ETHEUR
Ethereum / Euro
cryptoComposite

19,630 ETH is still withdrawable from six abandoned EtherDelta-era contracts — here is a checker for any address

You just need to deposit some ETH in your wallet once, just once. Any time you send USDC make sure you sill have ETH when your ETH is low just Swap some USDC for ETH before you run out of ETH.

Pretty classic case, and more fixable than you’d think. The blockchain is your receipt. Even with no chat logs, each sale usually shows up on-chain as two matching events: the NFT leaving your wallet to an address, and ETH arriving from that same address around the same time. That’s a P2P trade, and it reads like one on the blockchain. Here's what we’d add around it: * Proof you control the wallets (a signed message or a small test transaction, this shows that it's your wallet that received the NFTs) * What the collection was trading at on the day of each sale. Overpriced NFT sales are a known laundering pattern, so showing yours matched the market answers that question before it’s asked * Screening of the buyers’ wallets, since “random dudes” is the one part a compliance officer will want checked * Any Discord or Telegram screenshots you still have, as supporting rather than main evidence We’ve done this for plenty of people who traded peer to peer or bought with cash back in the day. Before AML rules caught up with crypto, LocalBitcoins, meetups and cash deals were simply how a lot of people got in. A good report explains that context, then backs it with whatever trail exists: matching cash withdrawals from your bank, old platform account data, and the on-chain history from that point on. Although as we are not accountants, the focus is on the trades that made the money. Losing trades rarely need the same level of evidence.

The roadmap was to upgrade their chain to be an ETH validium but at some point they abandoned it and decided they were going to remain a sidechain. No idea what they were thinking but they lost me. The best thing that they had going was their zk prover and their pessimistic cross-chain prover. Now they’re just another EVM L1 and the tech behind it isn’t even very good compared to Sonic, Avax, etc…

Ethereum Price Danger Zone: ETH Tests $2,300 Support as Outflows Surge

19,630 ETH is still withdrawable from six abandoned EtherDelta-era contracts — here is a checker for any address

Agree with the conclusion, and there's a neat way to see exactly what the pool "sold" for you 🧮 If ETH runs all the way through your range, the position ends up having sold your ETH at roughly the geometric mean of the two bounds, sqrt(lower x upper). Range of 3,000-4,000 means you exited around 3,464, not 4,000. So a narrow range above spot is basically a slow limit sell with fees on top, and a range below spot is a slow limit buy. Two things I'd add to the "compare vs holding" point: - Re-ranging is where people really bleed. Every time you move the range up after price leaves it, you lock in that sale and buy back higher. In a strong trend, a few rebalances can cost more than all the fees collected. - Hold isn't even the toughest benchmark. The LP is always trading at a stale price against arbitrageurs, so a fairer test is LP value vs a portfolio that rebalanced to the same exposure at market prices. Fees have to beat that gap, and in volatile, low-volume pairs they usually don't. Narrow ranges make the most sense when you actually want to scale out or in at those prices anyway. If you just want ETH upside, the fees are paying you to give it up 👀

Yeah, the assumption I have is that IF it became the financial backbone them the ETH price would reflect that. I think because ETH at that point would be required to deploy infrastructure, and then it would just make sense to hold it for staking and as a SOV. But there is definitely a potential world where Ethereum "succeeds" where ETH is just valuable enough to secure the network, but the value accrued on the network far exceeds the value of ETH. I suppose another view could be that ETH becomes valuable even if Ethreum the network remains a niche. But I feel like this is far less likely and would require people to see ETH as a better BTC for a SOV purpose.

Big outflows are interesting, but they don't automatically mean bullish. Could be staking, self-custody, or just wallets moving funds. Still, that's a lot of ETH leaving exchanges in one day.

Not manually. I only act when the system triggers an entry on BTC, ETH or BNB, so I don't really have a "this looks cheap, I'll buy it" list. That's kind of the point - removing that discretion from the process.

Editing your comments nice. But the mods removed your other one because you can’t play nice. I’ve 8x’d my money in Anthropic. If you’re too myopic to understand the change happening it’s not my loss. Look at the ETH news! World is changing. Hopefully others here don’t close their eyes

> ETH has been debunked by AI Are you saying there is no exponential money for me in ETH :).

Know your BTC from your ETH? Got HODL and FOMO down? Time to put that crypto knowledge to the test! Join the KuFam Crypto Crossword Challenge and see if you're the brains of the family. Crack the clues, complete the puzzle, and grab your chance to share **100 USDT** in prizes! 🎁 📅 **Date:** October 28, 9:00 AM UTC 📍 **Venue:** [KuCoin Exchange Group on Telegram](https://t.me/Kucoin_Exchange) 👉 Bring your brainpower and join the challenge! 💬 *Think you've got what it takes? Bring your crypto-savvy friends along and let's see who solves it first*!

**Tricky's Daily Doots #1,636** **Yesterday's Daily 24/10/2026** [Previous Daily Doots](https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/1xfntwu/daily_general_discussion_october_26_2026/19rodfgjftdhh/) - u/haurog reviews [Ambire wallet.](https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/1xfntwu/daily_general_discussion_october_26_2026/19ron99w4zqf4/) 👍 - u/FoucaultCareofSelf asks about [AI cybersecurity in Ethereum](https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/1xfntwu/daily_general_discussion_october_26_2026/19rolo59b4lfm/) and u/sm3gh34d explains [Ethereum's current strategy.](https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/1xfntwu/daily_general_discussion_october_26_2026/19rovg3q66j5s/) 🤖 - u/Numerous_Ruin_4947 covers [Justin Sun delling the dip.](https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/1xfntwu/daily_general_discussion_october_26_2026/19rpcpt2sa9vm/) 📉 - u/ethdaily delivers [the daily ETH news.](https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/1xfntwu/daily_general_discussion_october_26_2026/19rpeespxh7cz/) 📰

Target city ≠ target uni. It’s like saying MIT is not target because most shops are in NYC. The presence and on campus event tell you whether the uni is target. ETH is doing quite good regarding that, stuff happening multiple times a month.

I hear ETH has been debunked by AI, it's over guys! ^^^^/s

I get the frustration. Five years of upgrades, staking and layer two adoption without a convincing price payoff is a long time to wait. I think the missing piece in a lot of bullish arguments is explaining how network growth actually translates into demand for ETH itself. I follow shorter Ethereum price views through Moon and technical progress alone wouldn't convince me an investment is attractive at any valuation.

How many of the international companies have substantial presence in Zurich? Does Jane street have a Zurich office? Does Optiver have one? As I said ETH is a top university so these firms are looking and can afford to attend job fairs to look for the best. Do not confuse this with target. If the city is not a target location with significant company presence (and Zurich is not) the university is not a target. Finishing first in your year and being a genius will give you the opportunity to interview with top places. This has nothing to do with ETH being a target

Backtest Insight: Why my ATR-trail bot performed best in Chopp markets (and the Re-entry debate) I’ve been running extensive backtests on a crypto bot (BTC, ETH, SOL, AVAX, XRP) using a 2h ATR trailing stop (2.5x multiplier) that activates after +6% profit. I wanted to share some counter-intuitive findings from the last 90 days (July–Oct 2026) and get your thoughts on two specific areas The Chop Paradox I ran a market regime test classifying days into Bull, Bear, and Chop (using BTC EMA50/200 and ADX). Surprisingly, the Chop regime generated the highest net profit (+$24k) compared to Bull (+$7k) or Bear ($0). My hypothesis is that in strong Bull trends, the 2.5x ATR trail is too tight and gets shaken out before the real run, whereas in Choppy markets, the bot effectively scalps the volatility by buying dips and selling on small bounces via the trail. Has anyone else found their trend-following bots actually perform better in sideways volatility than in clean trends? Re-entry after Trail-out: Worth the fees? I compared two exit/re-entry styles over the same period Single Ride: Hold until trail hits, wait for a new dip signal Aggressive Re-entry: Sell on trail, then buy back if price dips 1 ATR + RSI < 40 The Re-entry strategy won significantly (+$24.2k vs +$19.5k) even after fees However, this was during a period with no major crashes. My concern is whipsaw risk. If the market turns choppy/bearish, does the re-entry logic just bleed capital through fees? Question for the group For those trading similar ATR-based trails Do you use a minimum time gap or price gap (e.g., must drop 2.5% from sell price) before allowing a re-entry to avoid whipsaws? Or do you prefer a Half-Sell approach (sell 50% on trail, let the rest run with a wider daily ATR stop) to stay exposed without paying double fees? Curious to hear how you handle the trade-off between capturing the full trend and securing profits in volatile/choppy conditions

So I have got a cbBTC/ETH pair on pancake swap which earns cake rewards aswell but the TVL is just 5.4M whereas in uniswap v3 the TVL is around 19M. Considering the same range, which one do you think would earn more fees considering uniswap does not earn cake rewards?

i think the premise is half right but the “AI can’t pass KYC” part is a bit off agents don’t really need their own bank account. in practice there’s always a human or a company behind them that’s legally responsible, and that entity already has a stripe account. and the card networks and stripe are clearly not sitting still on this, they’ve all been pushing agent payment stuff (visa, mastercard, stripe with openai etc). so for “agent buys something from a normal business” the boring tradfi rails will probably win for a long time where crypto actually has an edge imo: * **micropayments.** paying $0.002 per API call or per scraped page doesn’t work with card fees. stablecoins on cheap L2s or solana do. coinbase’s x402 thing (payment over HTTP basically) is the most interesting attempt i’ve seen at this * **agent to agent with no business in the middle.** if two agents settle between themselves 24/7 programmatically, a wallet is just way simpler than any bank API * **cross-border.** same reason stablecoins are already growing for B2B payments but notice that it’s mostly stablecoins, not ETH or SOL as currency. nobody wants their agent’s budget swinging 10% in a day. so the question is more “which chains host the stablecoin volume” than “which token goes up”. LINK is a different category anyway, that’s oracles/data, not a payment rail the part people underestimate is compliance. at my company (VestaScan, we do RWA tokenization) we’ve spent more time on KYC flows and who’s liable for what than on the smart contracts themselves. regulators won’t let anonymous agents move real money at scale, so whatever wins will probably have identity baked in somewhere, likely tied to the human or company behind the agent timeline wise i’d say micropayment use cases are real now but small, and big volume is still a few years out. curious if anyone here is actually running agents that pay for stuff on-chain today

$5 won't do anything or won't have an effect for whatever you do - sorry to say it bluntly. Would suggest don't fall for the internet stories of getting rich with memecoins, etc. 0.001% actually make money and the rest are just exit liquidity. Gather more - like \~$50 of more and push towards investments - BTC, ETH to stay on the safer side and always keep reserve USDT to buy dips.

Having USDC but needing ETH just to send it is frustrating

It has no implications on bitcoin because ETH is not used for it. But it does show that mathematics is being chalenged by AI, so we can expect more.

I won't apply to ETH Zurich since I will be rejected based on GPA :(