ETHEUR
Ethereum / Euro
cryptoComposite

ETH at $2,230. Which button are you pressing?

Long-term holders: Do you still risk staking your ETH or just keep it cold?

Sol ETH HBAR

Proof: [https://imgur.com/a/gLwU8bu](https://imgur.com/a/gLwU8bu) **$318** Payment methods: * USD: venmo, PayPal, Cash APP. No note. * Cryptos: USDC on ETH network, BTC on BTC network (3% surcharge), ETH on ETH network (3% surcharge). Ship to all 50 states, US Territories, and Military Bases. Shipping fee will be estimated based on zip code, weight, and size. Almost all my shipping labels each carry $100 complimentary insurance. Additional insurance coverage is available at the buyer's expense. Packaging will be done in a way that protects not only the metals, but also their containers. I have an industry-leading standard of padding, filling, packaging, and taping for every shipment. Once the carrier takes possession of the package directly from my hands, my liability ends. But I will do my best to help with investigation, and insurance claim filing on behalf of the buyer, in the rare case of package loss, package damage, or content leakage.

🌍 **Macro** The post-election rally lasted just one day before U.S. equities suffered a sharp sell-off, led by AI and technology stocks. The Nasdaq plunged 5.52%, the S&P 500 fell 4.35%, and the Dow dropped 3.44%. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index crashed 12.3%, its largest daily decline since March 2020, wiping approximately $2.9T off the S&P 500’s market value. Concerns over tighter AI regulation, data center restrictions, stretched valuations, and the returns on massive AI investments fueled the sell-off. Crypto followed: BTC retreated from above $80K toward $76K, while ETH fell below $2,250. Despite BTC ETFs recording $74.57M in net inflows on November 4, broader risk aversion and leveraged liquidations continued to weigh on prices. ⸻ 📈 **Market Snapshot** • BTC: $76,087.90 (-5.49%) • ETH: $2,238.01 (-7.70%) • NASDAQ: 24,315.00 (-5.52%) • S&P 500: 7,353.79 (-4.35%) • F&G: 28 (previous: 50) ⸻ 🧠 **Market Take** Hedge fund deleveraging may be amplifying the equity sell-off. Walleye Capital, which manages approximately $17B, plans to scale back its internal equity long/short business and return some capital after losing 5.9% in October. Other multi-strategy funds are reportedly facing redemptions, shutting down investment teams, or unwinding positions. If multiple funds reduce exposure simultaneously, forced selling across asset classes could intensify volatility. Meanwhile, Hyperliquid’s daily priority fees hit a record $521K, accounting for 12.7% of platform revenue as liquidation bots, arbitrageurs, and high-frequency traders competed for faster execution. The AI trade is also facing a major reality check. SanDisk fell approximately 22%, Micron, Western Digital, and AMD dropped more than 17%, while Nvidia lost around 9%. Investors are increasingly questioning whether massive AI infrastructure spending can generate sufficient commercial returns. Concerns over potential data center restrictions, weaker-than-expected AI business outlooks, and skepticism around major AI companies’ fundraising and IPO valuations have added to the pressure. The market is shifting its focus from infrastructure expansion toward actual revenue growth and investment returns. **Key levels:** * Resistance: $78K * Support: $75K–$76K * Trend: Bearish, closely correlated with U.S. tech stocks ⸻ 🔥 **Hot Tokens** * **INJ:** Held up against the broader market sell-off, gaining approximately 2%–3% after Canary’s staking-enabled INJ ETF began trading on Nasdaq, following an intraday rally above 10%. * **CCD:** Gained over 20% as Concordium launched a 75M CCD developer grant program, brought its EURQ euro stablecoin to testnet, and advanced its AI agent identity infrastructure. ⸻ 📰 **Key Updates** * **U.S. Elections:** 226 pro-crypto candidates won House seats and 19 won Senate seats, totaling 245 across both chambers. * **South Korea:** Plans to delay its digital asset income tax by two years, pushing implementation to 2029. * **Greece:** Passed its first crypto tax framework, setting a 10% capital gains tax and a 15% tax on lending, liquidity provision, and staking income, effective January 1, 2027. * **Singapore:** Visa opened six global centers focused on AI, agentic commerce, stablecoins, wallets, and quantum computing. HSBC, JPMorgan, Standard Chartered, and two other banks also established Global Layer One to advance tokenized financial infrastructure. * **Samsung:** Enabled USDC on Solana in Samsung Wallet for U.S. Galaxy users, reaching approximately 82M devices. * **Base:** Activated its Denim mainnet upgrade, reducing block times to 200 milliseconds. * **Uniswap:** Introduced a permissioned pool hook, bringing the first permissioned asset to its AMM. * **Other developments:** Arkansas sued Kalshi over alleged illegal gambling operations; the White House is reviewing proposed SEC crypto broker rule changes; France’s rejected budget bill puts proposed stablecoin taxation and self-custody reporting provisions on hold. * **Token unlocks:** STABLE unlocks 4.93% (approx. $23M) and AVAX 0.3% (approx. $14.7M) on Nov 8. ⸻ ⚡ **Quick Take** BTC has fallen back toward $76K as the AI stock sell-off, hedge fund deleveraging, and leveraged liquidations trigger broader risk aversion. The $75K–$76K zone is the key support to watch, while tonight’s U.S. nonfarm payrolls could further influence rate expectations and market direction.

Short answer: no. Leaving fees in and keeping a 1% range does not lock you to 1 ETH forever. While price sits inside the range the pool is continuously rebalancing you — selling the asset that is rising into the one that is falling. Your ETH balance only looks stable when price is still near your entry and you have not been pushed to the edge yet. Once price walks fully through that 1% band and you are 100% cbBTC, that cbBTC amount is whatever the swaps left you with (including IL). Pulling only fees does not rewind the inventory shift; on a tight range fees are usually tiny next to that move. A single-sided 1% deposit is basically a range / limit order. The strong fee APR is the market paying you for that liquidity. The flip into less of the other asset when it fills is the other half of the same trade. If the real goal is accumulating more ETH or cbBTC rather than max fee APR, people usually either re-center when price leaves the band (paying the rebalance cost) or widen the range so composition drifts slower. Tight range + single-sided + "never touch principal" do not all fit together 👀

ETH Daily - 5th November 2026 📰 \-Base activated Denim upgrade. \-Reth v2.10.0 patch release. \-Lido x Firelight protection. \-Amundi tokenized fund on Ethereum. \-ETHBEAT CROPs guide. \-Zilliqa transitions into an L2. \-AZTEC delegation program. \-EtherFi launches Liquid Bold USD vault. \-DIFC Courts Dispute Resolution Oracle. Read more: [https://ethdaily.io/base-activates-denim-upgrade](https://ethdaily.io/base-activates-denim-upgrade)

A poke above 2.4k after a wick to 2.22k is not the same thing as owning the level. Reclaims that stick usually leave footprints: a few daily closes back on top, a retest that holds instead of slicing straight through, and ETH/BTC not making a fresh low while spot wiggles around the number. Until that shows up I treat the bounce as short covering, not a regime change. Same pattern showed up on the last couple of false recoveries this year. Level first, narrative second 👀

I traded a single trade after market close going short on NQ and it is based on my scanner on futures in NQ, ES, CL, GC, BTC and ETH. Makes $415.

Going to sleep. Probably sub 2k when I will wake up because, well because this is ETH

ETH price is the way to measure it

It's completely unrelated to crapto, entire markets rose yesterday and shit today. ETH will follow the overall tech trend. Look at crypto and relate it to the political calender. Mid-terms is always a crab market, presidential election is a bull market, post presidential election is the start of the bear market. You can't fully know when each part begins but this is usually how it's gone every 4 years (especially since the halving cycle also dances around the US political cycle)

On a 1% range, a single-sided deposit is basically a limit order, it fills around the middle of the range, so 0.0296 to 0.028 is more than it should cost, and I’d check the tx. To stack ETH, I’d put the next cbBTC range at or below where it sold. If price runs away you sit out of range earning nothing

DCA daily ETH and BTC.

One thing I keep wondering about Ethereum is how we should measure its progress beyond the ETH price. Lower fees and better scaling are great, but the real test is whether they bring in more people who actually use the network, build on it, and stay. Sometimes it feels like the most important Ethereum milestones are happening quietly in the background, while everyone is watching the chart. What metric do you think best reflects Ethereum's long-term health: active users, L2 adoption, developer activity, staking participation, or something else?

It's so fun how ETH gets none of the benefits of the AI capex cycle but all of the drawbacks.

I think the key distinction here is between keeping your initial deposit untouched and keeping its value in ETH. Those are two very different things in a concentrated liquidity position. With a 1% range, your position is constantly rebalancing between ETH and cbBTC as the price moves. Once it goes out of range, you're effectively holding one side of the pair, so the amount of ETH you can recover later depends on where the price is when you convert back. Also, fees don't automatically cancel out impermanent loss. You could withdraw only the fees and still end up with less ETH-equivalent value than simply holding your original ETH. I'd track three things separately: the original capital, the fees earned, and the current value of the LP position compared with holding 1 ETH. That last comparison is the one that really tells you whether the strategy is working. Are you measuring performance in ETH, cbBTC, or USD? The answer can look very different depending on the benchmark

aaaaaaaand ETH dumped. You should have listened to the wisdom and made 7%.

No, unfortunately. While the price sits inside your range, the pool keeps selling whichever token is rising for the one that is falling, so your 1 ETH only stays 1 ETH while price is on the side of the range where the position is all ETH. Once price crosses the whole 1% band you are fully converted at roughly the average price of that band, and you only get the ETH back if price crosses back. Pulling out just the fees does not change that, because the fees are separate from the principal that is being swapped. The narrow range earns more because it converts more often, and that conversion is where the cbBTC shortfall you saw comes from. If your goal is to grow either token, track the position in one unit, say ETH, including fees, and compare it to simply holding. If it beats holding over a full month, the narrow range is working for you. If not, a wider range or rebalancing less often usually does better.

BTC is yesterday's news XMR is the future, it's poised to explode like BTC did when Silk Road hit the mainstream SOL/ETH are the distant future, incredble tech but too soon, and contracts are not secure yet. BCH is likely Satoshi's original plan and it has great devs and community YMMV

So I am currently experimenting with single asset deposits on cbBTC/Weth pool on pancake swap. The returns have been phenomenal but compounding only works if you end up with the same tokens when it goes out of range. I am only trying to accumulate more tokens. Lets say 1 ETH is 0.0296 cbBTC. If you deposit 1 ETH on 1% range and price of ETH rises then it gives you 1 ETH + fees. But when it turns to cbBTC completely you notice that you have less cbBTC such as 0.028 cbBTC. The only solution I find was to keep a large range but this means earning very less in fees. If I am not withdrawing from my capital of 1ETH and only withdrawing the fees, and keep the range 1% will I always end up with 1ETH regardless of price changes?

The great flippening isnt ETH BTC but SNDK MU

Which will happen sooner? S&P 500 below 7000 or ETH below 2000? But tbh, i'm happy that the AI craze settles down a bit.

I think holding time is a big factor, but the type of market matters too. Funding costs can add up on perps, especially for longer holds, while spreads and liquidity can make a big difference for active traders. Are you mainly looking at crypto perpetuals like BTC/ETH perps, or the newer Kalshi contracts? The cost structure can be quite different.

Any crypto representing a pure fiat replacement with no value case is complete speculation with no heading. Platform cryptos (ETH, SOL) have a leg to stand on because they fundamentally resolve true RWA blockchain adoption use cases, like stock tokenization, real estate tokenization, etc. Then you have to account for rug-pull ability. If you can freely buy as much of the crypto as you want and sell liberally, it’s probably not gonna work out either. Greed corrupts. My bias is for GENNY since its basis is effectively data tokenization