ETHEUR
Ethereum / Euro
cryptoComposite

Crypto outside of ETH, BTC and SOL is fucking cooked. AI will eat it alive and drain the funds before long. Nothing to do with the “Trump crime family.” When shit continues to go south after 2028 and if AOC is on the ticket are you going to blame it on hookers, bartenders and blow? Tired of this Trump shit in every post. He’s cooked and might not even make 2028 as president.

All you need is one ETH node that doesn't filter. You can continually submit a transaction until it goes thru. I don't see Binance hack coins getting seized or frozen (yet).

Hi r/Daytrading. For Software Sunday I’m sharing what I’ve been building: r/Trading_simulator, a paper trading community where the simulator runs inside the Reddit post itself. The video shows the app first, then a strategy you can practice in it. Here’s the background the video doesn’t cover. **Why build it inside Reddit** Practicing alone on a demo account never taught me much. I’d take a trade, lose, and never know if anyone else saw the same setup. On Reddit, everyone who trades in the post leaves their entries and exits on the same chart. You can scroll back to a candle and see who bought the dip, who shorted the top, and where the stops got hit. Paper trading becomes something you can discuss, not just a private score. **Why the strategy is built in** Most beginners draw support and resistance by hand and redraw them after the fact. The EMA + Lookback indicator takes the guessing out: it plots the levels from rules, so everyone in the community looks at the same levels and can argue about the same trade. It’s one toggle in the indicator menu, and you can change the EMA and lookback values. I've been using this way of reading levels in my own trading for years. Honestly, not as methodically as I should. It has given me good results, but I know I don't get the most out of it, because I'm not disciplined or focused enough to follow it the same way every time. That's part of why I built it into the app, and why I wanted to see what happens when you take my judgment (and my lack of discipline) out and run it as pure rules. **Details** * Free, virtual money only, no sign-up beyond your Reddit account * Live crypto prices (BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, DOGE, LINK), 1m to 1W * Built with Reddit’s developer platform (Devvit); I’m a solo developer **What I’d like from you** * What would make a simulator actually useful for your practice? * Should I add stocks? * Would you join weekly competitions? * If you trade levels like these on lower timeframes, how do you filter fake breakouts? I’ll be in the comments answering everything. Not financial advice.

> Expanding on why I believe "ETH as store of value (SoV)" makes much more sense to focus on than "ETH as fee-burning token". > Three primary reasons: > 1. ETH as fee-burning token never was as strong as it seemed 2. Optimizing for ETH as fee-burning token would demand Ethereum and ETH function in ways that are very hard to make compatible with decentralization and capture resistance. 3. Meanwhile, optimizing for ETH as SoV is aligned with Ethereum focusing on its unique strengths (decentralization and CROPS) > EIP-1559 (including its burn) is fine and good, we should keep them. But we should not feel sad if fee burn is < 10% of breakeven indefinitely; the value of ETH comes from elsewhere. > The core idea: the big thing that people appreciate about Ethereum is decentralization and CROPS. The main pragmatic benefit that these things translate into is stability. SoV is the category where that is not an unneeded extra we merely put effort into for ideological reasons, but rather a pragmatic strength from the perspective of people putting in their assets. And in the era of AI disruption, stability will be highly valued. https://x.com/VitalikButerin/status/2119401255919604064 More detail in the thread. CROPS = censorship resistant, open source, private, and secure https://blog.ethereum.org/2026/03/13/ef-mandate

Hello everyone i wanted to make a little update post regarding my last post and my losses here is the [original post](https://www.reddit.com/r/WallStreetBetsCrypto/s/uAXFHzJbew) so you can check it for context First of all thanks again for everyone who cared enough to leave a comment or read through my post I wanted to clarify some points because i think i didn't explain myself enough in the original post The total amount i actually deposited was around 5k usd that was around the end of 2024 and the start of 2025 and was distributed as an investment between safe assists most of it in SOL around 30 SOL and ETH around 0.5 ETH i don't remember the exact numbers now and some other small projects like ARB,XRP,ADA just small amounts just in case something go to the moon. Everything was going great till the October last year crash at that point the portfolio was around 10000$ usd or so and then it kept bleeding but i kept holding and holding and the recovery never arrived at least not to even the amount i initially originally added, i know crypto is risky and loss to be expected however i felt uneasy to loss that much but i tried to convince myself everything will be okay Then the building that my appointment is in the one i am going to marry in after 6\~7 months was found by the state as unsafe and I can't move to it and that's what broke me and i couldn't take it anymore, i looked at my balance on binance and i saw that all what i had was like 4k + 2k that i have in my bank because i kept saving in my bank after the crash and didn't want to deposit anything else to binance From here i thought maybe if i do some trades with leverage i can recover and have enough money to get a small apartment and everything will be okay all i need is like 2k more usd and i got small wins then lose after lose after lose it kept bleeding till i got liquidated at the end I want to mention that i never touched futures before, i have no history with gambling but i saw no other option there was basically nothing else to do (at least this is what i thought at that time) and here i am lost all the money on binance, i have 2k left in my bank which puts me in a worst situation because now even if the apartment issue was fixed by somehow I don't have enough money for basic renovations but it's all my fault no one else's and i understand my mistake now And that's the whole story thanks for reading and if someone would like to help with anything here is my binance id : 546079188 even a dollar or two will help but it's okay if you don't want to you are not required to send anything it's my mistake and it's up to me to figure out how to resolve it Thanks again for reading and have a wonderful day

You're missing my point. I'm not arguing that Ethereum only recently discovered the store of value narrative. I'm arguing that Ethereum keeps shifting emphasis because it hasn't delivered on its original ambitions. Ethereum spent years promoting itself as the "World Computer," yet it still struggles to function as a comprehensive decentralized computing platform. Its scaling strategy increasingly relies on L2s, and applications still depend heavily on off chain infrastructure. Now we're emphasizing ETH as a store of value instead? Just because both narratives have existed for years doesn't mean the priorities haven't changed. A narrative can be old and still become the fallback when the original vision isn't being realized. You even acknowledge that the ultrasound money thesis underdelivered, which is part of my criticism. If growing network activity isn't producing the economic benefits previously advertised, what exactly makes ETH such a compelling store of value? What advantage does it offer over Bitcoin in that role? Ethereum's strongest demonstrated use cases are increasingly financial, which is fine, but that's a considerably narrower achievement than the original World Computer vision. And claiming Ethereum is both the "best blockchain" and the "best money" doesn't establish either. At some point, I'd rather see Ethereum deliver on its ambitions than continuously redefine what success is supposed to look like.

Price went up with the staking update. 33 ETH is needed?

One doesn't rule out the other. ETH has always been a Store of Value, this just wasn't a narrative that was pushed early on because it was so much more than that, and at the time it was launched, basically every other alt was just a discount BTC. >And if ETH is now supposed to compete as a store of value, what compelling advantage does it offer over Bitcoin? This is a good question. The advantages are many. Bitcoin has garbage tps, 10 min blocks, no finality, so waiting 10 minutes isn't even enough. Sending BTC is expensive. Bitcoin doesn't know how to face quantum computing threat. BTC doesn't have an answer to its failing security budget. If you're going to park your money in something and feel safe it's going to be around in 20 years without getting wiped out from failing to address looming threats, you're going to be a lot better off parking your money in ETH.

Lol yea none of these buzzwords matter for actual price growth because ETH doesn't capture much value from network usage. The chain consistently makes less than $50,000 per day. The burns that it does have are easily offset (and then some) by net new issuance.

The biggest compelling advantage over bitcoin. ETH solved its long term security budget and can currently survive as the most secure Blockchain with an inflation rate of 0.8%. Look at current central bank rates so you know that it is a better store of value than holding fiat. Bitcoin on the other hand will have a big problem when they don’t sacrifice their “only 21m” narrative. because after the next two halvings the Bitcoin network will be attacked as the cost of attacking is becoming rapidly cheaper.

Less than a year ago, the Ethereum Foundation was heavily pushing the "World Computer" narrative. Now Vitalik is arguing that ETH as a store of value makes significantly more sense to focus on than ETH as a fee burning token. At what point do we acknowledge that Ethereum seems to be struggling with its own identity? For years, the argument was that adoption, network activity, and fee burning would strengthen ETH's economic value. Now that this thesis looks increasingly questionable, we're shifting the emphasis toward being a store of value? It feels less like a coherent long term strategy and more like constantly repositioning the narrative. What exactly is Ethereum trying to be at this point? If its ambition is to become the World Computer, why is its cofounder downplaying one of the primary mechanisms connecting network usage to token value? And if ETH is now supposed to compete as a store of value, what compelling advantage does it offer over Bitcoin? You can't just keep changing the investment thesis whenever the previous one becomes difficult to defend. At some point, the community should demand a consistent explanation of what actually drives ETH's value rather than accepting whatever narrative happens to be convenient.

This isn't a pivot, ETH has been pitched as both a computer and money for years. The whitepaper describes a blockchain with a Turing-complete language, and "world computer" becomes the tagline. The "triple point asset" thesis, from around 2019., already framed ETH as a store of value, a consumable (gas) and a capital asset (staking) at the same time. In 2020. Vitalik jokes about "supersonic money" and Justin Drake turns it into "ultra sound money", a direct reply to Bitcoin's "sound money". Even the EF Mandate from this year, which I'm not a fan of, says on page one that "Ether is a store of value and money". "World computer" describes the network. "Money" describes the asset, they were never competing narratives. Fair point that ultra sound money leaned on the burn, and the burn underdelivered, since supply is growing again. But Vitalik isn't removing it (he says keep EIP-1559), he's saying it shouldn't be the valuation story. That's updating a mechanism, not changing identity. Ethereum has had so many narratives because it has more kinds of users than any other chain. Devs see a computer, DeFi sees collateral, holders see money. That's not an identity crisis, it's what being the best blockchain and the best money at the same time looks like.

indeed, until there's something more attractive to do with ETH, staking is the only game in town. Alternatives don't magically appear, especially in an environment where the leader outcompetes everyone in yield and in (perceived risk). We should be aware of where this leads Ethereum and accept the consequences. The Golem Foundation published this interesting report: https://x.com/golemfoundation/status/2117672047619010907?s=46 " Little beats staking in ETH terms. Lending (1.3%) and LPing (1.2%) pay less than staking (2.2%); only first-loss cover (4.8%) and covered calls (7.6%) pay more, and each adds a different risk." Even with ETH being the highest volume asset on CEX, you don't even make it with LPing. At 50% of ETH at stake, the protocol still pays 2% while diluting every holders of 1%. At 100% it would pay 1.5% and dilute the whole supply of that number. If staking is the only game in town, it's time to consider a good old and higly DPOS consensus.

https://preview.redd.it/y3uj3lm5ee0i1.png?width=1080&format=png&auto=webp&s=5100513dd9e6b42ff085157444172c9e7c9cb158 Less than a year ago, the Ethereum Foundation was heavily pushing the "World Computer" narrative. Now Vitalik is arguing that ETH as a store of value makes significantly more sense to focus on than ETH as a fee burning token. At what point do we acknowledge that Ethereum seems to be struggling with its own identity? For years, the argument was that adoption, network activity, and fee burning would strengthen ETH's economic value. Now that this thesis looks increasingly questionable, we're shifting the emphasis toward being a store of value? It feels less like a coherent long term strategy and more like constantly repositioning the narrative. What exactly is Ethereum trying to be at this point? If its ambition is to become the World Computer, why is its cofounder downplaying one of the primary mechanisms connecting network usage to token value? And if ETH is now supposed to compete as a store of value, what compelling advantage does it offer over Bitcoin? You can't just keep changing the investment thesis whenever the previous one becomes difficult to defend. At some point, the community should demand a consistent explanation of what actually drives ETH's value rather than accepting whatever narrative happens to be convenient.

>**Some quantum landmines,** >**Deep down the blockchain confines,** >**Read between the lines.** ~Daily haiku until we’re at least at 0.178 on the ETH/BTC ratio or highest market cap

It's absolutely a demand problem. ETH issuance is negligible compared to other coins.

The whole conversation the speaker himself while trying to sell this EIP keeps coming back to the same point, that is, that rate of issuance isn’t the problem, lack of uses for ETH is. The way I see it, until there is something more attractive to do with ETH staking is the only game in town.

I ran a backtest of plain HYPE/BTC/ETH/SOL spot long + perp short on Hyperliquid, both legs on HL, with real hourly funding and taker fees. Parameters were picked on JAN 2025 to Apr 2026. Always-on beat every funding-based on/off filter I tried: exiting on short-term funding dips just added fees and missed the rebound. Out-of-sample it came to about 7% a year on notional for the basket: HYPE around 10%, BTC/ETH 7%, SOL 4.6%. Basis noise stayed within a few bps. Funding on HYPE was negative only about 3% of days, compared with roughly 17% for SOL. As a sanity check I scanned the public HL leaderboard. About 28 large accounts, around $110M short in total, run exactly this trade on HYPE with a 1:1 hedge. The cleanest ones collected roughly 11.5–12% a year in funding over the last 90 days, so the backtest matches reality. Heads up: the leaderboard ROI for these accounts is meaningless, because it only counts the perp leg. Two other things stood out. HYPE funding roughly halved from 2025 to 2026 as the trade got crowded. And with portfolio margin, spot HYPE/BTC is collateral for the short, so the liquidation-from-split-collateral problem mentioned above mostly goes away if you stay on one venue. One thing I'm still unsure about: has anyone here actually run levered carry under HL portfolio margin, borrowing USDC against spot HYPE? I'd like to know how the borrow rate behaved when utilization spiked, and whether the margin ratio moved the way the docs describe during a sharp HYPE rally.

>He didn't elaborate that much. Yeah I wonder why... >I assume he means big companies will buy ethereum regardless of yield. But solo stakers are more sensitive to yield and will exit before big companies well. So small solo stakers are driven out and big corpo are buying ETH. How does that result in "more decentralization"?

Before he created Hex he podcasted about how he should create a scamcoin, then he created the flywheel that became Hex whereby people "donated" their ETH for him to dump and use to pump Hex. If newer victims didn't know about it I can't say or not, but he was very public before, during and after that he viewed it and deliberated on it as a scam but in his head if Ethereum isn't viewed as one then his shouldn't be either.

Thanks for the additional info. Definitely missed out on the discussion in the last 2 days. 200k contracts would be way more than the chainsecurity guys estimated. Maybe they missed some mechanism or could be that the effect on most of the contracts are minimal. If the transactions only reverts in a new way, that is not too bad, if it allows to enter into code that it was not supposed to get to, ever, then thats pretty bad. We will have to see in the coming weeks what comes out of it. There are some discussions in the ETH R&D discord on how to adapt EIP-8037 to fix some (all?) of the issues. There isn't too much discussion about it on their discord though. I would guess most of the core devs were at Devcon and probably now have some more in person meetings. I would therefore guess it will take some more time until the various teams can realign. I can imagine some of the following happening with increasing delay for Glamsterdam: - No changes to Glamsterdam. Projects need to fix their smart contracts. - Gas repricing gets changed. Needs more tests and probably a delay of some months. - The most problematic Gas repricings will get axed. Might impact gas limit scaling post Glamsterdam. No idea how much testing that needs - The whole upgrade gets overhauled. Don't think that is realistic, as most of the things are alright and do not touch anything gas repricing related.

Full debate on ETH issuance cuts ([pretty lively video](https://x.com/ethvaorg/status/2119101260951441557)) featuring . @jdetychey, @Pol_Lanski, @0xzak, and more. It's very lively discussion with supporters from both sides and genuinely undecided people asking thoughtful questions. A few things jumped out at me but **the whole video was very interesting**: * 14:12 -- Jerome is very frustrated/impassioned here. "When it reaches 50% it's over." (He means the whole Eth asset is over, not just the debate). * 31:40 -- Jerome: The main product of Ethereum is block space, and less and less people want it. On top of that we're lowering the price. We have low activity and the classic way to deal with this is to cut savings rate. * 34:07-- Jerome addressing BMNR employee: "Why don't you do something else other than staking? Why not do something cool like Blackrock just-in-time liquidity thing?" Someone at 35:00 made a really good argument roughly paraphrased: >Big companies like Blackrock will buy Eth as stocks/hedge for their clients. They get their management fee anyway, they don't care about decrease in yield. So that just results in more decentralization as solo stakers exit.

Decentralization also matters. I've been in this space for ten years. Do you realize how many "ETH killers" I've seen? Hype is going to do great... until it gets hacked/the chain halts/gets targeted for investigations or whatever black swan is next.

> Honestly, if as a dev your contract depended on fixed values of gas to work, then you either did a poor job, or you assumed Ethereum to be an ossified chain when it clearly is not and wont be in the near future. This is how I'd write contracts now but for example I remember after the DAO hack when people were just learning about reentrancy it was considered best practice to use `transfer()` so you don't send enough gas to do anything move the ETH and write a log entry. Solidity devs put this call in the contract for that reason and we were recommended to use it. It's been deprecated a long time people are still using the contracts I deployed from that era. Also IIUC these changes do things that aren't just shuffling constants around, for example `gasleft()` will no longer tell you how much gas you've got left (since glamsterdam complexified it and splits it into multiple budgets). It's one thing to know that the gas price of a particular call might change but it's another to anticipate how the chain might rewrite the entire concept of gas from underneath you.

I’m part of HoodFellas ($HOOD), a meme project on Robinhood Chain, and wanted to introduce the project and its game. The game centers on forming a family, running jobs, and competing with rival families. The crime-family theme also carries through our character artwork and community branding. The part I’d like people to look at is the game itself and how the family competition works, rather than just the token’s price. The top three winning families will share a total prize pool of $15,000 USD worth of ETH. That is the combined pool across all three families, not $15,000 for each family. The website is [https://hoodfellas.org/](https://hoodfellas.org/) and the game is accessible through the “Enter the Game” button. If you try it, I’d be interested in feedback on the family competition, the onboarding, and anything that could be clearer. For anyone checking the token, these are the project references: Network: Robinhood Chain Token: HoodFellas ($HOOD) Contract: 0x2932B2f5761cadCa5cB3e09D940092cA723D9EE2 Pool: HOOD/ETH on Uniswap v4 DEX Screener: [https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0xd6a5bc05379b098c59fcc643bb17ce5bb1d8f3e2d417f5d00aa1bd98f88d4521](https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0xd6a5bc05379b098c59fcc643bb17ce5bb1d8f3e2d417f5d00aa1bd98f88d4521) I’m posting from our project profile so the affiliation is clear. Questions and critical feedback are welcome.