UX
Roundhill Uranium ETF
stock BATS ETF

I’m looking for a reliable and secure wallet. I used MetaMask for a while but honestly the UX was clunky, and I keep running into complaints about bugs and issues that don’t seem to go away.
What are people here using instead? I’ve heard of wallets like Trust and also newer ones like Bitlock wallet that bundle trading tools, cross-chain swaps, and scam detection into one app. Curious if anyone has tried them and how they compare.
Looking for something that’s actually smooth, secure, and doesn’t feel outdated. Any suggestions?

Those using BTC IRL are already in the thesis. Those waiting for UX are already trapped.

UX Bounty just launched a community programme: spot UX issues, submit reports, earn DOT. Your feedback matters - whether it's confusing flows, inconsistent terms, or unclear docs.

That's fantastic to hear. An intent-driven approach is much needed for DeFi UX. My focus was on a more immediate, stateless 'recipe' or 'macro' engine as a first step to solve the multi-tx pain point. But huge respect for what you're building. I'll be following OISY Wallet closely.

The way Auto Earn is being pushed is very dangerous, and Kraken should have clearer UX/UI distinguishing a terms of service update from activating a feature with serious financial consequences.
I tried to bring this up in this post, but it was quickly removed by the moderators:
https://old.reddit.com/r/Kraken/comments/1nu7u9p/auto_earn_has_serious_tax_implications_and_kraken/
Here is the text I wrote, which still appears for me but quietly appears as [removed] for everyone else:
"In some jurisdictions, earning yield on an asset can significantly change the long term holding period. In Germany for example, it changes from 1 year to 10 years.
Kraken is currently pushing activation of Auto Earn by presenting users with what looks like a regular terms of service update. Actually, besides accepting the terms of service one is also tricked into activating the Auto Earn feature.
Many users may not notice this and end up changing their tax situation entirely by earning yield. A serious financial platform should clearly separate accepting terms of service from activating a feature with such consequences."

ChainSente proves ADA-collateralized lending on Cardano with clear safety rules (LTV bands, partial auto-liquidation) and a mobile-first UX that simulates Airtel/MTN withdrawals all on testnet and fully open-source.
Why this matters:
* Real problem: users sell ADA for cash to cover daily needs. That drains value from Cardano.
* Real test: ChainSente shows you can *borrow* against ADA in a way ordinary mobile-money users understand.
* Real proof: script hashes, tx IDs, a price-shock simulator, an Android APK and reproducible tests so anyone can audit results.CHainSente
If you care about shipping safe, reusable DeFi primitives for African users (not just slides), read the evidence and [**vote ChainSente**](https://projectcatalyst.io/funds/14/cardano-use-cases-concepts/chainsente-a-cardano-wallet-for-defi-and-mobile-money)**.**
[https://projectcatalyst.io/funds/14/cardano-use-cases-concepts/chainsente-a-cardano-wallet-for-defi-and-mobile-money](https://projectcatalyst.io/funds/14/cardano-use-cases-concepts/chainsente-a-cardano-wallet-for-defi-and-mobile-money)

Well, native bitcoin is extremely bad for retail payments, for peer to peer international transactions, and basically for anything that could be considered a replacement of traditional banking or payments. It's just borderline unusable in the real world (only drug dealers in the third world are still trying, for some reason, probably because they are tripping).
Stablecoins and wrapped assets on programmable chains do that just fine though (some UX can be improved, sure, but given that they are a cheap alternative I think crypto is doing fine), they are essentially the most boring version of a 100% reserve banking.
Most street OTC crypto exchanges I see around have a bitcoin logo but that are mostly used to exchange stables for cash dollars really.
The current and projected value of bitcoin has nothing to do with it's usability for payment, the narrative completely shifted to it being a good investment because people are interested in it being a good investment, supply is limited, and that's it. Which is a very good situation for ripping profits off the gullible investors little by little if you bought early enough. How long such a situation can be sustainable, will the next buyers always come? Well, the maxis believe it's forever like diamonds, I personally treat it pretty much like the actual diamonds (an overhyped thing you can still profit on while ngu but better not hold it to zero because magic)

On **September 30, 2025**, **PATEO AutoLink (2889.HK)** went public on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, opening at HK$135 and briefly surpassing HK$20B in market value. PATEO calls itself the *“first smart cockpit stock in Hong Kong.”*
And in the company’s own words:
>*“At the same time, its collaboration with system vendors like BlackBerry QNX has enabled its solutions to be successfully integrated into star models like the Avita, accelerating commercialization.”*
That one line is a reminder of how QNX, though rarely visible in flashy PRs, continues to sit beneath the surface of China’s cockpit boom — from PATEO’s IPO to Horizon Robotics’ domestic silicon ramp.
■**PATEO: Growth and High-End Breakthroughs**
* Revenue CAGR 44.9% (2022–24), shipments >3M domain controllers, \~7.3% market share.
* Largest number of Snapdragon 8295 wins among Chinese suppliers; expanding to 8397 Extreme Edition.
* Porsche partnership: first time Porsche’s board selected Chinese Tier-1 cockpit suppliers.
* Three of China’s top five OEMs now deploy PATEO cockpits.
■**QNX’s Role Inside PATEO**
* Confirmed by BlackBerry in 2022: PATEO’s next-gen cockpits **run on QNX** across >10 models.
* PATEO also joined the **IVY ecosystem**, linking cockpit data to cloud monetization.
* HarmonyOS ≠ competitor: HarmonyOS covers UX/apps; QNX anchors the safety/hypervisor layer.
■**Horizon Robotics: Domestic Silicon Meets QNX**
* PATEO brought in **Horizon Robotics** as a cornerstone investor in its IPO.
* In a **QNX talk (Dong Yuanwen, Gasgoo, July 30, 2025)**: QNX 8 confirmed as **ported to Horizon’s Journey-6 family (J6e/J6m/J6b)** with ASIL-D targeting.
* Horizon already scaling Journey-6 with OEMs like BYD.
* This creates a **triangulated model**: PATEO integration + Horizon silicon + QNX safety layer.
■**The Triad Model**
* **PATEO** = domain controllers, cockpit integration, OEM trust.
* **Horizon** = domestic AI chips, scaling in auto + robotics.
* **QNX** = invisible safety foundation and IVY cloud bridge.
This structure aligns perfectly with Beijing’s policy goals: domestic chip + local integration + global safety credibility.
■Investor Takeaways
1. PATEO IPO shows cockpit integration is investable at scale.
2. QNX is embedded in PATEO cockpits and now technically enabled on Horizon Journey-6.
3. OEM validation via Porsche, Qualcomm, and BYD create indirect QNX scale.
4. Dual-track TAM: cockpits today, robotics tomorrow.
5. Valuation gap: PATEO at \~5× P/S vs sector median \~13×; QNX royalties even less visible.
**Disclosure**
* [PATEO IPO + QNX reference: Company press (Sept 30, 2025).](https://m.eeo.com.cn/2025/0930/756411.shtml)
* [Horizon Robotics / QNX Journey-6 port: QNX presentation, Gasgoo report (July 30, 2025).](https://www.reddit.com/r/BB_Stock/comments/1mdk07r/inside_chinas_ev_software_revolution_what_dong/)
QNX is **invisible by design** — rarely named in top-level PRs, but confirmed in technical talks and OEM stack descriptions.
🔑 **Bottom line:** PATEO’s IPO validates the cockpit integrator model. Horizon shows domestic silicon scaling. And QNX is the invisible constant, binding them together with global safety certification and cloud connectivity.

Nice, KuCoin App 4.0 sounds like a big upgrade if they’re improving UX and tools. Excited to test new features and see how it changes my flow.

If they solve their fractional shares problem with ETFs and allow automatic investments I would love it. Hope that rumor is true. I don't really care about UI/UX if basic investment features are there. I think with this update along with their customer service, it would be an easy pick.

> Because people aren’t good at decimal math,
This doesn't really effect me when I spend my bitcoin because almost every wallet shows the fiat and btc equivalent at the same time to avoid this UX nightmare.
I suppose we can discuss a hypothetical future where everything in only priced in BTC but that will be fine as bitcoin has different units akin to saying "dollars" and "cents" like with fiat
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Units
Sats = 0.00000001
Bits = μBTC = 0.000001 (historically bits was used in money)
millies = mBTC = 0.001
Coins = 1 Bitcoin
Thus if bitcoin is worth 10 million dollars a bitcoin than a cup of coffee will cost 10 sats and a 5 dollar burger would cost 50 sats and a 40k usd car would cost 4 millies or 4000 bits

This reads like a promotional post tbh, especially with the specific exchange callout at the end. That said, the gasless stablecoin transfer concept isn't new and the execution is what matters.
The 1000 TPS claim is pretty mediocre by modern L1 standards. Solana does way more, BSC handles that easily, and even optimistic rollups on Ethereum are hitting similar numbers. Sub-second finality is nice but again, not groundbreaking when you look at what Avalanche or Fantom were doing years ago.
The paymaster contract approach for gasless transactions is legitimately useful for UX though. Our clients building payment applications hate that users need to hold native tokens just to move stablecoins around. It's a massive onboarding barrier and kills conversion rates. If Plasma can subsidize gas costs sustainably without the foundation going broke, that's actually valuable.
The problem is sustainability. How long can they afford to pay everyone's gas fees? What happens when transaction volume scales and the foundation's treasury runs out? Most projects that tried subsidized transactions either ran out of money or had to introduce fees later, which pissed off their user base.
Another red flag is the EVM compatibility claim combined with being a Layer 1. That usually means they forked Geth or BSC's codebase and tweaked some parameters. Nothing wrong with that, but it's not exactly innovative architecture. The real question is whether their validator set is actually decentralized or if it's just a few nodes controlled by the foundation.
Our clients who evaluate these chains care way more about security audits, validator distribution, and bridge security than marketing claims about TPS. I'd want to see their consensus mechanism details and who's actually running nodes before getting excited about this.

finally we can see normal ticker symbols on page ! somebody with at least some UX experience was hired no less

All the replies are missing OPs point. He literally said that he k own it was ultimately his fault.
His point is that it's a poorly designed UX if a user can't easily tell the difference between connecting to a site and signing a malicious contract. And it's also bad that it's so difficult to even perform a post mortem to isolate the security leak.
It's a legitimate complaint. We should care about improving the system if we want wide scale adoption.

Short answer: nail security and realistic execution, or traders won’t touch it.
Tools: I rotate between Freqtrade (spot momentum), Hummingbot (MM), Backtrader/Lean for research, CCXT Pro for websockets, and Kaiko/CoinAPI when I need cleaner history. Biggest pains: sloppy data (gaps, symbol quirks), backtests that ignore partial fills/funding/maker-taker fees, and paper trading that fills like magic. Also, exchange idiosyncrasies (rate limits, nonce drift, cancel/replace rules) wreck naive bots.
If you build this, must-haves: per-exchange execution models (L2 backtests, queue position, partials), true paper trading using live order book sim, automatic fee/funding modeling, symbol mapping across venues, and robust connectors with jittered retries and clock sync. Security: scoped trade-only keys, IP allowlists, no-withdraw permissions, KMS/HSM storage, JIT decryption, full audit logs, kill-switch and daily loss limits. UX: visual blocks with a code escape hatch, versioned experiments, shadow mode before going live, and testnet/prod parity checks.
For wiring telemetry, I’ve paired Hummingbot and Freqtrade with TimescaleDB/Grafana, and DreamFactory to expose secure REST APIs over Postgres/Mongo with RBAC for dashboards and strategy services.
Bottom line: prioritize security and faithful execution over fancy UI.

Lost my full post earlier after switching apps (rookie mistake), but had to rewrite this because I believe the clock’s ticking.
This is my final post while Eventbrite ($EB) is under $3.
Last week’s Fed commentary tanked small caps, and $EB got caught in the drop. But the fundamentals haven’t changed—and I think this week marks the start of the rebound.
🎟️ The Ticketing Landscape
Here’s where $EB stands in the top 3 by volume:
Ticketmaster ($LYV) – Market leader, but now being sued by the FTC over illegal resale practices.
StubHub ($STUB) – Just IPO’d, only 8 trading days in. Purely resale-focused.
Eventbrite ($EB) – The most agile of the three, focused on self-serve, independent events—no legal baggage, no Wall Street hype yet.
📈 Q2 2025 Earnings – Quiet Strength
Revenue up YoY, with better take rates
Gross margin over 60%
Positive adjusted EBITDA
Lower cash burn, better efficiency
The turnaround is already showing in the numbers.
🔁 2025: New Brand, Better Product
Rebrand: Clean, modern, creator-focused
Revamped App: Faster UX, smarter discovery, better tools
New Features: Analytics, social integration, creator monetization
This isn’t just a facelift—they’re building a sustainable platform.
🧱 Britehouse – The Underrated Catalyst
Britehouse is Eventbrite’s new creator hub: tools, resources, and support for local organizers. Think Shopify for IRL events.
It’s a smart move into a niche that’s growing fast but still overlooked by the major platforms
🚀 Final Thoughts
Ticketmaster is in legal trouble
StubHub just hit the market
Eventbrite is lean, improving, and undervalued
Sub-$3 won't last. I'm long, I'm confident, and this is my last post before the bounce.
Not financial advice — just a heads-up.

**Tricky's Daily Doots #1,248**
**Yesterday's Daily 28/09/2025**
[Previous Daily Doots](https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/1nsfsn3/daily_general_discussion_september_28_2025/ngn01eo/)
- u/Flashy-Butterfly6310 asks us [how many of us manage most of their wealth on Ethereum vs utilising TradFi and other platforms.](https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/1nsfsn3/daily_general_discussion_september_28_2025/ngn6izt/) ❔
- u/RandomZileanMain is [calm and collected and thinks our moment is near.](https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/1nsfsn3/daily_general_discussion_september_28_2025/ngqmpoc/) ☺️
- u/gwenvador has some feedback on [the Keystone hardware wallet.](https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/1nsfsn3/daily_general_discussion_september_28_2025/ngmswk5/) 🔐
- u/Tricky_Troll explains [why the validator entry and exit queue is worth the hit to staking UX.](https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/1nsfsn3/daily_general_discussion_september_28_2025/ngsuss8/) 🧠
- u/Jey_s_TeArS delivers [the daily haiku.](https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/1nsfsn3/daily_general_discussion_september_28_2025/ngq8rh0/) 📝

Only for Lin UX I think due to open source GPU drivers.
I think but I am not sure!

The UX is bad and the platform is sluggish but in terms of feature support they have the most options out there.

Other than the mobile UX how the service, I'm looking at it to primarilry use on my computer.