Create Account
Log In
Dark
chart
exchange
Premium
Terminal
Screener
Stocks
Crypto
Forex
Trends
Depth
Close
Check out our Level2View

BTCUSDT20240724P68500
Bitcoin / Tether USD Jul 24 2024 68500.00 Put
crypto

Inactive
Jul 22, 2024 8:00:00 PM EDT
1390.00USDT0.000%(0.00)00
OverviewHistoricalDepthTrends
BTC Reddit Mentions
Subreddits
Limit Labels     

We have sentiment values and mention counts going back to 2017. The complete data set is available via the API.
Take me to the API
BTC Specific Mentions
As of Nov 29, 2025 5:59:22 AM EST (<1 min. ago)
Includes all comments and posts. Mentions per user per ticker capped at one per hour.
4 min ago • u/Numerous_Ruin_4947 • r/CryptoCurrency • daily_crypto_discussion_november_29_2025_gmt0 • C
You're forgetting that the dollar is losing value fast. Every few months my bills go up. So why should BTC, ETH, etc. go down when even fast food fries go up?! The fundamentals have not changed one bit. Shady KOLs want to will a bear market into existence because they have all sold most of their bags. The market does not have to do what they wish for.
sentiment 0.21
6 min ago • u/Anxious-Jaguar-7739 • r/Bitcoin • according_to_this_pattern_2062_btc_will_be • C
I think the BTC will be 100+~300M USD in 2045
So... It's will be 10B~30B USD in 2062😅
sentiment 0.36
7 min ago • u/Live-Distribution995 • r/Bitcoin • question_aboutfor_long_term_holders • C
To avoid taxes, can't you go and exchange your BTC in Dubai or some other country where taxes aren't exorbitant?
sentiment -0.30
11 min ago • u/OrangeIndependent658 • r/Bitcoin • cold_wallet • C
I think there's no good answer to that. It depends on your threat model and what do you want to do with your bitcoin.
As a rule of thumb - cost of setup and maintenance of cold wallet shall not be higher than expected profit on your crypto.
Taking into consideration that you're asking on reddit, I assume we're talking about small amounts (like 1 BTC or so) - in that case you may consider something simple like cold card, or even hot wallet like Trezor and move any amount you don't plan to sell in near future.
sentiment 0.64
12 min ago • u/Oikrenlpm • r/Bitcoin • humble_request_help_a_person_with_disability • B
Hello kind community,
I am reaching out with a humble request. Due to my disability, I am struggling to gather enough funds to build a safe home for myself. Every small donation in cryptocurrency could make a real difference in my life.
If you feel moved to help, my wallet address is:
Bitcoin (BTC) only – Native SegWit address
bc1qet5fdhjklfy0tueg5a397paz5z57wt7cw32tet
If you want to contact me or have any questions, please reply here or send a private message through this platform.
Even the tiniest contribution would mean the world to me. Thank you from the bottom of my heart for reading this and for any support you can offer. 🙏
r/cryptobeg r/help
sentiment 0.96
13 min ago • u/Relevant-Team-7429 • r/wallstreetbets • they_told_me_to_sell • C
Mostly cash for now and BTC@90k
sentiment 0.00
14 min ago • u/xesionprince • r/Bitcoin • i_live_off_credit_cards_to_buy_btc • C
I’d be careful what you say on the web! The HMRC and no doubt the IRS are going all out next year to target BTC users like us!
sentiment 0.70
20 min ago • u/Cptn_BenjaminWillard • r/CryptoCurrency • ama_eth_strategy_wartime_ethereum • C
I agree with you 50% on the first. Yes, institutions can behave like retail, but less so.
Perhaps 50% on the second also. I would only say "impact" rather than "significant impact." But yes, I do agree that money will almost certainly flow from BTC to ETH, simply because of the potential for use in DeFi, etc.
sentiment 0.93
22 min ago • u/CryptoBombastic • r/Vechain • getting_scammed_for_100_bitcoin_led_sunny_lu_to • C
I think any tech savy person who gets introduced into crypto gets that "spark" and never lets go. Actually interested to know about you people, how did you guys got introduced? I mean I knew about it for a while, but what really did it for me was actually a colleauge
(who I didn't like) and was bragging about buying BTC. Looked into BTC and quickly realised there was a lot going on with this scene. Different projects with different applications. Got sucked into the rabit hole and never got out :D.
Yeah.. I only got scammed later though, with NANO (Firano), Cryptopia exchange, XMR markets pffff I definatly had my share.
sentiment 0.06
27 min ago • u/trustmedude913 • r/btc • when_do_you_take_profits • C
Why would you consider this as spam? It's a genuine question and exchange. If you don't like prattling about BTC, perhaps don't leave any odd comments in the first place
sentiment -0.36
38 min ago • u/TobeRez • r/Bitcoin • according_to_this_pattern_bitcoin_will_reach_10b • C
I started investing in BTC 25 years ago and this is the most accurate chart pattern I have seen so far. 100% legit.
sentiment 0.00
43 min ago • u/ImNitefall • r/Bitcoin • not_a_loss_if_you_dont_sell • C
I added a bit at 83k myself. These volatility phases after breaking ATHs are pretty normal - we saw similar patterns in past cycles. The market never moves in a straight line!
I think your mindset is spot on - focusing on fundamentals rather than short-term price action. Nobody can time the bottom perfectly, but DCA during these dips has worked well for me over the years. What's your time horizon for your BTC holdings?
sentiment 0.72
53 min ago • u/Just_Stirps_Opinions • r/btc • bitcoin_moat • C
Yes, BTC moat is the vast majority of people these days are idiots and idiots do dumb stuff like over value monopoly money.
sentiment 0.51
54 min ago • u/pyalot • r/btc • hopefully_the_last_flush_of_leveraged_longs • C
Low effort spam to keep prattling on about BTC. Moderation please?
sentiment -0.32
55 min ago • u/yldf • r/Bitcoin • i_have_never_met_anyone_who_actually_understands • C
This can get long very fast, but let’s try to oversimplify:
Let’s look at the opposite of inflation, deflation. Assume money would gain in value, instead of losing value. What would you do? You’ll probably say: save more, spend less. And that is a problem, because when people are unwilling to spend money, demand for products and services goes down. Factories have to cut production, service providers have to reduce their services, ultimately lay off people or cut their wages. More people are unemployed, they spend even less because they no longer had money to spend. This can spiral out of control quickly.
Another issue with deflation is: most people cannot buy a house outright. They have to take a loan. With deflation, their loan becomes more expensive with time, which is bad…
Hitting exactly zero inflation is difficult, but even you could, having inflation has its benefits: people don’t want to just hold on to their money, it would become worth less over time. So they do something else with it. Usually invest or spend. Spending is great, increases demand, more workers are needed, unemployment goes down. Companies want to take loans so they can invest, since the loan depreciates over time. Same goes for homeowners whose loans become cheaper and cheaper (inflation-adjusted) over time.
Since with moderate inflation, people like to spend money, employers need more people. What happens when workers are in high demand? Right, they can choose where they want to work, and employers will be willing pay more to.
The key is: that inflation must be low enough that wages can increase in the same way. If inflation becomes much larger than wage increases, people effectively have less and less money for buying the things they need, and have less to spend on other things (see above).
If you have say 2% inflation and an average of 2% wage increases, that is not only sustainable but also kind of optimal: it encourages people to spend or invest their money, both create jobs and stabilise the economy, and the wages are stable, value-wise. Also, it makes sense for both businesses and homeowners to take loans, because the loan will decrease over time, the money borrowed can be invested (which again, keeps the economy going).
Without inflation, you have stagnation. People just keep their money and don’t do anything with it. You can see it in this sub, so many people advocating for never selling Bitcoin. If Bitcoin would be our main money, that would be a problem.
Inflation becomes problematic if it becomes too big. If inflation becomes greater than wage increases, it just becomes a kind of tax, essentially.
The idea of Bitcoin of not allowing uncontrolled inflation is a good one. But zero inflation is the wrong choice. I would argue that a constant 2% annual increase in supply would have been a better design choice.
This would also solve another issue: the halvings have been significant in the beginning, and no longer are significant for the Bitcoin price (this is natural since the effect gets lower from halving to halving, and it’s not a problem). Yet people still seem to believe halvings are significant because they have been in the past.
In fact, at some point, no new Bitcoin will be issued through mining and mining rewards will all be transaction fees. This is an unnatural transition in the design (albeit smoothed because rewards/supply increases are reduced slowly). Keeping the supply increases constant at a fixed level would have been a cleaner design.
If you look at the current supply increase, btw, which is around 165k BTC per year, at 19.5 million of BTC in circulation, that’s a supply increase of a bit less than 1%. Before the last halving, it was closer to 2%, which is arguably close to ideal. You could argue - but I have no evidence for that - that this contributed to Bitcoin doing so exceptionally well in recent years.
sentiment 0.99
60 min ago • u/Kaewha • r/CryptoCurrency • bitcoins_coinbase_premium_flips_positive_after • C
Coinbase premium turning positive is a solid sentiment indicator! When this metric flips positive, it typically means US institutional investors are buying BTC at higher prices than global averages. This often signals strong buying pressure from bigger players in the market.
After weeks in the red (indicating selling pressure), this flip could suggest institutional confidence is returning. Worth watching if this trend continues beyond a few days before drawing major conclusions though.
sentiment 0.92
60 min ago • u/moneyman567 • r/Bitcoin • according_to_this_pattern_2062_btc_will_be • C
Conversational
I see you're having fun extrapolating numbers into the distant future! 2062 is a looong way off though - I'll be happy if I can just figure out what BTC will do in the next bull run. Have you thought about all the variables that might exist in crypto 38 years from now? Would be crazy to see Bitcoin reach those numbers in our lifetime though.
sentiment 0.79
1 hr ago • u/RealitySucksTheBig1 • r/Bitcoin • is_strongcoin_pulling_a_fast_one_on_their_users • C
I view my naivety and ignorance as a blessing in one fashion or another.  Had I been fully cognizant of what I had when the price was amidst soaring its way to top, my impatience and cluelessness would have driven me to sell it for less than half of what I can get now... Had I been smart and lucky enough to sell it at its zenith, that would have been $12000 which is a shit ton of money to a poverty-stricken dolt such as myself.  And if there was a way to access/reobtain my .1 BTC, $8k, or whatever 10% of what it's going for now is, would go a long way in my life the way the bills are piling up and with Christmas fast approaching.  I should sue those slimeball sleazeball fu*ks at StrongCoin!
sentiment -0.11
1 hr ago • u/pyalot • r/btc • history_shows_cooling_inflation_changes_how • C
All of this is completely irrelevant, because BTC price is a mirage created by endless free USDT and the NgU cult. It‘s **manufactured** to look a certain way to you in the charts, because that‘s how they‘d like you to view it. Because they know you‘re not smart enough work out that BTC is a dead cripplecoin walking.
Bitcoin is not about endless price circle jerks. It‘s about this:
> **Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System**
>
> A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online
payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a
financial institution. Digital signatures provide part of the solution, but the main
benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required to prevent double-spending.
>
> What is needed is an electronic payment system based on cryptographic proof instead of trust,
allowing any two willing parties to transact directly with each other without the need for a trusted
third party.
— [Satoshis Bitcoin Whitepaper, October 31, 2008](https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf)
Wake up.
sentiment 0.98
1 hr ago • u/metalzip • r/Bitcoin • according_to_this_pattern_2062_btc_will_be • T
According to this pattern 2062 BTC will be extremely bullish and reach 1000+ billion USD (→∞ / 21M)
sentiment 0.39


Share
About
Pricing
Policies
Markets
API
Info
tz UTC-5
Connect with us
ChartExchange Email
ChartExchange on Discord
ChartExchange on X
ChartExchange on Reddit
ChartExchange on GitHub
ChartExchange on YouTube
© 2020 - 2025 ChartExchange LLC