Create Account
Log In
Dark
chart
exchange
Premium
Terminal
Screener
Stocks
Crypto
Forex
Trends
Depth
Close
Check out our Level2View

ARKUSDT
Ark / Tether USD
crypto Composite

Inactive
May 15, 2026 11:35:00 PM EDT
0.1724USDT-3.146%(-0.0056)747,8570
OverviewHistoricalDepthTrendsNewsTrends
Composite
0.00
HitBTC
0.00
ARK Reddit Mentions
Subreddits
Limit Labels     

We have sentiment values and mention counts going back to 2017. The complete data set is available via the API.
Take me to the API
ARK Specific Mentions
As of May 29, 2026 4:03:08 PM EDT (3 minutes ago)
Includes all comments and posts. Mentions per user per ticker capped at one per hour.
1 day ago • u/itriedtoplaynice • r/ETFs • whats_happening_with_dram • C
I know what an ETF is and how it works. The pricing of anything on the market is dictated by those who are buying and selling. There are reasons why vanguard funds do so well compared to say ARK funds.
sentiment 0.41
1 day ago • u/harrison_wintergreen • r/ETFs • mods_can_we_do_something_about_the_dram_spam_on • C
the same thing happens with any trendy hot ETF
a few years ago it was everything ARK and Cathie Wood, along with electric vehicle ETFs.
there was a crypto phase, and a green / renewable energy trend, etc. then it was non-stop Avantis/AVUV/Ben Felix worship.
next year it will be a new trend.
sentiment 0.51
1 day ago • u/Boys4Ever • r/ETFs • dram_is_another_arkk • C
Temporary demand anxiety can end badly. ARK was just the same lucky timing and ended badly.
sentiment -0.68
1 day ago • u/EbolaFred • r/AMD_Stock • cathie_wood_sells_16m_of_surging_semiconductor • C
I wish this wouldn't get posted every time ARK sells. They still hold a MASSIVE amount of AMD across several of their ETFs, close to $1B.
Their strategy is to actively balance, which means they are always pruning the winners and buying others where they perceive value. Selling $16M, and whatever they sold the other week, is peanuts compared to what they still hold in AMD. The decision is based purely on spreadsheet math, and not because they suddenly turned bearish.
Say what you want about their historic returns and the "cult" of Cathie Wood. But a small sale like this is meaningless.
sentiment 0.70
1 day ago • u/TheSixthNonsense • r/AMD_Stock • cathie_wood_sells_16m_of_surging_semiconductor • C
Tons of people here took profit on the way up too. Not sure why this is news worthy when ARK for sure has more strict rebalancing rules as an institution investor.
sentiment 0.75
1 day ago • u/itriedtoplaynice • r/ETFs • whats_happening_with_dram • C
I know what an ETF is and how it works. The pricing of anything on the market is dictated by those who are buying and selling. There are reasons why vanguard funds do so well compared to say ARK funds.
sentiment 0.41
1 day ago • u/harrison_wintergreen • r/ETFs • mods_can_we_do_something_about_the_dram_spam_on • C
the same thing happens with any trendy hot ETF
a few years ago it was everything ARK and Cathie Wood, along with electric vehicle ETFs.
there was a crypto phase, and a green / renewable energy trend, etc. then it was non-stop Avantis/AVUV/Ben Felix worship.
next year it will be a new trend.
sentiment 0.51
1 day ago • u/Boys4Ever • r/ETFs • dram_is_another_arkk • C
Temporary demand anxiety can end badly. ARK was just the same lucky timing and ended badly.
sentiment -0.68
1 day ago • u/EbolaFred • r/AMD_Stock • cathie_wood_sells_16m_of_surging_semiconductor • C
I wish this wouldn't get posted every time ARK sells. They still hold a MASSIVE amount of AMD across several of their ETFs, close to $1B.
Their strategy is to actively balance, which means they are always pruning the winners and buying others where they perceive value. Selling $16M, and whatever they sold the other week, is peanuts compared to what they still hold in AMD. The decision is based purely on spreadsheet math, and not because they suddenly turned bearish.
Say what you want about their historic returns and the "cult" of Cathie Wood. But a small sale like this is meaningless.
sentiment 0.70
1 day ago • u/TheSixthNonsense • r/AMD_Stock • cathie_wood_sells_16m_of_surging_semiconductor • C
Tons of people here took profit on the way up too. Not sure why this is news worthy when ARK for sure has more strict rebalancing rules as an institution investor.
sentiment 0.75
2 days ago • u/Agreeable-Ad5887 • r/ArkInvestorsClub • arkvx_private_company_valuations • C
This one is from Oct 2025.
[https://assets.ark-funds.com/media-12243148-2a3e-4996-9763-260f93905eb9/5fc639dd-19d6-4e60-8793-9606b1fa7855/ARK%20Venture%20Fund%20Schedule%20of%20Investments%2010.31.25.pdf?\_gl=1\*18l3nhm\*\_gcl\_au\*MTA1NDIxNzA0Mi4xNzc5OTI1NzM5\*\_ga\*MTI0MTIzOTk3OC4xNzc5OTI1NzQ3\*\_ga\_2DZXEXTHEJ\*czE3Nzk5MjU3NDckbzEkZzAkdDE3Nzk5MjU3NTAkajU3JGwwJGgw](https://assets.ark-funds.com/media-12243148-2a3e-4996-9763-260f93905eb9/5fc639dd-19d6-4e60-8793-9606b1fa7855/ARK%20Venture%20Fund%20Schedule%20of%20Investments%2010.31.25.pdf?_gl=1*18l3nhm*_gcl_au*MTA1NDIxNzA0Mi4xNzc5OTI1NzM5*_ga*MTI0MTIzOTk3OC4xNzc5OTI1NzQ3*_ga_2DZXEXTHEJ*czE3Nzk5MjU3NDckbzEkZzAkdDE3Nzk5MjU3NTAkajU3JGwwJGgw)
sentiment 0.00
2 days ago • u/Empty_Customer_4367 • r/ArkInvestorsClub • arkvx_private_company_valuations • C
here you go...
[https://assets.ark-funds.com/media-12243148-2a3e-4996-9763-260f93905eb9/bb3445b8-258d-475b-b709-d25b4a89f4c4/ARK%20Venture%20Fund%20Schedule%20Of%20Investments%2004.30.2025.pdf?\_gl=1\*1192xzh\*\_gcl\_au\*MTU5MzA3NjkzOC4xNzc4OTc0OTA4\*\_ga\*OTA1Mjg0MTY5LjE3Nzg5NzQ5MDg.\*\_ga\_2DZXEXTHEJ\*czE3Nzk5MjE5NzYkbzIkZzEkdDE3Nzk5MjE5OTUkajQxJGwwJGgw](https://assets.ark-funds.com/media-12243148-2a3e-4996-9763-260f93905eb9/bb3445b8-258d-475b-b709-d25b4a89f4c4/ARK%20Venture%20Fund%20Schedule%20Of%20Investments%2004.30.2025.pdf?_gl=1*1192xzh*_gcl_au*MTU5MzA3NjkzOC4xNzc4OTc0OTA4*_ga*OTA1Mjg0MTY5LjE3Nzg5NzQ5MDg.*_ga_2DZXEXTHEJ*czE3Nzk5MjE5NzYkbzIkZzEkdDE3Nzk5MjE5OTUkajQxJGwwJGgw)
sentiment 0.00
2 days ago • u/progz • r/WallStreetBetsCrypto • cathie_woods_bitcoin_price_target_at_125m_buy_btc • C
Cathie Wood is a very polarizing investor. Some people think she’s brilliant at spotting disruptive tech early, while others think her macro/economic predictions are often too optimistic and overly aggressive.
Here are some objective stats and context:
Her flagship fund performance (ARKK)
Her main fund, the ARKK had a massive run-up in 2020, gaining roughly 150% in a single year, largely due to big bets on high-growth tech like Tesla, Zoom, Roku, and genomics. But then it crashed hard in 2021–2022 when interest rates rose and speculative tech sold off.
Long-term performance is mixed:
* Since inception (2014), ARKK has at times roughly matched or slightly beaten the S&P 500 on a compounded basis — but with far more volatility and much deeper drawdowns.
* ARKK experienced a drawdown of over 60%–70% from its highs after 2021, which hurt many investors who bought near the top.
* Recently, ARK had a comeback year in 2025, with some ARK funds strongly outperforming due to AI and tech exposure.
Why people say she’s “bad at predicting the economy”
Cathie Wood makes very bold macro predictions, and many have not played out on the timeline she expected:
Examples critics bring up:
* She repeatedly argued inflation would be temporary/deflationary, even when inflation surged in 2021–2022. Critics say she underestimated how persistent inflation would become.
* She made very aggressive price targets on some companies. For example, ARK projected very high long-term prices for Zoom that ended up far above reality after post-pandemic growth slowed.
* She often predicts a major productivity boom from AI, robotics, genomics, and crypto leading to unusually strong GDP growth. Right now, she still argues the economy could grow much faster than mainstream economists expect.
Why some investors still like her
Supporters argue:
* She correctly identified major themes early (especially Tesla and disruptive tech).
* Her investing style is high risk / high reward, so judging it over a 1–2 year period may miss the point.
* She is very transparent — ARK publishes trades daily and shares research publicly.
The main criticism in plain English
A lot of investors would say:
“Cathie is great at identifying exciting future technologies, but not always great at timing the economy or valuing stocks realistically.”
In other words, she tends to be extremely bullish, sometimes too early, and that can lead to big swings.
For someone like you who often compares things to the S&P 500 and likes steady growth (like SWPPX/VOO), Cathie Wood–style investing is generally considered much higher risk and more volatile than broad index investing. One bad year can be brutal, but a great year can massively outperform.
sentiment 0.95
3 days ago • u/Accurate-Flow8078 • r/ETFs • dram_and_nasa • C
Well all those ARK ETFs are diversified too.
sentiment 0.27


Share
About
Pricing
Policies
Markets
API
Info
tz UTC-4
Connect with us
ChartExchange Email
ChartExchange on Discord
ChartExchange on X
ChartExchange on Reddit
ChartExchange on GitHub
ChartExchange on YouTube
© 2020 - 2026 ChartExchange LLC