 0x02 module is the tight one, capped at 0.01% of Lido (about 970 ETH), with 30 validators deposited and 2 more waiting.

Method 1: The Bottom-Right Toggle Button (Fastest) 1. Look at the bottom-right corner of your chart interface (next to the time zone settings). 2. Find the button currently labeled RTH (Regular Trading Hours). 3. Click RTH once to switch it to ETH (Extended Trading Hours). Pre-market and post-market candles will immediately populate on your chart.

Lmao Grok thinks ETH target 18k by Jan 1-2027, and top bull market reaching 49,000$. Someone tell grok he’s smoking the nicest crack anyone’s ever seen.

There's now over 1.5 million ETH sent to the Ethereum 2.0 contract