ETHEUR
Ethereum / Euro
crypto Composite

Between most ETH Lvl2 yep. Best way to do this nowadays. Just make sure you use the uniswap dot org link and not the sponsored links from google.

Most ETH “valuation” is still TA or narratives — we tried building one that starts from the chain itself and the result is a first-principles valuation model for Ethereum, based on demand-side fee flows for ETH

Yes do NOT use anything centralized options, its dumb as you can do it in fully decentralized ways.
Just use a DEX aggregator like [https://switcher.finance](https://switcher.finance/)/ select ETH -> SOL it takes 2 seconds and 0% slippage

at this point Im holding ETH but I think crypto is dead, scams, ponzis and absolute garbage. Maybe bitcoin survives. It may still rally the next time the fed cuts rates to a certain level. But if there is a rally to like 5k/ETH im taking the money.

Hello, quants!
For the past few months, I've been developing a quantitative forecasting system.
Due to the need to run a large number of simulations on 1-month-1-day data, we attempted to speed up feature calculations and the inference process itself. Initially, we used NumPy and reduced latency from 900 ms to 140 ms, which was encouraging. However, interest in simulations grew, so we rewrote everything in Rust/C++,
and achieved inference in 4-40 µs, opening up the possibility of using not only minute bars but also ticks.
We've achieved interesting forecasting results for many tickers in real time. We currently track BTC and ETH futures on the OOS buybit platform.
The accuracy of trend direction (reversal) determination is approximately 69-76%.
partial Spearman IC controlling for momentum > 0.15-0.2.
BPS 0.8-1 per trade (in our opinion, not suitable for execution as a standalone system).
AVG hold between signals 1000-4000 ms
Key architectural features:
Low latency: The core mechanism is written in Rust, providing inferrence times of approximately 4-40 microseconds on high-frequency AMD processors.
We suspect this is a potential filter for toxic flow, as the average BPS per trade is 0.8-1, which is insufficient for execution as a standalone strategy, unlike, for example, 15m-1d, where the BPS is 20-50+.
What do you think of the usefulness of this? Have we reached a high enough standard?
https://preview.redd.it/ihc5hjfse0ch1.png?width=1280&format=png&auto=webp&s=bbe4f9fe386de0643b2327ad1182eb27d02c35df

If Ethereum is taking notes from Cardano’s EUTXO model, that is just how open-source tech works. Cardano literally took Bitcoin’s UTXO model and upgraded it. If Ethereum grabs a piece of that tech to fix its massive storage issues, it is not stealing, it is just smart engineering.
For years, ETH fans clowned Cardano for using UTXO, saying it was too clunky for DeFi. Now that Ethereum is facing major database bloat, their devs are looking at a proposal to use UTXO-style payments to clean up the clutter.
Is Hoskinson right to want some credit? Sure, attribution is cool. But at the end of the day, blockchains are going to borrow the best ideas from each other to survive. It is a win for the tech, even if it bruises some egos on crypto Twitter.

In a business is war scenario Cardano might broadcast to the VC community over and over until it buzz'ing that Ethereum is lagging the curve by years. Cut off ETH funding pipelines then buy(ahem "save") Ethereum just before bankruptcy.
just sayin

Most of DeFi runs on stablecoins, you will never get those on XMR. The chain is not meant for smart contracts. If you come out of XRM to ETH and then go back into XMR, the privacy remains very high.

>There is more value in RWAs on Ethereum than on every other chain combined; more value in DeFi on Ethereum than on every other chain combined; and more value in stablecoins on Ethereum than on every other chain combined.
And this has been true for years, but it hasn't really mattered that much in a practical sense and hasn't matter from a price perspective. ETH has been at roughly 50% dominance for stablecoin supply and TVL share of the industry and while a 50% share is great, it's also been at 50% for years now and obviously started much higher (essentially at 100%).
Every chain it competes with has plenty of liquidity and can use those same assets to similar degrees and often with better performance. So why would this be a selling point for ETH?
And what is the bull case for ETH right now?

While I agree, we've seen superior tech fail time and time again. Still bullish on HBAR long term but I wouldn't be surprised if ETH pumps in the next few years, sometimes that's just how it is.

Idk how anyone can be bullish on ETH...
Vitalik literally just said they have to rebuild and redesign the entire protocol over the next 3-4 years (optimistic).
"Lean Ethereum", because it's too complicated, too centralized, not secure enough (quantum), can't scale, etc.
Bye bye ETH, it was nice knowing ya!
HBAR is the future! All roads lead to Hedera!

Tell me your honest opinion on this project:
A tool that lets you lock your ETH and other tokens in a lock for up to 10 years (with a smart contract). -> to physically remove the possibility to sell and enforce long term holding.

ADA is the only serious protocol.  ETH is still playing tech catch up to ADA.  BTC was first, thats its only reason why people buy it even though its the most obsolete tech.

**Tricky's Daily Doots #1,527**
**Yesterday's Daily 07/07/2026**
[Previous Daily Doots](https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/1upl7od/daily_general_discussion_july_07_2026/ow12p7u/)
- u/Flashy-Butterfly6310 covers [impressive growth from an institutional product.](https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/1upl7od/daily_general_discussion_july_07_2026/ow2ik1u/) 📈
- u/TheMoondanceKid noticed [a major TradFi non-believer flip.](https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/1upl7od/daily_general_discussion_july_07_2026/ow4vbmk/) 🏛️
- u/Tricky_Troll noticed [crypto rails being adopted in the back end and normies having no idea.](https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/1upl7od/daily_general_discussion_july_07_2026/ow2ag87/) 🛠️
- u/ethdaily delivers [the daily ETH news.](https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/1upl7od/daily_general_discussion_july_07_2026/ow6utj5/) 📰

Good point. Is the staking yield your main reason for choosing ETH, or is it the ecosystem as well?

Methodology across all 8: lock signal definition, cost model, and decision rule before touching data. Chronological or discovery/confirmation split for OOS. Bonferroni correction whenever multiple variants/assets/parameters get tested in parallel. Full code + data for each on GitHub, linked from profile.
Friday-Monday CME futures fade (base + 4 pre-registered variants: ATR filter, weekend gap, MA200 regime, extreme close position) — all falsified after Bonferroni, threshold p<0.025.
SMT divergence across XAU/XAG, XAU vs DXY-proxy, XAU vs synthetic DXY, BTC/SOL — four pre-registered tests, all falsified.
Standard vol-breakout entry logic, same discipline — falsified after correction, nothing new to add there.
Full SMC/ICT signal family (sweep, absorption, cascade, FVG, opening-window bias) on real tick data — gross moves \~7-10x smaller than round-trip cost across the board. One cascade cell looked suggestive (BUY+OI-up at +1min, t=2.76), flagged as regime-locked, one cell out of 30+ tested, not treating it as a claim.
Delta-neutral funding carry, BTC/ETH/SOL — falsified, but via two different mechanisms. BTC/ETH die on the cost floor outright (funding never clears \~0.48% round-trip). SOL in-sample funding actually beat the cost floor (0.55% vs 0.48%), but basis drift between the two legs ate the edge anyway, net -0.16%.
XAU/DXY divergence, first 2h of London/NY sessions — headline pooled test not confirmed (p=0.1265). London turned out to be resolution-dependent noise (significant on 5min, dead by 15min). NY held up across timeframes but wasn't the pre-registered headline, so it's reported as a lead, not a finding.
Direct follow-up on that NY lead — locked NY-only as headline this time, confirmation restricted strictly to data collected after the registration date (everything prior reclassified as discovery-only, no reuse of already-inspected data). Ran a cross-asset check before any forward data existed: same rule on silver came back p=0.0005, opposite direction from gold.
The "6 ICT session profiles" thing (Asia/London/NY blocks) — turned it into actual numeric rules, tested BTC/SOL/XAU/XAG across 3 threshold bundles, 72 cells total. Nothing clears the Bonferroni bar. Lowest p-value in the whole sweep is 0.0025, one cell, doesn't mean anything at that search width. No-match rate alone is telling: even the loosest thresholds leave 35-40% of days matching none of the six profiles.
Across two completely unrelated studies now, XAG just doesn't move like XAU on session-timing/liquidity signals. Opposite sign in the forward-test, worst performer across all 72 cells in the profile study. Different signal constructions, same conclusion both times. Not treating gold and silver as interchangeable for this kind of thing anymore.
Repos linked from profile.

honestly probably ETH just because it's the one I actually understand well enough to not panic-sell during a 70% drawdown. holding something for 10 years is more about your own conviction surviving the chart than picking the "right" coin

BTC or ETH is clearly the obvious answer.

However, if you want to "venture" out into lower cap coins, I would say any of RENDER, CRV or TEL would be my choices.

Yea I reckon you might be right. I doubt BTC will be worth much at all, its just a useless HODL coin and if thats what you are after youd invest elsewhere. Has to be one on which lots of other things are built. SOL or possibly ETH.

Holding SOL long term will be looked back on exactly like we look back on EOS, NEO etc.
BTC might be fine in 10 years, but it faces 2 long term risks, the security budget falling and the threat to old UTxOs (potentially about 30% of BTC) from quantum computers.
There is no way to know when either of these will result in an attack, but there is also no sign of any meaningful consensus from the bitcoin community about what to do about either risk (other than trying to avoid talking about them).
So that leaves ETH. Since the move to PoS there is no risk to the security budget, and a fairly simple analysis of addresses shows that less than 0.5% of ETH is in accounts vulnerable to the early private key hacking type of quantum attacks that threaten bitcoin.
On the other hand, heads of literally the biggest financial institutions in the world are currently talking about moving the legacy financial system onto 'one common blockchain' and have been deploying tokenization projects to Ethereum.
https://ethereumadoption.com/built-on-ethereum/
There is more value in RWAs on Ethereum than on every other chain combined; more value in DeFi on Ethereum than on every other chain combined; and more value in stablecoins on Ethereum than on every other chain combined.
The answer to your question seems pretty simple.