Create Account
Log In
Dark
chart
exchange
Premium
Terminal
Screener
Stocks
Crypto
Forex
Trends
Depth
Close
Check out our Level2View

CROUSDT
Crypto.com Coin / Tether USD
crypto Composite

Real-time
May 23, 2026 2:23:03 AM EDT
0.06805USDT-1.719%(-0.00119)19,595,044CRO1,343,273USDT
0.06804Bid   0.06805Ask   0.00001Spread
OverviewHistoricalDepthTrendsNewsTrends
Composite
0.06805
OKX
0.06805
Coinbase
0.06810
HitBTC
0.00000
CRO Reddit Mentions
Subreddits
Limit Labels     

We have sentiment values and mention counts going back to 2017. The complete data set is available via the API.
Take me to the API
CRO Specific Mentions
As of May 23, 2026 2:22:34 AM EDT (<1 min. ago)
Includes all comments and posts. Mentions per user per ticker capped at one per hour.
7 hr ago • u/CptCrunchHiker • r/ethereum • daily_general_discussion_may_22_2026 • C
Zach Rynes from Chainlink, a former “ETH maxi,” said in a recent interview:
*"The ultrasound money story was perfect - adoption directly tied to deflationary supply. Then revenue fell 99.9% because they gave MEV and congestion fees to L2s."*
Tweet: [https://xcancel.com/therollupco/status/2057913135302840449](https://xcancel.com/therollupco/status/2057913135302840449)
He may be right about the 99.9% revenue drop - but I think he's missing a crucial point: **this decline in revenue was inevitable in the midterm, regardless of the L2 strategy.**
Without L2s, the following would likely have played out instead:
* Companies like Coinbase would have simply built their own L1s (e.g., BNB, CRO), completely internalizing the revenue and further fragmenting the ecosystem - with Ethereum seeing none of that upside.
* Transaction fees were always going to fall dramatically in the mid-to-long term - this is essentially an iron law across all blockchains, because ultra-cheap transactions are a prerequisite for many real-world use cases to become economically viable
My point is: **the revenue compression Zach describes was inevitable.** And if Ethereum's economic zone - built around tightly integrated and interoperable L2s - actually works, it's a far better outcome than every major company spinning up their own isolated L1.
The real question (and my main concern) is this: Will Base and other major L2s remain committed to Ethereum long-term? And will transaction volume grow enough to offset the lower per-transaction revenue? This isn’t Ethereum’s only challenge, but it’s a critical one - and when it comes to revenue from transactions (which ultimately need to be very cheap), **every blockchain faces t**his structural constraint.
sentiment 0.73
13 hr ago • u/MadSL1m • r/defi • crypto_debit_cards_and_credit_cards_are • C
Lots of variables. Framework I'd use:
\*\*Custody first.\*\* Custodial cards (Crypto.com, Bybit, Coinbase, RedotPay, Binance) mean the crypto behind your card sits at the CEX. They can freeze it or get hacked. Easy onboarding, usually $0 issuance. Self-custody (Gnosis Pay, Ether.fi Cash, Solflare) debits straight from your wallet. No CEX in the middle, more friction setting up.
\*\*"Credit" is mostly marketing.\*\* Most cards labeled "credit" are prepaid or charge-card hybrids that auto-settle. Only Coinbase Credit Card and Gemini Credit Card report to US bureaus afaik.
\*\*No-KYC\*\* = anonymous prepaid with tiny caps (€150-€2,500). Real spending limits always need KYC somewhere.
\*\*Fees that bite:\*\*
\- FX spread quietly eats cashback. Gnosis Pay sDAI route is 0%. Cryptocom non-base currency is 2-4%.
\- Tier-lock. Cryptocom Visa wants $4K+ CRO staked 180 days for 3% cashback. CRO down \~95% from ATH, real principal risk.
\- Top-up fees and ATM allowances vary wildly.
If you're yield-focused specifically: self-custody with productive collateral is the structurally different design. Etherfi Cash spends against weETH staking yield. Gnosis Pay's sDAI auto-swap settles in a yield-bearing position by default.
Region kills a lot of options before you start.
Full disclosure: I built [sweepbase.net](http://sweepbase.net) which tracks 141 of these with fees/regions side by side. Drop your region + monthly spend and I'll narrow it down.
sentiment 0.19
13 hr ago • u/breakarule_ • r/cro • for_the_people_complaining_about_the_unburn • C
ya ya and do let me know how has CRO performed stbau
sentiment 0.00
14 hr ago • u/aharfo56 • r/cro • new_cronos_website_is_live • C
“Honorary PhD” in the hard sciences does not exist. I’ve read and lived through enough of CDC’s press releases, commercials, and hopium while understanding the math behind it to know better.
There was indeed a time CDC and CRO could well have been a sort of utility/stable coin of sorts and it had possibilities. It was a wasted opportunity in favor of greed and fanfare.
Instead they chose to be untrustworthy and yes, the massive unburning against the wishes of all voting groups besides management did it for me. Now add Trump Media Group, combined with what I saw in my account after more than half a decade, and yeah….
It’s not what you would call an uniformed, ignorant, new to crypto person.
sentiment 0.66
15 hr ago • u/aharfo56 • r/cro • new_cronos_website_is_live • C
Over six years I now have over 300% of the original CRO I started with from re-staking every time from 5-20%.
I have three times the CRO and it was $30 less than the original amount.
sentiment 0.52
16 hr ago • u/AkoSiDagS002 • r/defi • crypto_debit_cards_and_credit_cards_are • C
been using my crypto.com debit card and earned decent $CRO cashback which I play around on defi as its free but always have the option to put it back again to the card. Recently, they just announced that their new Credit card can earn you $BTC cashback!
sentiment 0.76
21 hr ago • u/Obtusk22 • r/CryptoMarkets • what_is_the_bitmart_card_and_is_it_worth_using_in • C
both of them, yeah. BitMart took me like 2 weeks to fully set up, apple pay was the worst part, kept failing tokenization for whatever reason. eventually worked.
FX at checkout is fine on paper but i ran it next to my regular bank card on the same purchase once and the gap wasn't zero.
bybit one was less of a headache here, separate EU entity so onboarding was actually fast for once. holding USDT specifically, it just spends without converting, which is the bit that matters because you're not getting some surprise rate. crypto. com i'd skip honestly. the CRO cashback thing has been bleeding for years and you only find out after you lock in.
oh and don't trust the "works across EU" line on any of these without testing in YOUR country. mine took two tries to activate properly.
sentiment -0.42
22 hr ago • u/Mark3Apple • r/Crypto_com • over_99_billion_of_the_100_billion_coins_to_be • C
OK when CRO = 10$ ?
sentiment 0.45
1 day ago • u/aharfo56 • r/cro • new_cronos_website_is_live • C
I’ve been touching grass for 6 years now and understand the math and their repeated behavior. Touching grass meant stop staking for 300% or more inflated coin amounts but drops in value. Then, buying bitcoin and sure I left 5% of CRO unstaked to sell if there’s a pump and dump to at least have some profits but I am skeptical.
sentiment 0.30
7 hr ago • u/CptCrunchHiker • r/ethereum • daily_general_discussion_may_22_2026 • C
Zach Rynes from Chainlink, a former “ETH maxi,” said in a recent interview:
*"The ultrasound money story was perfect - adoption directly tied to deflationary supply. Then revenue fell 99.9% because they gave MEV and congestion fees to L2s."*
Tweet: [https://xcancel.com/therollupco/status/2057913135302840449](https://xcancel.com/therollupco/status/2057913135302840449)
He may be right about the 99.9% revenue drop - but I think he's missing a crucial point: **this decline in revenue was inevitable in the midterm, regardless of the L2 strategy.**
Without L2s, the following would likely have played out instead:
* Companies like Coinbase would have simply built their own L1s (e.g., BNB, CRO), completely internalizing the revenue and further fragmenting the ecosystem - with Ethereum seeing none of that upside.
* Transaction fees were always going to fall dramatically in the mid-to-long term - this is essentially an iron law across all blockchains, because ultra-cheap transactions are a prerequisite for many real-world use cases to become economically viable
My point is: **the revenue compression Zach describes was inevitable.** And if Ethereum's economic zone - built around tightly integrated and interoperable L2s - actually works, it's a far better outcome than every major company spinning up their own isolated L1.
The real question (and my main concern) is this: Will Base and other major L2s remain committed to Ethereum long-term? And will transaction volume grow enough to offset the lower per-transaction revenue? This isn’t Ethereum’s only challenge, but it’s a critical one - and when it comes to revenue from transactions (which ultimately need to be very cheap), **every blockchain faces t**his structural constraint.
sentiment 0.73
13 hr ago • u/MadSL1m • r/defi • crypto_debit_cards_and_credit_cards_are • C
Lots of variables. Framework I'd use:
\*\*Custody first.\*\* Custodial cards (Crypto.com, Bybit, Coinbase, RedotPay, Binance) mean the crypto behind your card sits at the CEX. They can freeze it or get hacked. Easy onboarding, usually $0 issuance. Self-custody (Gnosis Pay, Ether.fi Cash, Solflare) debits straight from your wallet. No CEX in the middle, more friction setting up.
\*\*"Credit" is mostly marketing.\*\* Most cards labeled "credit" are prepaid or charge-card hybrids that auto-settle. Only Coinbase Credit Card and Gemini Credit Card report to US bureaus afaik.
\*\*No-KYC\*\* = anonymous prepaid with tiny caps (€150-€2,500). Real spending limits always need KYC somewhere.
\*\*Fees that bite:\*\*
\- FX spread quietly eats cashback. Gnosis Pay sDAI route is 0%. Cryptocom non-base currency is 2-4%.
\- Tier-lock. Cryptocom Visa wants $4K+ CRO staked 180 days for 3% cashback. CRO down \~95% from ATH, real principal risk.
\- Top-up fees and ATM allowances vary wildly.
If you're yield-focused specifically: self-custody with productive collateral is the structurally different design. Etherfi Cash spends against weETH staking yield. Gnosis Pay's sDAI auto-swap settles in a yield-bearing position by default.
Region kills a lot of options before you start.
Full disclosure: I built [sweepbase.net](http://sweepbase.net) which tracks 141 of these with fees/regions side by side. Drop your region + monthly spend and I'll narrow it down.
sentiment 0.19
13 hr ago • u/breakarule_ • r/cro • for_the_people_complaining_about_the_unburn • C
ya ya and do let me know how has CRO performed stbau
sentiment 0.00
14 hr ago • u/aharfo56 • r/cro • new_cronos_website_is_live • C
“Honorary PhD” in the hard sciences does not exist. I’ve read and lived through enough of CDC’s press releases, commercials, and hopium while understanding the math behind it to know better.
There was indeed a time CDC and CRO could well have been a sort of utility/stable coin of sorts and it had possibilities. It was a wasted opportunity in favor of greed and fanfare.
Instead they chose to be untrustworthy and yes, the massive unburning against the wishes of all voting groups besides management did it for me. Now add Trump Media Group, combined with what I saw in my account after more than half a decade, and yeah….
It’s not what you would call an uniformed, ignorant, new to crypto person.
sentiment 0.66
15 hr ago • u/aharfo56 • r/cro • new_cronos_website_is_live • C
Over six years I now have over 300% of the original CRO I started with from re-staking every time from 5-20%.
I have three times the CRO and it was $30 less than the original amount.
sentiment 0.52
16 hr ago • u/AkoSiDagS002 • r/defi • crypto_debit_cards_and_credit_cards_are • C
been using my crypto.com debit card and earned decent $CRO cashback which I play around on defi as its free but always have the option to put it back again to the card. Recently, they just announced that their new Credit card can earn you $BTC cashback!
sentiment 0.76
21 hr ago • u/Obtusk22 • r/CryptoMarkets • what_is_the_bitmart_card_and_is_it_worth_using_in • C
both of them, yeah. BitMart took me like 2 weeks to fully set up, apple pay was the worst part, kept failing tokenization for whatever reason. eventually worked.
FX at checkout is fine on paper but i ran it next to my regular bank card on the same purchase once and the gap wasn't zero.
bybit one was less of a headache here, separate EU entity so onboarding was actually fast for once. holding USDT specifically, it just spends without converting, which is the bit that matters because you're not getting some surprise rate. crypto. com i'd skip honestly. the CRO cashback thing has been bleeding for years and you only find out after you lock in.
oh and don't trust the "works across EU" line on any of these without testing in YOUR country. mine took two tries to activate properly.
sentiment -0.42
22 hr ago • u/Mark3Apple • r/Crypto_com • over_99_billion_of_the_100_billion_coins_to_be • C
OK when CRO = 10$ ?
sentiment 0.45
1 day ago • u/aharfo56 • r/cro • new_cronos_website_is_live • C
I’ve been touching grass for 6 years now and understand the math and their repeated behavior. Touching grass meant stop staking for 300% or more inflated coin amounts but drops in value. Then, buying bitcoin and sure I left 5% of CRO unstaked to sell if there’s a pump and dump to at least have some profits but I am skeptical.
sentiment 0.30
1 day ago • u/alemorg • r/smallstreetbets • ionq_is_paying_its_own_customers_to_buy_its • Epic DD Analysis • B
**May 21, 2026**
*Disclaimer: This is an analysis of public records. I am not a financial advisor and this is not investment advice. I could be wrong about any of this. Verify the sources yourself before making any decisions. I have no position in IonQ.*
**TLDR/Summary**
What does IonQ actually sell? Its FY2025 filings show a business built on self-funded deals, acquired revenue, and a quantum computer that hasn't delivered a logical qubit. Here is what public records show:
**Self-funded sale:** IonQ's headline "$22M commercial quantum computer sale" to EPB Chattanooga was 68% funded by IonQ itself ($15M of the $22M), per the Chattanooga Times Free Press. EPB is not mentioned anywhere in the FY2025 10-K. Under ASC 606, IonQ's stated accounting policy, payments to a customer require judgment about whether they reduce revenue.
**Acquired revenue:** 39% of IonQ's FY2025 revenue came from four acquired companies. Three are not quantum computing businesses (satellite imaging, cryptography, atomic clocks). The auditor, Ernst & Young, excluded all four from the internal control audit.
**$1.59B for nothing:** Oxford Ionics, the one actual quantum acquisition, was bought for $1.59 billion. Its revenue was "not material." 79% of the purchase price was goodwill. IonQ then claimed credit for Oxford Ionics' DARPA Stage B advancement as if its own systems advanced.
**Customer concentration:** 53% of revenue from three customers. In FY2024, two customers were 77%. After acquiring four companies and reporting 202% growth, concentration barely moved.
**Insider timing:** Form 4 filings show Executive Chair Peter Chapman sold $37.4M with no 10b5-1 plan the day after IonQ terminated its ATM program, and four days before the continuing resolution eliminated the earmark funding that was 86% of 2022-2024 revenue. CEO de Masi adopted a 10b5-1 plan the day in between, later selling $105.9M.
**Zero logical qubits:** Competitor Quantinuum, on the same trapped-ion technology, has 48-94 logical qubits and is approximately 1,000,000 times ahead on the industry-standard Quantum Volume benchmark. IonQ has zero.
If one "commercial sale" was 68% self-financed, how many others were? IonQ doesn't name its customers or disclose payments to them by contract. You cannot tell from public filings.
Infographic links:
EPB self-financing diagram + key numbers (39% acquired, 79% goodwill, 53% concentration, zero logical qubits):
https://files.catbox.moe/3wf018.png
Insider timeline (March 10-15, 2025 — Chapman $37.4M, de Masi 10b5-1, funding cut):
https://files.catbox.moe/qqocwk.png
(End of Summary)
**1. The $22 Million "Sale" Where IonQ Paid The Customer**
In April 2025, IonQ announced EPB Chattanooga purchased a quantum computer for $22 million. CEO Niccolo de Masi cited it on earnings calls as commercial demand.
The Chattanooga Times Free Press reported what the press release did not: IonQ supplied $15 million of the $22 million. The seller funded 68% of its own customer's purchase.
Under ASC 606, IonQ's stated accounting policy, money paid to a customer reduces revenue unless the customer provides a "distinct good or service." IonQ does not disclose what it received from a Tennessee municipal utility. EPB is not mentioned in the FY2025 10-K.
**2. The Revenue They Bought, Not Earned**
IonQ reported $130.0M FY2025 revenue, up 202%. Ernst & Young's audit opinion excluded four acquired businesses from internal control testing. Those four produced 39% of total revenue. Three are not quantum computing companies: Capella Space (satellite imaging), id Quantique (cryptography), Vector Atomic (atomic clocks).
The fourth, Oxford Ionics, cost $1.59 billion. Purchase price: 79% goodwill, negative net tangible assets. Revenue: not material. IonQ then claimed credit for Oxford Ionics' DARPA Stage B advancement. IonQ's own trapped-ion systems were never evaluated.
Three customers were 53% of FY2025 revenue. In FY2024, two customers were 77%. After four acquisitions and 202% growth, concentration barely moved.
**3. The Insider Timeline**
**March 10, 2025:** IonQ terminates its ATM stock program.
**March 11, 2025 (next trading day):** Executive Chair Peter Chapman sells $37.4M. No 10b5-1 plan. CRO and CFO sell. All discretionary.
**March 12, 2025:** CEO de Masi adopts a 10b5-1 plan. Director Scannell buys $2M in stock.
**March 15, 2025:** Continuing resolution eliminates the earmark funding behind 86% of IonQ's 2022-2024 revenue.
**June-September 2025:** De Masi sells $105.9M under the March 12 plan.
Chapman sold four days before the revenue pipeline was eliminated. De Masi set up his plan the day in between.
**4. Zero Logical Qubits**
IonQ and Quantinuum use the same trapped-ion technology. Quantinuum: 48-94 logical qubits, Quantum Volume 2\^25. IonQ: zero logical qubits. Does not report Quantum Volume. Uses a proprietary metric no one else uses. On the standard benchmark, Quantinuum is roughly 1,000,000 times ahead. Same ions.
IonQ's roadmap depends on photonic interconnects. No research group globally has demonstrated the required fidelity. Best published result: 95.9% (Chinese group, not IonQ). Threshold: above 99%. IonQ's April 2026 architecture paper is a blueprint. No experimental results.
**What To Watch**
Q2 2026 earnings (August): customer concentration, payments to customers.
FY2026 10-K: will EY audit the acquired businesses now that they've been owned a full year?
Clark Street LDA filings (lda.senate.gov): if Clark Street drops IonQ, the earmark pipeline is dead.
**Sources:**
IONQ FY2025 10-K (SEC EDGAR): [https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001824920&type=10-K](https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001824920&type=10-K)
Q1 2026 10-Q: [https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001824920&type=10-Q](https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001824920&type=10-Q)
SEC Form 4 filings: [https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001824920&type=4](https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001824920&type=4)
Chattanooga Times Free Press (April 25, 2025): [https://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2025/apr/25/epb-in-chattanooga-to-buy-quantum-computer/](https://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2025/apr/25/epb-in-chattanooga-to-buy-quantum-computer/)
Senate LDA database: [https://lda.senate.gov/](https://lda.senate.gov/)
Quantinuum (arXiv:2602.22211): [https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.22211](https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.22211)
Cui et al. (arXiv:2510.20392): [https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20392](https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20392)
IonQ "Walking Cat" (arXiv:2604.19481): [https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19481](https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19481)
sentiment -0.47
1 day ago • u/BlazingPalm • r/cro • new_cronos_website_is_live • C
So there’s going to be at least 4 CRO/CDC apps now? What a joke. Strong Trump casino vibes and I hate to break it to y’all…
sentiment 0.20


Share
About
Pricing
Policies
Markets
API
Info
tz UTC-4
Connect with us
ChartExchange Email
ChartExchange on Discord
ChartExchange on X
ChartExchange on Reddit
ChartExchange on GitHub
ChartExchange on YouTube
© 2020 - 2026 ChartExchange LLC