USDTUSD
Tether USD / United States dollar
crypto Composite

I need to trade USDT on the Solana network a lot, and we buy daily in amounts of 100k and above.I will pay you first with a 100% prepayment after I confirm that you have USDT. 

UEX.com
No MiCA issues because they’re registered in Wyoming and follow U.S. regulatory rules. Still listing USDT.

For example, in earlier days, I used to borrow funds by keeping BTC as collateral and use that capital somewhere else instead of selling and losing exposure. Thus, The BTC stayed in the position, but part of its value became usable again.
Though it was not fully free, but an asset did not have to sit idle just because you wanted to keep holding it.
That idea now extends beyond crypto. I read about the Bitget rTokens, where someone holding rNVDA can keep the stock exposure while using it as collateral inside a unified account to borrow USDT. It is still not free capital. Interest, collateral haircuts, and liquidation risk matter, especially if the borrowed funds are used to increase the same position.
But the concept is practical. Tokenized assets become more useful when they can do more than track a price. The bigger opportunity may be turning assets that usually sit idle into collateral that can support the rest of a portfolio.

U can buy USDT in binance or any other FIU registered platform and transfer it to ur defi wallet like trustpilot or phantom and the transfer it to offshore broker.
I request u to not trade in large amounts

**Source:** [https://x.com/Blockworks/status/2079204785425670413](https://x.com/Blockworks/status/2079204785425670413)
[Solana: Network REV. Source: https:\/\/blockworks.com\/analytics\/solana](https://preview.redd.it/olfxahl9feeh1.png?width=680&format=png&auto=webp&s=fc862260dc0e7ae08a2dea57fdaf58f73d22d846)
# Executive Summary
Q2 2026 delivered the strongest evidence yet that durable, non-speculative demand is building on Solana, and that its king of spot position generalizes beyond any single asset class. Tokenized asset volumes reached a new all-time high of $5.8B, up 114% QoQ, led by tokenized equities at $4.8B, more than four times the Q1 record. June alone accounted for $3.3B of equities volume, and Solana today handles approximately 97% of tokenized-equity trading across all chains. This growth came amid a broader industry slowdown and a continued post-memecoin revenue reset, with REV declining 43% QoQ to $51.0M and application revenue falling 31% to . Even so, Q2 suggested that Solana’s demand base has broadened beyond purely speculative activity.
Institutional demand for SOL held through the quarter despite significant outflows from both BTC and ETH spot ETPs (-$3.7B and -$0.5B, respectively). SOL spot ETPs recorded $120M in net inflows, ahead of Q1's $113M, and staked SOL ended the quarter at a new quarter-end high of 427M (roughly two-thirds of supply). Stablecoin supply stayed relatively flat at $16.3B, and DEX volume, while down 44% QoQ at $160.8B, rebounded 26% month over month in June, suggesting the activity trough may have passed mid-quarter.
At the network level, Solana processed 9.8B non-vote transactions, its second-highest quarterly count after Q1's record, while median fees averaged $0.0004 and remained stable throughout Q2. The forward story now centers on Alpenglow, Solana's largest protocol upgrade to date, bringing 150 milliseconds confirmation times alongside staged slot-time reductions, larger blocks, and a standardized mechanism for sharing block revenue with stakers.
https://preview.redd.it/nqyxwzmbfeeh1.png?width=680&format=png&auto=webp&s=eb48b7d1f36aaf18534440bcc642202bc12671da
# Financials
# Real Economic Value (REV)
Solana's Real Economic Value (REV) totaled $51.0M in Q2 2026, down 43% from Q1's . After stabilizing near $90M for two consecutive quarters, REV took another leg lower as the memecoin-driven activity that powered the 2025 peaks continued to unwind: monthly REV declined from $18.6M in April to $18.1M in May and $14.3M in June. The decline was broad-based across components: priority fees fell 45% QoQ to $30.8M, Jito tips fell 50% to $9.9M, and vote and base fees together contributed $10.3M .
[Solana: Network REV. Source: https:\/\/blockworks.com\/analytics\/solana](https://preview.redd.it/02lj0bgjfeeh1.png?width=680&format=png&auto=webp&s=6d19f0482217f8699eb544a95e27ab3ccdfe5577)
Q2 saw the introduction of SIMD-553, a proposal from Solana research and development firm Temporal that would materially strengthen SOL’s value-accrual framework.
The proposal would reintroduce a meaningful transaction-fee burn by replacing part of Solana’s existing fixed fee with a new resource-based fee that is permanently removed from supply. Unlike the current burn, which has become negligible relative to issuance, the new mechanism would scale with both network usage and capacity.
At current activity levels, SIMD-553 is estimated to burn between 7,500 and 9,000 SOL per day ($600k to $720k at $80 per SOL), roughly ten times the current rate and equivalent to approximately 12% to 15% of daily issuance.
[SIMD 553: Potential Daily SOL Burn. Source: Blockworks Research](https://preview.redd.it/mfdu619lfeeh1.png?width=680&format=png&auto=webp&s=342c17fd2cc50a2464f667068459d6c1d755c198)
For SOL holders, the implication is straightforward: as network usage and demand for blockspace grow, a larger amount of SOL would be removed from circulation. This would give REV a second value-accrual channel, alongside the revenue distributed to validators and stakers, and ensure that increased network activity benefits all token holders rather than block producers alone.
The distribution of REV across network stakeholders remained consistent with recent quarters: roughly 72% accrued to validators, 26% to token holders, and about 2% was captured by Jito.
When looking at revenue by chain, Solana ranked fourth with a 12% share ($51.0M), behind Hyperliquid with 33% share ($141.4M), Tron with 21% ($89.8M), and Ethereum with 15% ($63.3M). Solana’s 12% share of network revenue represents a 33% QoQ decline from 18% in Q1 2026.
# Staker Revenue
SOL's nominal staking yield ended Q2 at approximately 5.5%, down from 5.8% at the end of Q1, as the fixed emission schedule continued to decay: inflation now sits near 3.8%, with the 1.5% terminal rate roughly six years out under the current schedule. Real staking yield (nominal yield less inflation) ended the quarter at approximately 1.7%.
[Solana: Staking Yields. Source: https:\/\/blockworks.com\/analytics\/solana](https://preview.redd.it/mjvot8enfeeh1.png?width=680&format=png&auto=webp&s=40ca048c7737da2597fe5051acfbff939f1b6514)
Solana stakers earned $487M in Q2 2026, down 23% from $630M in Q1. Issuance accounted for over 98% of staker revenue, with Jito tip yield contributing $8.2M .
[Solana: Staker Revenue. Source: https:\/\/blockworks.com\/analytics\/solana](https://preview.redd.it/98hwnpjofeeh1.png?width=680&format=png&auto=webp&s=c4dd216b9f9cee331efaad76f2e4727f9bc37e52)
Q2 saw issuance move to the center of governance discussions. Helius, a Solana infrastructure provider, proposed SIMD-550 during the quarter to target the supply side of staker economics. An updated version of the firm’s November 2025 proposal, SIMD-550 would double Solana’s disinflation rate from 15% to 30% a year, doubling the pace of decay while leaving the terminal rate of 1.5% unchanged. This would halve the time to terminal inflation, from 5.8 years (H1 2032) to 2.9 years (H1 2029), and cut roughly 18.9M SOL of emissions over the period. The trade-off for stakers is a faster decline in nominal yield: assuming a 68% staking rate, nominal staking yields would decline to 4.34%, 3.00%, and 2.25% across the first three years. For token holders, the same math cuts dilution, narrowing the gap between nominal and real yield. SIMD-550 and SIMD-553, introduced earlier, take on two sides of the same problem, the former cutting supply growth and the latter adding usage-linked burn.
[SIMD 550: Doubling SOL's Disinflation Rate. Source: Blockworks Research](https://preview.redd.it/039s0lgqfeeh1.png?width=680&format=png&auto=webp&s=bc18b5a699a8a6c5739564a82efb1950b72c005b)
The staker-economics story remains tied to SIMD-123, which would introduce a standardized in-protocol mechanism for validators to share priority fees with stakers. Eighteen months after SIMD-96 redirected 100% of priority fees to block producers, that distribution mechanism has still not activated on mainnet, though it is now expected alongside Alpenglow. With priority fees at 60% of REV, in-protocol fee sharing is the single largest pending improvement to staker value accrual. Currently, many large stakers, including Helius and Jupiter, share priority fees with stakers through third-party mechanisms. However, these arrangements are validator-specific and harder to track than in-protocol revenue sharing, resulting in most staking revenue analysis omitting priority fees from staker revenue entirely.
# Applications Revenue
Application revenue serves as an indicator of success for businesses within an ecosystem. While REV is an important metric to track, the true metric of an ecosystem’s product market fit is the revenue generated by user-focused applications.
Solana applications generated $228.4M in revenue in Q2 2026, down 31% from Q1's $329.3M and the lowest quarterly total since Q1 2024. The decline tracked the broader cooldown in retail trading activity rather than share loss to other chains.
[Solana: Application Revenue. Source: https:\/\/blockworks.com\/analytics\/solana](https://preview.redd.it/lyaaw50sfeeh1.png?width=680&format=png&auto=webp&s=2188de340a8f0bcd2451b16d9e3c0cf7b11d4cd5)
The leading apps by revenue in Q2 were Pumpfun ($90.1M, 39%), Collector Crypt ($32.2M, 14%), Pacifica ($20.0M, 9%), Jupiter ($15.3M, 7%), and Phantom ($11.9M, 5%).
# Institutional Flows
Q2 saw institutional adoption of Solana beginning to reach the traditional banking system. Seven of the 29 global systemically important banks (G-SIBs) have live Solana capabilities, led by JP Morgan Chase and Citigroup, the two most systemically important names on the list by capital-surcharge tier. The deployments span the full service stack rather than a single use case: tokenization and delivery-versus-payment settlement at JP Morgan, SOL and SPL custody alongside USDC mint/burn and fund administration at BNY Mellon, custody, spot trading, ETFs, and lending at Morgan Stanley, stablecoin issuance at Société Générale, and a money-market fund at State Street. The breadth of these deployments, covering custody, issuance, settlement, and distribution, is among the clearest external validations of Solana as institutional settlement infrastructure.
[Solana: Institutional Capabilities by G-SIBs. Source: Blockworks Research](https://preview.redd.it/h9iifpstfeeh1.png?width=680&format=png&auto=webp&s=a169431ac2e09f0962564d6ce96d17d22cf71a3d)
# Exchange-Traded Products (ETPs)
Institutional demand decoupled from price for a third consecutive quarter. SOL spot ETPs recorded $120M in net inflows in Q2 2026, ahead of Q1's . Over the same period, BTC spot ETPs saw $3.7B in outflows and ETH ETPs saw $500M in outflows. When looking at all SOL ETPs, the quarterly inflow figure comes in at . While the intra-quarter distribution was uneven, the quarter as a whole extended the pattern of positive net flows through drawdowns that has defined SOL's institutional bid since US spot ETFs began trading in October 2025.
[Solana: ETP Flows. Source: https:\/\/blockworks.com\/analytics\/solana](https://preview.redd.it/mx27vzevfeeh1.png?width=680&format=png&auto=webp&s=ee8b0e43b8efc3924ef62c37396252326f4ceaf5)
Regionally, the US remained the engine with $185M in net inflows across SOL ETPs, offset by $38M of net outflows from Europe with APAC flat, netting to the $148M all-ETP total. Spot ETP AUM ended the quarter at $1.9B, down 5% QoQ, as price depreciation outweighed inflows.
# Digital Asset Treasury Companies (DATCOs)
SOL DATCO holdings were effectively unchanged for a ninth consecutive month, ending Q2 at 16.8M SOL, down 0.9% QoQ, with aggregate NAV of . Holdings trimmed roughly 150K SOL between April and May as limited secondary liquidity and persistent mNAV discounts continued to constrain the vehicle class. DATCOs remain a stable, passive holder base rather than a source of incremental demand.
# Sector Analysis
Solana's Q2 confirmed the thesis that the network's trading infrastructure generalizes beyond any single asset class. As memecoin activity cooled, the same rails (prop AMMs, aggregators, low fees, sub-second confirmation) absorbed tokenized equities at record scale. The 'everything exchange' is no longer a forward-looking claim; it was the network's primary growth engine in Q2.
# Spot Trading
Solana DEX spot volumes totaled $160.8B in Q2 2026, down 44% from Q1's $288.5B . Nonetheless, Solana handled the most spot volume across networks in Q2, representing 32% of volume, ahead of Ethereum (25%), Base (16%), and BNB Chain (12%). This marks the eighth quarter in a row where Solana accounted for over 30% of spot DEX volume.
[Spot DEX Volume by Blockchain. Source: https:\/\/blockworks.com\/analytics\/spot-dex](https://preview.redd.it/soazz9cxfeeh1.png?width=680&format=png&auto=webp&s=fe8fcd9885f1a02536696cca558250c09f914f31)
The monthly path tells a more constructive story than the quarterly total: volumes fell from $52.3B in April to $48.0B in May, then rebounded 26% to $60.5B in June, the strongest month of the quarter, as tokenized-asset activity accelerated sharply.
[Solana: Spot Volume by Pair Category. Source: https:\/\/blockworks.com\/analytics\/solana](https://preview.redd.it/olfgbsuyfeeh1.png?width=680&format=png&auto=webp&s=d266cd5f69b871496a87fa35ea3d07bbfa924ab4)
SOL-stablecoin pairs remained the anchor at roughly 46% of volume, while the fastest growth came from the newest categories: stablecoin swaps climbed from roughly 17% of volume in Q1 to 21% in Q2, foreign tokens nearly doubled their share to 8%, and tokenized assets quadrupled theirs to almost 4%. Memecoins held near 17%, a steady contributor within a market that is trading an increasingly diverse set of assets. Venue structure kept evolving as well: BisonFi led prop AMMs with roughly 17% of Q2 volume, and Pumpfun's integrated AMM continued gaining share, representing 13% of volume in Q2.
[Solana: Spot Volume by Pair Category. Source: https:\/\/blockworks.com\/analytics\/solana](https://preview.redd.it/by8vsuc0geeh1.png?width=680&format=png&auto=webp&s=db0a918d2d330e654f90ec2d2404777bf27caf79)
DEXs on Solana remain a prop AMM story. Prop AMMs are spot exchanges with actively managed liquidity via oracle updates. Each prop AMM is operated by an individual market maker (no external LPs), who uses highly optimized transactions to update the oracle price, enabling quotes to be adjusted multiple times per second. With close to twenty prop AMMs live on Solana, their share of spot DEX volume sat at 53% in Q2 2026, up from 30% in Q2 2025.
[Solana: Spot Volume by Exchange Type. Source: https:\/\/blockworks.com\/analytics\/solana](https://preview.redd.it/6hcvztv1geeh1.png?width=680&format=png&auto=webp&s=92d9ab07b928ac13597c6cf41f106fcaac2b3194)
# Tokenized Assets
Tokenized assets were the standout of Q2 2026, and arguably of Solana's year so far. DEX volume in tokenized assets reached $5.8B, up 114% QoQ and a new all-time high for a sixth consecutive quarter.
[Solana: Tokenized Asset Volume by Category. Source: https:\/\/blockworks.com\/analytics\/solana](https://preview.redd.it/yeot5b73geeh1.png?width=680&format=png&auto=webp&s=3f794190ed9c98fa3f5a92db8470c669e3abfbb4)
The vast majority of this activity came from tokenized equities, which accounted for 84% of volume. Solana now processes approximately 97% of tokenized-equity volume across chains, making this vertical the clearest expression of durable, non-speculative demand on the network.
[Solana: Tokenized Equity Volume Share. Source: https:\/\/blockworks.com\/analytics\/spot-dex](https://preview.redd.it/zlxu6lo4geeh1.png?width=680&format=png&auto=webp&s=1af80c5a29736a206b111d6be680e3ad8d0b142c)
Tokenized equities saw $4.8B in Q2 volume, roughly a fourfold increase from $1.1B in Q1. This growth is even more significant intraquarter, with $670M in April, $871M in May, and $3.3B in June alone.
June's figure marked an all-time high for the category and was catalyzed by the June 12 public listing of SpaceX, the largest IPO in history. Measured across the broader tokenized-asset segment, which includes instruments beyond listed equities, monthly volume reached approximately $3.6B, a 222% increase month-over-month. Tokenized SPCX, issued through Sunrise and distributed via Backpack, accounted for roughly $770M of that total. Issuers have since expanded tokenized-equity coverage to additional names, including Micron, SanDisk, and the Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). Together with SPCX, these four instruments contributed over $1B in June volume.
Prop AMMs began quoting tokenized assets during the quarter and now represent an estimated 50% of tokenized-asset volume. Because these tokenized equities are redeemable one-for-one against the underlying shares, integrating venues may encounter lower operational friction when providing liquidity, which could support tighter arbitrage and greater confidence in quoting. This remains a plausible and currently unconfirmed driver of prop-AMM participation, and it warrants monitoring as coverage broadens.
Beyond equities, tokenized private credit contributed $803M (14% of volume), with commodities at $111M and collectibles, a new category led by Collector Crypt's trading-card market, at $20M .
[Solana: Tokenized Asset Volume \(ex Equities\). Source: https:\/\/blockworks.com\/analytics\/solana](https://preview.redd.it/xl0on666geeh1.png?width=680&format=png&auto=webp&s=45e5e8fc7d89ced319064e71b0c12ae2380aadab)
# Foreign L1 Tokens
Foreign L1 tokens continued to scale as a category, reaching an all-time high 8% of DEX volume in Q2 at $12.2B, with BTC and HYPE contributing over $9B alone. May also marked the first month in which HYPE volumes surpassed ETH volumes on Solana, a signal that listing velocity, not legacy asset hierarchies, is shaping what trades on the network.
[](https://x.com/Blockworks/article/2079204785425670413/media/2078871876307128320)
[Solana: Foreign L1 Spot Volume by Subsector. Source: https:\/\/blockworks.com\/analytics\/solana](https://preview.redd.it/fq0cbwr7geeh1.png?width=680&format=png&auto=webp&s=3e4119e7302da5f4d2597715b6db329f64631d8e)
# Perpetual Futures
Perps remained Solana's most challenging vertical in Q2. Drift's April 1 exploit, a social-engineering attack on its multisig that affected roughly half of the protocol’s TVL, set the tone for the quarter. The recovery response was substantive: Drift announced a relaunch backed by close to $150M in partnership with Tether and others, with a recovery pool and token mechanism directing protocol revenue toward reimbursement and USDT as the new quote asset.
Nonetheless, Solana-based perpetual futures platforms processed roughly $183B in notional volume in Q2 2026, a 60% QoQ increase. GMTrade accounted for 50% of total perps volume in Q2, with Pacifica representing 39% and Jupiter falling to 10% of total volume.
[Solana: Perps Notional Volume. Source: https:\/\/blockworks.com\/analytics\/solana](https://preview.redd.it/uqaeae99geeh1.png?width=680&format=png&auto=webp&s=0e58d24613c31fd32b5d4ee8f788b4c3dbb422b2)
Phoenix, built by Ellipsis Labs, remains the most credible attempt to close the perps gap on Solana in a fully onchain form. Its design addresses toxic flow at the compute layer by allowing market makers to quote much more cheaply than taker orders. While still nascent, Phoenix processed $777M in notional volume in Q2.
The forward-looking development came from Jito: JTX, announced May 5, is a trading frontend for spot and eventually perps built on Phoenix, with 80% of JTX fees directed to JTO value accrual. Between Phoenix's compute-layer approach to toxic flow and JitoBAM's growing share of stake, the infrastructure investments targeting the perps gap are compounding, but closing it remains a 2026 execution story rather than a delivered result.
# Lending
As of Q2 end, total deposits and outstanding loans across Solana’s two largest money markets, Kamino and Jup Lend, stood at $4.1B and $1.6B, respectively. Deposits declined 8.3% QoQ, while outstanding loans fell 7.9%, reflecting continued weak demand for onchain leverage across crypto markets.
[Solana: Lending Deposits and Loans. Source: https:\/\/blockworks.com\/analytics\/solana](https://preview.redd.it/d8eu0htageeh1.png?width=680&format=png&auto=webp&s=8e4196e96b5af0ffbc811a0d509ef3e90a4645cb)
While RWA lending emerged as a key area of growth in Q1 2026, led by Kamino’s Figure PRIME (HELOC lending) and OnRe (reinsurance) markets, they experienced a sharp pullback in Q2. RWA lending deposits on Solana fell from $1.23B in Q1 to $0.64B in Q2, a 48% QoQ pullback.
The structural bright spot within lending was stablecoin-adjacent: Jupiter Lend's mid-May integration of Ethena’s USDe, launched with a vault managed by Bitwise, took USDe on Solana from virtually zero to over $500M in supply within the month. Kamino launched an Ethena market of its own, which has grown to over $500M in deposits and now ranks as the second-largest market on the platform. In a quarter when lending balances declined, yield-bearing stablecoin markets were the clearest source of new capital, drawn onto the network rather than recycled from existing crypto collateral.
# Consumer
Token Launchpads
Launchpad volume totaled $25.8B in Q2 2026, down 33% from Q1's $38.3B, while token creation held up better at 2.6M tokens launched, down 7% QoQ. In Q2 2026, launchpads on Solana generated $63.9M in revenue, down from $95.2M in Q1, with Pumpfun accounting for 97% of the total.
\[IMG\]
>Solana: Launchpad Revenue. Source: [https://blockworks.com/analytics/solana](https://blockworks.com/analytics/solana)

While the category's product-market fit with retail users is not in question, its cyclicality and concentration are. Pumpfun's share of both launchpad revenue and total application revenue reached new highs this quarter precisely because the rest of the market shrank faster.
# Stablecoins
Total stablecoin supply on Solana ended Q2 2026 at $16.3B, up 2% QoQ. Supply has held essentially flat through four consecutive quarters of declining activity. Stablecoin composition kept diversifying, with USDC’s share declining from 55% in Q1 to 47% in Q2, while USDT grew market share slightly from 22% in Q1 to 24% in Q2.
\[IMG\]
>Solana: Stablecoin Total Supply. Source: [https://blockworks.com/analytics/solana](https://blockworks.com/analytics/solana)
Solana stablecoin transfer volume reached $1.5T in Q2 2026, representing a 29% decrease in volume QoQ. Notably, this figure is filtered to exclude flash loan activity and other forms of inorganic volume.
\[IMG\]
>Solana: Stablecoin Transfer Volume. Source: [https://blockworks.com/analytics/solana](https://blockworks.com/analytics/solana)
# Payments
Q2 2026 was a breakout quarter for Solana’s payments vertical, marked by a wave of traditional finance and enterprise adoption. Major banks and fintechs leaned in heavily to Solana with SoFi announcing its “Big Business Banking” product and launching a stablecoin on the chain. SBI-backed B2C2, Singapore Gulf Bank, Shinhan Card, and South Korea’s Toss Bank all moved institutional stablecoin or settlement infrastructure onto Solana.
Payment giants followed suit with Mastercard adding Solana-based stablecoin settlement to its global card network and unveiled a protocol for AI agents to make micropayments. Western Union launched USDPT, a stablecoin on Solana, and Moneygram entered the validator space with their own validator. On the cross-border and payroll front, Deel rolled out stablecoin salary payouts and Y Combinator settled its first fully stablecoin funded round in USDC on Solana.
The quarter’s biggest new frontier was agentic commerce: Google Cloud and the Solana Foundation launched [Pay.sh](https://pay.sh/), a pay-as-you-go stablecoin payment rail for AI agents, and AWS introduced a stablecoin system for monetizing AI traffic. Meta began testing stablecoin payouts for creators, and Open Standard unveiled OUSD, a new stablecoin for the internet economy backed by BlackRock and Google, with Solana as part of its rollout. Lastly, the World Series of Poker added Solana-based payments for tournament buy-ins, highlighting the broad range of use cases that stablecoin rails on Solana can facilitate.
Looking forward, stablecoin transfer volumes on Solana are expected to continue its steady growth, propelled by increased adoption of the network as the backend for payments.
# Network Analysis
# Transaction Count and TPS
Solana processed 9.8B non-vote transactions in Q2 2026, down 3% from Q1's all-time-high 10.1B and the second-highest quarterly count on record. Of the 9.8B transactions, 73% were successful and 27% were reverted. Reverted transactions are most often associated with automated strategies such as arbitrage bots. As such, they are often a feature, rather than a bug, where slippage conditions may have worsened or fallen outside set limits, resulting in reverted transactions.
\[IMG\]
>Solana: Non-Vote Transaction Count. Source: [https://blockworks.com/analytics/solana](https://blockworks.com/analytics/solana)
Non-vote transactions per second (TPS) averaged near 1.25K in Q2. Daily active addresses averaged 2.0M, down from 2.4M in Q1, consistent with the retail cooldown visible in application revenue. The network is processing nearly as many transactions from a smaller, more sophisticated user base.

\[IMG\]
>
Solana: Non-Vote TPS. Source: [https://blockworks.com/analytics/solana](https://blockworks.com/analytics/solana)
# Median Transaction Fees
Median transaction fees averaged $0.0004 in Q2 2026 and never exceeded $0.0005 on any day of the quarter, ensuring stability. Fee stability at this level is not simply a cost advantage; it is the property that makes high-frequency market making, prop AMM quote updates, and consumer applications economically viable on shared infrastructure.
\[IMG\]
>Solana: Median Transaction Fees. Source: [https://blockworks.com/analytics/solana](https://blockworks.com/analytics/solana)
# Validators and Decentralization
Solana's validator count declined this quarter as the Foundation wound down delegation subsidies, but node count is the least informative measure of decentralization. Control of a network is determined by who holds stake, who routes delegation, what software validators run, and where they operate. Measured on those dimensions, Solana is comparable to Ethereum, and on several it is stronger: meaningfully more independent entities would need to coordinate to halt finality than on Ethereum, roughly 80% of SOL is self-directed by holders rather than routed through intermediaries, stake is geographically well distributed, and validators run a genuinely diverse set of clients.
The resilience record supports the same conclusion with Solana having previously absorbed the sudden loss of roughly a fifth of its stake without interruption. Alpenglow will raise the network's tolerance for offline stake to 40%, further hardening consensus against concentration risk.
# Product & Ecosystem Updates
The Q2 roadmap converged on a single destination: Alpenglow. Core development in the quarter was dominated by shipping its prerequisites while the economic layer moved to the center of governance debate.
# Agave v4.0
Agave v4.0, the first major release since v3.1, was recommended for mainnet validators in May with feature activations beginning late in the month. The release carries prerequisites for several Alpenglow features and restructures block replay, cutting replay thread usage per block roughly 3x, from \~130ms to \~50ms.
# P-Tokens (SIMD-266)
The p-token standard went live in mid-May, replacing the SPL Token program with a compute-optimized implementation that delivers roughly 95% reductions in CU consumption for standard transfers, compressing the token program's share of block-wide compute from around 25% toward the low single digits. The rollout also demonstrated the maturing security process: Asymmetric Research disclosed a critical bug in the implementation ahead of mainnet impact, and Anza patched it promptly with dedicated ownership checks.
# Slot-Time Reduction (SIMD-525)
SIMD-525, which formalizes halving slot times from 400ms to 200ms, was merged in late May. The reduction is staged (400ms to 350ms, 300ms, 250ms, then 200ms, with one-epoch delays between increments), and implementation is targeted for Agave v4.2 around August, bundled alongside Alpenglow and rent reduction.
# Alpenglow
Alpenglow, Solana's largest protocol upgrade to date, is targeted for Agave v4.2 around August. The upgrade replaces Tower BFT and Proof of History with a consensus design that brings 150ms confirmation times (roughly a 100x improvement in finality), removes onchain vote transactions (eliminating the dominant recurring validator cost), introduces a 1.6 SOL Validator Admission Ticket per epoch, and raises tolerance for offline stake to 40%. For applications, sub-second finality closes most of the remaining user-experience gap with centralized venues; for validators, removing vote costs restructures the economics of running smaller operations.
# Post-Quantum Preparedness
On April 27, Anza and the Firedancer team each released independent reports on Solana's post-quantum migration paths, prompted by research that materially reduced estimated resources needed to break 256-bit elliptic-curve cryptography. Anza places the probability of a cryptographically relevant quantum computer within five years at 3% to 5%, and both teams have published initial implementations of compact post-quantum signatures.
# Closing Summary & Outlook
Solana's most important Q2 2026 results came against the tape. With asset prices depressed across the board, tokenized-asset volume more than doubled to a record $5.8B, led by tokenized equities up more than fourfold to $4.8B, with June alone contributing . Spot ETPs absorbed $120M in net new capital, ahead of Q1's total despite the drawdown. DEX volumes rebounded 26% in June, driven by tokenized assets rather than memecoins. Demand that grows through a falling market is the durable kind, and Q2 produced more evidence of it than any quarter to date.
The cyclical half of the story continued to reset: REV fell 43%, application revenue fell 31%, and quarterly DEX volumes declined 44% as the memecoin era's excesses continued to drain out of the system. The distinction between the two halves matters for how the next several quarters should be read. Revenue tied to speculative velocity is repricing; demand tied to settlement (stablecoins, tokenized equities, institutional wrappers) is growing through the same conditions, and June's tokenization-led rebound is an early data point that the durable leg can become the growth leg.
The catalyst path forward is unusually concrete and sets the stage for growth to continue. Alpenglow is expected as soon as Q3, bringing 150ms confirmations, the removal of vote costs, and higher offline-stake tolerance, with staged slot-time reductions and larger blocks behind it. SIMD-123 would give stakers an in-protocol claim on the priority fees that now make up 60% of REV, and the burn and issuance proposals under debate would tighten the link between network usage and token-holder value.
**Full report available** [**here**](https://blockworks.com/quarterly-reports) **for download.**
**All data from this report was powered by the Blockworks Solana** [**dashboard**](https://blockworks.com/analytics/solana)**.**

Looking to move my USDT

Quick clarification first — Energy itself isn't an asset you "sell" directly. On Tron, Energy is generated by staked (frozen) TRX and it regenerates over \~24h. So if you're seeing \~200k Energy, it means you have TRX staked that produces it.
What you *can* do is **rent it out** (delegate it) to people who need Energy for TRC-20 transfers. Marketplaces let stakers delegate their idle Energy for 24h/7d periods and collect TRX for it — and importantly, your TRX stays yours, you're only delegating the resource, not handing over funds or keys.
One thing worth checking: what's the "trust account" exactly? If it's your own Trust Wallet where *you* staked the TRX, then yes, that Energy is yours to delegate. If it's held on some custodial service, you may not control the delegation.
For scale: \~200k Energy covers roughly a couple of USDT transfers' worth at a time (a TRC-20 USDT send needs \~65k Energy, more if the recipient has no USDT yet). So it's a modest amount — renting it out earns a bit of TRX, but don't expect much. Happy to point you to how delegation works if you confirm it's your own staked wallet.

Hi everyone,
I’ve been thinking about moving my gold exposure from CFD brokers to XAUUSDT on crypto exchanges. The main reason is simple: most of my portfolio is in crypto now, spread across platforms like BYDFi, Bybit, and Binance. Since they all offer XAUUSDT, being able to manage both gold and crypto in one place and settle everything in USDT seems more convenient.
What I’m unsure about is the risk. With CFDs, gold feels tied to more traditional market structure, while XAUUSDT trades much more like a crypto market with extended trading hours. Does that change how you approach risk management compared with trading gold through a traditional broker?
For anyone who’s traded both, what differences stood out? Would you stick with CFDs or move to XAUUSDT?

I put $10 into 8 different Crypto Cards to see which one works best in South Africa. My goal was to cut through the smoke and mirrors. Reward claims are locked behind tiers and hidden fees. Let's see exactly which card is honest, cheapest, and best for the end user.
**The Methodology:**
* **Time spent:** 2.5 hours downloading, signing up, and doing KYC for 8 different cards.
* **The purchase:** 8 packets of Lays at a local OK supermarket (one on each card). Poor cashier.
* **The cost per packet:** R23.99.
* **The official FX rate at the time:** 1 ZAR = 0.061796 USD | 1 USD = 16.182216 ZAR
At that exact spot rate, a **R23.99** packet of chips *should* cost exactly **1.482492 USD.** Any amount charged above $1.48 on my $10 balance is the hidden spread, network fee, or conversion tax. I expect most cards to round up to $1.49 when claiming a 0% fee, even though this will be a 0.50% fee incurred.
Note: VISA and Mastercard are always at a slight premium above the official FX rate. Mastercard actually tends to have a slightly better raw exchange rate than Visa.
**\*This is charged to the crypto platform issuing the card, which then passes the cost down to you.** 
Visa sources its daily exchange rates directly from wholesale foreign exchange markets. Independent tests historically show that Visa’s actual base rate is usually only 0.2% to 0.5% higher than the true "mid-market" rate (the rate you see on Google). This tiny spread is mostly due to market fluctuations and the 1-2 day lag between when you tap your card and when the transaction officially settles. 
Here is the full breakdown of what it takes to get these cards in SA, and what they actually cost to use.
# The South African Crypto Card At Base Tiers
|**Rank**|**Card**|**Net Effective Cost (on \~$1.48 purchase)**|**Gross FX Spread**|**Base Cashback**|**Custody**|**Virtual Card Cost**|**Setup Time**|**Key Strengths**|**Key Weaknesses**|**Best For**|
|:-|:-|:-|:-|:-|:-|:-|:-|:-|:-|:-|
|2|**Coca**|**1.47** (after CB)|1.18%|1% (USDC, monthly)|Non-Custodial ✅|Free|\~8 min|Good perks, stablecoin CB up to $10,000/monthBest Card with just 1 upgrade|"Up to" higher tiers|Balanced rewards + subscriptions|
|1|**EtherFi**|**\~$1.45** (beats market after cashback)|\~0.51%|3% instant|Non-Custodial ✅|Free (1st)|\~8 min|Highest base reward, tier upgrades suck|$2k/mo cap for top CB|Everyday spending + max savings|
|3|**Bitget**|**\~$1.47** (beats market)|\~0.51%|Fx fee refund|Non-Custodial ✅|Free|\~10 min|Transparent Mastercard rate, Africa focus|Limited ATM|Self-custody + low friction|
|4|**Wirex**|Competitive (\~1.18% all-in)|1.18%|0.5% (WXT)|Custodial ⚠️|Free|\~12 min|Long track record, multi-currency|Volatile token rewards, strict POA|Reliable backup|
|5|**RedotPay**|Full spread (\~2.53%)|\~2.53%|0%|Custodial ⚠️|$10|\~12 min|High limits, popular in ZA|No rewards, issuance fee|High-limit backup|
|6|**Bybit**|\~$1.53 (after points)|\~2.53%|2% (points)|Custodial ⚠️|Free|Gated|High limits, potential airdrops|Double fees, points system|Higher volume users|
|7|**Kast**|\~$1.60 (expensive)|\~7.93%|1.5% (locked)|Custodial ⚠️|$2|\~10 min|Solana-native, credit mode|Flat fees kill small purchases|Large USD/Solana spends only|
|8|**Oobit**|\~$1.74 (very expensive)|\~17.5%|1–10% (tiered)|Self-Custodial ✅|Free|\~7 min|Direct wallet link (no preload)|$0.25 min fee destroys small tx|Large transactions only|
# 1. 🥇 Coca Card
**Charged:** $1.50
**Base Cashback:** 1% Paid back on the 10th.

**Remaining:** $8.50
**Wallet Architecture:** Fully Non-Custodial ✅
# Card Costs & Limits
* **Virtual Card:** Free
* **Physical Card:** $1 + International Shipping
* **Monthly Spend Limit:** $30,000
* **ATM Withdrawals:** Fee-free up to $250/month (standard international network fees apply immediately to any amount over this threshold).
# Sign-Up & KYC Process
**Total Setup Time:** \~8 minutes
* **Email Verification**
* **ID/Passport Scan**
* **National ID Number (Entered Separately)**
* **Verification Questionnaire**
# The Claim vs. The Reality
**Claim:** Earn "up to" 8% cashback on purchases and 50% cashback on subscriptions like Netflix and Spotify.
Note: The phrase "up to" does a lot of heavy lifting.
**Actual:**
1% cashback on all purchases up to $10,000
Cashback paid in USDC on the 10th of each month
5% APY on Stablecoin
No 50% subscription discounts
# FX Cost & Conversion Fee
**The Promise:** *"Zero FX Fees on Direct Pairs"*  (meaning a fee is applied here)
https://preview.redd.it/rwiw16axodeh1.jpg?width=945&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=56460937cfaf389808490e5200de493dad7dfc7a
* **The Baseline Market Cost:** $1.48 *(Based on the true mid-market rate)*
* **The Actual Deducted Charge:** $1.50
* **The Hidden Spread:** A **1.18% markup** applied on top of the mid-market exchange rate.
* **Cashback:** With the included 1% Cashback, this brings Coca to a 0% fee for the first $10,000 spent monthly
# 2. 🥈EtherFi
https://preview.redd.it/cl7t5qezodeh1.png?width=617&format=png&auto=webp&s=4fd4286520d90e6707d36e4038de66d516626f79
**Charged:** $1.50
**Base Cashback:** 3% Instant

**Remaining:** $8.55 with instant cashback.
**Wallet Architecture:** Fully Non-Custodial ✅ 
# Card Costs & Limits
* **Virtual Card:** 1st Virtual Free *(Additional virtual cards are $10)*.
* **Physical Card:** $50 ⚠️ *(Metal cards are unlocked on higher VIP tiers)*.
* **Spend Limit:** Up to $30,000/day on the free Core tier.
* **ATM Withdrawals:** $250/day limit with a 2% flat fee per withdrawal (there is no free tier for cash withdrawals).
# Sign-Up & KYC Process
**Total Setup Time:** \~8 minutes
* **Email Verification**
* **ID/Passport Scan**
* **Verification Questionnaire**
* **Mobile Number Verification**
# The Claim vs. The Reality
**Claims:**
* **3% Cashback**
* **Borrow without selling**
* **Up to 5% APY**
* **Earn on Autopilot**
**Actual**
* **3% Cashback on first $2,000 monthly spend**
* You can spend against collateral while it continues to earn yield in a Vault.
* Liquid vaults offer high APY. The highest yield offer currently is Euro Yield 11.39%
# Real FX Cost & Conversion Spread
**The Promise:** 0% FX fees on EUR and USD, with a 0% to 0.5% markup (plus network rate) for other currencies.
https://preview.redd.it/xuc2xaaxodeh1.jpg?width=945&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=99e42c4e83fd7b49631a2925f0ae5e89e9a62413
**The Reality:** While they do apply a small FX spread to convert your ZAR purchase, the cashback completely absorbs it.
* **The Baseline Market Cost:** $1.48 *(Based on the true mid-market rate)*
* **The Actual Deducted Charge:** $1.49
* **The Hidden Spread (Gross):** A **0.51% markup** applied on top of the mid-market exchange rate during the swipe.
**The Verdict:**
While EtherFi does apply a 0.51% network/FX spread when you swipe in Rands, their massive upfront cashback completely neutralizes the fee. Because your net cost was only $1.45, you mathematically paid *less* than the global market value for those chips. As long as you stay under the $2,000 monthly cap to retain that high cashback tier, you are literally beating the system on every swipe.
# 3. 🥉Bitget Wallet
**Charged:** $1.49
**Base Cashback:** Full Fx Fee Refunded later.

**Remaining:** $8.51
**Wallet Architecture:** Fully Non-Custodial ✅
# Card Costs & Limits
* **Virtual Card:** Free
* **Physical Card:** $49 *(Processing & Shipping fee)*
* **Spend Limit:** Up to $5,000 daily limit. $100,000 yearly limit.
* **ATM Withdrawals:** No ATM withdrawals or over-the-counter cash withdrawals.
# Sign-Up & KYC Process
**Total Setup Time:** 10 minutes
* **Email Verification**
* **ID/Passport Scan**
* **National ID Number (Entered Separately)**
* **Verification Questionnaire**
* **Mobile Number Verification**
# The Claim vs. The Reality
Bitget is pushing hard into the African market (rolling out in SA in May 2026) and their marketing is aggressive, but they actually deliver on the backend utility.
**Claims:**
* **0 fees**
* **Bank Transfers**
* **$5 bonus on sign up**
* **Earn as you spend**
**Actual:**
* **Fx Fee is returned as pending cashback on transaction fees. This can only be claimed once the accumulated cashback balance exceeds $1.00.**
* **$5 Bonus unlocks after a single $5 transaction is made**
* **Bank Transfer using Banxa incurs as 6% fee**
# The Real FX Cost & Conversion Spread
**The Promise:** Non-USD payment fees - 1.7%
https://preview.redd.it/hnay18axodeh1.jpg?width=945&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1dcc2713296fb25e79705edfac14396027be33ca
**The Reality:** Out of all the cards tested, Bitget's Mastercard rails proved to be the most transparent and closest to the true mid-market rate.
* **The Baseline Market Cost:** $1.47 *(Based on Mastercards true mid-market rate)*
* **The Actual Deducted Charge:** $1.49
* **The Hidden Spread:** An incredibly low **0.51% markup** applied on top of the mid-market exchange rate during the swipe. Below the 1.7% fee Bitget promises.
**The Verdict:** When you factor in the **$0.02 guaranteed cashback**, your *net effective cost* drops to exactly **$1.47**
Bitget Wallet essentially subsidizes the entire Mastercard network fee, giving you a mathematically perfect mid-market exchange rate.
# 4. Wirex One
**Charged:** $1.49
**Base Cashback:** 0.5%

**Remaining:** $8.5
**Wallet Architecture:** Custodial ⚠️ 
# Card Costs & Limits
* **Virtual Card:** Free 
* **Physical Card:** ⚠️ Locked under Premium tiers
* **Spend Limit:** High daily limits, but heavily dependent on your tier and source of wealth checks.
* **ATM Withdrawals:** Free up to roughly $250/month (200 GBP/EUR equivalent); a 2% fee applies thereafter.
# Sign-Up & KYC Process
**Total Setup Time:** \~12 minutes ⚠️
* **Email Verification**
* **ID/Passport Scan**
* **National ID Number (Entered Separately)**
* **Proof of Address -** *Strict verification required)*
* **Verification Questionnaire:**
# The Claim vs. The Reality
**Claims:** 
* **One of the original pioneers of the crypto card.**
* **Up to 8% Cryptoback on purchases** 
* **Zero-fee FX globally** 
**Actual:** 
* **Around since 2014, but the rewards system has become highly tokenized over the years.** 
* **Token-Locked.** To hit that 8%, you have to lock up a massive amount of their native WXT token. Standard base-tier users usually earn a modest 0.5% cashback, and it is paid entirely in WXT (which is subject to market volatility) rather than stable USDC. 
* **Mostly True. Wirex uses real-time OTC. However my ledger shows a tiny "ghost fee"** 
# Real FX Cost & Conversion Spread
**The Promise:** 0% Fx Fee Globally.
https://preview.redd.it/ha3f6iaxodeh1.jpg?width=945&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c8c3d3d463afd213a5456ed468547f04c248dba8
**The Math Breakdown:**
* **Initial Balance:** $10.00
* **The Swipe Charge (What the terminal requested):** $1.49
* **Your Final Balance:** $8.50
* **Total Actual Deduction:** **$1.50**
* **The All-In Hidden Spread:** A **1.18% markup** on top of the mid-market exchange rate.
# The Verdict
Wirex is highly competitive. A final all-in spread of 1.18% puts them right next to Coca and Bitget as one of the cheapest cards to use for spending Rands in South Africa. The only major downside is that their cashback is paid in their volatile native token (WXT) instead of stablecoins, and their strict Proof of Address requirements can make onboarding a headache.
# 5. RedotPay (Most Used in ZA)
https://preview.redd.it/u61o1kbyodeh1.png?width=395&format=png&auto=webp&s=6b5dcf163e3654891ba8bd7da1bbcec100f9fe43
**Charged:** $1.515 (rounded up to $1.52)
**Base Cashback:** 0%

**Remaining: -** $8.48. 
\*Card was $10 alone, so I needed to add $20 for this test.
**Wallet Architecture:** Custodial ⚠️
# Card Costs & Limits
* **Virtual Card:** $10
* **Physical Card:** $100 + International Shipping
* **Spend Limit:** $1 Million yearly ($100,000 per-transaction limit)
* **ATM Withdrawals:** 2% fee up to $10,000 monthly (increases to 3% for amounts above $10,000). There is no fee-free ATM tier.
# Sign-Up & KYC Process
**Total Setup Time:** \~12 minutes ⚠️ *(Slightly longer due to address verification)*
* **Email Verification:** ✅
* **ID/Passport Scan:** ✅
* **National ID Number (Entered Separately):** ✅
* **Proof of Address (POA):** ✅ *(Required for full limits)*
* **Verification Questionnaire:** ✅
* **Mobile Number Verification:** ✅
# The Claim vs. The Reality
**Claim:** "Up to 40% referral commission" and competitive conversion rates.
*Note: Their perks lean entirely toward affiliates rather than rewarding everyday consumers for spending.*
**Actual:**
* 0% cashback on regular card spending
* Yield earning available on stablecoins (USDT/USDC)
* Crypto credit lines available against collateral.
* P2P Integrated (with almost no usage though)
* USD and EU Banking Accounts
* A great Referral program
# FX Cost & Conversion Fee
**The Promise:** "High Limits, Low Fees" (Typically citing a \~1% internal crypto-to-fiat conversion fee).
https://preview.redd.it/susrflaxodeh1.jpg?width=945&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=fa20f1acdd294fe7a6c51b3c5cfaaae36abdbd60
* **The Baseline Market Cost:** $1.48 *(Based on the true mid-market rate)*
* **The Actual Deducted Charge:** Claimed - $1.515 Actual in bank - $1.2
* **The Hidden Spread:** A 2.53%% markup applied on top of the mid-market exchange rate.
* **Cashback:** With **0% base cashback**, RedotPay offers no consumer rewards to offset this spread, making that \~2.53% markup your true, out-of-pocket expense
# 6. Bybit Card
https://preview.redd.it/fb263vezodeh1.png?width=604&format=png&auto=webp&s=a3fab4230ef0c8ab1e87e9cae7c33d8c33988023
**Charged:** $1.50
**Base Cashback:** \*2% given in points.

**Remaining:** $8.47
**Wallet Architecture:** Custodial ⚠️ 
# Card Costs & Limits
* **Virtual Card:** Free
* **Physical Card:** $29.99 ⚠️
* **Spend Limit:** Up to $10,000 daily / $50,000 monthly
* **ATM Withdrawals:** First $100 per month is free; a 2% flat fee applies to all withdrawals after that.
# Sign-Up & KYC Process
**Total Setup Time:** Usually fast, but heavily gated for South Africans.
* **Email Verification**
* **ID/Passport Scan**
* **National ID Number (Entered Separately)**
* **Proof of Address (POA)**
* **Tax Number**
* **Authenticator Set Up**
# The Claim vs. The Reality
**Claims:**
* **Up to 10% Cashback**
* **Cashback on every purchase**
* **$10 Airdrop after depositing $100**
* **100% off some subscriptions** 
**Actual:**
* **2% on starter tier**
* **Paid in points.** The cashback isn't paid directly in USDC. 
* **$10 Airdrop includes a 100 USDT Deposit and spending on the card. Must manually claim**
* **Must spend 500 USDT a month to unlock 100% subscription cashback. Works for multiple subscriptions**
# The Real FX Cost & Conversion Spread
**The Promise:** A transparent \~2% Foreign Exchange Fee.
https://preview.redd.it/7lllufaxodeh1.jpg?width=945&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=075b9b875e5774bd0e15decfd6031b69c57389a0
**The Reality:** Bybit actually hits you with a "Double Fee" if you hold stablecoins. They charge a 2% FX fee for spending outside of USD/EUR, but they *also* charge a **0.9% Crypto Conversion Fee** to convert your USDC into fiat to fund the transaction.
They claim a **“Currency & Fee Breakdown”** where they show exactly how I paid $1.5. However, my balance showed something else. On further investigation, I can see the actual USDC charge was $1.5237.
When you spend using their card, you aren't just dealing with standard Visa or Mastercard fees… You are also dealing with Bybit's internal exchange fees for converting your crypto into fiat before the swipe even happens.

https://preview.redd.it/0d1xfjaxodeh1.png?width=1080&format=png&auto=webp&s=2eb4d6b59c9b52647190e9cd9aa1da01759f1ff7
Let's break down your exact math:
* **Initial Balance:** $10.00
* **Actual USDC Deducted:** \-1.5237 USDC
* **Final Balance:** $8.47 
* **The Baseline Market Cost:** $1.48
* **The Actual Deducted Charge:** $1.52 (1.5237)
* **The Hidden Spread (Gross):** A **2.53 % markup** applied on top of the mid-market exchange rate. *(This perfectly matches their 2% FX fee + roughly 0.9% crypto conversion fee)*
# The Verdict
Bybit's fee structure is heavy. Hitting you with a 2% regional FX fee *plus* a 0.9% crypto conversion fee pushes your gross markup to almost 3%. While the 2% cashback brings your net out-of-pocket cost back down to $1.49 (a highly competitive net rate of \~0.76% above market), those rewards are paid in points, making it a bit more tedious than cards like EtherFi that pay out instantly in stablecoins. The 100% off subscriptions are a heavy incentive, though.
# 7. Kast
https://preview.redd.it/9mmulwezodeh1.png?width=677&format=png&auto=webp&s=6a46ccfe7d04a35b5b13bfb17038090ae60a5d1d
**Charged:** $1.60
**Base Cashback:** 1.5%

**Remaining:** $6.40

\*Incl $2 Virtual Card
**Wallet Architecture:** Custodial ⚠️

# Card Costs & Limits
* **Virtual Card:** $2 ⚠️ *(Kast markets the base tier as "free" in 2026, but regional variations or legacy signups often trigger this $2 issuance fee).*
* **Physical Card:** \~$40 + Delivery
* **Spend Limit:** Unlimited daily purchases.
* **ATM Withdrawals:** $3 flat fee + 2% of the withdrawal amount ⚠️ *(Very expensive for pulling ZAR cash locally)*.
# Sign-Up & KYC Process
**Total Setup Time:** \~10 minutes
* **Email Verification**
* **ID/Passport/Drivers Scan**
* **National ID Number (Entered Separately)**
* **Proof of Address (POA)**
* **Verification Questionnaire**
* **Mobile Number Verification**
# The Claim vs. The Reality
Kast heavily markets itself as a premium, Solana-native lifestyle card. The perks are solid, but they come with strings attached.
**Claims:**
* **0.5-1.75% Fx Fees**
* **1.5% cashback**. 
* **Solana-First Architecture**
**Actual**
* **$0.10 to $0.20 "Low Transaction Surcharge" on any non-USD purchase under $25**.
* On the standard tier, you get **1.5% cashback**. However, the catch is that it has a 14-day holding period and cannot be withdrawn to external wallets. It is locked inside the Kast ecosystem to offset future card purchases.
* Top-ups flow through the Solana network (USDC, USDT, SOL), delivering near-instant settlement and sub-cent gas fees to fund your card.
# The Real FX Cost & Conversion Spread
**The Promise:** *up to 1.7% fx on purchases under $25. A flat $0.10 on any purchase under $25.*
https://preview.redd.it/6jlkeirxodeh1.png?width=945&format=png&auto=webp&s=a49c000625364a082c009dad5130fea0a2ba663e
**The Reality:** Kast absolutely punishes small, everyday local purchases due to a hidden micro-transaction penalty buried in their terms of service.
* **The Math on Your End:** $10 deposit - $2 virtual card fee - $6.40 remaining balance = **$1.60 deducted for the chips.**
* **The Baseline Market Cost:** $1.47 *(Based on the true mid-market rate)*
* **The Actual Deducted Charge:** $1.60
* **The Hidden Spread:** A massive **\~7.93% markup.** They claim there is either a 0.5-1.75% fee or a $0.10 fee. But in this case they’ve included both a **1.18% markup + $0.10**
**The Verdict:**
Kast works as a card if you are spending heavily in USD or moving large amounts of money on the Solana network. However, for daily, small-ticket ZAR spending like coffee or groceries, their flat low-transaction fees make them mathematically one of the most expensive cards you could possibly use in South Africa.
# 8. Oobit
https://preview.redd.it/a3ci2u2zodeh1.png?width=549&format=png&auto=webp&s=d8d2896409c540be77efd425de508f2f2574ca71
**Charged:** $1.74
**Base Cashback:** 1%

**Remaining:** $8.26
**Wallet Architecture:** Web3 Bridge (Self-Custodial) *- Funds stay in your own Web3 wallet until the split-second the transaction is authorized*
# Card Costs & Limits
* **Virtual Card:** Free
* **Physical Card:** ❌ Not available. The platform operates entirely via Apple Pay and Google Pay integration.
* **Spend Limit:** Up to $5,000 daily / $150,000 monthly.
* **ATM Withdrawals:** Not supported (virtual only).
# Sign-Up & KYC Process
**Total Setup Time:** \+-7 minutes
* **Email Verification**
* **ID/Passport Scan**
* **National ID Number (Entered Separately)**
* **Verification Questionnaire**
* **Mobile Number Verification**
# The Claim vs. The Reality
**Claims:** 
* **Up to 10% Cashback**
* **Never Pre-Load Again**
* **Bitcoin Debit Card**
**Actual:**
* **Heavy spending or Oobit Token Spending is required.** The 10% rate is strictly limited to purchases made using their native OOB token. If you pay with stablecoins (USDT/USDC), cashback tops out at 5%. You only unlock that rate after you have already spent $1,500 through the app within a 90-day cycle.
* Oobit aggressively markets its cashback program, but the reality is heavily restricted by regional and asset limitations.
* **This is their killer feature.** You can send money to your account, but unlike crypto cards, Oobit connects directly to your wallet, staying in crypto until you pay, with no preloading.
* **You can absolutely pay with Bitcoin Directly**, but watch out for fees.
# The Real FX Cost & Conversion Spread
**The Promise:** Oobit is transparent about pricing, 1% transaction fee OR a $0.25 minimum, whichever is higher.
https://preview.redd.it/tecl2oaxodeh1.jpg?width=945&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d5b4d90ef0c955b6e78b9540126dc872ba98a2ff
**The Reality:** I paid a 0.51% fee + the $0.25
* **The Baseline Market Cost:** $1.48
* **The Oobit Flat Fee: 0.51%** \+ $0.25 
* **The Actual Deducted Charge:** $1.74
* **The Hidden Spread:** A staggering **17.5% markup** applied on top of the mid-market exchange rate.
# The Verdict
Oobit’s underlying technology is arguably the best on the market right now for true Web3 self-custody. However, their fee structure makes them completely unusable for small, everyday purchases in South Africa.
If you use Oobit to buy an R5,000 plane ticket, you will only pay a standard 1% fee. But if you use Oobit to buy a R25 coffee or packet of chips, that $0.25 minimum flat fee will hit you with a 15% to 20% effective markup every single time.

I used it for a hotel booking during a trip a few months ago. Paid with USDT through Oobit and it felt just like using a regular card. Not having to cash out to my bank first was the best part.

**💬 We are heading into the final stretch of our 9th-anniversary bounty! 💬**
The 8th activity is officially live: The **"9 Years in 9 Emojis"** Challenge! Condense your entire crypto journey into exactly 9 emojis and submit your creative combination on our Gleam form.
👉 **Submit Your 9 Emojis on** [**Gleam Here**](https://gleam.io/vD4Jl/kucoin-9-activity-8-happy-birthday-kucoin) 
🎁 **Rewards:** 9 creative masters will share a total of 9 KCS!
🚀 *New to KuCoin? Time is running out!* [*Register and trade*](https://www.kucoin.com/campaigns/Community_legao_9thAnniversary0630?utm_source=9th_Anniversary&utm_medium=community&utm_campaign=9th_Anniversary) *a min. of $99 USDT to win a share of the $9,999 Futures Lucky Draw pool here*.
\#KuCoin9th #BeyondTheSignal #9YearsOfKuCoin

The $360 loss on a $15k USDC to USDT conversion is significantly higher than typical stablecoin slippage and suggests either a poor multi-hop route or a small liquidity pool.

I’ve been doing a job that paid me in USDT from 2022 to the present so I lost all trading memecoins and selling soon a 10% l'oss etc etc

BTC & USDT.D Technical Update: The pieces are falling into place! 🧩

​
PredictAsiaX is a full-stack prediction market built for Asia.
The platform is currently about 95% complete and still in the final development stage. Core infrastructure has been running in continuous production since 18 April 2026 (89 calendar days as of the latest update). Multi-chain USDT custody, multi-source oracle, settlement engines, public proof system, and the full trading interface are already live. User acquisition has not started, and trading is currently gated while the team finishes the remaining work. All activity to date is internal QA.
Core design:
• USDT-native + multi-chain
Accepts USDT deposits from 8 EVM chains + Tron under a single custodial address per user. Designed around how Asian retail actually moves money.
• 13 languages from day one
Including Arabic and Hebrew with full RTL support.
• Two market surfaces
Long-form markets (sports, politics, crypto, macro, tech, entertainment) with structured settlement.
Fast markets (1-minute / 5-minute / 15-minute / 1-hour binary rounds on BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, BNB) for high-frequency trading.
• Additional layers
Parlay builder, copy trading, creator economy (anyone can create markets and earn a share of fees), LP earn, and VIP fee discounts.
Settlement & trust:
Settlement is currently off-chain on a double-entry ledger with daily reconciliation. Every settled market produces a public, unauthenticated \`/proof/<id>\` page that returns market outcome, LLM verdicts from multiple providers, article content hashes + snapshot URLs, and an ed25519 signature. Anyone can independently verify the evidence trail. A hard-void watchdog forces resolution within a bounded time window so no market stays open indefinitely.
The oracle layer runs \~50 external data sources across multiple fallback tiers plus an adaptive multi-provider LLM resolution system with self-critique and per-engine accuracy tracking. There are currently 39 settlement engines (23 general + 16 sports).
Current status:
• Development progress: approximately 95% complete
• Production infrastructure live since 18 April 2026
• Organic public users: 0 (acquisition has not begun)
• Trading, deposits and withdrawals: currently paused
• Remaining work is focused on final checks and launch preparation
Website: https://predictasiax.com
Full platform overview with live screenshots: https://predictasiax.com/overview.pdf
Happy to answer questions about the architecture, oracle design, multi-chain custody, or the public proof system.

Wow thanks OP now only because of this post I will buy 1,000,000,000 USDT worth of AuroraCoin
To the moon!!!