ETHEUR
Ethereum / Euro
crypto Composite

BTC for store of value, ETH for smart contract infrastructure

Last time I checked Chainflip gave the best rate for me to swap native Sol to native ETH

ETH has outperformed every single one of these on the 1y

ETH issuance is limited by the protocol's staking reward schedule (which decreases as more ETH is staked), while transaction fee burning (introduced by EIP-1559) can offset or even exceed issuance, making the net supply growth low or occasionally deflationary.

Let it be known that I bought 5 ETH at $1,559

I've marked the last 3 halving dates on the chart so you can see it visually. The halving event is the amount of bitcoin you gain per block mined which makes each bitcoin attained twice as hard to get with their ultimately being a finite number of bitcoins.
As I've previously said I'm not a crypto guy, I have traded crypto in the last two bull runs though, the later run I used a buy the dip momentum bot with some success on ETH.
I do not own any crypto now and it was always just a casino for me. The average person will not adopt something that is so ridiculously hard to purchase/use and is so easy to be scammed for your whole net worth. Not only that but you can actually look up people's net worth if you know their wallet address.
I do believe central banks may (may being a big word here) try to implement a digital currency, but it would be all their own systems and wouldn't used existing internet gamble tokens.
You can actually do a quick Google search of retail Vs institutional bitcoin holders and it was over 90% institutions (around 5% of which is for ETF's), Small retail (under 10btc) were around 9% of float. They hunt each other as it's unregulated their algos manipulate the market to liquidate each other, it's not uncommon for massive liquidation events in the bullruns and someone always profited from them (i.e cough cough Jane Street ) . I think that is the main draw for these institutions really, liquidity and little regulation.
https://preview.redd.it/b1t5btfhw9bh1.png?width=1008&format=png&auto=webp&s=6524e7569628d86f06a6e43c26edfea3341c61bf

>**Beyond the tendance,**
>**Each node's network attendance,**
>**True independence.**
~Daily haiku until we’re at least at 0.178 on the ETH/BTC ratio or highest market cap

Why not just buy a leveraged play on ETH like BMNR instead of 25x leveraged position that can wipe you out in short notice.

Let it be known that I sold 5 ETH at $1,559

Bitcoin and maybe ETH. Most shitcoins will be gone. Same like most popular websites from 2000s are gone now.

Personally, I look for where composite volume profiles correlate on the daily the weekly on the RTH and the ETH sessions and then I draw a box around that and then I validate that with us either being in a positive gamma or negative, gamma environment and then I just trade either the continuation or the reversal to set levels preferably the reversal. I am a short by a straighter. I would call myself a bear rarely do I go along most of my trades are probably 80% short 20% long in the long is just a quick bounce. It’s easier to read at least for me book map and deep charts footprints CVD’s, etc. when we’re in a down trending market I don’t know why but I love a down trending market. That’s where I make majority of my money I really don’t trade on days. We’re just ripping up. I hate those days. It’s hard to gauge where certain levels are even with options flow I just prefer us to retrace back down to a level that we’ve already been in especially where zero prints are a.k.a. big fair value gaps.

At that point there will be some other narrative for why "ETH is dead" when it's down from $3T mcap to only $1.5T mcap. We'll still be telling people it's fine and they'll say something like "not everyone bought in the ICO".

Looking to retest $1500 for ETH. Just waiting for a pullback

ETH will be safe. They have solid reasercheras and devs to make network post quantum safe.
I am not sure about other...

The 32nd chart and I use bookmap mostly to spot out areas of exhaustion of buyers to sellers or the inverse and I can see absorption of buyers to sellers or sellers to buyers and then from there I’m just targeting my areas that I drew on the composite profile a.k.a. volume profiles for the day the week, the RTH and ETH

Happy 4th everyone.
I'm glad ETH is making the holiday weekend better!

Thats the best critic I got so far, thanks!
You are right in general. A Just a naive freeze-and-swap mixes curve-fit with a reald edge thats just unnormalized across different microstructures.
What I did in this use case, was, that I tried re-tuning params for the different assets. This still couldn't resuce ETH/SOL and a 0% win rate / sign flip on SOL isnt a scaling problem.
A normalization would rescale the magnitude and not flip the sign of the edge. Reads to more more like the pattern is not there. Still, fair point that a param grid isn't a proper vol + funding-normalized representation
Also, good catch with the carry trade. Thats not realls proof that the logic generalizes. Sounds plausible, but not a proof. It just shows that Im harvesting one shared factor, the funding/basis premium. So yes, its a risk factor, not a signal in this case.
And your last question is something I didnt actually test so far. And I should do this before I actually call it dead.
Had to think a lot about my answer here. Thanks again!

It's not necessarily the cheapest anymore. Uniswap Labs charges a 0.25% fee on their official front-end for most swaps. I recommend using 1inch or CowSwap.
To swap SOL for ETH, use a cross-chain aggregator like Jupiter’s bridge feature, deBridge, or maybe Mayan Finance. They allow you to swap native SOL on Solana directly for ETH on Ethereum or L2s (like Base/Arbitrum, which I highly recommend to avoid high Mainnet gas fees)

1. Not always; need to compare it with other options.
2. [meta-aggregator](https://app.rango.exchange/bridge?fromBlockchain=SOLANA&fromToken=SOL&toBlockchain=ETH&toToken=ETH&fromAmount=10) can offer several options

Cross-asset breakdown is useful, but it doesn’t automatically separate “curve fit” from “different exposures.”
BTC vs ETH vs SOL aren’t just different samples of the same process. They’re different microstructures (liquidity, funding, leverage demand, reflexivity). A strategy failing across them might just be missing a normalization layer rather than being invalid.
Same caution on the carry example — consistency across assets could just mean you’re harvesting a shared funding/roll dynamic, not proving generality of the rest of the logic.
The harder question is: are you testing a signal, or a risk factor expressed differently per asset?
Would your BTC edge survive if you stripped everything down to a common volatility + funding-adjusted framework?