ETHEUR
Ethereum / Euro
cryptoComposite

Makes sense, liquidations being mostly longs fits the headcount skew. 2390 on ETH is a level I'm watching too.

Your headcount numbers line up with the liquidation side too. Roughly 80% of ETH and SOL liquidations over the last 24h were longs, and there's still a fat ETH long pool sitting around 2,390 with SOL longs stacked near 104.4. I'd lean lower on both until those get tagged, wrong if ETH pushes through the 2,567 short pool. The crowd going 75% long on alts during a bleed is a bold way to spend a paycheck. Not advice.

Before choosing the coin, I'd look at the market regime first. I made my current BTC/ETH/BNB regime status public for exactly this kind of context. It won't tell you what to buy, but it can help decide whether going all in now or scaling in makes more sense.

They would know that you had bought a ledger but would NOT know what you have bought or are holding. Some examples of this though would be the Celsius bankruptcy case, creditors that were involved with that had their holdings on there leaked. For instance, Matt has 100 ETH and 3 BTC at time of bankruptcy, they'd be able to see how much Matt would have gotten back with distributions but would NOT know if he had sold or bought. Same here, they know you have a Ledger that you bought but for all they know you could have $100 in BTC or $1,000,000. A bigger risk, like in France, would be those who have sold and had their capital gains taxes that showed this.

Thanks! We just received an audit grant from Zealynx, and their audit of the current code is underway. The report will be public. A default is easy for a validator to avoid. All it takes is having the ETH in the contract when each bond matures, either by topping the contract up directly, which counts instantly, or by requesting a partial withdrawal early enough to clear the exit queue. The exit can't be reversed, and that's the point. It's what makes a bond enforceable without trusting the validator, and a validator that keeps its contract funded never gets near it. A default also isn't bad news for holders. It doesn't mean the stake is short, only that the validator didn't serve the ETH on time. If the stake covers what's owed, every holder is paid in full, at full maturity value, even for bonds that weren't due yet. So when a validator misses a payment on a covered Coffer, declaring the default is in holders' interest. First come, first served only matters when the stake falls short, and you can check that before buying.

Any of the three is fine, so pick based on how you want to handle backups. Trezor is open source and has the simplest seed-phrase setup, which makes it a solid beginner pick for BTC and ETH. Ledger supports the most coins if you plan to branch out a lot. Tangem is the easiest day to day since it’s just a card you tap on your phone, but by default your backup is extra cards instead of a written seed, so make sure you’re comfortable with that. The mistakes to avoid: buy straight from the manufacturer’s site (people just lost millions on Ledgers bought from a reseller), never photograph or type your seed phrase anywhere, and send a small test transaction before moving everything. Down the line, if you start spreading into other coins or DeFi across a few wallets, trackers like Chain Glance, DeBank or Zerion can show it all in one place. That’s way off though. Get comfortable with the basics first.

Interesting design! The key concerns for me would be the default-triggered irreversible exit and first-come, first-served claims. I’d want to see independent audits, clear slashing-risk analysis, and a transparent buffer methodology before trusting it with real ETH.

ETH Holders, How Much More Pain Can We Take?

Honestly, I’d keep it until you’ve confirmed there’s nothing worth recovering, but I wouldn’t reuse it for meaningful funds. Since you’ve already recovered the wallet, you could check whether LPT and OMG can be swapped or sold through a reputable service that supports those exact Ethereum tokens. You’d need a little ETH for gas, so compare the cost with the roughly $4 value first. If it’s not worth it, export your transaction history, securely wipe the device using the manufacturer’s instructions, and recycle it as e-waste. Just make sure you’ve verified your backup and transferred anything valuable before destroying the seed phrase. The hardware might be obsolete, but it could still be a neat teardown or electronics-learning project.

ETH/USD 30Min

ETH lookin a little sleepy today, might go doodle some triangles on my coffee cup while it figures itself out

For a one or two year window, I'd be careful about putting the entire $25k into ETH, Monero and QNT. They have very different adoption stories and all carry substantial volatility. I use Moon for speculative crypto price exposure, but money with a defined spending horizon is something I'd avoid concentrating in a few volatile assets.

25k is decent amount for a 2 year window, you can spread it without getting too thin. From those three, ETH feels like the safest bet but QNT has interesting upside if enterprise adoption actually moves. Monero's more of a privacy play, less about price growth in my opinion.

Hi ! I’m not a trader nor a crypto specialist. But obviously I understand the fundamentals and potential. So finally got 25k to invest for 1-2 years. Looking at ETH, Monero or QNT. What’s your opinion on that type of bank and the best 1-2 year investment to make? Thanks

Today's split between BTC and alts is pretty clear in the positioning data. Price 24h / % of accounts long / funding: \- BTC: +0.2% / 59% long / +0.0089% \- ETH: -1.7% / 70% long / -0.0072% \- BNB: -1.3% / 73% long / -0.0005% \- SOL: -4.0% / 74% long / -0.0034% \- AVAX: -6.6% / 73% long / -0.0071% \- DOGE: -3.9% / 78% long / -0.0039% \- XRP: -2.9% / 79% long / +0.0011% What stands out to me: 1. BTC is the least crowded and the only one holding up. The more long-heavy the coin, the worse it's doing today. 2. On most alts funding is slightly negative while 70-79% of accounts are long. So lots of small longs by headcount, but the bigger money is leaning short. That usually doesn't end well for the crowd. 3. XRP dropped 2.9% and OI went down about 1%, but it's still 79% long. Some leverage got flushed, but most of the crowd is still holding. Until alt positioning cools off, I'd expect them to keep underperforming BTC. Anyone else seeing the same skew, or do you think alts are setting up for a squeeze from here? I post these positioning snapshots daily in a free Telegram channel, link in my profile if you want them live.

1. Origin Protocol. 2. ETH classic 3. SATS You're come :) :) I hope this helps some newbies. This information has come from some insiders. Say no more.

1. Origin Protocol. 2. ETH classic 3. SATS You're come :) :) I hope this helps some newbies. This information has come from some insiders. Say no more.

Thanks! 7002 is what made this possible at all. First come, first served only matters when the stake falls short, and a default doesn't mean that. It means the validator didn't have the ETH in the contract when a bond matured. That's a timing failure, and coverage is a separate question. If the stake covers what's owed, every holder is paid in full once the exit lands, at full maturity value, even for bonds that weren't due yet. You can check coverage before buying by comparing contract plus beacon balance with all outstanding bonds plus the remaining issue size. It's all public, and while bonds are outstanding the validator can only change its terms in holders' favour. The buffer isn't there for timing. It's there for coverage, against penalties shrinking the stake. A slashing costs a single validator around 0.2%, and a full year offline around 1.8%, so a buffer of about 2% covers both for a bond of up to a year. And that already assumes an extreme case, a validator that stays offline for the entire year and then gets slashed on top. A day offline costs about 0.005%. Timing is handled differently. The validator requests its withdrawal early enough to clear the exit queue before maturity, or tops up the contract directly, which counts instantly. And the shortest bond it sells sets how much notice it gets.

For BTC + ETH as a beginner, any of the mainstream ones is fine: Trezor Safe 3 or 5, BitBox02, Ledger, or Tangem if you'd rather have a card than a device. The model matters a lot less than where you buy it and how you set it up After this week's Ledger mess, the one rule that matters is to buy from the manufacturer's own store. So far every confirmed case traces back to devices bought through a reseller Setup: \- the device generates the seed itself. If a recovery phrase or scratch card comes in the box, it's a scam, send it back \- 24 words on paper or metal. Never a photo, never cloud notes, never typed into a website \- send a small test amount, then wipe the device and restore from your words, so you know the backup works before the real money goes in \- check the receive address on the device screen, not just on your computer With a screen on the device you see what you're actually signing. Tangem has no screen, so that part happens on your phone

The total hash value of all bitcoin inside of ETH pools, such as dex elliptical or balancing pools To be clear, not just the amount of BTC inside ETH, but also BTC's hashrate

Stablecoin activity and DEX volume, at least the headline version. I pulled the 12 biggest Ethereum DEX pools by 24h volume this morning: about $1.31B in total. \- 84% of that was stablecoin-to-stablecoin (USDC/USDT, DAI/USDC, the USDS pairs). \- 60% was a single pool, Maker's DAI/USDC converter, which swaps at a fixed rate. That is plumbing, not trading. \- Another pool in the top 12 printed $28M of "volume" on 3 transactions. So "Ethereum DEX volume is up" can mean a handful of treasury moves through a peg converter. If someone argues ETH strength from volume, I'd ask for two things: volume excluding stable-to-stable pairs, and transaction count next to it. The USDC/WETH pool doing $61M across 25,000 trades says more about real activity than the converter doing $780M across 3,500. Curious whether anyone here already filters it that way. I work on DEX data at DexPaprika and we argue about exactly this internally.

Interesting question. Stablecoins seem better suited for everyday payments because of price stability, while ETH can serve a different role within the ecosystem. Mainstream crypto adoption probably doesn’t depend on everyone spending volatile assets directly - stablecoin usage can be adoption too.

Agree, and actually, you can be very happy with a model few months, and suddenly .... ko. My experiments on crypto and regime detector also were no super successful, either mathematical or based on macro indicators. Any suggestion of regime detectors for crypto, mainly BTC/ETH/BNB/SOL....(top 10)

**ALL HAIL THE ETERNAL CRAB** 📈 📉 📈 🌊 📈 📉 📈 📉 🌌 📉 📈 📉 🌌 📉 📈 📉 📈 🐋 📈 📉 📈 🌊 📈 🐋 🦀 🐋 📈 🌊 📈 📉 📈 🐋 📈 📉 📈 📉 🌌 📉 📈 📉 🌌 📉 📈 📉 📈 🌊 📈 📉 📈 **$1000--------$2521--------$5000** **2021----------2026----------∞** *Some will say the market is undecided on ETH.* *But I say that the market decided a long time ago.*

🌍 Macro Energy supply concerns intensified after an oil tanker attack in the Strait of Hormuz, pushing oil prices to a near one-month high. Hawkish signals from Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack fueled expectations of another rate hike before year-end, while the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield remained above 5%, pressuring risk assets. Technology and memory-chip stocks declined, although industrial and energy stocks helped the Dow close higher. BTC fell from around $84.2K to near $81K before rebounding, as leveraged long liquidations accelerated the sell-off. ⸻ 📈 Market Snapshot • BTC: $81,858.6 (-2.27%) • ETH: $2,447.15 (-3.54%) • NASDAQ: 27,245.90 (-0.44%) • S&P 500: 7,807.24 (-0.06%) • F&G: 57 (previous: 69) ⸻ 🧠 Market Take BTC broke below $83.2K and $82.4K before touching $81K, then rebounded sharply. The immediate resistance zone is $82.4K–$82.8K, while $81K–$81.2K remains critical support. A sustained recovery above resistance would help stabilize sentiment, but another breakdown could trigger further downside. Liquidations totaled $672M over the past 24 hours, including $586M in long positions versus $85.92M in shorts. This imbalance highlights how crowded bullish positioning amplified the decline, leaving leveraged traders vulnerable to further volatility. Beyond short-term price action, on-chain finance continues to expand into real-world payments. Weekly DEX trading volume for tokenized equities has risen 447% since Robinhood Chain launched in July, while stablecoin infrastructure acquisitions have exceeded $3B across three deals. FASB is also considering allowing qualifying stablecoins to be classified as cash equivalents, potentially easing corporate adoption, although regulatory clarity and practical payment use cases remain essential. Key levels: * Resistance: $82.4K–$82.8K / $83.2K * Support: $81K–$81.2K / $80K * Trend: Bearish pressure with a short-term rebound BTC needs to reclaim $82.8K to strengthen its recovery; losing $81K would increase the risk of another leg down. ⸻ 🔥 Hot Tokens * RSR: Closed up over 21% after briefly surging more than 54% to $0.0026 on news of new KRW and USDT trading pairs on South Korean exchanges. * GTC: Gained nearly 40% after a planned GTC/KRW listing drove a rally of more than 100% intraday. * W: Rose over 52% intraday and gained more than 40% over seven days, supported by Wormhole’s tokenomics upgrade and new multichain integrations. * BLUR: Fell nearly 30% after Blur announced that its [blur.io](http://blur.io) frontend will shut down on November 12, 2026; the underlying protocol will remain operational. ⸻ 📰 Key Updates * South Korea: Plans to expand security tokenization to stocks, bonds, and funds, with regulations expected to take effect in February 2027. * Morgan Stanley: Plans to support tokenized equities on an alternative trading system in Q1 2027. * Hong Kong: HKEX is scheduled to list its second spot Solana ETF on October 13. * Australia: ASIC plans to bring digital-asset-settled contracts under its contracts for difference regulatory framework. * France: The Finance Committee rejected the revenue section of the 2027 budget, invalidating amendments including a proposed crypto exit tax. * Stablecoin adoption: Stripe, Mastercard, and Circle have acquired Bridge, BVNK, and Tazapay for a combined value exceeding $3B over two years. * Upcoming data: U.S. September CPI is due October 14, followed by PPI and retail sales on October 15. * Token unlocks: UP unlocks approximately $4.11M on October 13, representing 16.7% of circulating supply; ARB unlocks approximately $18.4M on October 16. ⸻ ⚡ Quick Take BTC’s rebound from $81K offers some relief, but hawkish Fed signals, energy-supply risks, and heavy long liquidations continue to weigh on sentiment. Watch $82.4K–$82.8K for recovery confirmation and $81K for downside risk, with U.S. CPI data on October 14 likely to be the next major catalyst.